Psychopathology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 743-771, 2003.[7] M. B. Spencer, "American Identity: Impact of Youths' Differential Experiences in Society on Their Attachment to American Ideals," Applied Developmental Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 61-69, 2011/04/19 2011.[8] C. L. Outcalt and T. E. Skewes-Cox, "Involvement, Interaction, and Satisfaction: The Human Environment at HBCUs," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 331-347, 2002.[9] R. Mendoza-Denton, G. Downey, V. J. Purdie, A. Davis, and J. Pietrzak, "Sensitivity to status- based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 896-918, 2002.[10] M. Bonous
) (b) Figure 3. Screenshots illustrating the use of EMAP for modal analysis of an L-bracket. In (a) the natural frequency of the second nontrivial mode is being identified by peak picking. The corresponding mode shape is shown in (b).Results from the cantilevered beam experimentEach student team was given a rectangular aluminum beam. They clamped it to a table andattached an accelerometer to its free end, similar to the setup shown in Figure 2. The beam wasplucked to measure the acceleration time history of the beam’s tip. Students determined thebeam’s first natural frequency using a lumped mass model, a lumped mass model that includedthe mass of the accelerometer, a finite element model, and the experimental data by
., 2014). Such experience allows students andinstructors to collaboratively bridge the research and classroom and provide research experiencesfor students relative to traditional individual mentored research. Undergraduates who are involvedin research report cognitive gains such as a) learning to think and analyze, b) affective gains suchas delight, c) psychosocial gains such as belonging to a team, identifying as an effective engineer,and d) behavioral gains such as motivations to pursue graduate education or careers in engineering(Laursen et al., 2010; Lopatto and Tobias, 2010).Studies of undergraduate research experiences have been criticized for some reasons such ascounting on students to convey their own knowledge and skill gains, applying
efforts are notalways driven by experiences of the practitioners in the field. In this study, this lens is beingused to address the proposed research questions and achieve the following outcomes: A. Literature review synthesizing and highlighting the current state of research and practice around broadening the participation of African Americans; B. Innovation Cycle of Broadening Participation, a conceptual model that depicts the current relationship between research and practice in this context and outlines a national agenda for coordinating the efforts of stakeholders committed to broadening participation of African Americans in engineering and computer science.To this end, we began a three-year, NSF-funded project in
,andsustainability.WearedevelopingafacultythatembracestheredefinedengineeringcanonandtheprofessionalspinethroughfacultyempowermentworkshopsandbyhiringfacultywiththedesiretocontributetotheREDgoals.Wearealsoestablishingpartnershipstodevelopacultureofchangewithintheschoolanddevelopingprofessionalskillsincludinggreaterconnectionsbetweentechnicalknowledgeandprofessionalpracticethroughanindustry-developed“IndustryScholarsProgram.Finally,weareusinganew“GeneralEngineering”departmentasanincubatorofREDcurriculumstaffedwithclusterhiresaroundtheREDproposalthemes.References[1] Bamford, D. & Forrester, P., “Managing planned and emergent change within an operationsmanagement environment,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management,23(5), 546–564 2003.[2] Przestrzelski, B., Roberts, C., and Perry, L.,“The Industry Scholars Program: An OrganicProgram Grown by Industry Professionals for Undergraduates,” Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 24-27, 2018.[3] Fosfuria, A. & Røndeb, T., “Leveraging resistance to change and the skunk works model ofinnovation, Journal of Economic
, there is littlediscussion on the engineering faculty experiences and perceptions on the use of observationprotocols, more specifically, the use of COPUS for teaching evaluation. In this study, wecontribute to the literature by providing insight into the engineering faculty observers’experiences and perceptions. For the purposes of this study, the research team chose to use theCOPUS for a pilot study about the evaluation of teaching in the college of engineering at aMidwestern tier-one research institution. The goals of the pilot study include (a) characterizefaculty observers’ experiences making classroom observations an providing peer feedback usingthe COPUS (b) describe instructors’ perspectives on being observed and receiving peer
Paper ID #22697Development of Virtual Environment to Introduce Spatial Reasoning to First-and Second-year Engineering StudentsDr. Ulan Dakeev, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Ulan Dakeev is an Assistant Professor in Industrial Technology Department in the College of En- gineering, Texas A&M University - Kingsville. His areas of research include Virtual and Augmented Reality, renewable energy (wind energy), quality in higher education, motivation, and engagement of students.Dr. Reg Recayi Pecen, Sam Houston State University Dr. Reg Pecen is currently a Quanta Endowed Professor of the Department of Engineering
education to improve academicachievement and encourage learning [5]. Research suggests that tutoring has many positiveoutcomes affecting both tutors and tutees, including [6][7]: a. Improve students’ performance b. Improve the learning for both tutors and tutored students c. Improve overall performance in large mixed ability classes d. Help disadvantaged students academically and give them a sense of belonging to the school e. Help students develop a more positive attitude toward hard courses f. Increase social enhancementAside from its academic and social effect, Keerthana in [8] explained that "peer tutoring canprovide more than twice as much achievement than computer aided instructions and three timesmore than reducing class
final GPA of ‘A’ students is statistically higherthan the average final GPA of ‘B’ students, and both ‘A’ and ‘B’ students have astatistically higher average final GPAs than ‘C’, ‘D’, and ‘F’ students. Interestingly, theaverage final GPA of ‘C’ students is not statistically different than the average final GPAof ‘D’ students, but is higher than the average final GPA of ‘F’ students. There is nostatistical difference in average final GPA between ‘D’ and ‘F’ students. Note that thesample size of ‘F’ students is low across all courses. The ‘C’, ‘D’, and ‘F’ students in allcourses have an average final GPA below a 3.0, which is the typical industry cutoff forhiring. In all courses, ‘B’ students have an average final GPA right around the
Paper ID #21613Lessons Learned from a Chemical Engineering REU: The Importance ofTraining Graduate Students Who are Supervising REU StudentsJoseph C. Tise, Pennsylvania State University Joseph Tise is a doctoral candidate in the Educational Psychology program at Penn State University. His research interests include self-regulated learning, measurement, and connecting educational research to practice.Ms. Kirsten Susan Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a graduate assistant at Penn State Student Affairs Research and Assessment. She received her M.S. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in
Fig. 3: Technical lectures schedule in 2017 Fall semesterAfter accomplishing the training, students are awarded a certificate (Fig. 4(b)) as proof oftheir learning experience. The certificate benefits Makerspace activities in the followingaspects: to obtain the certificate, students come to the lecture and receive the training;students with the certificate have more access to Makerspace; students with the certificatehave the priority to be considered for internship opportunities from Makerspace, etc. (a) (b) Fig. 4: Technical lectures. (a) Robot training, (b) certificateHands-on project based on engineering coursesTo provide students a practice-based
) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i)Fig.1 (a-i): Shows the independent classroom survey results for section 1 (learning outcomes)during the fall 2016 and fall 2017.Newton’s laws in section 4 (Fig.1d) rated as above average by 55% of students in 2017, 7% lessthan the previous year. In both years, 30% of the students voted below average for mechanicalequilibrium (Fig.1e). “Work energy theorem” reported as above average by 29% of the class in2016 (Fig.1f) and 50% in 2017.Section 8, rigid body rotation (Fig.1h) received a lowest rating of 19% in 2016 and 25% in 2017.At the same time, it
.” Lines 1123-1133: “I feel like you should, because you should be content with whatever you get . . . like a B, if I’m not happy with it then that’s to me, that’s fine that’s not 3. Experiencing isolation as a high- unhealthy . . . but me being competitive and being upset at somebody else for getting performing student a good grade . . . that’s not healthy, because that’s not the right thing.” Lines 187-199: “I tend to make good grades and so teachers will sometimes point that out in class . . . when other people hear it that makes me uncomfortable
Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, 1991.[2] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[3] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006.[4] P. Fonseca, P. Pedreiras, P. Cabral, J. N. Matos, B. Cunha, and F. Silva, “Motivating first year students for an engineering degree,” in 2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), 2016, pp. 1–7.[5] T. Knapp, B. Fisher, and C
theimplementation of coherent and constructively aligned group-based, project-driven pedagogiesacross the electrical engineering programs.The overall objective of this study was to understand the experiences of the people in the facultylearning community and analyze any transformation that occurred. We hoped to shed light on: (a)the operation of the group; (b) the group’s role in the transformation process; and (c) the impactthe group had on participants, the program, and the program’s overarching pedagogy. Indeveloping such a description, we examined the experiences of those most active in the learninggroup as well as those who contributed to the effort but resisted joining the formal learning group.We probed individuals’ motivations, the issues and
learning in large lecture classes." Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 53 – 61, 2011.[7] G. Hampden-Thompson and J. Bennett, "Science Teaching and Learning Activities andStudents' Engagement in Science." International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35 no. 1, pp.1325-1343, 2013.[8] N.Hunsu, B. Abdul, O. Adesope, B. J., Van Wie, G., Brown, "Exploring students’perceptions of an innovative learning paradigm in a fluid mechanics and heat transfer course,"International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31 no. 5, pp. 1200 – 1213, 2015.[9] M Credéa, and L. A. Phillips (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies forLearning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 21, no 4, pp
motivate studentswithin their class by customizing course instruction and materials reflective of their students’future goals. With this additional motivation, students are more likely to use self-regulatorystudy strategies and behaviors, which has been shown to be a positive predictor of classroomsuccess [61]–[64].References[1] J. Husman and D. F. Shell, “Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2008.[2] S. E. Tabachnick, R. B. Miller, and G. E. Relyea, “The relationships among students’ future-oriented goals and subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and task-oriented self- regulation strategies in an academic environment.,” J
disciplines. a) b)Figure 1: a) IDEAS Showcase at the End of a Semester (There have been 8 events, with a participation ofapproximately 2000 students in total with more than 600 projects so far), b) IDEAS Showcase Awardees at the endof a Semester (Top 10% of the Projects are Awarded First Place)For IDEAS students are asked to form groups and work on a final project. They select a topic,preferably related to their majors, and conduct research involving some of the concepts learnedin the Engineering Analysis-Statics course. The projects involve creation of physical models,designing experiments, testing, measurements, and comparison of the experimental data with thetheoretical
, 97, 139-156.[7] Monte-Sano, C., & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 273-299.[8] Cervetti, G. N., & Pearson, P. D. (2012). Reading, writing, and thinking like a scientist. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55, 580-586.[9] Chauvin, R., & Theodore, K. (2015). Teaching content-area literacy and disciplinary literacy. SEDL Insights, 3(1), 1-10.[10] Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 393- 424.[11] Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home
examined the percentage of students in these groups who ended the first andsecond semester of introductory chemistry with a grade of B- or better. This analysis reflects aspecific goal of RESP, which is to encourage students to persist in STEM with relatively goodgrades while acknowledging that attaining the highest course grades may be out of reach formany of these students during their first year in college. Thus, RESP aims for students to finishthe semester in the top two-thirds of the course, which in most cases reflects grades of B- orbetter.Hypothesis 4: RESP participants will receive proportionately more B- or higher grades than theproportion received by control group students in first-semester chemistry.Hypothesis 5: RESP participants will
Replication. Archives of general psychiatry, 62(6), 593-602.Ludwig, D. S., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2008). Mindfulness in medicine. Jama, 300(11), 1350-1352.Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Regulation of the Neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: effects of meditative expertise. PloS one, 3(3), e1897.Mackenzie, E. (2015). Mindfulness Training: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Efficacy in Education.Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological science, 24(5), 776-781.Newberg, A. B., Wintering, N
Machine, Apress, 2009.[7] T. Spilling, Self-Improving CNC Milling Machine, Master's Thesis, Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 2014.[8] DIY CNC Router Kit, Retrieved, May 12, 2017, https://www.amazon.com/24x17cm-Milling-Machine- Desktop-Engraving/dp/B01NBTLIM8.[9] R. Ginting, S. Hadiyoso, and S. Aulia, Implementation of 3-Axis CNC Router for Small Scale Industry. Int. J. Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 12, No. 17 (2017), pp. 6553-6558.[10] DIY Desktop CNC Machine Plans and Comprehensive Builder's Manual, 2011, Retrieved July 15, 2017, www.MyDIYCNC.com.[11] D. B. Patel and A. R. Kyada, DIY CNC: A Review, Proc. 5th Int. & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research
tab which has a detailed description of stone masonry on it(Figure 7a). On the left is an illustration of a section view of a sluice gate, where students can seethe dimensions for stone block walls. On the upper right, there is a table where students learnhow many columns and layers of stone blocks are placed to construct a sluice gate. In the upperright corner is a “Return” button which takes students back to the Construction Materials tab(Figure 7c).(a) (b)(c)(d) (e) Figure 7: MUSSN Construction Materials Tab ScreenshotsIf students click the “Green bricks (0.5 m * 0.167 m * 0.1 m)” button, they will be lead toIntroduction to Construction Material tab which introduces brick
troubleshooting processthat they would follow to identify and repair common failure modes for the device covered.Control (students completing standard pre-lab assignments, n=12) and experimental (studentscompleting the modified pre-lab assignments, n=12) groups were compared in terms of (a)laboratory team report grades, (b) an end of semester quiz that focused on troubleshootingclinically-relevant equipment not covered in the lab, and (c) a qualitative survey to assess howeach course assignment contributed to the process-knowledge gained in the lab. All studentscompleted all assessments. The quiz was graded blindly by both instructors separately, emphasizing the process andnot the correctness of the answers for each one of the troubleshooting
were implemented this early in the curriculum at ourinstitution. Such efforts have however been reported in literature [10], indicating similar goals ofhelping to enhance student learning; linking theory with real-world applications, and helping todevelop career-ready students prepared for job market requirements when they graduate. Thatstudy described implementation of two energy-related student projects using COMSOL andmentioned that assessment of students’ satisfaction with the experience based on survey data wasoverall positive, but survey data was not included [10]. Our project incorporated three scaffolded and contextualized simulations that develop:(a) technical competency in modeling, (b) deeper understanding of thermo-fluids
Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 347-365, 2015.[2] E. O. Wisniewski, R. L. Shapiro, E. Kaeli, K. B. Coletti, P. A. DiMilla, and R. Reisberg, “The impact of supplemental instruction on the performance of male and female engineers in a freshmen chemistry course,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2015 Annual Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015.[3] M. C. Grillo and C. Leist, “Academic support as a predictor of retention to graduation: new insights on the role of tutoring, learning assistance, and supplemental instruction,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 387-408, 2013.[4] V. Fayowski and P
introductionstarted with the difficulty of digital image processing due to the transformation from 3D viewinto 2D image. Furthermore, the quantization of analog signal introduces the concept of pixels.For each pixel, the number of bright level can decide the clearness of an image as shown inFigure 6 (See [12] for detailed information). In digital image processing, whether the number ofpixels and the level of brightness of each pixel change are important parameters for a processorto decide if the motion happens after it compares a sequence of image frames. Figure 6: Bright Level (a) 64; (b) 16; (c) 4; (d) 24. Design and implementation of teaming robotsUsing the VEX robotics construction kit with two Cortex controllers, two Vex robots
Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge [11] *“Manufacturing engineering programs [12] must prepare graduates to have proficiency in (a) materials and manufacturing processes: ability to design manufacturing processes that result in products that meet specific material and other requirements; (b) process, assembly and product engineering: ability to design products and the equipment, tooling, and environment necessary for their manufacture; (c) manufacturing competitiveness: ability to create competitive advantage through manufacturing planning, strategy, quality, and control; (d) manufacturing systems design: ability to analyze, synthesize, and control manufacturing operations using statistical methods
statusupdates. 10References[1] L. Katehi, G. Pearson, and M. Feder, "The status and nature of K-12 engineering education inthe United States," The Bridge, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 5-10, 2009.[2] National Academy of Engineering, "Appendix C: 2016-2017 Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs Proposed Changes," Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET EngineeringAccreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and5): A Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press, 2016.[3] B. Hollers, "documenting the engineering design process: Documentation of ideas and theengineering design process is a critical, daily component of a
recruited via email distribution lists, andultimately 20 leaders were selected from institutions across the country.Since the establishment of the VCP, members have met online via Adobe Connect every 2-4weeks during the academic year to (a) identify LGBTQ inclusion approaches appropriate fortheir department context, (b) share resources and (c) support each other as they develop andimplement an action plan to change climate and promote LGBTQ equality in their owndepartments.During Phase 1 (also called Leadership VCP or LVCP) in the fall of 2015, a series of HumanRelations Facilitation training sessions was led by two meta-trainers who trained twenty STEMfaculty and staff to facilitate Safe Zone workshops. The meta-trainers brought rich