Paper ID #15423Using Multi-Image Presentations to Enhance Continuing Engineering Edu-cationDr. Charles E. Baukal Jr. P.E., John Zink Co. LLC Charles E. Baukal, Jr. has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an Ed.D., and Professional Engineering License. He is the Director of the John Zink Institute which offers continuing professional development for engineers and technicians. He has nearly 35 years of industrial experience and 30 years of teaching experience as an adjunct. He is the author/editor of 13 books on industrial combustion and is an inventor on 11 U.S. patents.Dr. Floyd B. Ausburn, Oklahoma State University
. Eval., vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 1– 10, 2001.[12] B. M. Moskal and J. A. Leydens, “Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability,” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 71–81, 2000.[13] NASA, .[14] H. Ibarra, R. Ely, and D. Kolb, “Women rising: The unseen barriers,” Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 60– 66, 2013.
Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri - Rolla, in 2012. Prior to her current leadership position she served as Associate Vice President for Strategic Research Initiatives and as Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and STEM education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
Paper ID #14705Increasing Learner Engagement in Online Learning through Use of Interac-tive Feedback: Results of a Pilot StudyMr. Eugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Eugene Rutz is Academic Director in the College of Engineering & Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati. Responsibilities include oversight of eLearning initiatives, working with high schools on engineering coursework, and academic oversight of the Master of Engineering program. Eugene serves as co-PI on an NSF sponsored Math and Science partnership grant and PI on other grants that examine the intersection of instructional technology and
percent oftotal organizations participating in fee-based professional programs, and (b) industry sectorparticipation as a percent of total industry participation in fee-based professional programs.Figure 6.0 depicts the top participating named organizations as a percent of total organizationalparticipation. This data provides qualitative insight into areas for future focus. Simply lookingat the data from figure 6.0 provides valuable insight into which companies may be targeted forbetter understanding; this given their percent participation. In this manner, allocation ofmarketing resources could be made specific to participation rich organizations.Equally, insight extracted from figure 7.0 provides a view by industry sector. This, similar to
Research in Engineering Education: Creating a Community of Practice. (2006). 5. Chism, N. V. N., Douglas, E. & Hilson, W. J. Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators . (2010). at 6. The Regents of the University of Michigan. Center for Research and Learning and Teaching in Engineering. (2016). at 7. University of Washington. Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching. at 8. The Pennsylvania State University. The Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education. (2008). at 9. Weaver, G., Goldstein, B. & Finkelstein, N. Creating and Studying a National Network of Centers of STEM Education: Developing Foundational Infrastructure
Paper ID #14379A Return on Investment Force Multiplier of an Entrepreneurial Administra-tive Organization for Professional StudiesDr. Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, Purdue University - West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer, PMP, SPHR Dr. Springer currently serves as the Executive Director for Purdue University’s Polytechnic Institute located in West Lafayette, Indiana. He has over 35 years of theoretical and industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: Software Engineering, Systems Engineering, Program Management and Human Resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant strength in pattern recognition
Paper ID #15906Using a Blended Online Program to Teach Professional Innovation Skills andPromote Peer InteractionRonie Shilo, Stanford University Ronie Shilo is the Director of Professional Programs at the Stanford Center for Professional Development. She works with faculty and partners to extend the Stanford experience to industry, as well as build new and existing professional education programs in a variety of engineering fields. Prior to joining Stanford in 2011, Ronie has had extensive experience as an organizational psychologist and consultant, and was deeply involved in all phases of development and delivery of
the weights and graded theperformance as shown in Table 2. We quantized the grades using standard methods (10 for A, 8for B, etc.) Most of the faculty members had chosen the best faculty from their department (80%)or from the first year department (14 %). Since departments have varying numbers of facultymembers, we graded them by departments. Table 2: Sample peer evaluation scores and their derived grades (done at departmental level) Peer Evaluation Faculty Department Score Derived Grades Faculty A - 1 Dept A 31 A Faculty A - 2 Dept A 11 B Faculty A - 3 Dept A
apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies c. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes d. An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to program educational objectives e. An ability to function effectively as a member or
faculty learning communities: Considering socialdimensions of participant choice. Learning Communities Journal 2, 5–26.24 Sirium & Madigan (2010). Ibid.25 Cox (2004). Ibid.26 Haviland, Alleman, & Allen (2015). Ibid.27 Sorcinelli & Aiken (1995). Ibid.28 Allwright, R. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. LanguageTeaching Research 7(2), 113-141.29 Wenger, E., Trayner, B., and de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities andnetworks: a conceptual framework. Rapport 18, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of theNetherlands. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/documents/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf.
Signal Processing etc. He has published 40 papers in National/International Conferences/Journals and he has Co-authored two books. He is Member of IEEE and life member of ISTEProf. Jayantrao Bhaurao Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur, India Jayantrao B. Patil is working as the Principal at the R. C. Patel institute of Technology, Shirpur, India and holds appointment as a Professor in the Department of Computer Engineering. He is also serving as a Dean, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Member of Senate, Member of Academic Council, and Chairman of Board of Studies in Computer Engineering & Information Technology at the North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, India. Jayantrao’s research
Paper ID #16892Piloting Accessible Engineering Education OnlineRachel LeBlanc, WPI Rachel LeBlanc is the Executive Director of Corporate and Professional Education at Worcester Polytech- nic Institute. She manages the portfolio of non-traditional academic programs for the University including online programs, corporate education, and professional education. Rachel has over ten years of experi- ence working with faculty and industry experts to create education solutions to meet business needs. She manages a variety of functional areas including business development, marketing, product development, and operations