professor at Rowan University. In this role, he helped develop a series of experiments for a freshman engineering course that explored introductory engineering concepts through chocolate manufacturing, and another series of experiments involving dissolvable thin films for a similar course. Alex is also the president of the Syracuse University Chapter of ASEE, and has been working diligently with his executive board to provide seminars and workshops for their fellow graduate students. Alex’s plans upon graduation involve becoming a professor or lecturer, specifically at a primarily undergraduate institution.Ms. Shelby Buffington, Syracuse UniversityDr. James H. Henderson, Syracuse UniversitySally B. Mitchell, Rye High School
Paper ID #21328Student Perceptions of Engineering Based Upon Board Game ParticipationAlexis Basantis, Rowan University Alexis graduated from Rowan University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a minor in Bio- logical Sciences. While there, she dedicated her time to performing engineering outreach and research surrounding the gender gap in STEM. Currently, she is pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research is centered around studying human factors and safety in transportation at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.Megan DiPietroantonioAmy B. Geary, Rowan UniversityMelanie V
featured pre-defined inquiry questions and design problems,pre-planned investigations, did not ask for model generation, and did not call for mathematizingbeyond very simple linear measurement. Though Practice 8 was demonstrated in Classroom B,there was little opportunity for it in Classroom A, so it was not included in the analysis.This review informed the decision to focus on practices 4, 6, and 7, which involve working withdata, explaining phenomena, designing solutions, and engaging in argument from evidence. Toanalyze the student data for these three practices, we broke them down into sub-practicesaccording to NGSS Appendix F [1] for grade band 3 to 5 (see Table 1).For each classroom, we coded for sub-practices first with the richer data
further studies in STEM?Eighty-three percent (84%) of the parents whose daughters returned for the summer of 2017reported that their daughters’ grades in mathematics and science had improved since attendingthe FEMME program in 2016. A few of the comments include; • My child's grade in science improved after attending NJIT last summer. She went from a B student to an A+ student. • She had B's last year and now she has all A's • She was placed a grade ahead in 7th grade math even though she is a 6th grader. Her grades did go down first term but are going back up.Seventy-four percent (74%) of the parents reported that their daughters’ attitude towards theirmathematics and science classes improved since attending the FEMME program in 2016. A
Not every participant was Strongly Disagree At the end of the interested in pursuing a career in Electrical Engineering. Based on lab, I am more an asked open-ended question, curious about many student had already chosen Electrical I found the B-To-D Converter a useful tool to a different career path other than understand decimal to binary
] J. V. Wertsch, Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.[7] R. S. Schwartz and B. A. Crawford, "Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science: Identifying critical element," in Scientific inquiry and nature of science, ed: Springer, 2006, pp. 331-355.[8] L. Vygotsky, "Interaction between learning and development," Readings on the development of children, vol. 23, pp. 34-41, 1978.[9] J. A. Mejia, A sociocultural analysis of Latino high school students' funds of knowledge and implications for culturally responsive engineering education: Utah State University, 2014.[10] R. R. Valencia and D. G. Solórzano, "Contemporary deficit thinking," The evolution of
on applications of nanotechnology and materials scienceconcepts. Two annual events crown the intervention: a) an annual club meeting at the universitycampus, and b) a Nanodays event, where each club conducts nanotechnology demonstrations attheir own schools. Furthermore, a group of high school students and teachers is selected toparticipate in a 4-week Summer Research Program, in the Center’s laboratories. Collegeadmissions data show that 75% (N=12) of the research summer program participants and 42% ofstudents admitted from schools with MSE clubs have enrolled at UPRM, with a 94% second-year retention rate. For the schools with MSE clubs, between 49% and 75% of students whochose to major in Science, Engineering or Technology programs were
. 17 References[1] S. J. Poole , and J. F. Sullivan. "Assessing K-12 pre-engineering outreachprograms," Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 1, pp. 11B5-15, 1999.[2] J. J. Kuenzi, "Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education:Background, federal policy, and legislative action." 2008.[3] S.Y .Yoon, M. Dyehouse, A. M. Lucietto, H. A.. Diefes‐Dux, and B. M. Capobianco, "Theeffects of integrated science, technology, and engineering education on elementary students'knowledge and identity development," School Science and Mathematics, 114, no. 8, pp.380-391,2014.[4] T. J. Moore, and K. M. Tank,"Nature-‐Inspired Design: A PictureSTEM Curriculum forElementary STEM Learning," 2014.[5] T
question: From the principal’sperspective, what high school level local and contextual factors contribute to the variation inenrollment into 4-year University engineering programs?Site and Participant DescriptionThree schools are under investigation in this WIP study: High School A (HSA), High School B(HSB), and High School C (HSC). The case site that encompasses these three high schools is aprimarily rural geographic region. U.S. Census (2016) indicates the county containing these highschools has a population of approximately 80,000 - 120,000 and a median household income of$40,000 - 60,000. Ranges were reported instead of the actual values to obscure the identity of thecounty. Based on the ranges of secondary school size provided by Grauer (2012
-centered and learner-oriented [3], [9], [10].Bransford, Brown, and Cocking (2000) reported that an effective learning environment includesthe following four characteristics: (a) knowledge-centeredness, (b) learner-centeredness, (c)assessment-centeredness, and (d) community-centeredness [3]. A knowledge-centeredinstruction develops conceptual understanding and organization of the knowledge in the field. Ina learner-centered environment, students’ pre-conceptions and alternative conceptions areexplored prior to teaching, and the instruction focuses on what students know, what they want toknow, and how they will use the knowledge. Assessment centeredness provides frequentopportunities for formative feedback over the course of the learning, and the
Paper ID #22274’Helped Me Feel Relevant Again in the Classroom’: Longitudinal Evaluationof a Research Experience for a Teachers’ Program in Neural Engineering(Evaluation)Ms. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Sensorimo- tor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington, where she is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development. Previously, Kristen worked as an ed- ucational consultant offering support in curriculum design and publication. She received her M.Ed. in
abilities of most high school STEM teachers. Pre-planning with these circuit boards was a significant factor in the project’s success (Appendix B).Results and AnalysisResults from the 2017 implementation cycle are presented in this paper; these results indicatethat the unit successfully met its three objectives. Results from the 2018 cycle, in which a fewimprovements to the unit were incorporated, will be included once they are available.Objective 1: Before starting the unit, all 59 students were given a survey with twenty statementsadapted from the Friday Institute highschool S-STEM survey [9], NGSS 21stCentury skills statements, and NGSSengineering design standards. Thesewere grouped according to threethemes: students’ interest inengineering (ex
. Art was incorporated into different parts of the curriculum, from decorating prosthetic fingers as a consideration of the importance of aesthetics to the user, to the final slideshow to communicate the process of building their Arduinocontrolled model. To evaluate the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary Sensory Substitution curriculum, student selfassessments were administered. In the pilot year, only general questions were asked at the end of the unit (Appendix B). Students were able to selfassess their ability to perform a certain skill as “Yes,” “I’m getting there,” or “Not Yet.” In the second year, students selfassessed their change in skill level in building circuits, programming an Arduino, communicating neuroscience
PM PM (a) (b)Figure 1: (a) PD participants conducting hands-on learning activities during guided training and (b) PD participants discussing research projects3.3. Research and industry interaction phase: During the four-week collaborative research phase,to experience the process and challenge of conducting authentic engineering research, teachersworked individually or in teams to collaborate with and contribute to ongoing projects (discussedin Section 4) involving graduate, undergraduate, and high school researchers, and facultymembers. The research collaborations allowed teachers to practice and
understand engineering language, the first step in using engineering language in theclassroom is through teachers’ use of engineering terminology. Therefore, this study exploreshow a teacher used engineering language during the science- and mathematics-focused lessons ofan engineering design-based STEM integration curricular unit. Specifically, this purpose ofexploring how a teacher uses engineering language is represented two research questions: a)What engineering language does a teacher use during science- and mathematics-focusedlessons?, and b) When in each lesson and in what contexts is engineering language used?Theoretical frameworkIn Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of learning, the principle belief is that one’s internalconsciousness is
. 4. Study is empirical (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods). Empirical studies need to meet the following criteria: (a) state a research question, purpose, or hypothesis; (b) include a methods section with explicit mention of methods of data sources and data analysis; and (c) include results or findings that stem from the analysis. With this criterion in mind, theoretical papers and thought pieces are excluded from this study. 5. Participants in the study must develop or use evidence-based claims. 6. The evidence-based claims must relate to the designed world (e.g. devices or processes created by humans). 7. Meta-analyses or literature reviews should be excluded.Based
. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-374). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.[5] Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2010). Help wanted: Projections of jobs and education requirements through 2018. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from http://georgetown.app.box.com/s/ursjbxaym2np1v8mgrv7.[6] Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.[7] Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, Engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of
outcomes of this project are detailed in “Knowledge Translation forBiomedical Engineering Graduate Students”, Biomedical Engineering Division of the 2018 ASEEAnnual Meeting.Figure 3: Pilot outcomes of Discovery. (A) Exit survey results from participating high school students demonstrate ignition of curiosity andimpact on future pursuit of STEM. (B) Averaged student attendance at Discovery sessions compared to typical attendance in the school classroom(n=57 students). (C) Academic benefit to immersive learning environment. For a student cohort, grades noticeably increased for Discoverydeliverables compared to course average for lower achieving students (four sample selected by course; each symbol represents one student). (D-E)Impact on skill
Council, Report of a Workshop on the Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. Washington, D.C.: The National Acadamies Press, 2011.[9] V. J. Shute, C. Sun, and J. Asbell-Clarke, “Demystifying computational thinking,” Educational Research Review. 2017.[10] J. M. Wing, “Computational Thinking,” Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 2006.[11] J. M. Wing, “Computational thinking and thinking about computing.,” Comput. Think. Think. about Comput., 2008.[12] V. Barr, C. Stephenson, and B. V. Barr, “Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?,” ACM Inroads, 2011.[13] M. Israel, J. N. Pearson, T. Tapia, Q. M. Wherfel, and G. Reese
programparticipant in that week/iteration. ⋯ 1 1 2We developed two separate Likert scales with scores between 1 to 10 to determine the weight of eachcriterion ( , ,…, , and quantitatively assess the performance level of each criterion ( , ,…, through teacher-surveys. These scales are given in Appendices A and B, respectively.6. Iterative (Weekly) Evaluation and Analyses of the Program Performance and Improvement through DBRWe conducted the surveys at the end of each week (iteration), determined the computed
," Teachers College Record, vol. 113, pp. 1311-1360, Jan 2011.7. T. Kleickmann, S., Tröbst, A. Jonen, J. Vehmeyer, & K. Möller, " The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 108, pp. 21-42, Jan. 2016.8. K. Appleton, “Elementary science teaching,” in Handbook of Research on Science Education, S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman, Eds. New York: Routledge, 2008, pp. 493– 535.9. L. Darling-Hammond, B. Berry, & A. Thoreson, "Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 23, pp. 57- 77, March 2001.10
, 2015.[12] D. B. Bradley and A. M. Kelly, “Promoting inclusiveness in acoustical physics,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, vol. 15, pp. 88-93, 2011.[13] A. M. Kelly, “Differentiating the underrepresented: Physics opportunities for Bronx high school students in a university setting,” In H. Oluseyi (Ed.), 2009 American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings Series: Vol. 1280. Joint Annual Conference of the National Society of Black Physicists and the National Society of Hispanic Physicists (pp. 176-181). Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics, 2010.[14] Project Lead the Way, “PLTW Engineering (9-12),” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.pltw.org/our-programs/pltw-engineering. [Accessed March 1, 2018
own strengths and weaknesses and how to approach long term projects and deadlines in the future [Spring 2016] …and the whole collaboration piece is huge. Because some groups, if they’re not cohesive or if somebody’s railroading the group, it dissolves pretty quickly so they learn how to deal with different personalities and learn how to work as a collaborative unit which I think is really important [Spring 2016] This student in my chemistry class had a 72 as we were going through the semester. By the end of the semester, he had brought his grade up to a B and was so much more invested in class time because he found success with this. It's something that I think he had been a little
, the programmight have been more beneficial to each participant. In the next program, we plan to implementthese changes.Overall, we received positive feedback from students and parents at the end of each session.Many parents commented on how their daughter would come back from the program excitedabout what they learned. Students told us how they took the new skills and information andbrought it to their classroom to discuss with a teacher. These positive remarks demonstrate thatour first two sessions of this new program were impactful, but there are still areas in which theprogram can improve.References Brockman, J. B. (2015). WAVES: An integrated STEM and music program for fifth grade students, ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle
Paper ID #21694Developing Engineering Proficiency and Self-Efficacy Through a Middle SchoolEngineering Course (Fundamental)Dr. Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jessica Gale is a Research Scientist II at Georgia Tech’s Center for education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on and often connects a range of topics within STEM/STEAM education including, engineering and STEM integration at the elementary and mid- dle grades levels, project-based learning across STEM disciplines, college and career readiness, design- based implementation research, and STEM student
, 97, 139-156.[7] Monte-Sano, C., & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 273-299.[8] Cervetti, G. N., & Pearson, P. D. (2012). Reading, writing, and thinking like a scientist. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55, 580-586.[9] Chauvin, R., & Theodore, K. (2015). Teaching content-area literacy and disciplinary literacy. SEDL Insights, 3(1), 1-10.[10] Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 393- 424.[11] Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home
statusupdates. 10References[1] L. Katehi, G. Pearson, and M. Feder, "The status and nature of K-12 engineering education inthe United States," The Bridge, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 5-10, 2009.[2] National Academy of Engineering, "Appendix C: 2016-2017 Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs Proposed Changes," Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET EngineeringAccreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and5): A Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press, 2016.[3] B. Hollers, "documenting the engineering design process: Documentation of ideas and theengineering design process is a critical, daily component of a
session corresponding to the motor lesson, participants wereprovided a worksheet in which the basic motor concepts were reiterated so that participants hadopportunity to review them. Next, in a simple exercise, they were asked to compute the duty cycleand power for several given PWM signals. For the first experimental activity, participantsinterfaced a 2-wire VEX motor using the L293D IC to an Arduino and programmed it to controlthe speed and direction of the motor. As a final experimental activity, the participants performeddirection and speed control of a 3-wire servo motor after calibrating it. Figure 2(a) showsparticipants building a Clawbot for this activity. (a) (b
that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee.Mrs. Susan Beth D’Amico, North Carolina State University Susan B. D’Amico Coordinator of Engineering K-12 Outreach Extension The Engineering Place College of Engineering NC State University Susan earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from NC State and has worked in the Telecom and Contract Manufacturing Industries for over 25 years as an Industrial Engineer, Process Engi- neer, Manufacturing Engineer, Project Manager, Business Cost Manager and Program Manager. Inspired by coursework she developed and presented as an engineer, her professional path made a turn
serve as mentors to the new teams. Now in its sixth year, theprogram has engaged twenty-two school and district teams, both public and private, in theprocess of strategic planning and implementation of quality STEM program.The year-long program embodies a structured, yet flexible, approach that emphasizes thatcreation of STEM integration is a process that occurs over time. The logic model for the program(Fig. 1) displays the components of the structured approach. A detailed timeline of program’sactivities is found in Appendix A, and agenda for the summer institute is found in Appendix B. Figure 1. Logic model of program outcomes, with related activities and inputsParticipant populationOver the six years of the program, 22 teams and 160