Paper ID #16350Privatization of Public Education: Lessons from New Orleans for Engineer-ing Education in K-12 and BeyondDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Mrs. Janice L. Hall, Virginia Tech I am a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. I have B.S. and M.S. degrees in biolog- ical and bio-medical engineering respectively. It was through my participation in extracurricular activities and my experience as a graduate teaching assistant I found my passion for engineering education. My research interests include broadening participation and
Paper ID #14555First Round Evaluation of First Tech Challenge (FTC) Robotics Club: Doesit Really Prepare Students for beyond College?Dr. Fethiye Ozis, Northern Arizona University Fethiye started working as an instructor in CECMEE at Northern Arizona University in Fall 2014. She has received her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from University of Southern California in 2005. Her doctorate work focused on modeling of bio filters for air pollution control. After graduation, she has been involved in K-12 STEM institutions both as a teacher and administrator. Her research interests include biotechnology for environmental
become a valued resource for business incubator programs throughout Virginia and her success as a business consultant is reflected in the successful outcomes of her clients. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Beyond "The Innovator's DNA:" Systematic Development of Creative Intelligence in an Engineering Entrepreneurship ProgramIn a seminal paper published in the Harvard Business Review in 2009 and titled “The Innovator’sDNA,” Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen argue that there are "five discovery skills thatdistinguish the most innovative entrepreneurs from other executives." The specific skills theyidentified through their research were (1) associating, (2) questioning, (3
through an Undergraduate Mentoring Teamand Module Database, ChE Outreach, 48, (1), 33-36.40. Moskal, B., Skokan, C., (2011). Supporting the K-12 Classroom through University Outreach, Journal ofHigher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15 (1), 53-75.41. Sullivan, J., et al, (1999). Beyond the Pipeline: Building a K-12 Engineering Outreach Program, Proceedings ofthe 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference – Session 11b5-21, San Juan, Puerto Rico.42. Nadleson, L., Callahan, J., (2011). A Comparison of Two Engineering Outreach Programs for Adolescents,Journal of STEM Education, 12 (1&2), 43-52.43. Groh, J., Scott, R. (2014) Access Engineering: Re-visioning Summer Opportunities for Pre-College Outreach,WEPAN 2014, available at http
building blocks for the first time. There are no instructions – there are blocks and the laws ofphysics. Structures are built through trial and error. Manipulatives allow young children to learn, developand then build simple structures without needing a civil engineer to scaffold their knowledge. Why shouldcomputing be any different? The use of manipulatives in K-16 classrooms has already been well established. Research ofmanipulatives in fields that are more theoretical and abstract in nature, such as mathematics, are alsobeing to emmege4-7. While specific areas of brain activity and development only occur duringmanipulative activities8-10, little academic instruction ever focuses on active manipulation11. The problemin certain fields, in
Paper ID #16215Supporting K-12 Student Self-Direction with a Maker Family EcosystemJames Robert Larson, Arizona State University I am an undergraduate student in Arizona State’s Electrical Systems Engineering program. This program, which isn’t the same as Electrical Engineering, takes a project-based approach to the curriculum. I am 20 years old and excited to have this opportunity to offer a student’s perspective on the future of engineering education.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams
Paper ID #15700Implementation of a Mobile Makerspace in a K-8 School (Work in Progress)Mr. Brian Patrick O’Connell, Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Brian O’Connell received his undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 2006. He then worked for Kollmorgen Electro/Optical as a mechanical engi- neer developing periscopes and optrontic masts. In 2011, he returned to academia to pursue his Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University in Medford, Mass. He aspires to become a professor of mechanical engineering after graduation
Paper ID #16354Engineering Outreach on Campus: A Comprehensive Survey of 109 Pro-grams at 91 Colleges and Universities (Fundamental)Dr. Eric Iversen, Start Engineering Eric Iversen is the Vice President for Learning and Communications at Start Engineering. He has over 25 years experience in learning activities, encompassing work in non-profit, academic, and for-profit organizations. He was Manager of Public Affairs at ASEE, where he helped start many of the society’s K-12 engineering education activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Outreach on Campus: A
Paper ID #16961Students’ Use of Evidence-Based Reasoning in K-12 Engineering: A CaseStudy (Fundamental)Corey A. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Mathis is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in biology and her M.E.D. in secondary education from Northern Arizona University and is a former high school science and technology teacher. Her research interest includes improving students learning of science and engineering through integrated STEM curricula.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering
, engineering design-based approaches, context-richproblem solving strategies, and real-world applications. All of the foci were ideally suited forhelping K-12 students learn the interdisciplinary integrated STEM concepts now called for in theK-12 standards (e.g. Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards - NGSS). Althoughnot traditionally used in STEM subjects (or explored in this paper), astronomy concepts such asblack holes, distances to other stars, and planets in star systems beyond our own, are inspirationalto K-12 students while being explainable at a technical and quantitative level. Quantitativeassessment methods for the LASSI PD included an external evaluator who asked daily surveyquestions of the participants in the yearlong PD
of the following keywords: robotics (or robots), education, and K-12. The threedatabases yielded 229, 14, and 73 studies, respectively, giving a total of 316. Of the initial 316,we were able to eliminate 161 based on a preliminary read through. After scrutinizing theremaining 155 in more detail, we further refined our subset of included articles to a final total of119. Summaries for these 119 were compiled based on seven features (experimental vs. non-experimental, formal vs. informal, learning data, aspects of programming and what platform,sample properties, goals/purpose, and results/findings). Once the summaries were completed, we2identified commonalities in their research methodologies, results, and subsequent findings. Eacharticle was
K-12 Students1. IntroductionRecently there have been a rising popularity in the use of robotics as a vehicle to expose K-12students to the STEM disciplines. A common practice is to have the students build remotecontrol robotic vehicles for competitions such as the various First USA Robotics Competitions1.However, the robotics profession is not just focused on remote controlled mobile robots butrather involves stationary industrial arms running autonomously doing repetitive tasks. Ourapproach is to go beyond having the students simply build the robot and control it using a remotecontrol to teaching them more advanced engineering concepts more closely related to theprofession. We still aim to introduce STEM, and engineering in specific, to K
Paper ID #16763A Hands-On Approach to Teaching K-12 Students About Microfluidic De-vices (Work in Progress)Prof. Adam T. Melvin, Louisiana State University Adam Melvin obtained a BS in Chemical Engineering and a BA in Chemistry from the University of Arizona, a MS in Chemical Engineering (with a minor in Biotechnology) and a Ph.D. in Chemical En- gineering from North Carolina State University under the direction of Jason Haugh. He was an NIH postdoctoral fellow at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Departments of Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering under the direction of Nancy Allbritton. In August of
(Epicenter), funded by the National Science Foundation andmanaged by Stanford University and VentureWell.2 The goal of Pathways is to make high-quality innovation and entrepreneurship offerings available and accessible to undergraduateengineering students, through two strategies: faculty development and institutional change.Teams of faculty and administrators from 50 institutions participate in the program in threecohorts (chosen in a competitive process in three successive years).Participating schools are four-year US institutions with engineering programs, but beyond thatdo not have any specific profile: they include both public and private schools; range from fewerthan 100 undergraduate engineering students to more than 9,0003; are in urban
sunglasses with ahole the same size as an eye-dropper. As a result of this project, the novel design currently has aprovisional patent. While students practiced their technical communication skills during theirpresentations, they also expressed their thoughts about the camp. A local news channel filmedparts of this symposium and interviewed some of the students. One camper said, "Sometimesyou feel like you are the only visually impaired person out there, but there’s a lot of people outthere who are also trying to do the same stuff and have the same interests as you”7. Clearly, theeffects of the camp extended beyond the academic instruction by creating a community of youngaspiring engineers. As a result of connections made through this camp, one of
had choices in the design challenge assignments, the level to which thechallenge responsibility was predetermined by the teacher or instructional resources,3 and theinclusion of general engineering design cycle stages as outlined by Nadelson and colleagues,3Our goal was to determine the extent of and relationship among levels of engineeringresponsibility, attention to the design cycle, and inclusion of educational innovations inrelationship to how K-12 teachers planned to teach engineering. Prior to discussing our methodsand sharing our results, we lay a bit of groundwork for our report.Educational InnovationsThe needs of the 21st century engineer extend far beyond expertise with applying mathematicsand science to create new tools and
students an amazing experience in working closely with the industrial sponsor on a real problem. Attribute 4: Students apply broad perspectives to their work. In addition to focusing on the technical aspects of project work, students in the IDEAS studios are encouraged to consider broader perspectives to understand how their efforts influence and are impacted by global, societal, and economic drivers. We provide instruction on design thinking, encouraging students to practice empathy with users and to look beyond their current circumstances and locality. Students are also encouraged to consider the tailend of scaling and implementation. Often in the IDEAS studios, students struggle with the idea of how to deliver value to users through new
Paper ID #14992Advancing Engineering Education through Technology-Driven Teaching In-novationsDr. Mohamed Yousef Ismail, Texas A&M University - Qatar Mohamed Y. Ismail received the B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA, in 1989, and the M.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, in 1992 and 1997, respectively. He is currently a Senior IT Consultant with Texas A&M University at Qatar, since 2014. During 2013 and 2014, he taught a course on cyber security for the University of Maryland
demanded (Menary, 2007),the design challenge presented to students, such as design only, or design-to-make, ultimatelyresults in differences in specific processes identified. As Table 3 illustrates, the design challengepresented to students varied across research studies. Kelley (2008) and Welch and Lim (2000)use cognitive processes that extend beyond reasoning skills and include building, modeling,measuring. Using the same coding scheme as Kelley (2008), Strimel’s (2014) examination ofstudents in interaction with an engineering problem extended through the designing of a solutionto the making and evaluation of final solutions to include processes of experimentation andtesting. Yet, when a verbal protocol analysis is employed for analyzing a
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessment of K-12 outreach group project highlighting multidisciplinary approaches in the oil and energy industryAbstract A need exists to inspire female high school students to study engineering, and one approachis to expose students to the different engineering disciplines and highlight current technologicalproblems that require multidisciplinary approaches. The objective of a week-long residentialsummer program was to introduce high school females to six engineering disciplines andmultidisciplinary approaches through interactive topic lessons, a real-world group project andprofessional development sessions to excite female students about current
for continuous engineering education would be the creation of aseamless value chain in which a college of engineering would coordinate activities that benefitstudents from age 5 to 105. In such a value chain, alumni and other area technical professionalswould have access to non-credit opportunities for professional development that local, regionaland other employers actively support. Through such an inclusive ecosystem, we could deploy ametaphor of a system of systems of value-added activities that supports learning among K-12,college, graduate school, and engineering professionals. A university’s college of engineeringcan create a unique role for itself by brokering such activities. In this role, the need for marketfeedback for process
Paper ID #16706Instilling an Entrepreneurial Engineering Mindset through a Freshman De-sign CourseProf. Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is an associate professor at University of Detroit Mercy (UDM), He teaches design, in- novation and entrepreneurship. He received his Ph.D. from Wayne State University and joined UDM in 2001. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Instilling an Entrepreneurial Engineering Mindset through a Freshman Design CourseAbstractThe course “Fundamentals of Engineering Design” was developed at University of
Paper ID #15735Improving Student Retention Through a Redesigned First-Year EngineeringClassDr. Jonathan Backens, Christopher Newport University Jonathan Backens is an assistant professor of electrical engineering at Christopher Newport University (CNU). He received his Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from Old Dominion University in 2014 and his B.S. in computer engineering from CNU in 2004.Dr. Anton Riedl, Christopher Newport University Dr. Anton Riedl is an Associate Professor of computer engineering at Christopher Newport University and currently the Chair of the Department of Physics, Computer Science and
Paper ID #16740Teaching Engineering Through the use of a Student UAS CompetitionMr. Calvin Russell Walker, Mississippi State University Mr. Calvin R. Walker (Instructor, MSU) received his B.S. from Mississippi State University in 1988 and M.S. in 2006 both in Aerospace Engineering. He went on to work in C-17 Flight Test at McDonnell Douglas in the early 90s and later in the research, development, test and evaluation of a composite quasi- constant speed propeller and composite aircraft trainer at Global Aircraft. At Raspet, he oversaw the fabrication of composite molds for Bell Helicopter’s Eagle Eye UAV and the
owner of STEMinent LLC, a company focused on STEM education assess-ment and professional development for stakeholders in K-12 education, higher education, and CorporateAmerica. Her research is focused upon the use of mixed methodologies to explore significant researchquestions in undergraduate, graduate, and professional engineering education, to integrate concepts fromhigher education and learning science into engineering education, and to develop and disseminate reliableand valid assessment tools for use across the engineering education continuum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Learning to Conduct “Team Science” through Interdisciplinary Engineering
Paper ID #16151Integrating STEM and Literacy through Engineering Design: Evaluationof Professional Development for Middle School Math and Science Teachers(Program/Curriculum Evaluation)Prof. Reagan Curtis, West Virginia University Reagan Curtis, Ph.D., is Professor of Educational Psychology and chair of the Department of Learning Sciences and Human Development at West Virginia University. He pursues a diverse research agenda in- cluding areas of interest in (a) the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge across the lifes- pan, (b) online delivery methods and pedagogical approaches to university instruction, and
female and male K-12 students: effects of a multimediaoverview on elementary, middle-, and high-school students,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(5),519-531, 2013.[18] S.L. Bem, “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,42(2), 155-163.[19] H.E.P. Cattell and A.D. Mead, “The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF),” in The SAGEHandbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 2 — Personality Measurement and Testing, London,2008.[20] J. Hogan and R. Hogan, “Big Five Personality Traits,” in Encyclopedia of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, 2004.[21] A. Tellegen and N.G. Waller, “Exploring Personality Through Test and Construction: Development of theMultidimensional Personality
most software development now takes place. These stereotypes are especially harmful toyoung students, who may feel disinclined to pursue a career that carries such a negativeconnotation. We investigate a current and successful program –the Software Factory approachwith existing undergraduates, and apply it to K-12 students. The goals of this exploratory casestudy were to counteract negative stereotypes by 1. Having K-12 students work in a team that resembled a small professional software development group, and 2. Having students work in the Software Factory –an especially designed physical space created to promote a realistic open and modern work environment. This case study aimed to address both goals through a summer
Paper ID #14909Improving the Impact of Experiential Learning Activities through the Assess-ment of Student Learning StylesDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr
There is opportunity for further explorationwith respect to a holistic model to expand work by Günsel and Açikgöz beyond softwaredevelopment projects to engineering projects in general.The measure of engineering management effectiveness used in this paper is the completion of anassigned task to meet a set of specifications within a provided time constraint. The paperinvestigates two variables: awareness of team development stages3 and use of electronics.Tuckman’s work regarding team development in small groups is simple to explain, well knownand well cited. Thus it is considered an appropriate choice for a classroom experiential learningexercise. With students today being inseparable from their technology of choice, the researcherswere also