99% of the students find the workshop very or somewhat valuable, with the section on“recruitment and messaging” being the most highly rated. Over 93% of the participants reported beingsomewhat or very motivated to engage in specific bias-reducing activities in their organization. Futureanalyses will include tracking demographic data from student organization membership and leadershiplists, as well as climate survey results. I. IntroductionIt is clear that the field of Engineering not only lacks the diversity of the U.S. workforce, but also is lessdiverse than other fields in STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine)fields [1], [2]. At the undergraduate level
contributing to the students’belongingness to their academic unit; however, they were regarded as meaningful interactions with advisors.Students did not perceive such psychological and emotional support as the responsibilities of their advisors,as Farzad mentioned, “I understand what support is, so I'm not looking for beautiful words from [myadvisor]”. This contributes to the impact of student expectations on their perceived quality of interactionsand reflects the previously reported limited interactions with advisors [13].Theme 5. Unease being “friends” with peers This theme includes student perceived challenges in socialization that result in a lower possibilityof being socially accepted and included in a community, i.e., feeling or lacking
visibility for their particular campuses. Houston Community College at Spring Branch is located at the intersection of Interstate 10 and Beltway 8—two of the busiest highways in Houston. They used the entire $15,000 allocation to develop a highway facing sign for the academy and light pole banners for their parking lot. While there is not an effective way to capture data regarding how many people learned about the program from seeing the sign and banners, one student indicated through additional remarks on a marketing survey that the sign and banners were the reason they searched for the program online. The Engineering Academies team now includes unique URLs on all marketing so impact can be measured and evaluated. Conversations are ongoing with
Teaching and Learning Office Science Department in Baltimore City Public Schools (City Schools).Our center works hard to learn what City Schools’ needs are and focuses our outreach efforts on those needs. For example, the annual Hopkins Robotics Cup came from a need identified by a science specialist in City Schools Central Office who wanted to grow the VEX robotics teams in middle and high schools by having a college site for the qualifying event. We also worked very closely with City Schools’ Teaching and Learning department and faculty from both our engineering and education schools to jointly write a proposal for a Math Science Partnership which developed elementary STEM teachers in school and out of school and engaged the community in STEM
that their experience at LATTICE thus far will help them be better mentors and senior faculty members.• The Mentoring Circles help build community, provide needed support, and allow participants to hold themselves accountable. Participants view the Mentoring Circles as a valuable source of strategies to address career issues they are facing.• Within several months of participation, participants perceive that the LATTICE program is having a positive impact on their self-confidence and ability to pro- actively engage in career-building behaviors, such as asking for resources, seeking advice, and starting collaborations. Participants self-reported significant improvements in both self-efficacy and networking activity
andeducational activities focused on computational science and high-performance computing. Visitingfaculty and students are recruited from a variety of institutions including minority serving, women’s,liberal arts, community colleges and other educational institutions. Selected qualified faculty applicantsattend a matching workshop in which both, faculty and Laboratory researchers briefly present theirwork, learn about potential research collaborations, engage in one-on-one discussions, and developcollaborative research proposals. Faculty who are matched to Laboratory researchers engage in anintensive summer research experience at the Laboratory with a few of their students or in some casessend students to engage in a summer Laboratory research
43 percent of their credits when they transferredbetween institutions [9].ADVANCE is a solution not just for students but also for the entire community of employers,companies and organizations in our region. The Northern Virginia region is booming, and eventhough NOVA and Mason constitute one of the largest educational systems anywhere in any cityor region in the country, we are not producing enough talent to meet our economy’s demands.The recent announcement by Amazon to locate a new headquarters in Northern Virginia (HQ2)will only exacerbate this situation.Employers are key partners for us in the program, and employer engagement is crucial in helpingus design a program that leads students to meaningful careers. We are designing
profession” [6]. It is critical that we understand how all students, and 3especially those from underrepresented groups, come to negotiate the cultural norms within thesemaker communities [7] and the impact that it has on their identity development as engineers.IdentityIdentity is a process of understanding one’s self within the larger sociocultural context [8-9].According to Erikson, identity helps individuals make sense of and find their place in the world.In the 1980’s, McAdams extended Erikson’s work on identity, arguing that as an individual tellsand retells their story and how they fit into the world, they are developing their identity. In
staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research pro- ductivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engaging in STEM education equity work through a course: studying race, class and gender theory in engineering educationAbstractEach of the authors are currently enrolled as students or serving as an instructor in a graduate-level engineering education course which is cross-listed with the women’s, gender, and sexualitystudies program at a large research university in the Midwest. Through engagement withpodcasts, readings, reflection, and discussion with others, this course seeks to help
Exploring Student Perceptions of Teamwork in a Summer Outreach ProgramAbstractIncreasing numbers of summer outreach programs aim to engage students in science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM). A common approach to these programs is project-basedlearning (PBL), which often involves working in teams. Ideally, students participating in theseprograms work together in teams to apply the STEM knowledge gained from their programexperiences; these intentional communication and collaboration experiences are also likely toenhance students’ teamwork skills. However, team experiences are not always positive, andsome team members may not feel welcome to contribute. Team experiences can negatively affectstudents’ sense
reflect on previous in-class and out-of-class team/project experiences. Students’ strong connections to family and peers couldalso provide motivation for engineering-related community engagement projects, experiences thatdevelop students’ abilities to engage with user populations, and/or connect course topics with community-related challenges (e.g., hurricane relief, immigration).Overall, the findings of this study seek to complement existing work exploring the educationalexperiences of Latinx students within college [19] and within engineering specifically [20], [24], bycapturing educators’ perceptions of their students at HSIs. Through this work and similar studies, theengineering education community can begin to shift the conversation towards
has documented the importance ofprogrammatic efforts, such as informal mentoring, co-curricular programs, support centers forengineering students, and living-learning programs [5]. Gándara and Maxwell-Jolly revealed thatmany minority student success programs focused on a combination of mentoring, financialsupport, academic support, psychosocial support, and professional opportunities [6].A Building Engineering and Science Talent (BEST) report recognized common characteristicsamong institutions that have been successful at increasing diversity in engineering by broadeningparticipation of underrepresented minorities. These characteristics included institutionalleadership, targeted recruitment, engaged faculty, developing student talent as a
, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. She was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program at CU, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is currently the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and a member of the AAAS Committee on Sci- entific Freedom and Responsibility.She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and
, we suggest offering fieldtrips to local companies to community college students to help them achieve a similar broadeneddefinition of engineering. Overall, we highlight a need to expand access to study abroad programs and a need forprogram administrators to integrate potential transfer students into programs like RSAP carefullyand purposefully, especially when those students are older than their peers. This paper also callsfor more research into the experiences of potential transfer students, including longitudinalstudies, which assess the long-term impacts of participating in an experiential global learningprograms on success at a 4-year institution. Ultimately, additional research into the experiencesof potential transfer students
also be informed by the differing ways in which these students engage with their academic life. Survey results showed that students from underrepresented groups attempt to engage more with their academic programs as a community than their peers do. Their responses indicate that, frequently, the issues that they run into are systemic issues with the university’s culture. Many student responses highlighted the lack of intentionality on the part of those creating a hostile academic environment; these students from underrepresented and marginalized groups see other faculty, staff, and students not putting the same attention into being part of an academic community as they themselves do. These students’ negative experiences are, frequently, not a
Emerging Ethnic Engineers (E3) Program. She teaches Calculus 1 during the Summer Bridge program and instructs Cooperative Calculus 1 during the school year. Continuing with her commitment to community involvement, Whitney has previously served on the Na- tional Executive Board for the National Society of Black Engineers, a student-managed organization with more than 30,000 members. She served as the Planning Chairperson for the 2013 Annual Convention and is currently an advisor for the Great Lakes Region. Dr. Gaskins the President of the Sigma Omega graduate chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. She is also a member of the Society of Women Engineers, the Women’s Alliance, the National Technical Association
eat in restaurants or engage inother social activities with the rest of the study abroad group. Differential access to resourcesmight result in differential leveraging of co-curricular programs. Because of substantial fundingbarriers to participation in co-curricular support, students from low socioeconomic backgroundsoften utilize financial aid refund check/dollars such as, grants, scholarships, and or loans asmonthly spending money for participation in all different types of co-curricular activities.Visibility and Perception One aspect of visibility is accessibility relating to placement, language, and format ofbranding, advertising, and physical artifacts, all of which impact who is aware of opportunities inco-curricular programs
seeks to offer this cohesive program and effective services specific to this cohort of alternatelyadmitted students. The outcomes this program aims to achieve for students are as follows: • Academic outcomes o Students will meet cumulative GPA requirements for professional admission o Students will be Calculus ready by the end of their first year • Retention outcomes o Students will persist from semester 1 to semester 2 o Students will persist from year 1 to year 2 • High Impact Practice outcome o Students will participate in at least one high impact practice (study abroad, undergraduate research, learning community, student organization, or other) • Skill-Based outcomes o Students
minorities, or URMs) have positive experiences inengineering programs early on in their education. This heightened interest is evidenced by theplethora of support programs intended to ease transitions and promote student retention. Collegesof engineering often invest considerable resources in educational practices to support first-yearstudents, such as summer bridge programs [1], mentoring programs [2], and living-learningcommunities [3], [4].One way of improving educational practices is through educational research, which can informthe effective use of resources invested to support students. Research on engineering students’transitions from high school to college provides insight into how students adapt to their newsurroundings and can impact the
Doctoral Studies in the MathematicalSciences, and the National Society of Black Physicists (NSBP).Financial Support. The availability of funding is important to the success of URM students in STEMdegree programs [13][14]. Many URM students lack familial support or are impacted by responsibilitiesto provide for their families [15]. At the Master’s level, funding is limited and typically not competitive.Fortunately, through the NRT, fellowship awards support two (2) fellows per year at a $34,000 stipend,tuition, fees, and support to present at professional conferences for a two-year term. Eligible studentsmust have demonstrated a record of active engagement in Bridge activities for at least one semester.Additional graduate students can become Bridge
National Academy of Sciences committee on ”Revitalizing Gradute Stem Education for the 21st Century.”Dr. Yvette Maria Huet, UNC Charlotte Yvette Huet is Director of the ADVANCE Faculty Affairs and Diversity Office and a Professor of Kine- siology at UNC Charlotte. She has worked with and created a variety of workshops for faculty, graduate students and post-doctoral fellows, and current and future leaders and provided professional development consultation to faculty. She has provided training at UNC Charlotte and other programs and institutions across the country, many with current or previous ADVANCE grants, that addresses best practices in recruitment, inherent bias, communication, mentoring and reappointment
skills. Students who successfully complete these courses are eligible for a $300 scholarship at the beginning of the fall semester.● Students move into their designated residence hall one week prior to the beginning of the fall semester. For the duration of this week they: ○ familiarize themselves with the VCU campus ○ participate in classes, workshops, and community building activities ○ attend guest lectures and visit research laboratories ○ meet with advisors in preparation for the fall semesterSTP SCHEDULE DEMOHave members break into teams and perform a brainstorming activity similar tothat which was done during the design challenge so that
private school students are set up to be paid a stipend. We also meet with the mentors multiple times to allow for a peer learning community of mentors and to share strategies for engaging the high school students. 6Now I’m going to show a video that describes one student and her mentor’s thoughts on the WISE program.*music*Madison Haywood: In my lab we focus on glycoengineering for cancer and this semester I focused on the techniques that we use in this lab.My name’s Madison Haywood. I’m in the 11th grade and this is my 12th year at Garrison Forest School. I really enjoy having a mentor ’cause they’re so knowledgeable in um their topic
am a first generation college student at Clemson University. During my academic journey I have joined many clubs that center around advancing the minority community in the areas of economics, education, and health.Khushi Patel, Clemson University Khushi Patel is an Engineering and Science Education PhD candidate at Clemson University. Her research focus is on student conceptualization in chemistry. She received her undergraduate degree in Chemistry with a minor in secondary education from Millsaps College. She also holds a secondary license to teacher chemistry and general science for middle and high schools in the states of Mississippi and Tennessee. She received her master’s degree in Inorganic chemistry from
Paper ID #24863ADVANCE Women’s Leadership at The University of DelawareDr. Heather Doty, University of Delaware Heather Doty is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Delaware (UD). Dr. Doty teaches undergraduate courses in thermodynamics, statics, dynamics, and technical communication and conducts research on gender in the academic STEM workforce. She is co-PI on UD’s NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant, which aims to recruit, retain, and advance women STEM faculty at UD. Dr. Doty is faculty advisor to UD’s Women in Engineering Graduate Student Steering Committee.Dr. Shawna Vican
forexamining how students’ background characteristics, experiences at community college, and theaccrual of knowledge about the transfer process influence their experiences with the transfer andtransition process within a university.TSC can serve as a theoretical tool to ground both qualitative exploration to understand transferstudents’ experiences, as well as quantitative modeling to understand the impacts of policies,processes, programs and experiences on transfer student outcomes [27]. Its most recent iterationdefines transfer student capital as a function of academic counseling experiences, perceptions ofthe transfer process, experiences with faculty, and learning and study skills [27]. We aim tofurther explore these factors by examining how
stakeholders who are committed to growing andsustaining a networked community to recruit, retain, and accelerate the progress of Hispanics incomputing.The Formation of CAHSITo ensure our nation’s economic and social health, it is imperative that the U.S. maintain aglobally competitive computing workforce by expanding its engagement of individuals from allsectors of our society, in particular Hispanics, the nation’s largest minority group. Representingless than 6% of postsecondary institutions in the U.S., Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs)enroll almost half of Hispanic students attending college [2]. Further, while Hispanics represent18% of the U.S. population, the percentage of core CS bachelor degrees conferred to Hispanicstudents in 2015 was 8.6
2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology reported thatone million more science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) professionals would needto be introduced into the workforce to keep up with economic demands [1]. The council alsorecommended a variety of tools to recruit students to STEM programs, including the use ofsummer camps, research courses, and pathways from two to four-year institutions [1]. Thoughthe time has expired for this call to action, the importance of having educated STEMprofessionals and engagement of students in STEM is imperative. Engineering camps, a method of recruitment supported by PCAST, have been activesince the middle of the 20th century [2]. These camps often feature hands-on
students, including students in rural areas and those who learn differently, in STEM education from pre-K through graduate studies. Her current work focuses on supporting and evaluating the construction of collaborative communities and building evaluation capacity within organizations and large-scale programs. In all efforts Adrienne works to (a) truly understand the purpose and needs for the evaluation or research undertaking, (b) develop feedback cycles that support continuous program improvement, (c) make implementation and impact data available and interpretable for program implementers, and (d) select the most rigorous, yet feasible analytic designs that are tailored to the unique needs of each program context. She
somewhere in thecurricula. Disciplinary culture not only impacts curricula, but there have also been studiessuggesting that disciplinary cultures are associated with perceptions of engagement, educationalvalues and norms in science and engineering students [31]. Differences in disciplinary culturehave been found to account for why students in social sciences prize individual assertion,classroom participation, and interest in ideas; in contrast, science and engineering students aredescribed as placing more value on participation that fosters quantitative competencies throughindividual and collaborative efforts [31].Depending on an institution’s definition of STEM (e.g., broad enough to encompass socialsciences) and the organizational structure of