engineering grant supporting Historically Black University and Col- leges; ”Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District” , and ”Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University” Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She is also the PI on both ”Syracuse City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership: Science Project and Mathematics MSP Grant initiatives.Dr. Corey A Graves, North Carolina A&T State University Corey A. Graves is an associate professor and the director of the Auto Mobile Pervasive and Embedded Design 9AMPED) Laboratory in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at North Carolina A&T State University
they are activities that wouldtypically reside outside of the norms as defined by the current process, procedures, and budget resourceallocations.The Connect Grants Review Committee (see details below) was provided a rating sheet developed bythe AdvanceRIT Program Director. Each committee member rated all the grant proposals using a Likertscale on the following criteria: • Relevance to a. AdvanceRIT goals and rationale b. faculty plan of work or department mission/goals • Quality of a. project plan b. project mentor/role description c. outcome and impact description d. proposer’s CV e. recommendation letter f. budget planOverall scores were then
course grades at the end of each quarter virtuallyimpossible. In addition, there were no mechanisms in place to give credit to students wanting toleave the program. Thus, the team agreed that the core values and objectives of the programcould still be met in a one year-program via semi-independent quarters. There were severalbenefits to running the program in the aforementioned format: (a) the new scheme does not havean impact on scheduling or grade assignment; (b) students have the option to leave the program Page 26.1385.9at the end of each quarter and, at the same time, new students can join it at any quarter as long aspre-requisites are met
in the engineering classroom.Dr. Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS and PhD Washington State University and made the switch from Instruc- tional Laboratory Supervisor to Post-Doctoral Research Associate on an engineering education project. His research area has been engineering education, specifically around the development and assessment of technologies to bring fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratory experiences into the classroom.Prof. Robert F. Richards, Washington State University Dr. Robert Richards received the PhD in Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. He then worked in the Building and Fire Research Laboratory at NIST as a Post-Doctoral Researcher
with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 5157.18. Stowell, J., & Nelson, J. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology 34, 253–258.19. Cook, E. D., & Hazelwood, A. C. (2002). An active learning strategy for the classroom—”Who wants to win . . . some Mini Chips Ahoy?” Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 297–306.20. Fies, C. c., & Marshall, J. (2008). The C3 Framework: Evaluating Classroom Response System Interactions in University Classrooms. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17(5), 483-499.21. Ford, M. B., Burns, C. E., Mitch, N., Gomez, M. M. (2012). The effectiveness
. The supervisors consisted of a diverse set of junior and senior engineering studentsthat received a B or better in dynamics. At the beginning of the meeting the supervisor wouldlook over each student’s homework to ensure they attempted all the problems. Then eachstudent was asked to present a portion of their problem set. The problems selected by thesupervisors for students to present were those that required the application of important anddifficult concepts covered in the course.Each student in the group would be asked to present a portion of their solution using awhiteboard. The portion assigned was selected so that the presentation would require about tenminutes. Students were allowed to use their notes, but expected to explain each step
otherwise unknown. Please select for each question the correct answer as well as the corresponding reason. Question 1 (2 points, if both items are correct) Item 1.1 vL(t) and v0(t) A are in phase, B are not in phase, C can have the same or a different phase, Item 1.2 because a the inductance and the source are connected in parallel. b the inductance and the source are connected in series. c at the inductance the voltage leads. d between source and inductance, there is a branch with R and C. e the phase relation depends on the
Paper ID #13352Teaching Idea Generation to Undergraduate Students within the Time Con-straints of a Capstone CourseDr. Shraddha Sangelkar, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Shraddha Sangelkar is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. She received her M.S. (2010) and Ph.D. (2013) in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University. She completed the B. Tech (2008) in Mechanical Engineering from Veermata Jijabai Tech- nological Institute (V.J.T.I.), Mumbai, India. She has served an instructor for the senior capstone design course in the Department of Mechanical
., & Goldfinch, T. (2012). EngineeringAcross Cultures. Retrieved fromhttp://aaeescholar.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/61545770/Engineering%20Across%20Cultures%20%5Bdraft%20unformatted%5D.pdf; Williams, B., Figueiredo, J., & Trevelyan, J. (Eds.). (2014). Engineering Practice in a GlobalContext: Understanding the Technical and the Social. Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.2 Jesiek, B. K., Qin, Z., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J. D., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency inContext: Situations and Behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), p. 1.3 Lloyd, S., & Härtel, C. (2010). Intercultural competencies for culturally diverse work teams. Journal ofManagerial Psychology, 25(8), 845–875
institutions: How do students perceive that they benefit from the inverted classroomapproach and what classroom approach do they prefer? Additionally, how does this change atdifferent institutions with different approaches to the inverted classroom model? Page 26.72.2MethodsUniversity and Course DescriptionsThree Midwestern institutions participated in different aspects of this study. The threeuniversities were: • University A – University of Cincinnati: a large, urban public university • University B – The Ohio State University: a large, urban public land grant university • University C – Youngstown State University: a medium, urban public
development: (a) school socio-economic status, (b) teacher experience with engineering,(c) student gender, (d) student race/ethnicity, and (e) student prior exposure to engineering.Literature ReviewIn recent years, much work has been devoted to the synthesis of the large body of teacherprofessional development literature 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8. Desimone3 goes further to identify the modelthat has been formed over years of TPD research, shown in Figure 1. There is a consensus thatthe critical features of TPD can be expected to increase teacher knowledge and skills, improvetheir practices, and then have potential to influence student achievement. The critical features arefoundational and interactive with teacher knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Teacher
; b. identify the stakeholders for an engineering challenge and identify their needs; c. prioritize stakeholder needs and determine appropriate ways to engage them for a given engineering challenge; d. define a set of engineering requirements for an engineering challenge; Page 26.1466.6 e. articulate the functional and/or spatial basis of an engineering challenge; f. create a verification plan1
learning inductivemethodology5 referred to as a Term Project. For this project, students are organized in teams oftwo or three students and the instructor specifies an assignment to carry out one or more tasksthat lead to the development of a final product. Teams are required to design, simulate, andimplement a digital controller on a Quanser’s Ball and Beam (B&B)6 system available in theProcess Instrumentation and Control Laboratory (PICL)7. The controllers should be implementedusing a microcontroller based system (MCS) as well as with Simulink through Quanser’sQuarc® tool. Finally, a comparison between both implementations was made. The MCSworkstation uses the Texas Instruments C2000 F28069 Microcontroller, the DRV8833 motordriver, and a
10 and 11 from 11 high schools were participated in the program. Of this group, 50 percent (22 students) were female and 50 percent (22 students) were male. In addition, 32 students (86.5 percent) were Qatari nationals and the remaining 13.5 percent were expatriates (Appendix A: Future Engineers Program). At the Engineering Explorers three-‐day workshop, Texas A&M University at Qatar hosted 47 students representing seven middle schools. A short questionnaire was distributed at the conclusion of the workshop to gauge and assess students’ interests regarding materials covered during the course of this workshop (Appendix B: Sample
study has only been offered this singletime so no control group exists which is a limitation concerning analysis. Future analysis willfocus on assessing how being the “expert” for a measurement and analysis technique leads toincreased knowledge and skills.References1. Sinatra, G. M. “The “worming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, issue 2, pp. 107-115, 2005.2. Farnsworth, C. B., R. W. Welch, M. J. McGinnis, G. Wright, “Bringing Creativity into the Lab Environment,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013. Page 26.947.43
.________ Engineering plays an important role in the everyday production of chocolate.________ This chocolate project is not engineering; it is a waste of my time. Page 26.827.11MULTIPLE CHOICE: 1. A Life Cycle Assessment is: a. A tool that shows the chemistry behind common products b. A guide to how to properly recycle c. An assessment on the environmental impacts of a certain product d. A guide to making new products from recycled plastics 2. Sustainability as it relates to engineering can be defined as: a. Reducing the waste that a manufacturing process produces b. Making sure that a process will be mechanically
need to betaken into consideration: (1) how to construct a program graph and handle compound conditionsautomatically. Compound condition consists of multiple simple conditions, e.g., (a>b) &&(b>c) contains two simple predicates a>b and b>c. Compound conditions need to be recog-nized automatically so that different paths can be derived from a program graph based on deci- Page 26.42.2sion, condition, and multi-condition coverages; (2) how to visualize program graphs. Visualizingprogram graphs is essentially a graph auto-layout problem, which arranges the positions of eachvertex and edge of a graph automatically. However
influencingindividuals in their values hierarchy (Leaper et al18). Males may place a higher valuepriority on achieving career success and achievement of higher income. Females mayseek more balance between career and family.The study also draws on Tobin et al3 Gender Self Socialization Model (GSSM) as anauxiliary framework to help explain gender role in the development of women’s valuebased hierarchy. The GSSM model links childhood gender cognition theories into atripartite classification of three constructs: (a) gender identity: children develop a self-identity as a boy or a girl at a young age; (b) gender stereotype: children’s beliefs aboutwhat boys and girls are expected to do are influenced by their desire to conform to thecollective gender stereotype; (c
image, i.e. removing the noise or at least minimizing it with theleast possible damage to the image quality. During their search for a solution, students learnabout area processing. The best de-noising is achieved using either a low pass (smoothing) filteror a median filter. The project is also a good place for the instructor to introduce another usefularea process, the high pass (sharpening) filter. The de-noised image is shown in Figure 3.b. a. Original Image b. De-noise Image Figure 3. The original and the de-noised (low pass filtered) versions of the image used in the image de-noising project. III. Edge DetectionIn this project, students are given the
, and final exam. During the semester,there were 6 home assignments that totaled 30% of the course grade, two midtermexams, two quizzes which were mix of multiple choice, short answer, and essayquestions (30% weight for two midterms, and 20% for both quizzes), and the finalexam (20% of course grade), which was also a mixture of questions similar to themidterm exams.Research questions: A. Is there a correlation between the students’ demographics and their performance? B. How did the students perform in distance learning and F2F sections? Is there a significant difference in the outcome (course grade)?4. Analysis and ResultsA. Demographics correlation with course gradeThe data used to determine whether there is a correlation between
analysis directly to a topic relevant their electrical or computer engineering courses,and to introduce the student to computer aids for data analysis. With this sophomore-levelbackground, further integration may be facilitated through future curricula developments. Suchcurricula components address various ABET assessment outcomes, e.g. “a) an ability to applyknowledge of mathematic, science, and engineering; b) an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; and k) an ability to use the techniques,skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.” Also, the ABETprogram criteria for ECE explicitly note probability and statistics content1.The circuit analysis laboratory (Electrical
versions of industry-type equipment that can beused to illustrate engineering concepts in the classroom- fluid mechanics and heat transfer in thiscase. The module consists of a base unit with rechargeable batteries, fluid reservoirs, pumps andtubing, and receptacle ports to which different detachable equipment cartridges can be installed(e.g. venturi, orifice and packed/fluidized bed cartridges) depending on the instructional need.Also connected to the base units are digital displays to monitor readings (e.g. differentialpressure and stream temperatures) and a rotameter to control readings.Figure 1 below shows a typical DLM with heat exchanger cartridge installed. The moduleconsists of two reservoirs (Tanks A & B), and a pump, rotameter, gate
numerous studieshave appeared regarding the important features of an effective professional development program, less isknown about the specific features that result in improved student achievement 4-11. It has been generallyaccepted that effective professional development, that influences classroom practice, would have thefollowing features 11:(a) There is a focus on content knowledge;(b) There are opportunities for active learning, where teachers can be actively engaged;(c) It builds on prior knowledge aligned with standards and assessment;(d) It is of long duration (and not a “one-shot” workshop).While effective professional development can be linked to improved classroom practice, a direct link tohow professional development affects student
models in science,engineering, and technology to the development of abstract symbol systems. 16 The abundantpresence and the variety of models in these disciplines suggest that modeling can help studentsdevelop understanding about a wide range of important ideas. However, modeling is largelymissing from school instruction. Figure 1(a) shows engineering practice cycles and Figure 1(b)shows cycles of modeling based learning. Page 26.747.3Figure 1. (a) Engineering practice cycles; (b) Model based learning cycles; (c) The LeshTranslational Model 15Education researchers have long believed that the structure of any domain knowledge can becharacterized
relationships can be included.In summary, their formalism consists of the following relationships†: GDF = M×N + MFlows + NRates (2.a) GSC = MStreamConstraints + NBalances + RRR (2.b) PSC = F + C + NR + NOC (2.c) from which DF=GDF-(GSC+PSC) (2.d)where M is the number of streams, N is the number of molecular species in the systems, MFlows isthe number of stream
outcomes of testing such as feature not working, expectedBugs Revealed results not observed, missing or inaccessible features (optional field) Figure 1. Test case development template.The benefits of developing the template for a case study are twofold: (a) template provides astandardized way to document the background information, description and objectives of casestudies and (b) facilitates identification of any missing information or gaps of knowledge for the Page 26.332.6students as they attempt to solve the questions based on the case study. This allows improvingthe description contained in the case study
occurrence of thesefast motions within their sport that results in injury of the forearm muscles. After somebackground on the problem, it is recommended that the biology of the muscle be discussed, witha focus on explaining that tendons carry tensile forces from muscle to bone, with the collagenfibrils contained within tendons accounting for the mechanical resistance to tension.15 Finally,a See example introduction presentation in the supporting information (S1).b If the activity is used for women outreach purposes the project can be shifted to create an implant for female Page 26.1.3athletes.depending on the group of students, the
shift, manny CEM proograms havee introducedd BIM intoundergrraduate and graduate edducation. As A BIM pracctices emergge and becoome codified, it is clearrthat CE EM program ms in higher education needn to playy a vital rolee in BIM edducation. To o reflectthe grow wing demannd for BIM in the consttruction inddustry, CEM M programs have been trying t toteach BIM B skills annd VDC knowledge to students, inntegrating with w traditional or main nstreamcoursess more broaddly.To introoduce BIM within the existing
learned a lot about engineering education research from this program. Many studentsexpressed their desire to purchase further graduate studies, or teaching, in the development oftheir professional careers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1262806. Graduate students Mr. Andreas Febrian, Mr. Moe Tajvidi, Mr. PresentacionRivera-Reyes, and Ms. Ting Song are acknowledged for their efforts in mentoring REU students.The project external evaluator Dr. Margaret Lubke is also acknowledged for her efforts inconducting independent evaluation of this program.Bibliography[1] Hathaway, R. S., Naqda, B. A., and Gregerman, S. R., 2002, “The Relationship of Undergraduate Research
, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[4] Barrett, S. F., LeFevre, E. W., Steadman, J. W., Tietjen, J. S., White,K. R., and Whitman, D. L., 2010, Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination as an Outcomes Assessment Tool, National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, Seneca, SC.[5] Streveler, R. A., Geist, M. R., Ammerman, R. F., Sulzbach, C. S., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., and Nelson, M. A., 2006, “Identifying and Investigating Difficult Concepts in Engineering Mechanics and Electrical Circuits,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.[6] Cornwell, P. J., 2000, “Dynamics Evolution – Change or Design,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference