Paper ID #22070A Comparative Study on Affordable Photogrammetry ToolsMr. John Fraley, Tennessee Technological University Mr. John Fraley is a Manufacturing and Engineering Technology undergraduate student at Tennessee Technological University. He has a degree in Mechanical Drafting from Tennessee College of Applied Technology in Shelbyville. He is a member of TTU’s Formula SAE team and an undergraduate research assistant for Dr. Ismail Fidan. John’s strong CAD and Fabrication skills have helped him play active roles in FSAE and SME at Tennessee Technological UniversityMr. Astrit Imeri, Tennessee Technological University
Paper ID #23222Teaching Undergraduate Manufacturing in a Flipped ClassroomDr. Dawn Wendell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Dawn Wendell is an engineer whose past projects range from BattleBots robots to medical devices, for which she holds several patents. She received four degrees from MIT including a PhD in Mechanical Engineering. She worked as a fluid mechanics researcher in Paris, France before returning to MIT as Assistant Director of Admissions. Currently Dr. Wendell works as a Senior Lecturer in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching design, manufacturing, and instrumentation
Paper ID #21367Innovative Energy Elevator: a Physics and Engineering Wonder!Prof. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, PhD Northeastern University 367 Snell Engineering Center Boston, MA 02115Mr. Cristian Scott Stransky, Northeastern University Computer science and computer engineering student enrolled in Northeastern, graduating 2020.Dr. Haridas Kumarakuru, Northeastern University Department of Physics, College of Science, 100 Forsyth street, Boston, MA 02115 E.Mail: h.kumarakuru@neu.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Innovative Energy Elevator: A Physics and
. 2012. “Sustainable development in engineering education,”Education in a Changing Society 1: 115-130.Allenby, B., C.F. Murphy, D. Allen, C. Davidson. 2009. “Sustainable engineering education,”Sustainability Science, 4: 7-15.Amadei, B. and R. Sandekian. 2010. “Model of integrating humanitarian engineering intoengineering education,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice,136(2): 84-92.American Society of Civil Engineers. 2016. Policy statement 418: The role of the civil engineerin sustainable development. http://www.asce.org/issues-and-advocacy/public-policy/policy-statement-418---the-role-of-the-civil-engineer-in-sustainable-development/Cech, Erin A. 2013. “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Meritocracy and
Paper ID #22907Assembling a Successful Industry-sponsored Senior Capstone Program: LessonsLearned from a Startup Effort at a Liberal Arts UniversityDr. Lori Houghtalen, Abilene Christian University Lori Houghtalen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Physics at Abilene Christian University. She is Co-Director for Senior Clinic, the capstone senior design course, and teaches courses in the engineering and physics curriculum. Dr. Houghtalen has won awards from the National Science Foundation, Georgia Tech, the ARCS Foundation, and the Association of European Operational Research Societies. She holds degrees from the
Paper ID #22200The Engineering Design Graphics Journal and Its Selected Metrics of EffectDr. Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. ”Bob” Chin is a faculty member, Department of Technology Systems, College of Engineering and Technology, East Carolina University, where he has taught since 1986. He is the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s chair and in 2015, he completed his second term as the director of publications for the Engineering Design Graphics Division and the Engineering Design Graphics Journal editor. Chin has also served as the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s annual and mid-year
Paper ID #21784IoT-based Building Automation and Energy ManagementDr. Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University Joseph A. Morgan has over 20 years of military and industry experience in electronics and communica- tions systems engineering. He joined the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department in 1989 and has served as the Program Director of the Electronics and Telecommunications Programs and as the Associate Department Head for Operations. He has served as Director of Engineering and Chief Technology Officer in the private sector and currently a partner in a small start-up venture. He received
Paper ID #23952Work in Progress: One Approach to Software Engineering Project Selectionfor Small Student PopulationsDr. Paul A Bender, Ohio Dominican University Paul Bender is an Assistant Professor of Software Engineering at Ohio Dominican University in Colum- bus,OH. He previously taught Computer Science at McNeese State University in Lake Charles, LA. He holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, an M.S. in Computa- tional Mathematics from Ohio University, Athens, OH, and a Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering from Wright State University, Dayton, OH. These degrees were
Paper ID #22827Motivating STEM Participation through a ’Making as Micro-manufacture(M3)’ ModelMr. Osazuwa John Okundaye Jr, Texas A&M University Osazuwa is a first year PhD student at Texas A&M University. He is a part of the Texas A&M Embodied Interaction Lab (TEILab). His research is motivated by the idea of an embodied conception of the mind. He comes from an interdisciplinary background having earned a Bachelor’s degree in psychology and a Masters of Science in Visualization afterward. He is versed in engaging the theoretical aspects of Human- Computer Interaction while able to engage in computer
Rubric Criteria for“overall effectiveness” (see Appendix B).The writing instructor met with each team to share the feedback and discuss how the commentsmight be used to revise the proposal. Teams were encouraged to send working drafts of revisions 3to the writing instructor, who provided ongoing feedback during the revision process. Studentsscheduled follow-up meetings as individuals or teams to discuss revisions-in-progress or torequest additional resources.Data Collection and AnalysisData collection began during the Senior Design Presentation when each team was asked tocomplete a note card in response to two prompts: (1) How is the design process like the writingprocess? and (2) How did the
(those that best minimize the Within Sum of Square value, 𝑊𝑊, for the applied science course’s pre-surveys (N = 1,865). A total of 31 criteria (of 1000) provide adequate group separation (that is, having 𝑊𝑊 < 0.36 according to [5]).It is interesting to note the different response patterns of the students in different groups and tocompare them with those of the entire applied science class. First, Figure 3(b) (the middle column of6Figure 3) shows the mean values for the 15-dimensional feature vector for all students in Course 1.We will be comparing the groups identified by 𝑛𝑛-TARP with this “baseline profile” (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3 also shows the response statistics for the first two criteria shown in Figure 2 (i.e., Group 1and
frequently mentioned difficulties with procrastination and timemanagement (Figure 1.b). (a) (b)Figure 1 - Word cloud representation of responses regarding (a) strengths and (b) weaknesses as students.Students were also asked to describe the most interesting fact or concept learned in a class insideand outside of their major, respectively. Figure 2.a represents a word cloud representation ofanswers pertaining to concepts learned inside their major. Interestingly, human-related topicswere by far the most common answer provided, a pattern that is likely quite different than thatobserved in students taking standard programming or engineering courses. With respect toconcepts
] M. B. Brewer, “The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 17(5), pp. 475-482, 1991.[5] J. E. Dutton, J. M. Dukerich, and C. V. Harquail, “Organizational Images and MemberIdentification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 39(2), pp. 239-263, 1994.[6] G. H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society (Vol. 111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.[7] S. Stryker, Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Benjamin/Cummings:Menlo Park, CA, 1980.[8] R. B. Cialdini, R. J. Borden, A. Thorne, M. R. Walker, S. Freeman, L. R. Sloan, “Basking inReflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,vol. 34(3), pp. 366-375, 1976.[9
WCC student mean minus comparison group mean) WCC WCC NWCCU WA Small National 2017 2010 colleges colleges colleges10. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (0 = none, 1 = 1-5, 2 = 6-10, 3 = 11- 20, 4 = 21-30, 5 = more than 30) b. Working for pay. 2.23 -0.18 -0.37 -0.14 -0.60* -0.72*11. How much has your experience at WCC contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? (1 = very little, 2 = some, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much) a. Acquiring job or
[1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, “Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” Science (80-. )., vol. 2, p. 130, 2012.[2] B. E. . 1960- Lovitts, Leaving the ivory tower : the causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.[3] R. Sowell, J. Allum, and H. Okahana, Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion. Washington, DC, 2015.[4] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” 123rd Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 15, 2016.[5] J. C. Hilpert, J. Husman, G. S. Stump, W. Kim, W. T. Chung
and professional-topics surveys to assess: (a) their ability to apply a systematic approach to identify design inputs and outputs, and to verify the attainment of design requirements in the final prototype; (b) their ability to develop a functional prototype appropriate for the level of challenge associated with the project; (c) their ability to apply appropriate research and analyses tools to arrive at their engineering solutions; (d) their ability to work functionally as a team and resolve team conflicts; (e) their ability to stay continuously engaged in and remain enthusiastic about their project; (d) their perceived knowledge and recognition of importance of professional design topics
. Karpicke, “Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improveslong-term retention,” Psychological Science, vol. 17, pp. 249-255, Mar. 2006.[8] J. D. Karpicke & H. L. Roediger III, “The critical importance of retrieval for learning,”Science, vol. 319, pp. 966–968, Feb. 2008.[9] K. B. Lyle & N. A. Crawford, “Retrieving essential material at the end of lectures improvesperformance on statistics exams,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 94–97, Apr. 2011.[10] J. Dunlosky, K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, & D. T. Willingham, “Improvingstudents’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive andeducational psychology,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 14, pp. 4–58, Jan.2013.[11
a flipped classroom can be difficult for teachers. Time is needed to developinstructional materials for students to view outside of class, in addition to the time required for developingconstructive in-class activities. Teachers who have persisted with this teaching method often report that theirclassrooms are not optimized until the third or fourth implementation. This paper describes the three-yearprogression from traditional lecture style to flipped classroom design of a large enrollment differential equationscourse at the University of Louisville’s J. B. Speed School of Engineering. The discussion section of the paperreflects on specific implementation difficulties of flipping a classroom, and gives strategic suggestions forinstructors
-term gains in learning (retention), responses to a single final exam question oncalculating equivalent resistance of a vascular network were compared between spring 2017 andspring 2016 students (Appendix B). Spring 2016 students did not participate in the lab modulebut received the same lecture by the same instructor on the concepts. Final exams were notreturned to students, reducing the chance that spring 2017 students knew the question in advance.Non-traditional sophomores (who took the course out of sequence in our curriculum) wereexcluded from analysis. Demographic analysis confirmed that the two populations were similarin composition (Table 1). Specifically, the average grade in the prerequisite course(Quantitative Cellular Physiology
: Place, Race, and the Literacies of Urban Youth. Language & Literacy Series. Teachers College Press, 2009.[6] D. Paris and H. S. Alim, Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for social justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press, 2017.[7] K. A. Morrison, H. H. Robbins, and D. G. Rose, “Operationalizing Culturally Relevant Pedagogy: A Synthesis of Classroom-Based Research,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 433–452, Oct. 2008.[8] C. C. Johnson, “The road to culturally relevant science: Exploring how teachers navigate change in pedagogy,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 170–198, Feb. 2011.[9] B. I. Grimberg and E. Gummer, “Teaching science from cultural points of
. Robinson, “Is it time for academic preparation of future regulatory affairs professionals?,” J Med Device Reg, pp. 18-23, May 2006.[2] K. Cardinal, “A case-study based course on ‘Device Evaluation and FDA Approval’,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA , USA, 2008, pp. 13.10.1-13.10.6.[3] R. H. Allen, S. Acharya, C. Jancuk, and A. A. Shoukas, “Sharing best practices in teaching biomedical engineering design,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1869-1879.[4] B. Perlmann and R. Varma, “Teaching engineering ethics,” in Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2008, pp. 6.940.1 – 6.940.11.[5] H. Miller, “The blessings and benefits of using
period, students were presented with the project goal: todesign a solar thermal water heater based on the thermosiphon model. A schematic (Figure 1) ofthe system was distributed by the lead instructor, who provided additional project specificationsand assumptions to be made: 1. The collector is made of a PVC tube array (21.33-mm outside diameter or ½” standard size PVC pipe). The tank is painted black and situated above the PVC solar collection tubes (also painted black for maximum sun energy absorption) and to be located outdoors. 2. The design is based on the following assumptions: a. We would like to raise the water temperature by 12 degrees Celsius. b. Average time duration for active water heating
licensed in an additional area based on his or her education and experience. Alaska’s PE licensure system is an example of this method. Method B - Exam Defined Discipline, Practice Limited The next method of discipline specific licensure is based upon the PE exam that a candidate chooses to take. Each discipline is named, but not explicitly defined in most of the jurisdictions with this type of system. If a candidate wanted to practice in multiple areas of engineering, then he or she may need to pass multiple PE exams. Nevada and Vermont have similar systems in place. Method C - Exam Defined Discipline, Practice Not Limited This method of discipline specific licensure is commonly called a
Engineering Students,” ASEE AnnualConference, 2016, New Orleans, LA.[8] Wright, L.A. and Moskal, B., “Including Children with Learning Disabilities in STEM: AnOutreach Program for Dyslexic Students (Research to Practice),” ASEE Annual Conference, 2014,Indianapolis, IN.[9] Meyer, R., “Frontloading the Core Curriculum,” Don Johnston Inc., 2006.[10] Inquire, “Pre-teaching,” National Council for Teachers of Mathematics, 1980.[11] Adams, J., “Frontloading-Increasing Critical Thinking and Focus,” Adams EducationalConsulting, October, 4, 2012.[12] Wilhelm, J., “Frontloading: Assisting the Reader Before Reading,” Commonwealth ofAustralia, 2002.[13] Van Note Chism, N., Douglas, E., and Hilson Jr., W., “Qualitative Research Basics: A Guidefor Engineering
happens after enrollment? Ananalysis of the time path of racial differences in GPA and major choice. IZA Journal of LaborEconomics, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-8997-1-5Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., &Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. ColoradoSprings, Co: BSCS, 5, 88-98.Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of scienceteacher education, 25(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4Carrington, B., Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2008). Role models, school improvement and the‘gender gap’- do men bring out the best in boys and women the best in girls? British EducationalResearch Journal
College, Carlisle, PA, Feb. 2016.Appendix A. Figures.Figure 1. The USMA Environmental Engineering Design Process.Figure 2. The Knowledge Cross walk between EV450 Capstone Course and the EnvironmentalEngineering BOK.Figure 3. Blending Army Doctrine and Environmental Engineering BOK throughout the EV450Capstone Course.Appendix B. Tables.Table 1. Longitudinal data on two course outcomes over a 5-year period present in a 1 to 5,Likert-type scale, where 1 represents a low understanding and 5 represents a highunderstanding.
Paper ID #22673”STEP-ing” Up: Building a Successful Student Leadership ProgramAdrienne Steele, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has over 18 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University, managing all aspects of the STEP project that consists of a large-scale peer mentoring program in the College of Engineering. Previously, she founded and coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope Outreach Program (SOAR) in the Department of Biological Sciences, where she worked for 10 years. Prior to her positions at LSU, Adrienne was the Science Education Curator at the Louisiana Art and
Paper ID #21781Engaging Students’ Creativity through Designing a Low-Cost EducationalRobotic ArmMs. Shunafrica C. White, Elizabeth City State University Shunafrica C. White was born and raised in Conyers, GA. She received in Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Technology with a concentration in Mechanical and Automation from Elizabeth City State University and her Master of Science degree in Bioengineering from North Carolina A&T State Univer- sity. Her research interests are biomechanics and sports injuries.Jason D. Farmer Jason Farmer graduated from Elizabeth City State University with a B.S. in Engineering
Paper ID #23116Engineering Connections in a Native American Community and CultureIeshya Anderson, Arizona State University Ieshya Anderson is Naak´etł’´ah´ı (Tohono O’odham), born for Tł’´aa´ shch´ı’´ı. Her cheii is Naak´etł’´ah´ı and her n´al´ı is T´od´ıch’´ıi’nii. Ieshya graduated from Arizona State University, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering with a Bachelor of Science in Engineering, emphasis in electrical systems. She is pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. Ieshya also continues to work with Dr. Shawn Jordan to develop engineering design curricula for
Paper ID #23794Implementing Entrepreneurial-minded Learning (EML) in a ManufacturingProcesses CourseDr. Vishal R Mehta, Ohio Northern University B.E. Metallurgical Engineering, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India, 1995, M.S. Materials Science and Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology USA, 2002, PhD. Materials Science and Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology,USA, 2010Dr. David R Mikesell P.E., Ohio Northern University David R. Mikesell is chair and associate professor of mechanical engineering at Ohio Northern University. His research interests are in land vehicle dynamics, autonomous vehicles