Conference Session

Cross-Section of Construction Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Jean Paradis

a fixed one in the near future. There is also a transparencies projectoravailable. We installed a black board on one of the walls. Under the conference table networkconnections can be used to connect portable or table computers as needed. A door gives access toa general computer laboratory containing digital tables and other computers that can be used ifneeded. 45'3 11'4 11'3 11'4 11'4 General contractor 2 Subcontractor's A Subcontractor's B or

Conference Session

Mentoring Graduate Students for Success

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Mara Wasburn

, based upon two years of working with the Research Page 7.343.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationSupport Group at Purdue University, that such groups can have a positive effect not only uponthe attrition rate of doctoral students at Purdue, but upon attrition rates nationwide.Bibliography1. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.2. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Poster

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Yann-Hang Lee; Sethuraman Panchanathan; Gerald Gannod; Forouzan Golshani; David Pheanis; Ben Huey

Session 1532 A Consortium-based Model for the Development of a Concentration Track in Embedded Systems1 Gerald C. Gannod2, Forouzan Golshani, Ben Huey, Yann-Hang Lee, Sethuraman Panchanathan and David Pheanis Department of Computer Science & Engineering Arizona State University Box 875406 Tempe, AZ 85287-5406 {gannod, golshani, huey, yhlee, panch, pheanis}@asu.edu

Conference Session

Innovative Lab and Hands-on Projects

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Matthew Obenchain; Keith Bearden; Dan Diaz; Brian Self

) (b) skills and will aid them in their future graduate education. Figure 4. Ultrasound results.The students also decided that the strain gages did not fully meet their research goal ofdetermining where the maximum stresses occurred in the foot. Realizing this, they decided toutilize another technique that they learned in their EM 460 class: photoelasticity. With the helpof another instructor, they were able to prepare a photoelastic coating for the bottom of the foot.They were then able to learn yet another experimental technique which would not have normallybeen included in their undergraduate

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Charles Forsberg

purchase orders for equipment, construction ofthe system, testing of the system, initial draft of the project report, etc. This will emphasize tothe students the limited time available for the various items, and hopefully prod the m to keepmoving. B. Interactions Between Faculty, Students, and Lab TechniciansAlthough the objective is certainly to have the students work with minimal supervision, it isdefinitely necessary to keep track of the students' progress or lack thereof. Weekly written andoral progress reports are necessary, and the professor should not hesitate to take a more activerole in project direction if he/she sees that students are proceeding too slowly or haveencountered major obstacles. It may be necessary at certain times

Conference Session

Global Engineering Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Reza Ziarati; Osman Nuri Ucan; Martin Ziarati

y e r e n r xm W km B ia s bk S p n a tic w e ig h tsFigure 1. General Block Diagram of a Neuron Page 7.390.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Educational Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Use of Labs to Introduce Students to Engr.

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Fan Lau; Kathryn Hollar; Eric Constans; Kauser Jahan; Bernard Pietrucha; Paris von Lockette; Linda Head

on student remarks and faculty experience) include better communication betweenwriting and engineering faculty, allowing more time for students to develop designs, andrequiring more coordination between robot and fuel cell subteams. Page 7.270.6Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Engineering EducationREFERENCES(1) Newell, J. A.; Marchese, A. J.; Ramachandran, R. P.; Sukumaran, B.; Harvey, R. International Journal of Engineering Education 1999, 14.(2) Kim, N.; Choi, Y.; Jung, S.; Kim, S

Conference Session

Teaching Innovations in Arch. Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Daniel Davis

active-learning educational experience in the integration-rich workplace.We try to remember the old chinese proverb, “I hear and I forget, I see and I remember, I do andI understand”, as the faculty strives to create an active learning environment for our AETstudents.References[1] Pavlos, E, A., “Reflections Upon the Carnegie Foundation Study” AIArchitect, 1997.[2] Fiske, E, B, “Systemic School Reform: Implications for Architecture”, ASCD, 1995.[3] Fiske, E, B, “Systemic School Reform: Implications for Architecture”, ASCD, 1995.[4] Boyer, E, L, and Mitgang, L, “Building Community, A New Future for Architectural Education and Practice”, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1996.[5] 2000-2001 University of Hartford Bulletin

Conference Session

New ET Programs

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Newman; John Robertson; Lakshmi Munukutla

Society for Engineering Education A B C D E F G Class Class with Web with Web only Class with Lab with Lab with with book web assist class assist web assist class assist web assist & lab demo 0 6 4 3 4 0 1The delivery selection was largely determined by the location of information sources andthe degree of explanation what was considered appropriate for the topic. The absence ofany offering in the conventional category A was not deliberate but it does reflect thatstate-of-the-art descriptions exist largely on web sites and general information is

Conference Session

Capstone Mechanical Engineering Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

William Janna

not particularly rewardingfor 6 out of 17 seniors, although 5 of 17 thought it was. Seniors in general did not feel that theirgrades were improved by the presence of freshmen on their design teams. (See Item h.)(b) The freshmen were able to provide our group with assistance/ideas.Despite the response to Item a, Item b shows that 15 of 17 seniors believed that freshmen wereable to provide some assistance to the overall design effort. Every group was able to have thefreshmen work with them in some capacity.(c) The freshmen were able to participate actively in the design process.Item c shows that freshmen participation in the actual design phase was rather limited, due totheir inexperience with engineering fundamentals. It was, however, desired

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Drake; Mark Driver; Eric Welch

Session # 2793 A Low-cost, Interdisciplinary, Engineering Instrumentation Laboratory Course R. L. Drake, M. A. Driver, E. B. Welch School of Engineering Christian Brothers University Memphis, Tennessee 38104AbstractA question often asked of engineering deans is the following:"Dean, how can I conduct a meaningful engineering instrumentation laboratory coursewith such a small budget?"This paper reports the results of efforts to provide such a course at the School ofEngineering

Conference Session

Unique Lab Experiments

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Voon; F.C. Lai; Chean Chin Ngo

. Page 7.129.7Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationIV. ConclusionsAlthough this courseware has been designed for a specific lab course, the basic conceptsemployed are rather generic and can be apply to other lab courses. The courseware is schedu ledto be tested in class in Spring 2002. For a typical enrollment, there are six lab sections offeredfor this course. It is proposed that students be voluntarily divided into two groups (three sectionsin each group). While one group of the students (Group A) is asked to use the courseware as partof the course requirement, the other group of the students (Group B

Conference Session

Computers in Education Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Ranjith Perera; Ali Akber

. F. Neelamkavil “ Computer Simulati on And Modelling “ Chischester Publishing Co UK 1987 5. M Contu et al “ Delphi Developers Handbook “ Sybex Publishers USA 1997 6. M. Contu “ Mastering Delphi 4” Sybex Publishers USA 1992Biographical Information:Dr. RANJITH PERERAReceived B.Sc Engine ering Hons from the University of Sri Lanka, D.E.A and Dr -Ing. from Institut NationalPolytechnique de Grenoble France. He has worked as academic staff member in higher educational institutes inSri Lanka, Malaysia and Brunei. Currently he is a lecturer at Monash University, Gippsland School ofEngineering, Australia.AKBER ALIReceived an honours degree in Engineering (B. Eng) from Monash University, Victoria, Australia. He hasworked as a Technical

Conference Session

Innovative Curriculum in ET

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

James Globig

to complete the project; and finally a financial analysis. Each component of the Project Plan is individually addressed and developed further in the course: a. Functional Specification b. Task identification (Work Breakdown Structure) c. Risk analysis d. Personnel allocation into a Cross Functional Team e. Detailed time estimation for each task f. Schedule creation reflecting the principles of concurrent engineering g. Cost estimation incorporating both the cost of the personnel and the cost of the materials to deliver the final product Page 7.690.2

Conference Session

Accreditation and Related Issues in ECE

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Robi Polikar; Robert R. Krchnavek; Raul Ordonez; Peter Jansson; John Schmalzel; Shreekanth Mandayam; Ravi Ramachandran; Linda Head

in the Rowan University Freshman Engineering Clinic,” Proc. 1997 ASEE An. Conf., Session #3225, Milwaukee, WI, June 15-18.9. R.P. Hesketh, et al, “Multidisciplinary experimental experiences in the Freshman Engineering Clinic at Rowan University,” Proc. 1997 ASEE An. Conf., Session #2326, Milwaukee, WI, June 15-18.10. J.L. Schmalzel, K. Jahan, Z. Keil, J. Mariappan, A. Marchese, and S. Mandayam, “An interdisciplinary design sequence for sophomore engineering,” Proc. 1998 ASEE Nat. Conf., June 28–Aug 01, Seattle, WA.11. A.J. Marchese, J. A. Newell, R. P. Ramachandran, B. Sukumaran, J. L. Schmalzel and J. Marriappan, “The Sophomore Engineering Clinic: An Introduction to the Design Process Through a Series of Open

Conference Session

Computed Simulation and Animation

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

John Nestor

algorithms and other CAD tools.References1. Saraffzadeh, M., and Wong, C., An Introduction to VLSI Physical Design, McGraw-Hill, 1996.2. Sherwani, N., Algorithms for VLSI Physical Design Automation, 3rd. ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.3. Nestor, J., "Web-Based Visualization Tools for Teaching VLSI CAD Algorithms", Proceedings International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, pp. 100-101, June 2001.4. Brown, M. and Sedgewick, R., “Techniques for Algorithm Animation”, IEEE Software, Vol. 2, No. 1, January 1985, pp. 28-39.5. Stasko, J., Domingue, J., Brown, M., and Price, B., ed., Software Visualization: Programming as a Multimedia Experience. MIT Press, 1998.6. S. Kirkpatrick et. al., “Optimization by

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Phillip Thompson

Engineering.” ASEE 2000 Annual Conference Proceedings.4. Freuler R. J., Fentiman, A. W., Demel, J. T. Gustafson, R. J., Merrill, J. A. (2001) “Developing and Implementing Hands-on Laboratory Exercises and Design Projects for First Year Engineering Students” ASEE 2001 Annual Conference Proceedings.5. URL: http://ftp.usma.edu/cme/civilsoft.htm; United States Military Academy. Bridge Designer for Windows 3.1, 95, 98.6. Heacock, J., Starkey, S., Goodyear, D. and Smit N. (2001). “Cliff-Hanger”. Civil Engineering, 71:1, p.41-45.7. Pierepiekarz, M. R., Ballantyne, D. B. and Hamburger, R. O. (2001). “Damage Report from Seattle”. Civil Engineering, 71:6, p.78-83.8. Borroum, S. and McCoy, M. (2000). “The California Experience”. Civil Engineering, 70:7

Conference Session

Design, Assessment, and Curriculum

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

William Dempster

manufacturing’’, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, Volume 28, no 4 2000, p 321 -333. Page 7.476.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposi tion Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education[5] Glinkowski M.T., Hylan J. , Lister B., A new studio base d multimedia dynamic systems course: does it really work, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Multimedia engineering An Education, Philadelphia, 1997W.M.DEMPSTERDr Bill Dempster is a lecturer in Mechanical E ngineering at Strathclyde University, UK . He

Conference Session

Lab Experiments in Materials Science

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Redfield; Michael Guarraia; Suzanne Keilson

(named for the alloy developed at the Naval OrdinanceLaboratory,WhiteOak, MD, Buehler, et. al. ) has been getting increasing attention in a number ofapplications including eyeglass frames, fishing lures, cellular phone antennas, medical guidewires, and surgical tools. The particular alloy composition that is generally used is 55 weight %Ni and 45 weight % Ti. The crystal structure of NiTi is the B-2 structure, and is similar to theBCC structure, but with two differing atoms in the unit. The nickel atoms are on the cubecorners and the titanium is in the center of the unit cube (Figure 1). The NiTi alloy exhibits two very unique properties that have great potential forapplication. The first is superelasticity. This is the ability to

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

James McCowan; James Mason

change and innovation. If one wishes students to "think outside the box",it is perhaps not advantageous to locate them in a box.(b) first year studio The first year curriculum is common to all programs. Some 600 students are currentlyregistered each year. Since the introduction of Integrated Learning, all take a course, APSC 100,which includes a team-based design project component. The course may draw on any portions ofthe year one material in each project, and often requires the student to learn new material on theirown. A few lectures are included at the beginning on teamwork issues. The nature of projects currently undertaken is limited by the facilities available. The first yearstudios in the ILC are intended to relieve this restriction

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Classroom Tips

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Joseph Hartman

. Barrionuevo, Alexei, “Enron is Looking to Develop a Facility in the Bahamas,” The Wall Street Journal,January 29, 2001.2. Carey, Susan, “Midwest Express will Boost Fleet with Jets from Boeing, Embraer,” The Wall Street Journal,B8, April 11, 2001.3. Dow Jones Newswires, “Maytag to Expand Manufacturing,” The Wall Street Journal, B5, March 9, 2001.4. Hartman, J. C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum,” Proceedings ofthe 1998 American Society for Engineering Education Conference (CD-ROM), June, 1998.5. Schmahl, K.E., C.D. Noble and B. Myers, “Where is the Engineering in Engineering Economy,” Proceedingsof the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Conference (CD-ROM), June, 2000.Author BiographyJOSEPH C

Conference Session

Cultivating Professional Responsibility

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Betsy Dulin

words, determining the proper path fromA to B may be based on everything but the most efficient, economical design. The same is true,of course, of environmental engineering design courses – the list goes on and on. However, asalways, the devil in is the details. How can this material be covered in a class that is already“over-booked” with respect to material coverage, and by instructors who may not themselvesfeel comfortable with the material?While some engineering professors may be familiar and comfortable with the public policyprocess and associated issues, many are not. This presents a problem because, as with mostthings, real-life examples and anecdotes play a crucial role in making the subject come alive forengineering students. The

Conference Session

Issues of Concern to New Faculty

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Craig Quadrato

assignments include:platoon leader and executive officer, 864 th Engineer Battalion at Fort Lewis, Washington; Brigade PersonnelOfficer, Engineer Brigade, 2 nd Infantry Division at Camp Howze Korea, and Company Commander, B Company,52nd Engineer Battalion at Fort Carson, Colorado. Craig is a 1991 graduate of the United States Military Academywith a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering. He holds Master of Science degrees in EngineeringManagement from the University of Missouri and Structural Engineering and Construction EngineeringManagement from Stanford University. Craig lives in New Windsor, New York with his wife Kristi

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Donna Shirley

compiled by theHonors College on a 5 to 1 (best to worst) rating scale. In this case the comparison was withother Honors courses in the fall of 2001. Again, the average scores for this Introduction toEngineering class (3.94) were lower than the overall Honors course evaluations (4.24). The datadoes not directly compare freshman evaluations but includes all four years. Only one category –oral communication skills – was ranked higher for Introduction to Engineering than for otherHonors courses, and it was significantly higher. The main “downers” were in writing skills(3.35), fairness in grading (3.65), and individual attention by the instructor (3.6).As might be expected of an Honors course, grades were high: Fall 2000: 20 A’s, 1 B Fall

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Computer ET

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Combs; Ahmad Zargari

). Figure 1 is a diagram describing the individual bits in the control register. 82C55A Control Register D7 D6 D5 D4 D3 D2 D1 D0 Must be one to configure ports Port C for I/O operation Lower 4-bits 0=output 1= input, 00 (mode 0) 0= ouput For simple I/O Port B

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Samira Hasan; Tom Roberts

College of Engineering – Kansas State UniversityTo assist the University in a long-term project to improve advising and to smooth the transitionfrom high school to college, we ask that you take 2-3 minutes to respond to this survey. Pleasecircle your response below. The answers will remain anonymous – therefore we want yourhonest response.1. Are you a A) Male or B) Female2. Which type of student are you? Transfer B) Non-traditional C) Freshman3. Approximately how many students were in your high school graduating class? A) Under 50 B) 50 – 99 C) 100 – 199 D) 200 - 299 E) 300+4. Have your parents attended college? A) Yes B) No5. Are you worried about

Conference Session

Trends in Construction Engr. Educ. II

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

John DiMilia; Amitabha Bandyopadhyay

Session 2121 A Study on Materials Procurement and Management for Small Companies Amitabha Bandyopadhyay, John DiMilia SUNY Farmingdale, NY 11735IntroductionMaterials procurement and management is an integral part of the building process. Materialsaffect every aspect of a construction project. 1 However, smaller companies have little to nomaterial procurement and management systems. As a result these companies incur additional butavoidable costs. Some of these costs are due to; a)large delivery times for materials, b) excessordering of material

Conference Session

Unique Lab Experiments

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Anthony Oxtoby

asserted and the MS byte of the data is written to latch B. The output enable forlatch B is asserted so that the 80C552 can read the MS bits and the 8 LS bits from the IDMA arelatched into latch D. For the second 80C552 cycle, the output of latch B is disabled and the LSbyte of the data is read from latch D. All four tri-state latches and the glue logic for the interfaceis programmed into an Altera 7182 CPLD to reduce chip count. ADSP-2181 EZ-Kit Lite A 8-bit 8 80C552 IAD15-8 Latch OEWU

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Subrata Roy; Karim Nasr; K. Joel Berry

interested faculty. Moreover, evenprograms with non-traditional elements retain in one form or another the traditional engineeringcore topics of differential, integral, and vector calculus, differential equations, physics(mechanics and electromagnetics) and chemistry. Some of the relatively common elements ofinnovative core curricula that appeared in one or more of CET’s proposals were: (a) a common,interdisciplinary Introduction to Engineering course; (b) a selection of discipline-specificIntroduction to Engineering courses offered by the various engineering departments; and (c)integration of engineering applications into core mathematics and science courses

Conference Session

Engineering Management Curriculum

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Stephanie Adams

will occur: a) individually, team members will growin their understanding of teaming constructs; b) the team as a whole will grow in theirunderstanding of team constructs and c) proper synergy of task and team processes will occur. The model, which examines the essential components in building teams and determiningwhether or not teams are effective, starts with the assessment of the individual regarding theirunderstanding of teams and their attitude towards teamwork. This assessment begins prior tostarting the task and prior to any contact with fellow team members. The next step is thecollective assessment of the team with regards to the teams’ attitudes about teaming and the useof teams and the teams’ ability to manage the seven