mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant
Paper ID #9234ENGAGE 2Be Engineers Mentoring Program for Minority StudentsDr. Matthew B. A. McCullough, North Carolina A&T State University NC A&T Alumnus graduated from A&T in 2001 with a B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Mc- Cullough obtained his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Iowa in 2006, under the advisorship of Dr. Nicole Grosland. His research focused on hand and wrist musculoskeletal biome- chanics, and in particular total wrist arthroplasty and upper extremity kinematics. This experience was especially rewarding as Dr. McCullough was afforded the opportunity to work
evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.6. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.7. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.8. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research (2 ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Page 24.21.16
. Figure 3. A Conceptual Map of the Major Sources of Engineering Knowledge Figure 4 shows that the higher education learning goals for engineering, as outlined by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), align with the transdisciplinarymodel presented above in Figure 3. The engineering learning goals for modern day engineeringas listed by ABET32 are: A. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering B. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data C
thisword from German to English, translators must either decide to: (a) take the word directly as aloanword or (b) write its meaning periphrastically to attempt to grasp its sense structure to thebest of English’s extent. Likewise, when translating CATS to CATS-S, this also became anoticeable issue upon inspection. Consider questions one through three of CATS-S where “is tobe drawn” from CATS is phrased as “se dibujará” in Spanish, which translates to “will bedrawn” (see Figure 1). Although not dramatically, the imperative sense of “is to be drawn” islost, which could bring momentary confusion to a student undergoing the testing process.There were also inconsistencies with regards to the translation of terminology from CATS toCATS-S. Some words
2 1 0 A B C D F W Math 4 5 4 0 1 0 Chemistry 2 5 2 2 1 1Figure 1B Online Bridge Student Grade Distribution. Note that 17 of the 23 of the onlineSummer Bridge students enrolled in a math and 16 of the 23 students enrolled in chemistry classtheir first semester. Math includes students who have taken college algebra, precalculus, andcalculus (Math 141,151, and 200). Chemistry includes students who have taken introductorychemistry I, general chemistry II (Chemistry 100, 101
. Page 24.899.10Bibliography1 National Science Foundation, N. S. B. Science and Engineering Indicators: Digest 2012. NSB 12-02. (National Science Foundation, 2012).2 Olson, S. & Riordan, D. G. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President (2012).3 National Science Foundation, N. C. f. S. a. E. S. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304. Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. (2013).4 Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. Talking about leaving : why undergraduates leave
scalequantitative study utilizing the instrument developed and tested in the pilot study and followedby a discerning qualitative case study of selected individuals. The expanded study willdetermine if the phenomenon of rapid growth of Hispanic STEM majors is occurring at otherregional institutions and test the hypotheses identified in the pilot as to why this is occurring orin some locations why not. Page 24.577.6 ASEE 2014METHODOLOGYAs with all educational research, the choice of method must be driven by the research questions(R. B. Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004
after the workshop, in comparisons to that of before the workshop, showed higher average ratings in their interest in STEM field and pursuing a college degree program, thereafter. b) MORE-Transfer and Retention Program (MORE-TRP) This 2-week summer workshop is intended to improve the recruitment and retention of highly motivated Hispanic and other minority students in the Systems Engineering program at TAMIU. Page 24.1021.8 A major goal is to facilitate the transfer of Laredo Community College (LCC) students into the Systems Engineering Program at TAMIU by allowing them to take the first two years of coreand
their pathway to degrees inengineering. Areas worthy of exploration include (but are not limited to) the following: 1. What are common characteristics of students who successfully transfer into four year engineering degree programs? a. Demographics b. Internal factors (cognitive & affective) c. External factors (community & college – sending & receiving institutions)? 2. What transfer pathways (i.e. vertical, lateral, swirl) are most commonly used by students who successfully transfer into four year engineering degree programs? a. Do these pathways vary by student race, gender, prospective engineering major at receiving institution, and existence or lack
Paper ID #9294Toward a Conceptual Model: African-American Male Students’ Motivation,Persistence and Success in Community CollegesMrs. Olgha B Davis, North Carolina State University Olgha B Davis is currently a doctoral student at the Department of Leadership, Policy and Adult and Higher Education at North Carolina State University. She obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from Boston University in 1998. She worked in the software industry for 7 years, focusing on modeling and simulating automotive, aerospace and biological systems. She returned to graduate school and earned her Master’s degree in
activities. Socialactivities, which are optional, include activities such as movie night or volleyball and areorganized by the program assistant and four resident assistants, all of which are engineeringstudents. An example of a class schedule can be found in Figure 1 below. Page 24.561.4 Figure 1: Class Schedule Page 24.561.5 STEP typically involved between 70-95 students. At the beginning of the program, the group isdivided into three sections (Groups A, B, and C) and each student is assigned a correspondingschedule. Each schedule includes the same courses, though
Paper ID #9001Emerging Impact on Graduation Rates/Times From A Summer EngineeringEnrichment ProgramDr. Robert W. Whalin, Jackson State University Dr. Robert W. Whalin, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Director, Coastal Hazards Center, Jackson State University. He is Director Emeritus of the Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. He received his PhD in Oceanography from Texas A&M University in 1971 and is a Registered Professional Engineer. Dr. Whalin was Director of Army Research Laboratory (1998- 2003; Adelphi, MD), and Technical Director /Director of Waterways Experiment Station
Mexico.Miss Isabella Acevedo-Rodriguez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Isabella Acevedo-Rodriguez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Isabella Acevedo-Rodriguez is a second year student at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. She received her high school diploma from Alamogordo High School. She is a member of AIAA, the NMT Student Government As- sociation, Alpha Sigma Kappa: Women in Technical Studies, and a volunteer for the AIAA Design Build Fly Junior Design Team. She won the first place presentation award at the New Mexico AMP Conference in 2013.Dr. Ricardo B. Jacquez, New Mexico State University Ricardo B. Jacquez is Dean of Engineering and Regents Professor at New Mexico State
, engineering self-efficacy 2 and engineering careeroutcome expectations were significant predictors of men’s persistence in engineering.Engineering self-efficacy 1 measures a student’s ability to reach academic milestones focusingon courses (Chemistry, Calculus, and Physics) as barriers. Engineering self-efficacy 2 measuresa student’s ability to reach academic milestones facing all undergraduate engineering majors.This tells us that, for this sample, mastering coursework (earning an A or B) is the mostsignificant predictor for women’s persistence in engineering, and completing coursework (notnecessarily obtaining an A or B—merely completing the course) is the most significant predictorfor men’s persistence in engineering. For both men and women
a program. 2. Ambassadors must be trained to interact with first-year students in non-intimidating Page 24.1308.7 ways. a. Such topics as stereotyping, stereotype threat, and developmental challenges associated with transitions should be discussed. b. Training should focus on communication, interpersonal relations, perspective- taking, and features and characteristics of academic culture. 3. Ambassadors should be adequately compensated for their work. Payment helps to convey expectations of professionalism and ensures ambassadors have time to commit to tasks without distractions
in STEM Education with a focus on Engineering Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at Ohio State. He studies topics including but not limited to cognitive development, learning, teaching, and the social contexts within which they occur. He is an experienced Graduate Teaching Associate with the First-Year Engineering Program. He is also currently the Outreach Chair of the OSU American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Student Chapter. His research interests include: (a) technology, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. To contact Leroy, e-mail long.914@osu.edu.Mr. Michael Steven Williams, The Ohio State University
exhibitedcommon characteristics such as not being calculus-ready. These general characteristics of theincoming freshmen are captured through a survey instrument. The data collected from the surveyare used as a benchmark and comparison tool to assess the efficacy of the cohort program in thesubsequent semesters.The following survey instruments were developed based on the objectives of the cohort: a) Student demographic survey instrument, used to collect the background details of the incoming freshmen registered in the STEM courses. b) Cohort experience survey instrument, used to collect the students’ experiences and their goalsThe survey instruments, included in the appendix, are distributed to the students in the first year
morning sessions in each semester offall, spring, and summer at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry.Teacher professional development for CHiS&EProgram teachers received background content and instruction, STEM pedagogy anddirect guidance in the facilitation of each engineering activity. Upon completion of theprofessional development, teachers were able to a) to identify K-12 learning opportunitiesand challenges, b) describe engineering careers and K-12 engineering activities, c) relatethe connectedness of mathematics and science in the context of engineering designthrough hands-on practice, d) emphasize for students the role of mathematics and sciencein collecting, recording, analyzing, and communicating observations, e) demonstrate
. Page 24.937.155. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.6. Frehill, L. M. (2011). Moving Beyond the Double-Bind: WIE and MEP Programs and Serving the Needs of Women of Color in Engineering. Paper presented at the 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C. Canada.7. Maine, J. J. d., Freeman, T. L., Keely, B., & Roberts, J. (2001). Affinity Groups: More Bang for the Buck Paper presented at the 108th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico.8. May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for
comprehensive awareness of the issues associated withD/HoH students. The director of the lab is a tenure-track, faculty member at RIT and hasresponsibilities for direct instruction and direction of the lab.The following is a general model that is applied to all projects within the CAT Lab. This modelis used to highlight the features of three exemplary CAT projects, in various stages ofdevelopment.1. Model of a Project a. Accessibility needs / problems b. Feasibility for technical solutions c. Business needs (will it benefits others?) d. Engineering skills requirements (students and faculty members) e. Communication requirements f. Resources (skills, availability, lab, equipment, etc.) g. Funding / grants h
Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at Ohio State. He studies topics including but not limited to cognitive development, learning, teaching, and the social contexts within which they occur. He is an experienced Graduate Teaching Associate with the First-Year Engineering Program. He is also currently the Outreach Chair of the OSU American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Student Chapter. His research interests include: (a) technology, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. To contact Leroy, e-mail long.914@osu.edu.Ms. Blossom A Barrett, The Ohio State University Blossom A. Barrett is a doctoral Student in Higher Education
Paper ID #9831A STEM Transfer and Retention Program at Texas A&M International Uni-versityDr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Florida Golf Coast University Dr. Fernando Gonzalez joined FGCU as an Assistant Professor in the Computer Engineering Program in the fall of 2013. Previously he was an Assistant Professor within the Engineering, Math, and Physics Department at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas. Prior to that he was a Technical Staff Member (researcher) for the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Dr. Gonzalez was also a faculty member in the
Paper ID #10559A Engineering Discipline Awareness Workshop for Pre-Service STEM Teach-ersDr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Florida Golf Coast University Dr. Fernando Gonzalez joined FGCU as an Assistant Professor in the Computer Engineering Program in the fall of 2013. Previously he was an Assistant Professor within the Engineering, Math, and Physics Department at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas. Prior to that he was a Technical Staff Member (researcher) for the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Dr. Gonzalez was also a faculty member in the Electrical
Paper ID #9383Relational Development as a Cornerstone of Success in Latino STEM Reten-tionDr. DaVina J. Hoyt, Washington State University Dr. DaVina J. Hoyt holds a Post Doc / Faculty appointment at Washington State University in The School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. Dr. Hoyt is an inclusive community building specialist with over 13 years of diversity training, cultural competency programming, community development and cross- cultural collaborative experience. She has a strong background in designing and implementing programs that help to facilitate community building and inclusiveness. Dr. Hoyt is a
Paper ID #10893Pre-College Interactions, Early Expectations, and Perceived Barriers: AreThere Differences for Underrepresented Engineering Students?Dr. Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Sandra Dika is Assistant Professor of research methods in the Department of Educational Leadership at UNC Charlotte. Her current research is focused on college access and success for underrepresented and underserved student groups in higher education.Dr. Miguel A. Pando, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Miguel A. Pando is currently an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the
Paper ID #9336S-STEM: ENG2 Scholars for Success 2007-2013Ms. Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State University Sarah Cooley Jones is an Associate Director, College of Engineering at Louisiana State University. Ms. Jones develops and manages student programs for undergraduate and graduate engineering students in- cluding programs focused on underrepresented student populations. These programs encompass scholar- ships, fellowships, and seminars/workshops that develop students academically and professionally. She joined LSU in 1992 as a College of Engineering research associate in the area of environmental analyses and worked
perceived their ability to resist oppressive structures inschools.” (p. 911). Else-Quest, Mineo, and Higgins (2013) also found influence of years living in Page 24.668.6the U.S. in attitudes and achievement among High School students. 5The solutionsConsequently, the solutions to the misrepresentation of Latinos in engineering found in theliterature are aligned with (a) Support and preparedness at the pre-college levels, starting at very early stages of development, (b) Grants and financial aid available for Latinos, (c
Education, 29(1), 53-63.2. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157-197.3. Gorman, S. T., Durmowicz, M. C., Roskes, E. M., & Slattery, S. P. (2010). Women in the Academy: Female leadership in STEM education and the evolution of a mentoring web. In Forum on Public Policy Online, 2, 1- 21. Oxford Round Table: Urbana, IL.4. Herrera, C., DuBois, D. L., & Grossman, J. B. (2013). The role of risk: Mentoring experiences and outcomes for youth with varying risk profiles, executive summary. New York, NY: A Public/Private ventures project distributed by MDRC.5. Perna
/Main/arduinoBoardLilyPad.[4] Ashcraft, C. et al. 2012. Girls In IT: The Facts.[5] Barnes, T. et al. 2008. Game2Learn: Improving the engagement and motivation of CS1 students. ACM GDCSE. (2008).[6] Black Girls Code: www.blackgirlscode.org. Accessed: 2013-03-11.[7] Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. (1971).[8] Clark, R.M. 1990. Why Disadvantaged Children Succeed. Public Welfare. (1990), 17–23.[9] Cockburn, A. and Williams, L. 2000. The costs and benefits of pair programming.[10] CompuGirls | School of Social Transformation: http://sst.clas.asu.edu/about/compugirls. Accessed: 2013- 03-08.[11] Csikszentmihalyi, M. et al. 1996. Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure.[12] DiSalvo, B. and