error.Program Climate from Junior/Senior Year (JSY) Student InterviewsWhere the first year students focused primarily on academic survival as key to developing abelief they belong in engineering, more senior students had a broader view of their programenvironment and engineering culture. Most undergraduate engineering programs in the UnitedStates are dominated by white, middle class, straight male students (and faculty) so they arethe main contributors to the social dynamic of the school’s climate. Those that are part of thedominant culture are better prepared to navigate through the social spaces and sometimes donot see the inequalities present [24]. For example, one JSY white male student described hisclassmates in the engineering program: it is
Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) (2010- 2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a consulting engineer he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students, undergraduate and graduate. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. In 2017, he was part of the team that developed the OPTIONS Program (Opportunities for PhDs: Transitions, Industry Options, Networking and Skills) for engineering PhD students interested in careers outside the academy. He is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry.Prof. Julie Audet P.Eng., University of
self-authorship in their undergraduate years.In this paper, we share an educational framework built on the theories of adult development self-authorship and self-determination, as well as our curriculum which is designed to build capacityfor self-authorship in our students. We outline the innovations that this has introduced to ourprogram including creating an honors program that does not use GPA or standardized test scoresfor admission or retention, but rather emphasizes immersive experiences and reflective practicethat challenge students to develop their own internal voice and interpersonal relationships. Weshare our rubric for assessment of self-authorship using reflection assignments and offer casestudies of engineering students who reveal
, students who desire to earn a bachelor’s degree in an engineering discipline at acollege or university will declare a major upon matriculation or at the end of a first-yearengineering program. Whether or not the student is aware of it, their decision is generally guidedand informed by many beliefs [6] and values [7].Among the values often considered is the future value of being an engineer and/or having anengineering degree. Students studying engineering at a public research university located in thewestern mountain region of the United States, that specializes in undergraduate engineeringeducation, had very different reasons as to why their career and/or degree will be valuable – forsome, a financially rewarding career or benefits to society was
of the intellectual merit and the broader impactstatements. The Key findings from these statements are:The first component of this project will be the implementation of a REU program that willprovide a rich research experience and professional development opportunities to a largepopulation of under-served minority students enrolled in the 13+ engineering programs andtheir partner community colleges that have been unable to participate in traditional summerresident research programs. It builds on the strength of an existing 13+ institution Engineeringconsortium. The REU/RET Megasite will be built around the Smart and Connected City researchtheme, which will encompass the following research strengths in the host sites: Cyber Security,Power
evident that these skill sets, in particular entrepreneurially-minded education, arevaluable in preparing undergraduate engineering students to join the complex, technology-enabled, global 21st-century workforce [10]. In addition to integration into classrooms byindividual faculty members, programs like the NSF-funded I-Corps™ for Learning program (I-Corps™ L) have supported this shift in curriculum and aim to improve the scalability ofeducational innovations by leveraging the entrepreneurial mindset [10].The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) values EM for its potential to graduateengineering students who go on to “create personal, economic, and societal value through alifetime of meaningful work” [10]. The EM is often discussed in
University. The University of East Anglia has been delivering a ‘Rotation PhD’in which students visit different labs in 10-week long research mini-projects, directed bydifferent supervisors and trained in different techniques. The ‘Integrated PhD’ at theUniversity of Southampton has offered 3 laboratory rotation projects after which the studentis awarded an MRes (Master of Research) and they then spend 3 more years deepening theirexpertise towards a PhD degree. These approaches have been successful over the years anddemonstrate an appetite for very varied, skills-training focused programs that provide theresearcher with broader knowledge and varied competencies that prepare them foremployment. However, these programs are typically found in
agents, but lag in other areas of the finance sector including commodities brokeringand trading (45.4%). Similarly, most clerical positions are also dominated by women, such ascollections (69.6%) and public relations (64.3%). Education (62.6%) and other health services(79.9%) also follow this trend [23]. In engineering, women also participate in the workforce atlevels that are far below gender parity. Industrial engineering boasts the highest percentage ofwomen at 23%, followed by computer hardware (18.9%), chemical (16.3%), mechanical(10.9%), and electrical (9.4%) [24]. And, despite the fact that mechanical and electricalengineering are among the most popular fields within engineering, these fields graduate thelowest numbers of female students
in the industry. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019TEAM MENTAL MODELS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN CONTEXTS 1 A systematized literature review of the characteristics of team mental models in engineering design contexts AbstractDesign tasks are characterized by high levels of complexity and uncertainty. Accordingly, inengineering design practices, engineers communicate, share, and integrate their differentviewpoints and orientations to develop a deeper understanding of the problem space and tobroaden the solution space. In this context, engineering design is usually taught
; Biomedical Engineering. All had substantial research programs with a materialscomponent. Each participant was also mentored by one or more graduate students, who weremembers of their faculty mentor’s research group.Program ActivitiesThe goal of the program was for participants to have an authentic research experience and totranslate the excitement of their work into a classroom activity that would stimulate the interestof their students in STEM. To meet this goal, participants were required to complete theprogram with two products: 1) A research poster that was presented at our annual RET/REUResearch Symposium, and 2) A lesson plan that related to their research and that could beapplied in their classrooms. These products were developed through
engineering project activities to engage the following STEMconstituents (a) students (b) educators (c) first-year engineering students in undergraduate degreeprograms. Laboratory and engineering project experiences can effectively introduce and reinforceSTEM-related concepts. The first two constituents form part of the K-12 STEM education process.The third constituent represents the graduates of the process. The constituents identified as studentsare introduced to aspects of engineering design, assembly, test, and validation through step-basedproject activities. The introduction takes place with the students either participating in projectactivities in the undergraduate engineering laboratory or with faculty from undergraduateengineering programs
in1995 as a means of providing students with academic credit through participation in long-termservice-learning projects. Student teams are vertically-integrated multidisciplinary teams,comprised of students of all years of undergraduate study and multiple majors [1]. Studentoutcomes are often summarized to include technical skills, communication skills, organizationalskills, teamwork experiences, resourcefulness, resource management, sponsor awareness throughcustomer and client interaction, expanded community awareness, and professional ethics [1].Over 30 institutions across the US have an EPICS program, as well as multiple institutionsabroad. The EPICS program was implemented at Arizona State University in 2009 and has sincegrown to
(leading workshops, presenting) ● Participants or attendees of the pre-college programs (typically middle or high school students) ● Alumni of the pre-college programs that are currently undergraduate students ● RAs (undergraduate resident assistants) that live with the pre-college program participants on overnight experiences ● PAs (undergraduate program assistants) that lead pre-college program participants through the outreach experienceIt proved to be important to have someone that has been involved extensively and over severalyears with the system at hand, a central stakeholder, in order to help identify all the stakeholdersin the process. We suggest that when working to identify stakeholders, it is helpful to
outreach activities and projects led by both industry andacademia, for diverse groups of prospective students, mostly K-12 students. There is however avery limited offering of outreach programs targeting adult populations, one of the reasons beingthe fact that it is not an easy task to convince adults to volunteer for workshop activities.Scheduling issues, conflicting with work or personal schedule, are most of the time the mainreasons to turn adults away from programs that would otherwise interest and benefit them. A lotof times various incentives may help in convincing potential participants to rearrange theirschedule and participate in educational programs. The project presented in this paperencountered in part this problem in recruiting
to Lima, Peru from May through the middleof June, annually. Up to 15 students from UNI can also participate in this program as part of theGlobal Engineering Culture and Society course. Students from both institutions will grapple withopen-ended projects that stimulate intercultural competence, interaction, and collaboration. Inaddition to providing undergraduate students with a cross cultural engagement and STEM-related study abroad opportunity, the program also: 1) Expose them to the use of scientificmethods in developing a problem statement revolving around identified global challenges; 2)Give them an experience-based understanding of the value of multidisciplinary teams, and; 3)Require them to investigate contemporary issues in a broader
respondentsindicated that there is a fair/equal representation of faculty by disciplines assigned to the capstoneeither formally or informally through consulting. This is a positive statistic in that not having anequal representation could be seen as having bias towards disciplines from a student perspective.As literature promotes industry involvement, the survey asked those programs that include industryto rank their level of participation in four categories, including lectures, project support, coursejurors, and student consultations / mentors. Ranking of their participation was based on the amountof interaction in the course and is shown in Figure 4. The results indicate that for those programsthat include industry involvement, there exists a significant
on our data to answer this question, when asked to reflect on thechanges that have occurred, many interviewees remark that faculty today do pay greater attentionto undergraduate education, and participate in more regular, if not always continuousimprovement efforts both at course and program level. Indeed, individuals from many differentinstitutions, regardless of position or institutional rank, mentioned that conversations in thedepartments and colleges that were stimulated by an ABET visit were helpful. (This said, manyinstitutions still rush to compile their ABET data two to three years before a visit.) Many of thoseinterviewed also admit that curriculum changes, especially at program level, were a moreinfrequent occurrence prior to EC
, Colorado Christian University After earning my B.S. in Engineering Science at Penn State University (2007), I began working as an audio-video engineer/designer. I then made a career transition to teach high school physics. Having sparked my love for education, I went back to school to earn my M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering (2015) and my Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2016). My first faculty job was at Rowan University in southern New Jersey, where I had the honor of helping develop their first-year engineering and B.S. in Engineering Entrepreneurship programs. I’m now blessed to be at CCU contributing to what God’s doing through our Industrial & Systems Engineering program and university.Dr. Cheryl A
2019 ASEE Annual ConferenceIntroduction:To invite high school students into a college setting to learn about engineering design, and 3Dprinting to spark interest in STEM related programs, thirteen high school students (10th and 11thgrade) were invited to participate in a two-week summer camp at North Carolina A&T StateUniversity (NCAT) campus. The team that conducted the workshop is composed of two NCATfaculty members, one undergraduate student and a high school teacher. The workshop took placebetween July 9 and 20th, and started at 9 AM, and ended at 5 PM. The lunch break was at 12 noon(lunch was provided). The main objective of the workshop was to prepare a pipeline of students inthe area of advanced manufacturing and 3D-printing.In
,robotics and mechatronic systems, electrical, computer, environmental, and architecturalengineering. The College of Engineering & Science has a well-established co-operativeeducation program with a long history of placing graduates into the workforce upon graduation.Located in the city of Detroit the college has close ties to the automobile industry, its numeroussuppliers and local defense contractors.Detroit Mercy engineering students take a comprehensive physics sequence during the wintersemester of their freshman year and fall semester of their sophomore year. The college offersPHY 3690 Modern Physics with Device Applications as a junior level physics course. Thecourse is required of electrical engineers and offered as an elective to other
in managing and leading others [7], and companies signal to universities to producegraduates with leadership skills [8]. Responding to this demand, ABET [6] is requiring thatundergraduate engineering programs demonstrate attainment of student outcomes that includeleadership in a team setting. It remains to be seen how universities will demonstrate leadershipcompetencies in student outcomes [9] and how well these educational experiences will translateinto valued workplace behaviors. Despite a purported high level of interest, leadershipdevelopment in industry is often hit or miss, and on-the-job-training in leadership is the norm[10]. Indeed, none of the engineering graduates surveyed by Watson [11] mentioned anyworkplace training in the area