women are under-represented.INTRODUCTIONExtension Services for Undergraduate Programs (ES-UP) at the National Center for Women &Information Technology (NCWIT) employs a multi-pronged, systemic approach to increasing theenrollment and retention of women in undergraduate computing departments. ES-UP advocatesimproving the environment for all students using research-based strategies that correspond to thesix components of the NCWIT ES-UP Systemic Change Model. The components include creatinga Recruiting Strategic Plan; retaining students with Inclusive Pedagogy, Curriculum, and StudentSupport; securing appropriate Institutional Policies and Support; and finally, implementing acomprehensive Evaluation and Tracking System (See Figure 1.)Figure 1
, skills) (Matheis & VTInterCom, 2015) 10Module 1: Communication and Conflict (Matheis & VTInterCom, 2015) 11Module 2: Identity and Culture (Matheis & VTInterCom, 2015) 12Module 3: Ethics and Diversity Thinking Believing Knowing The Null Three paradigms Cherry Picking Curriculum of diversity The principle of The Fallacy of (The Golden Rule, charity Confirming Right the Wrongs, Instances Value
inclusion in the K-12 space, and navigation in engineering culture.Dr. Elizabeth Birr Moje c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 “What the problem really was…”: A preliminary exploration of youth problem definition in everyday contexts.Introduction Throughout the history, one consistent theme is the interplay between technology andsociety. In persistent cyclical iteration, members of a society require new tools to meet newchallenges, having been brought to these challenges by tools in the first place (see [1]). Forexample, the more advanced cell phone technology becomes, there is a higher demand forinnovative features [2]. It stands to reason then that the technology
novel ways of connecting with relevantaudience. Our analysis demonstrates that diversity initiatives related to STEM attract voices fromvarious entities including individuals, large corporations, media outlets, and community interestgroups.IntroductionThe term “STEM education” refers to teaching and learning in the fields of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics. According to Sanders (2008), in the 1990s, the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) “SMET” was the shorthand for “science, mathematics, engineering, andtechnology” and an NSF program officer complained that “SMET” sounded too much like “smut,”that resulted in the new acronym “STEM” [1]. Although it took some time for STEM to catch on,and even as recently as 2003 few people know
scienceexperiences.IntroductionSince the early 1990s, researchers have been exploring the reasons for the gender disparity inSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) and developing interventions designed toincrease the numbers of women entering STEM fields. Experts agree that a diverse STEMworkforce leads to global competitiveness and better economic outcomes for all involved [1]. Ina 2009 study of for-profit corporations, Herring found that gender diversity in the workforcecould be connected to greater sales, more customer acquisitions and ultimately larger profits [2].Additionally, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects growth rates for STEM occupationsof about 13% between 2012 and 2022, which is faster than average for all occupations. Workersin STEM
for disaggregatedstudent populations is limited, making the development of a baseline to measure progressdifficult.Community college students are often excluded from conversations surrounding broadeningparticipation in STEM – particularly in ECS fields, where they are significantlyunderrepresented. Community college is a particularly popular pathway for underrepresentedminority students. In 2012, approximately 56 percent of Hispanic undergraduates, 53 percent ofAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native undergraduates, and 49 percent of Black undergraduates wereenrolled in community colleges across the United States [1]. Among women, 44 percent ofundergraduate students were enrolled in community colleges in 2012 [2].Given that over 80 percent of first
one source of information on how to movetoward parity with national demographics, national reports—produced by organizations, suchas the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the National Society of Black Engineers(NSBE), and committees, such as the Committee on Women in Science and Engineering(CWSE)—are an underutilized source of insights. This paper presents the results of a modifiedumbrella review of 29 national reports published during 1974–2016 related to broadeningparticipation of underrepresented groups in STEM. The reports in this analysis included 134unique recommendations, which were synthesized into five themes, broadly labeled: (1)Practices, (2) Policies, (3) Culture & Climate, (3) Information & Knowledge, and (4
: ARE, EVE, COECurrent Structure and Organizations • WEP Program Coordinator Oversight • WEP Staff Support • All Officers Included • Listserv for All Officers Communication (Undergrad List; Grad List) • GroupMe for Presidents Communication • Central WEP Webpage Linking to Each OrganizationCurrent Structure and Organizations Facilitated by WEP: 3 Big Retreats Annually: 1. Fall Kick-off Retreat 2. Spring Kick-off Retreat
Stonewall1, Michael Dorneich1, PhD, Jane Rongerude2, PhD, Cassandra Dorius3, PhD 1 Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University 2 Community and Regional Planning, Iowa State University 3 Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University The use of teams and team-centric pedagogies such as Team Based Learning (TBL) in classrooms has been shown to increase engagement and lead to better overall learning outcomes. Active learning pedagogies such as TBL are also promoted as
., Fath, K. Q., Howes, S. D., Lavelle, K. R., & Polanin, J. R. (2013). Developing the leadership capacity and leader efficacy of college women in science, technology, engineering, and math fields. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 6-23.Ewrin, L., & Maurutto, P. (1998). Beyond access: Considering gender deficits in science education. Gender and Education, 10(1), 51-69.Fischer, D. V., Overland, M., & Adams, L. (2010). Leadership attitudes and beliefs of incoming first-year college students. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(1), 1-16.A WiSE approach: Examining how service-learning impacts first-year women in STEM 16Haber, P. (2012). Perceptions of leadership: An examination of college students
the senior women faculty, the second summittook place NC State and was a mini-summit specifically structured for senior underrepresentedminority women engineering faculty interested in leadership; 25 full professors and faculty 2years away from full professor attended. The senior women focused on identifying best practicesin cross-cultural mentoring, leading in the academy, professional development activities (e.g.,NSF program director, AAAS Fellows) and developing a collective voice in the academy forissues that go beyond diversity and mentoring, and laid the groundwork for the final summit.Figure 1: Participants in second summit held at California Institute of Technology in 2009The third summit for 60 women of all ranks, was co-sponsored by
inrecruitment, hiring, and promotion policies and strategies to improve institutional climate. In theCOE, ADVANCE seminar alumni thus far include the dean, four of five associate deans, four offive school heads, and 11 other engineering faculty with both direct and indirect means forsupporting change.College context and the strategic planIn June 2014 the College of Engineering began a strategic planning process and in May 2015celebrated adoption of Creating a better future — A strategic plan for the Oregon StateUniversity College of Engineering 2015-2020. The plan is framed around four Strategic Goalsrelating to (1) community, (2) transformational education, (3) research and innovation, and (4)partnerships. Goal 1 in particular commits the college to
recent challenges in the designand development of wearable technologies within the health and wellness space (i.e. connectedfitness technologies/devices), this paper presents a case study in engaging Afrofuturism inimagining more inclusive, equitable, and just future concepts. Moreover, thoughts are offered inhow this infusing of both the value and relevancy of diversity in thought and perspective inengineering could increase the participation of blacks/African-Americans in engineering.The case for inclusive engineering designAs engineers seek means by which to design, develop, and deploy technologies in meeting thegrand challenges for engineering in the 21st Century [1], it is important that engineers, think andact, specifically, imagine - more
Very muchA person who.. like me like me me like meThinks it’s valuable to findways to apply the world’s 4 123scientific knowledge 3 4 1 2Feels finding an answer toa new engineering problemis thrillingThinks engineersdiscussing newtechnologies and how they 4 3 1 2operate is importantThinks advances inengineering can solve 4 2 1 3many of the world’sproblems Not at all Not Like Very muchA person who.. like me like me me like meThinks it’s valuable to findways to apply the
-representedamongthestudentswhoreceivelowgradesinourtargetcourses.Thispresentationwilldiscusstheimpactofourcurricularchangesthusfar.Inaddition,wewillfocusonthesuccessratesoftheflippedclassroomapproachonstudentswithdifferentethnicities.Introduction SanJoséStateUniversity(SJSU),inpartnershipwithCaliforniaStateUniversity-LosAngeles(CSULA)andCaliforniaStatePolytechnicUniversity,Pomona(CPP),wasawardedaprestigiousFirstintheWorld(FITW)grant,fundedbytheDepartmentofEducation[1].GrantactivitieswereinspiredbySJSU’sFourPillarsofStudentSuccessinitiative[2]andrecognitionofthelowerratesofsuccessforunder-representedminoritygroupsamongSTEMstudentpopulations.Inparticular,thegrantfullysupportscollaborativedevelopmentacrossthecampusesofflippedclassroommaterialsforsevengatewaySTEMcoursesidentifiedtohavehighDFWrates(i.e.gradesofDorF,orwithdrawalfromthecourse
alone are insufficient in explaining a disparity in academicachievement between upper and lower income students. Not only do low-income and first-generation students encounter obstacles such as a lack of academic preparation and access toinformation about the college experience [1], but these students may also have internalizedbeliefs that hinder their academic achievements. A culmination of external and internalinfluences has resulted in a lack of representation of socioeconomically disadvantaged and first-generation students throughout academia [2]. Students’ metacognitions about their abilities andfeelings of affiliation with their institutions have been associated with academic performance.While there is much diversity within the population
body of engineering education literature [1-3] that addresses the need to improvegender and ethnic diversity, there remains a gap in scholarship that addresses the need to improve accessfor STEM students with disabilities. As such, in this paper, we aim to examine and report efforts aroundinclusion of engineering students with disabilities at a large, public Research I Institution, and providerecommendations for improving and such initiatives.Background The AAAS Resource Directory of Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities first published in1978 and now in its fourth edition [4] presents data and statistics on people in science and engineeringwith disabilities and includes details on type of disability, age of onset, ethnicity, and
isolation and impostor syndrome were exacerbated by negativeinteractions with their Asian international peers. Data were collected through semi-structuredinterviews with 23 Black PhD students regarding their doctoral experiences. Across theinterviews, participants expressed similar experiences in their programs: 1) Feelings of racialisolation from underrepresentation among their peers, 2) Perceptions that Asian peers werepositioned to be in STEM which made Black students feel as though they were impostors in theiracademic fields 3.) Interactions with Asian peers that challenged their sense of belonging in theirdepartments and programs, leading them to feel increased isolation and minimal support. Thisresearch affirms the need to create and employ
effort to recruit and enrollunderrepresented minority (URM) engineering students in an effort to broaden participation inengineering [1]. Access to financial resources is essential for many of these students in theirpursuit of higher education since they are disproportionately represented in lower incomebrackets and are more likely to be Pell eligible [2]. In an attempt to recruit these students, theUniversity of Colorado Boulder (UCB) developed a campus-wide “CU Promise” program toassist Pell Grant eligible students with college tuition and fees.The CU Promise program committed to provide enough grants to Pell Grant eligible students tocover the student portion of tuition and fees. However, after students committed to attend theuniversity for
background helps me feel like I belong here/fit in my with program; and as agraduate student, I feel like a fraud. Methods This study sought to understand whether there are differences in international anddomestic majority and minority student perceptions about campus climate focusing on aspects offaculty and peer interactions. As such, the following research question guided this study: (1)CLIMATE AND ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTS 8Are there differences in perceptions of campus climate between international, domestic minority,and domestic majority students? To answer this research question in our study, we used anAnalysis of the
wereexcluded from further analysis. This left us with roughly 800 qualified participants, or 16% of the Cal Polyengineering student population. 13% of respondents reported having been previously diagnosed with amental health condition, and 11% reported that they were in active treatment for a mental healthcondition at the time of taking the survey. 96% of respondents are undergraduates, while the remaining4% are from Master’s programs.A demographic breakdown of respondents is shown in Tables 1-4. To avoid the possibility of singling outor stigmatizing any one population, a breakdown of mental health results by demographic is notincluded in this publication. Table 1. Respondent's year in program. Year in Program
Intersection of Professional and Personal Identity of African American Engineering StudentsLow enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of African American engineering students in theUnited States are a cause for concern [1]. Consequently, over the last decade there has been anupsurge of research identifying factors that have contributed to the problems encountered byAfrican American students in higher education institutions in general, and in STEM fields inparticular [2, 3]. The key factors identified as contributing to the attrition of minority AfricanAmerican students include perceptions of racism on campus, internalization of stereotypes,feelings of alienation and rejection, and inadequate support systems [4, 5]. In this
-disciplinary team lies in qualitative methodologies, cultural theory and the belief that outliers offer great insight into the workings of power. Her research interests include cultural theory, the cultural/historical construction of women’s identities and roles in past and present societies, and most recently, equity issues surrounding gender and underrepresented populations in engineering education. She can be contacted at cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Critiquing the "Underrepresented Minorities" Label: Disrupting InequitySusan E. Walden, Deborah A. Trytten, Randa L. Shehab, and Cindy E. FoorResearch Institute for STEM Education, Gallogly College of
year 3Background and Context• STEM Teaching Fellowship: – Teachers apply in school teams of 3-4; typical composition includes both science and mathematics teachers, mostly middle school – Three main strands: STEM Integration, Core Teaching Practices, Schoolwide STEM Strategic Plan 4Background and Context• Approach to STEM Integration Strand – Experience STEM integration as learners – Reflect and unpack as educators – Introduce tools, strategies, and templates to empower teaching fellows to engage their students in STEM Integration• Summer 1: Platform Design• Summer 2: Flint Experience
the SOEhas around 1000 students.The report summarized the design of the forum as well as the results generated. The first halfof the forum focused on the expression of the experience of underrepresented students.Students worked in small groups to discuss the following questions: 1. When has there been a time in which your race or gender led to you being treated differently, by either a faculty member, staff, or student? 2. In the School, when have you felt proud or confident as a student of color or woman student? 3. When have you felt ashamed or marginalized as a student of color or woman student? 4. How supported do you feel in the School of Engineering? 5. How accepted do you feel in the School of Engineering
continued growth, serving every student is a realistic possibility.This paper examines student persistence in the VIP course sequence, and provides an overviewof the VIP Program, including common elements across VIP sites, prior research on studentinteractions within teams by race/ethnicity, and aspects of the Georgia Tech implementation ofVIP which may contribute to student diversity within the program. Findings indicate thatstudents of different races and ethnicities persist in the VIP course sequence at equal rates.IntroductionUndergraduate research is recognized as a high impact experience, which means it is correlatedwith higher graduation rates and greater gains in undergraduate learning [1]–[3]. While highimpact experiences benefit all
learning practice are presented and discussed,and transformative outcomes that can be linked to seminar participation presented.IntroductionWomen have historically been underrepresented within the ranks of tenured or tenure-trackfaculty with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines [1]. This isespecially so at higher academic ranks. The National Science Foundation (NSF) has recognizedthis issue and has been funding Institutional Transformation (IT) projects geared towardsremedying this shortcoming. In fall 2014 Oregon State University (OSU) received such anaward, created OREGON STATE ADVANCE, and established its overarching goal to serve as acatalyst for advancing the study and practice of equity, inclusion, and social
, regional, and local levels and authored journal articles, book chapters, policy briefs, and other publications on Latina/o student success.Ms. Mackenzie Sissel, Iowa State UniversityRonnia Estes, Iowa State UniversityDr. Erin Doran, Iowa State University Dr. Erin Doran is an Assistant Professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018LATINAS ENGINEERING IDENTITY 1 Engineering Identity for Latina Undergraduate Students: Exploring Development and Intersecting Identities Latina/o students remain underrepresented in the engineering industry
and interacting set of studentperceptions arose from the data For example, a commonly expressed theme in the focus groupswas the relative sense of gender parity in our engineering programs, but participants across theboard consistently shared experiences of gendered microaggressions. The findings suggestavenues for future research, as well as provide insights for interventions to improve the climateand experiences of underrepresented students.IntroductionResearch on student choice of and persistence in engineering majors emphasizes the importanceof students’ identification with a major or career in motivating their persistence and success [1-3]. Despite durable myths that students leave engineering primarily due to the difficulty of
performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering vs. Technology: Toward Understanding the Factors Influencing the Academic and Career Pathways of African American StudentsThe American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) reported that in 2016 the percentagesof bachelor’s degrees in engineering and engineering technology that were awarded to Black orAfrican American students were 3.9% and 8.6%, respectively. The report “EngineeringTechnology Education in the United States” by the National Academies Press [1] cites a similarstatistic for the share of four-year degrees in