economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability Kirsten H. Dodson Assistant Professor, Lipscomb an ability to communicate effectively University, kirsten.dodson@lipscomb.edu the broad education necessary to understand the impact Kerry E. Patterson Execute Director, The Peugeot Center of engineering solutions in a global, economic, for Engineering Service in Developing Communities at environmental, and societal context Lipscomb University, kerry.patterson@lipscomb.edu a knowledge of contemporary issues Joseph B. Tipton Associate Professor, Lipscomb
Paper ID #20880Creating a First Year Engineering Course Utilizing the SCALE-Up MethodDr. David Joseph Ewing, The University of Texas at Arlington Earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Pensacola Christian College and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University. He spent several years teaching in a first year engineering program at Clemson University. He is now a senior lecturer at the University of Texas at Arlington, where he continues to teach first year engineering courses. Combined, he has been teaching first year engineering courses for over five years. His previous research
with all of the interpretations/conclusions of this paper. 3 N/A REFERENCES 4 31 [1]Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing 5 29 the effects of stereotype threat on African American college 6 37 students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental
tasks [3]. Throughout the process students have obtained and these could have been used by faculty tomust document and manage the project appropriately. have conversations with the team about work distribution.Students began keeping track of their time via timesheets. For example, in Figure 1 it is clear that Students A, B and DThese timesheets tracked: (1) the activities each group are contributing a similar percentage of time toward themember worked on, and (2) the self-reported time spent on project. An instructor may want to determine what iseach activity. Activity choices included: Documentation, happening with Student C. Figure 2 shows helpful trends ofProject Management, Coding
future learning activities and pursuits.Process for Becoming a World Class Engineering Student. III. Design Your Process Project LITERATURE REVIEW The Design Your Process For Becoming A World Class Engineering Student project (DYP) is a nationally adoptedI. Framework: Self-Regulated Learning reflective activity originally developed by Raymond B. Landis [11] and Steffen Peuker [12, 13]. The primary purposeFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 – August 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL
Paper ID #20939Motivation Profiles of Non-Major Computer Programmers in a Flipped Class-room EnvironmentLauren Miranda LingarAbbey WilliamsDr. Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #20945Third year assessment of a student-based mentorship program for first-yearenvironmental engineering studentsJoanne F. Uleau, Environmental Engineering Program, University of Colorado- Boulder Joanne Uleau graduated from West Chester University in PA with a BS degree in Elementary Education. Currently she is the Undergraduate Academic Advisor in Environmental Engineering. She was awarded the Outstanding Staff Advisor Award in 2016, she holds the place as chair for the Advisors Council and graduation ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Kaitlin E. Mallouk, William T. Riddell, Karl B. Dyer Rowan University, mallouk@rowan.edu, riddell@rowan.edu, dyerk@rowan.eduAbstract - In a freshman engineering course, one measurements, units and dimensions, statistics, engineeringobjective is to introduce multidisciplinary teams of economics, etc.), as well as to develop the professionalengineering students to unifying engineering and science skills outlined in the ABET A-K outcomes. In the secondprinciples such as mass, momentum and energy semester, students from six engineering majors work inbalances; materials; thermodynamics, and electricity interdisciplinary teams on faculty-designed projects thatand magnetism using a
THREE C’S MINDSET BEHAVIORALengineering design classes. The paper describes the OUTCOME OUTCOME (ACTION)context and background of two vertically integrated (ATTITUDE)classes. Example work from students show the CURIOSITY 1. Inherently a. Observes surroundings tointerpretation of the entrepreneurial mindset. A survey interested in a wide recognize opportunitymeasures the effectiveness of the entrepreneurial mindset variety of things b. Explores multiple
engineeringENGR 101 is a 4-credit course meeting for 90 minutes of students are assigned to MATH 111 Calculus I (the desiredlecture two times a week, and 90 minutes of recitation and "normal path"); or to MATH 110 University Mathematics B90 minutes of lab meeting once a week. The total population II (pre-calculus, one course away from the "normal path");of students will be divided into a group of 90 students per or to MATH 108 University Mathematics B II (pre-calculus,common lecture and 30 students for both recitation and lab. two courses away from the "normal path").The structure of ENGR 101 is loosely based on the WSU MATH 108 engineering students who took ENGR 101 weremodel. The course was changed to cater
students, it is important to exploreand understand as much as possible about the many factorsthat can influence a student’s decision to stay or leaveengineering. At Virginia Tech we collect data while studentsare in enginering and also ask students who leave thecollege of engineering to complete an optional exit survey.Future plans for this work may include gathering morequalitative data to further unpack the significance of thedata. REFERENCES[1] First Year Experiences at Virginia Tech. (n.d.). Retrieved February 02, 2017, from https://www.fye.vt.edu/[2] Jones, B. D., Ruff, C., & Osborne, J. W. (2015). Fostering Students’ Identification With Mathematics and Science. In Interest in mathematics
science students. Together, these experiencesbased mentoring experience which pairs first-year pre- encourage ECS students throughout their first year to makeengineering students with an upper-division student connections with other students, faculty, and staff, identifymentor. This year-long program allows mentors to useful resources, and develop intellectually, socially, andinvest in students one-on-one as they walk alongside spiritually. At the end of the pre-engineering year, first-yearthem throughout their pre-engineering year. These students select their major in engineering once they meet theapproaches to peer leading, although vastly different, progression requirements, a B
the resources, inspiration, and continued efforts to improve first-year TABLE II engineering programs. ANOVA P-VALUE RESULTS Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 REFERENCES Gross Engineering 0.0042*** 0.0032*** 0.9620 Persistence Rate: [1] Landis, R. B., Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Net Engineering Career, 4th Edition. Los Angeles
and novel instructional methods.high school. Eng One is common to all departments. Upon IMPLEMENTATIONcompleting 11 courses within three semesters, students withsufficient academic standing are promoted to second year To facilitate student engagement, the Faculty of Engineering(“Term 3”). Academic Terms 3 through 8 alternate with 4- and Applied Science employs a First Year Engagementmonth mandatory co-op work placements. Approximately Coordinator. The coordinator is responsible for a) facilitating70-80% of Eng One students meet the promotion professional learning opportunities, b) promotingrequirements for Term 3
their project around. Each group mustthat were experienced in using the data that the students could select a freely available large data set from the internet.select from. The students in that section presented their Repositories for these data sets include kaggle.com andprojects as both posters, viewable by students and faculty in hadoopilluminated.com. Some examples include crimethe College of Engineering, and as videos posted online. statistics for Philadelphia, a bike sharing system in Boston,Instructor B had slightly fewer students at 68, but provided a and air quality data from Italy. Once they select the data, themore detailed framework for the project. The students in that groups must define their
general information; they were not program, a total of 38 students enrolled in three pre-calculusfamiliar with exact cut-off scores for these placements. Even courses: MATH107 (University Mathematics B I),when these cut off scores were communicated to students, MATH108 (University Mathematics I-B), and MATH 110they found it difficult to follow. The cut off scores for Fall (University Mathematics B II - Trigonometry and2017 entering class, who will be tested in Spring and Differential Calculus). As indicated in Figure 6, 35 studentsSummer 2017: moved to next course in Mathematics sequence by securing For placement in Math 111 (Calculus-I
, no. 4, 2000, pp. 63-85.did this, for example in asking the mentors to come to class [6] Pejcinovic, B., et al. “Assessing Student Preparedness forand talk about their work experience, expectations were met. Introductory Engineering and Programming Courses,” accepted forWhen we were less clear, for example regarding continuing FIE 2017.contact after the class meeting, results were less successful. [7] Ringenberg, J., et al., “The Programming Performance Prophecies: Predicting Student Achievement in a First-Year IntroductoryIn addition to making
Session W1A Adapting the S.I.M. (System, Interactions, and Model) physics problem solving strategy to Engineering Statics and an application to frictional forces on screws Lu Li Sacramento City College, lil@scc.losrios.edu or lulimail@yahoo.comAbstract – Many students struggle with Engineering research group, provides an overarching theme to tie physicsStatics, a core lower-division Engineering class. Current concepts together and to generate deeper understanding.education research suggests using
Session XXX Work in Progress: An Organized Team SelfSelection Process for First Year Engineering Design Projects Robert Gettens, Harlan Spotts, Jingru Zhang and Changhoon Lee Western New England University, robert.gettens@wne.edu, harlan.spotts@wne.edu, jingru.zhang@wne.edu, chanhoon.lee@wne.eduAbstract – The purpose of this work in progress is to of their own efforts. The thought of having their ownpresent a method of project development and team success be dependent on the efforts of someone else cancreation that is student driven. There are a variety of provoke anxiety. Often times these students
Paper ID #20930Understanding the Processes and Challenges Students’ Experience Solvingan Open-Ended ProblemDr. Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Courtney is a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the College of Engineering Honors Program at the University of Tennessee. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering & Science Education at Clemson University. Prior to her Ph.D. work, she received her B.S. in Bioengineering at Clemson University and her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University. Courtney’s research interests include epistemic cognition in the context of problem solving
on large, required, lower level classes, but several higheropportunities; the increased comfort and understanding level classes saw significant student demand as well. In fallthat comes from working with a peer; and greater 2016, both student-scheduled one-on-one sessions (“on-financial efficiency compared to hiring professional demand”) and drop-in group tutoring (“drop-in”) weretutors or additional TAs. Additionally, peer tutoring is available to students. In spring 2017, only on-demandknown to have positive academic and personal impact on tutoring was offered because of lack of interest in the drop-intutors as well. Recognizing these potential benefits, the format