Conference Session

Engineering Education Methods and Reflections

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qiuxing Chen, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

the invaluable writing feedback and guidance onpresenting my scoping review clearly and recommending the construction of a comparison tablefor the two types of literature reviews. I would also like to acknowledge the Arthur A.Schomburg Fellowship Program for the funding provided during the execution of this project.References[1] D. Levac, H. Colquhoun, and K. K. O’Brien, “Scoping studies: advancing the methodology,” Implement. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 9, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.[2] M. Petticrew and H. Roberts, Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.[3] B. Smela, M. Toumi, K. Świerk, K. Gawlik, E. Clay, and L. Boyer, “Systematic literature reviews over the years,” J

Conference Session

Engineering Education Methods and Reflections

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Cao, Virginia Tech; Andrea L. Schuman, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

through two qualitative analysismethods. The co-authors used qualitative interview data for their dissertations. Case Study Auses a narrative analysis method, while Case Study B uses a multi-case study. The narrativeanalysis helps dive into an individual’s personal experiences while multi-case analysis is suitablefor analyzing students’ longitudinal learning. These two analysis methods represent contrastingapproaches to understanding student and faculty perceptions in the engineering education area. This paper does not provide a standard technical lens or rules for analyzing the qualitativeinterview data. Instead, it aims to excavate detailed reflections that engineering educationresearchers can refer to as they do qualitative research in

Conference Session

Collaborative Learning in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

: The impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-18.Andrews, M. E., & Boklage, A. (2023, October). Spaces and Practices within University Makerspaces. In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.Barrett, T. W., Pizzico, M. C., Levy, B., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015, June). A review of university maker spaces. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-101).Buckner, A., Bradshaw, J., & McGuffin-Cawley, J. (2022). Help! I Need Somebody–Not Just Anybody: Impact of Student Technician Staffing at an Academic Makerspace.Chambers, B. D., Dowell, Z. D., & Bedard, N. (2023, June). Evaluation of

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Autumn Cuellar, Utah State University; Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

faculty,” White paper from, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=22934704e33b3b01b6fe b5797b087a075afb5cb2[5]​ R. D. Black, L. A. Weinberg, and M. G. Brodwin, “Universal Design for learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education,” Except. Educ. Int., vol. 25, no. 2, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.5206/eei.v25i2.7723.[6]​ CAST, Inc, “The UDL Guidelines.” Accessed: Dec. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/[7]​ “Learning in the Time of Coronavirus.” Accessed: Jan. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHYecYtM3fs[8]​ M. W. Ok, K. Rao, B. R. Bryant, and D. McDougall, “Universal

Conference Session

Engineering Education Methods and Reflections

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin; Brittney Outlaw, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

., &Altman, T., & Jacobson, M. S., & Goodman, K., “WIP: A Layered Mentorship Program (LMP)for Engineering Student Success and Retention,” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Virtual Conference, 2021, July.[3] McPheron, B. D., “Work-In-Progress: Applying Peer Mentorship in a First Year EngineeringCourse to Improve Student Learning and Retention Outcomes,” Paper presented at 2022 ASEEIllinois-Indiana Section Conference, Anderson, Indiana, 2022, April.[4] Geller, H. E., & Golding, P., & Gonzalez, A., & Perez, A., “Enhancing EngineeringEducation through Mentorship,” Paper presented at 2024 ASEE-GSW, Canyon, Texas, 2024,March.[5] Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Mir, M., & Osman, S., “The impact of mentoring in

Conference Session

Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Finn Morton, University of Georgia; Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

://afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AA3PM/AA3PM-STEM-Report-2021.pdf[8] Shields, D. R., & Kisi, K. P. (2011, June), Factors Influencing High School Students’ to Pursue an Engineering Baccalaureate Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2—17985[9] Mosyjowski, E., & Daly, S. R., & Peters, D. L., & Skerlos, S., & Baker, A. B. (2014, June), The Ph.D. Advising Relationship: Needs of Returning and Direct-Pathway Students Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2—23171[10] K. Kainz, “Early academic gaps and Title I programming in high poverty, high minority schools,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly

Conference Session

Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University; Abdisa Bedane Halkiyu, Bule Hora University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/5361[8] M. Mancini, Time management. New York : McGraw-Hill, 2003. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://archive.org/details/timemanagement0000manc[9] B. J. Zimmerman, “Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis,” in Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement, 2nd ed., Routledge, 2001.[10] V. Brunsden, M. Davies, M. Shevlin, and M. Bracken, “Why do HE Students Drop Out? A test of Tinto’s model,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 301–310, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1080/030987700750022244.[11] A. Sheikh, “Navigating the Tides of Time: A Sociological Exploration of Students and Time Management,” Medium. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2025. [Online

Conference Session

Industry and Technical Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zain ul Abideen, Utah State University; sehrish jabeen, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Human Development, D. Preiss and R. J. Sternberg, Eds. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2010, pp. 51–77.[13] T. Nunes, A. D. Schliemann, and D. W. Carraher, Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1993.[14] W.-M. Roth, “Mathematics in the everyday world and at work: Prolegomena for rethinking the concept of interdisciplinarity,” in Interdisciplinarity for the Twenty- First Century: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mathematics and Its Connections to Arts and Sciences, Moncton 2009, B. Sriraman and V. Freiman, Eds. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2011, pp. 67–108.[15] *G. B. Saxe, Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical

Conference Session

Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brandon Wilson, California State University, Los Angeles; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

://investigate.afsc.org. [Online]. Available: https://investigate.afsc.org/company/lockheed-martin. [Accessed: Jan. 21, 2025].[6]​ Investigate, “General Dynamics Corp,” https://investigate.afsc.org. [Online]. Available: https://investigate.afsc.org/company/general-dynamics. [Accessed: Jan. 21, 2025].[7]​ A. W. Johnson, C. L. Bowen, C. C. Cruz, and R. B. Rodriguez, “Ethical Issues In Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Engineering Ethics Education (1st ed.). Routledge, 2024, pp. 269–284. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003464259-19.[8]​ ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023,” https://www.abet.org/. [Online]. Available

Conference Session

Industry and Technical Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ruidong Ma, University of Washington; Frank Gao, University of Washington; Renee M. Desing, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #48554Design and Evaluation of a New, Student-Centered Multidisciplinary Coursein Mechanical Engineering: Artificial OrgansMr. Ruidong Ma, University of Washington Ruidong Ma is a fourth-year international Ph.D. student in the Mechanical Engineering Department and is dedicated to teaching engineering.Dr. Frank Gao, University of WashingtonDr. Renee M. Desing, University of Washington Dr. Renee Desing is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington. Her research interests include diversity, equity, and inclusion in the engineering classrooms and

Conference Session

Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chloe Faith Mann, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Nosakhare Iyobosa Idiaghe, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #47113Preliminary Results from a Survey to Understand the Motivations BehindChoosing & Staying in an Engineering MajorMs. Chloe Faith Mann, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Chloe is an undergraduate student researcher of engineering education in the Civil Engineering department at the University of Nebraska-LincolnNosakhare Iyobosa Idiaghe, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Idiaghe Nosakhare is a PhD Student of Engineering Education Research at University of Nebraska, Lincoln. He holds a Masters degree in Industrial Engineering and a Bachelors degree in Petroleum Engineering.Dr. Jessica Deters, University of

Conference Session

Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Imran Parvez, Texas A&M University at Qatar ; Osama Desouky, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Marwa AbdelGawad, Hamad Bin Khalifa University

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #48805Engineering Excellence through Strategic Team ManagementMr. Imran Parvez, Texas A&M University at Qatar I am a final-year mechanical engineering student at Texas A&M University in Qatar, and currently the Team Manager for the Shell Eco-marathon (SEM) 2025 team. While I have successfully led other organizations, this is my first time leading the SEM team. I bring two years of experience to this team, where I have focused on body design for the competition. My background in leadership, combined with hands-on experience in vehicle aerodynamics and lightweight construction, has equipped me to guide

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leo Kimura, Shibaura Institute of Technology; Hatsuko Yoshikubo Ph.D., SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; Sumito Nagasawa Ph.D. in Engineering, Shibaura

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

miniaturized robots using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems technologies and robot education for STEAM. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Enhancing Assessment of Student Engagement in Face-to-Face Global Project-Based Learnings (gPBLs): Adding Peer Assessment to Improve Slack-based EvaluationAbstractThis study aims to introduce and evaluate a peer assessment method as a complementaryapproach to Slack-based engagement assessment in face-to-face group work. The participantswere students who attended a Japan-Thailand joint global project-based learning (PBL)workshop held in 2024. Posts made on Slack were classified into three types—A, B, and C—according to their level of

Conference Session

Collaborative Learning in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taylor Martini, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

session. This schedule gave studentsmany opportunities to find an office hour session that worked within their schedule.MethodologyA two-part approach was used in this study to observe the impact of teaching fellows: recordingstudent attendance at TF office hours and performing an end-of-course anonymous survey. Forthis study, two professors with two sections of EGR 1301 were observed. Professors 1 and 2required the “A” section of the class to attend at least two TF office hours, one before each of thecourse’s two midterm exams, and did not require the “B” section to attend office hours. Classes1A and 1B had 28 students (n=28), 2A had 27 students (n=27), and 2B had 29 students (n=29),yielding a total sample of 112 students. The “A” Sections were

Conference Session

Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Naqash Gerard, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Isabella Victoria, University of Florida; Minji Yun, University of Florida; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Jasmine E. McNealy, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

, thoughthe findings and conclusions expressed herein represent the authors' views and not necessarilythose of the NSF. A special thanks to Dr. Buffy Smith, Dr. Laura Gelles, and Dr. Marialuisa DiStefano. We extend our thanks to the graduate students who participated in this study: NikolaosPippas, Mary Nwuana and two anonymous contributors. Special appreciation goes to theauthors themselves for engaging in critical self-reflection to identify their strengths, recognizetheir value, and build trust in the mentoring relationship.References[1] I. Villanueva Alarcón, V. Sellers, R. Paul, and B. Smith, “Transforming engineeringeducation through social capital in response to hidden curriculum,” in Routledge eBooks, 2023,pp. 380–401. doi: 10.4324

Conference Session

Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Usinski, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Alyndra Plagge, Trinity University; Emma Treadway, Trinity University; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

methodology that combinesthe many methods of creative problem-solving involves, “A) Planning your approach, B)Defining the correct problem/understanding the challenge, C) Generate Ideas/Alternatives –Brainstorm, D) Decide course of action/Preparing for action/Carry through/Implement, E)Acceptance and Evaluation,” [17]. It is also important to know that there is a common belief andvalue among engineering students that the skill of problem-solving is necessary for future careersuccess [21]. Students apply different combinations of the problem-solving steps based on thetype of problem given, prior knowledge before completing the problem, and beliefs about theusefulness of problem-solving in future careers [18]. This makes it difficult to tailor

Conference Session

Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Max Wu-Blouin, McGill University; Kennedy Grace Olsen, McGill University; Manish Malik, Canterbury Christ Church University; Lawrence R Chen, McGill University

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

, no. 3, pp. 84-91, 2019.[3] C. S. Dweck, Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development.Psychology Press, 2000.[4] G. S. Stump, J. Husman, and M. Corby, “Engineering students; intelligence beliefs andlearning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 360-387, 2014.[5] J. Buckley, A. O’Connor, N. Seery, T. Hyland, and D. Canty, “Implicit theories of intelligencein STEM education: perspectives through the lens of technology education students,”International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 29, pp. 75-106, 2019.[6] P. R. Pintrich, D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, W. J. McKeachie,. A manual for the use of theMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Report No. NSCRIPTAL-91-B-004

Conference Session

Collaborative Learning in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keating Dinsmore Ms., University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of California, Berkeley; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22602Context of All in Which You Live: How Women Engineering Students Perceive Gender BasedPatterns in Teams ​ 14 Dabić, M., Posinković, T. O., Maley, J. F., Vlačić, B., Marzi, G., & Kraus, S. (2024).Exploring the multifaceted challenges of women in engineering: A comprehensive literaturereview. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 3325–3339.https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3342980 Ingram, S., & Parker, A. (2002). The influence of gender on collaborative projects in anengineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45(1), 7–20.https

Conference Session

Collaborative Learning in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wylam Patrick DeSimone, University of Georgia; Parker Gavin Ferrer, University of Georgia; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

. References[1] B. Johnson, The impacts of Project Based Learning on self-directed learning and professional skill attainment: A comparison of project based learning to Traditional Engineering Education | IEEE conference publication | IEEE xplore, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7344028 (accessed Jan. 16, 2025).[2] R. Ulseth, “Development of PBL students as self-directed learners,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2016. doi:10.18260/p.26823[3] A. Micallef Grimaud and T. Eerola, “Emotional expression through musical cues: A comparison of production and perception approaches,” PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279605[4] The Techniques of Guitar

Conference Session

Collaborative Learning in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Engelke, NC State University / UNC-Chapel Hill; Zachary Wiebe; Daisy Huang, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Spencer Dougherty, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Margaret Elizabeth Ambrose

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

design, and troubleshooting exercises weredrawn from PS experiences on the floor as former PAs. The formatting of the initial CoP and theformatting of the New CoP are compared in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Comparison of New CoP Curriculum Timing vs Old CoP Curriculum Timing. The newly redesigned Staff CoP program launched in Fall 2024, with a total of 36 newlyhired PAs participating across six cohorts, each cohort led by a different PS for each 4-week toolrotation.Data Collection and Analysis Before each 4-week rotation, PA participants were asked to complete a pre-cohort survey(see Appendix A) before beginning each 4-week tool rotation, and a corresponding post-cohortsurvey (see Appendix B) after the rotation

Conference Session

Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Elizabeth Nortz, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

. National Academies Press, 1991.[2]​ National Academy of Engineering, Infusing Ethics into the Development of Engineers. National Academies Press, 2016.[3]​ ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021-2022,” Oct. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineeri ng-programs-2021-2022/[4]​ A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, “Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 327–338, 2008.[5]​ R. Foley and B. Gibbs, “Connecting Engineering Processes and Responsible Innovation: A Response to Macro-Ethical Challenges,” Eng. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–33, 2019.[6]​ D. R. Haws, “Ethics Instruction

Conference Session

Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kylee Shiekh, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ernesto Cuesta Alvear, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Summer S. Stevens, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

combined student-parent role. Thesecond possible limitation is that the ages of the participants’ children were not collected, which mightaffect how much time and effort the parent has for homework. A third possible limitation of this surveywas that there was a lack of consideration of working student-parents in the survey design, which createsfurther barriers to campus resources. ReferencesBakker, A. B., & Mostert, K. (2024). Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well- Being in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8Dolson, J. (2020). Factors Influencing Interrole Conflict Among Graduate Student

Conference Session

Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zain ul Abideen, Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

) Std. Change Statistics Error of R Adjusted the R Square F Sig. FModel R Square R Square Estimate Change Change df1 df2 Change a 1 0.456 0.208 0.167 0.77699 0.208 5.080 5 97 <0.001 b 2 0.538 0.289 0.253 0.64134 0.289 7.895 5 97 <0.001a. Dependent Variable: Mean Performance Goal Orientationb. Dependent Variable: Mean Mastery Goal Orientationc. Predictors: (Constant), Mean Closed Mindedness, Mean Need for Order, Mean Decisiveness, Mean Need for predictability, Mean

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zain ul Abideen, Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

. R. Pintrich and D. H. Schunk, Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J, New Jersey: Merrill, 2002.[7] M. Fouladchang, R. Marzooghi, and B. Shemshiri, “The Effect of Gender and Grade Level Differences on Achievement Goal Orientations of Iranian Undergraduate Students,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 968–972, May 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.968.972.[8] A. M. L. Cavallo, W. H. Potter, and M. Rozman, “Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors,” School Science and

Conference Session

Industry and Technical Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Liliana Elizabeth Tarud, Auburn University; Joan Tisdale, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

would be impacted by heavier EV’s. The task could involve using provided traffic load data to perform simplified calculations on pavement thickness or bridge stress, applying basic formulas provided in coursework. A possible deliverable is a short assignment with calculations, conclusions, and a recommendation for future infrastructure design adjustments. An example of a basic mathematical problem in this area is included in Appendix B. This project aligns with the FE Civil Exam topic of ‘Transportation Engineering’ and more specifically ‘Pavement System Design’. Current Events Article Review - Students can explore the topic of how the added weight of electric vehicles impacts infrastructure

Conference Session

Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katharine Sarah Getz, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

complex than the binarized system that isrequired for statistical significance. The remainder of the participants did not select a gender. 36participants identified as a member of the LGBTQIA+ community, and 198 identified as straight.Among those who identified their gender as “Woman”, there were 2 students who identifiedthemselves as lesbians, 15 who identified themselves as bisexual, and 4 who identifiedthemselves as queer.ProcedureStudents completed a survey that was approved by the Institutional Review Board of thePennsylvania State University. After reading a consent statement (see Appendix A), studentscompleted measures of belonging, identity, peer inclusion, hegemonic masculinity, and facultyinclusion (see Appendix B for full measures used

Conference Session

Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hang Zhang, Jining Normal University; Xinyao Song; Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Interviewee and Their Affiliated EnterprisesInterviewee Enterprise Name Engineering Fields Core Business A-1 engineering contracting, railway, highway, bridge, A-2 A design, consulting, import real estate, municipal, etc. A-3 and export B-1 engineering design, general railway construction and B-2 B contracting, investment

Conference Session

Industry and Technical Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aakash Alpesh Patel, University of Georgia; Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Excel file. The retrieved transcripts were thenprocessed to convert them into text from transcript form. This involved the removal of timestamps and correction of word spacing. Stage 3: Transcript Evaluation: For this study, we built off ongoing work by members ofthe research team to adapt a framework to perform deductive thematic analyses [redacted; underreview]. This method leverages a combination of prompt engineering techniques (PETs), naturallanguage processing via large language models (NPL via LLMs; i.e., ChatGPT), and Bradley etal.’s framework on thematic analysis. Appendix B details the exact prompts used to extractrelevant themes and ideas from the transcripts. Bradley et al.’s study outlined a method whereseveral codes should

Conference Session

Engineering Education Methods and Reflections

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jad El Harake, Vanderbilt University; gina yu, Vanderbilt University; Kaden Jorge Tro; Jonathan Ehrman, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

students could improve. In the future, these findings may be used to inform approaches toundergraduate research experiences and mentorship for improved student outcomes.References[1] J. Gilmore, M. Vieyra, B. Timmerman, D. Feldon, and M. Maher, “The Relationship between Undergraduate Research Participation and Subsequent Research Performance of Early Career STEM Graduate Students,” J. High. Educ., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 834–863, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777386.[2] S. Kaul, C. Ferguson, P. Yanik, and Y. Yan, “Importance of Undergraduate Research: Efficacy and Student Perceptions,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., Jun. 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25599.[3] P. R. Hernandez, A. Woodcock, M. Estrada

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hang Zhang, Jining Normal University,China; Hao He; Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

): A new paradigm for learning,” CDTLink, vol.7, no.3, 2003.[7] B. S. Mary, J. S. Larry, W. Harvey, et al., “Defining the outcomes: a framework for EC2000,” IEEE Transactions on Education, pp.100, vol.43, no.2, 2000.[8] M. I. Sarapin, “Implementing an assessment model for NAIT accreditation,” in NAIT 36th Annual Convention. Nashville, TN, 2003. pp.10-13.[9] S. Strong, S. J. Amos and N. R. Callahan, “Effective assessment: a model for industrial technology programs,” Journal of Industrial Technology, vol.19, no.3, pp.1-7, 2003.[10] R. L. Zollars, “The EC2000 system in chemical engineering at Washington State University,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &