Paper ID #25680Enhancing Student Perceptions of Engineering Disciplines through Showcas-ing of Career PathsProf. Matthew B. James P.E., Virginia Tech Matthew James is an Assistant Professor of Practice in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia. He holds bachelors and masters degrees from Virginia Tech in Civil Engineering.Kacie Hodges P.E., Kacie Hodges, PE works as a Civil Engineer in Blacksburg, Virginia. She holds BS and Master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech. Kacie is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia and
, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American psychologist, 44(9), 1175. 13. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive career theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122. 14. Yoder, B. (2013) Engineering By the Numbers 2012-2013. American Society for Engineering Educaiton. https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2017- Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics.pdf 15. Yoder, B. (2017) Engineering By the Numbers 2016-2017. American Society for Engineering Educaiton. https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications
perspective on adolescents’ academic decision making.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 677– 685, 2001.[7] M. K. Orr, K. Ehlert, M. L. Rucks, and M. Desselles, “Towards the Development of a Revised Decision-Making Competency Instrument,” Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2018.[8] R Code Team, “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.,” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria., 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.r- project.org/.[9] P. J. Curran, S. G. West, and J. F. Finch, “The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.,” Psychol. Methods, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 1996.[10] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner, H
Paper ID #26713Work in Progress: First-Year Engineering College Students: Value Createdfrom Participating in a Living/Learning CommunityDr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D., is an Clinical Associate Professor at Boise State University, Idaho. His academic research interests include innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Ms. Kim M. B. Tucker, Boise State University Kim Tucker is currently completing her Doctoral Degree in Curriculum and Instruction and works as the Coordinator of Residential Learning for in the Living
pedagogical uses of digital systems. She also investigates fundamental questions critical to improving undergraduate engineering degree pathways. . She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. In 2013, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh was honored as a promising new engineering education researcher when she was selected as an ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Choice of Major and Career Aspirations of First-Year ECE StudentsINTRODUCTIONTypically, university engineering study is categorized into specialty areas, e.g. civil, chemical,computer, electrical, mechanical, etc. Engineering students are asked to select a
cross-sections test. Hanna explained, For this one, because the cut from here and at here we will not have the same size so it will, and it is not a triangle because it does not meet at any part in the blue one… so, it’s not B and I think the upper here is smaller than the cut at the base.She seemed to have a particular criterion or expectation of what the correct answer should looklike based on the cut. This fits into the strategy we have classified as, guiding rule. Then, basedon this criterion, she could eliminate the unlikely answer choice, thereby demonstrating aprocess of elimination. Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations (PSVT:R): In this section, we discussstrategies students used in solving PSVT: R
Orr for reviewing this paper.References[1] “Employment Outlook for Engineering Occupations to 2024,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/employment-outlook-for- engineering-occupations-to-2024.htm. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2019].[2] S. D. Sheppard, A. L. Antonio, S. R. Brunhaver, and S. K. Gilmartin, “Studying the Career Pathways of Engineers,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 283–309.[3] National Science Foundation, “NSRCG Public 2006 Data File,” 2006. [Online]. Available: https://sestat.nsf.gov/datadownload/.[4] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar
? a) What amount of change (increase/decrease) after the first year is there in student's selecting a major (i.e. leaving first-year engineering) after the introduction of this module as compared to before indicating more informed decision making? b) What amount of change (increase/decrease) after two years is there in student's selection of a major (i.e. leaving first-year engineering) after the introduction of this module as compared to before indicating more informed decision making? 2. To what extent does retention increase/decrease within the STEM College and in engineering after introducing the informed decision making module? 3. To what extent have disciplines students are selecting
minors complementary to the major or participation in the Grand Challenge Scholar Program. Any faculty time not directly related to mentorship efforts is considered non-value-added. Examples include showing thestudents how to register for courses on Self Service, the course management system, orwhere to find the list of Humanities courses, a subset of which are graduation requirements.The overall duration and variance of advising sessions is reduced through two generalcategories of effort. The first focuses on value-added activities, with the goal of capturing thebest practices across the faculty. To demonstrate consider faculty members A and B whodiscuss the benefit of having a Mathematics minor with their advisees. Faculty member Aholds a
" Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006.[36] M. Allen and A. Kelley, "Emphasizing teamwork and communication skills in introductory calculus courses," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007: https://peer.asee.org/2166.[37] A. Bernal, J. J. Leader, and J. B. Ward, "Creating laboratories to aid student modeling ability in Calculus I," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018: https://peer.asee.org/30235.[38] J. D. Desjardins, E. Breazel, M. Reba, I. Viktorova, J. B. Matheny, and T. R. Khan
Paper ID #27235Freshman-year Initiative for a Cohort of Largely Engineering Minority Stu-dentsDr. Kamau Wright, University of Hartford Kamau Wright is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Hartford. He spe- cializes in thermo-fluids and plasma engineering. His technical research interests include applications of high voltage plasma discharges to liquids and wastewaters; plasma decomposition of carbon dioxide; foul- ing prevention and mitigation for heat exchangers; oxidation of organic matter in water; and inactivation of bacteria using high voltage plasmas. c
-189, 2003.[16] A. R. Carberry and A. F. McKenna, "Engineering student's conceptions of model uses in design," in 2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, REES 2011, 2011.[17] R. Lesh, M. Hoover, and A. Kelly, "Equity, assessment, and thinking mathematically: Principles for the design of model-eliciting activities," Developments in school mathematics education around the world, vol. 3, pp. 104-130, 1993.[18] O. B. J. Daniel K. Howe, "Developing an Interactive Computer Program to Enhance Student Learning of Dynamical Systems," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[19] A. J. Magana, "Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Education: A Learning Progression," Journal of
pre-engineeringprogram. What is the drop-out rate? Are there specific disciplines that pre-engineeringstudents enter? What is the ultimate successful graduation rate?The GEE 103 course should be developed to better gauge success in the pre-engineeringprogram. Class exercises need to be more frequent with better accountability from students toreflect academic expectations in an introductory engineering course. Though these exerciseswill not have academic rigor, they should be better structured to substantiate success andfailure rates. Further work will need to be done to develop a working protocol to predictsuccess for students in pre-engineering.References[1] T. A. Lacey, B. Wright, “Occupational Employment Projections to 2018,” Monthly
Handbook as a reference book forthe class.Teaching and Class Participation Assessment: This semester end assessment mainly targets toassess the effectiveness of teaching components and the methodology. Appendix-A provides thequestionnaire, Teaching and Class Participation Assessment.Final Examination: This semester end assessment survey evaluates whether a student hasrecognized the value of seeking assistance and mentoring from his/her major advisor or professorwithin the major. Appendix-B provides the final examination survey questions, FinalExamination.First-Year Seminar Survey: This semester end assessment gathers the information from thestudents on how various topics help individual students and what other topics they expect toinclude in the
by Ambrose andAmon [2]. The work performed in the labs is team-based and attendance is taken. (a) (b) Figure 1. (a) Motion simulation of a geared mechanism. (b) Thermal analysis simulation of sphere cooling under forced convection.Throughout the semester, students work on activities in the lab where they are taught how tocreate 3D part and assembly models using SolidWorks [16], how to set-up and run a motionsimulation of a geared mechanism [17] (Figure 1(a)), how to perform force analysis of simplestructures [18], and how to set-up and run a thermal analysis simulation on a sphere being cooledunder forced convection [19] (Figure 1(b)). As previously
Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA), 2018. http://learningoutcomesassessment.org/occasionalpaperthirtytwo.html[8] R. D. Moen and C. L. Norman, “Circling back: Clearing up myths about the Deming cycle and seeing how it keeps evolving,” Quality Progress, pp. 22-28, Nov. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.apiweb.org/circling-back.pdf.[9] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, “How do students become self-directed learners?” in How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010, pp. 188-216.[10] B. Enyon and L. M. Gambino, High impact ePortfolio practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus
the program, atleast for some students. Peer mentoring, including seeing students in leadership roles (both ason-campus peer mentors and as trip leaders on the outdoor portion of the program) and being able tohave informal conversations with upper-class students seemed to provide value to participants. Weintend to explore the effects of peer mentoring in future research on the outcomes of this program.References[1] T. L. Strayhorn, College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge, 2012.[2] A. Godbole, B. Miller, M. K. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and S. C. Davis, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belonging through the Lens of Social Identity,” presented at the 2018 CoNECD - The
] M. Ashley, K. M. Cooper, J. M. Cala, and S. E. Brownell, “Building better bridges into stem: A synthesis of 25 years of literature on stem summer bridge programs,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 4, 2017.[5] L. Chevalier, B. Chrisman, and M. Kelsey, “SUCCESS week: a freshmen orientation program at Southern Illinois University Carbondale College of Engineering,” pp. 7–8, 2001.[6] M. J. Grimm, “Work in progress - an Engineering Bridge Program - the foundation for success for academically at-risk students,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, 2005, p. S2C–8.[7] M. Harkins, “Engineering Boot Camp : A Broadly Based Online Summer Bridge Program for Engineering
commercialisation: student learning in a sustainable engineering innovation project, European Journal of Engineering Education, 32:2, 143-165, DOI: 10.1080/03043790601118689[8] Goldberg, D. E. (1996). Change in engineering education: One myth, two scenarios, and three foci. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 107–115.[9] Rogers, D., Jr., Stratton, M. J., & King, R. E. (1999). Manufacturing education plan: 1999 critical competency gaps. Society of Manufacturing Engineers and SME Education Foundation.[10] S. F. Freeman, C. Pfluger, R. Whalen, K. Schulte Grahame, J. L. Hertz, C. Variawa, J. O. Love, M. L. Sivak and B. Maheswaran, (2016) Cranking Up Cornerstone: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Pilot
Paper ID #26427Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income,Rural STEM Students SucceedDr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
., Yasuhara. K., Barker. T. J., & Morozov. A, “Considering context: A study of first‐year engineering students,” in Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), pp.321-334, 2007.[5] Dickrell, P., & Virguez, L. “Engineering Design & Society: A First-Year Course Teaching Human-Centered Design”. In 2018 World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC) (pp. 1-4). IEEE, 2018.[6] B. D. Jones, “Motivating Students to Engage in Learning: The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation”. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 272-285. 2009.[7] Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., & Miller, R. L. “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative
Proceedings, IEEE Frontiers in Education, 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, October 26 -31, 2006. Session S3G, pp. 1–6. [6] G. Heitmann, “Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions,” European J. of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 121-131, 1996. [7] H. Qi and H. Jack, “A scalable course project to accommodate academic variation,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016. Paper ID: 15437. [8] K. Meyers, B. P. Conner, and A. S. Morgan, “3-D printing in a first-year engineering design project
reflect on their perceivedconfidence level in their understanding of the content and their preparation in each of thecohorted courses through a daily reflection. Additionally, students were instructed to track theirtime throughout the day in thirty-minute increments, taking note of study sessions, class sessions,meal times, and sleep, for the week leading up to the exams in the form of a time trackinglearning journal (Appendix A). Following exams, students noted and described their mosteffective study session and evaluated their confidence levels.Upon receiving exam scores, students completed an exam wrapper survey (Appendix B), whichincluded learning outcomes from units covered on the exam and an evaluation of exampreparation behaviors for the
, "Beginning an engineer's journey: A narrative examination of wow, when, and why students choose the engineering major," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 556-582, 2018.[16] J. L. DeGrazia, J. F. Sullivan, L. E. Carlson, and D. W. Carlson, "A K-12/University partnership: Creating tomorrow's engineers," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 557-563, 2001.[17] P. Cantrell and J. Ewing-Taylor, "Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 295-303, 2009.[18] H. M. Doerr, J. B. Ärlebäck, and A. Costello Staniec, "Design and effectiveness of modeling-based mathematics in a summer bridge
issues with engineering identity. Therefore, the professors should also look into other areasto improve retention such as mentoring and tutoring [2], [3].Bibliography[1] M. Matthews, “Keeping students in engineering: A research-to-practice brief.” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, pp. 1–7, 2016.[2] B. L. Yoder, “Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students,” Washington, DC, 2012.[3] M. Atwater, “Why students leave engineering,” Engineering.com, Mississauga, Ontario, Jul-2013.[4] M. Yatchmeneff and M. Calhoun, “Exploring engineering identity in a common introduction to engineering course to improve retention,” in
psychological type in engineering education. Engineering Education: 394-400.3. McCaulley, M.H. et al. (1987). Myers-Briggs type indicator and retention in engineering. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education 3(2): 99-109.4. NERIS Analytics Ltd. (2019). Is it possible to change your personality type? 16 Personalities. Retrieved from < https://www.16personalities.com/articles/is-it-possible-to- change-your-personality-type>.5. Vitelli, R. (2015). Can you change your personality? Psychology Today. Retrieved from < https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/media-spotlight/201509/can-you-change-your- personality>.6. Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., and Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering
Paper ID #27207Creation, Development, and Delivery of a New Interactive First-Year Intro-duction to Engineering CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of LouisvilleMr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is a Graduate Teaching Assistance in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at the University of Louisville. A PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering, he received both his B.S. and M. Eng. from the University of Louisville in the same field. His research interests include power electronics and controls, as well as engineering education for first-year students.Dr. James E. Lewis
Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. [8] J. Ray and J. Farris, “First-Year Engineering Product Realization,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, MO, 2000. [9] M. F. Bays-Muchmore and A. Chronopoulou, “First Year Engineering Students Perceptions of Engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake CIty, UT, 2018.[10] K. Meyers, J. Uhran, C. Pieronek, D. Budny, J. Ventura, P. Ralston, J. K. Estell, B. Hart, C. Slaboch, and R. Ladewski, “Some Perspectives on First Year Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.
related to USP K-12 preparation, admission into higher education andsuccessful attainment of the engineering degree is well within reach with a tad bit of creativity andinnovation on behalf of educational institutions and higher education practitioners. 12References 1) B. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate Engineering Schools, Departments and Programs,” Washington, DC, 2016. 2) F. A. Maton, Kenneth I., Pollard, Shauna A., Weise, Tatiana V. McDougall, and Hrabowski, III., “The Meyerhoff Scholars Program: A Strengths-Based, Institution-Wide Approach to Increasing Diversity in Science, Technology
Paper ID #25277Visibly Random Grouping Applied to First-Semester EngineeringDr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the