Collection

2018 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Joseph Stanislow; Wendy A. Dannels; Mel Chua

ASEE St. Lawrence Section Conference, 2018 Cornell University April 20-21, 2018 ADDING VISUAL SIGNALS TO MACHINE SHOP EQUIPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF DEAF GAIN IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Joseph Stanislow Wendy A. Dannels Mel Chua Information and Computing Information and Computing Information and Computing Studies Studies Studies National Technical Institute for National Technical Institute for National Technical Institute for the Deaf the Deaf the Deaf Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester Institute of

Collection

2018 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Chaitanya K. Ullal; Elizabeth Herkenham; Amy H. Kim; Tara Chklovski

ASEE St. Lawrence Section Conference, 2018 Cornell University April 20-21, 2018 IMPACT OF INCORPORATING OUTREACH INTO AN UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL INTRODUCTION TO NANOTECHNOLOGY COURSE: RESULTS AND INSIGHTS FROM A SMALL SCALE STUDY Chaitanya K. Ullal Elizabeth Herkenham Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Amy H. Kim Tara Chklovski Iridescent, Los Angeles, CA Iridescent, Los Angeles, CAKeywords: nanotechnology, undergraduate, outreach.AbstractA small-scale study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of incorporating K-12 outreach intoan

Collection

2018 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Jikai Du

Figure 4. The 5:1 gear ratio Table 1 summarizes the experimental results. The gear ratios were adjusted by adding orsubtracting gears in certain forms. TABLE 1: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GEAR RATIO AND VOLTAGE OUTPUT Generator A Generator B Generator A Generator B Gear Ratio 4:1 5:1 8:1 10:1 Output (V) Trail 1 11.9 3.3 23.6 6.6 Output (V) Trail 2 12.3 2.9 24.6 6.4 Output (V) Trail 3 12.1 3.7 24.1 7.3 Output (V) Average 12.1 3.3

Collection

2018 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Mohamed Alshaer; Paul Cotae

like malware propagation.We consider the example as shown in Fig. 1. This time we will use the normalizations that wediscussed at the method section of the paper. we see the rank of each node (alternate) based onDC, CC, BC, or EC. Table 1: Centrality Measures Table #N DC CC BC EC a=1 4.0000 0.6666 1.6666 0.5940 b=2 4.0000 0.6821 1.1190 0.6959 e=3 5.0000 0.6922 4.5357 0.7383 h=4 7.0000 0.8181 8.8452 1.0000 j=5 2.0000 0.5555 0.0000 0.3407 d=6 6.0000 0.7555 6.5952 0.8690 g=7

Collection

2018 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Tabitha L. Sprau Coulter

and E. Peterson, "Learning styles and approaches to study," Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 537-542, Nov. 2004.[4] M. S. A. Mansor and A. Ismail, "Learning styles and perception of engineering students towards online learning," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , vol. 69, pp. 669-674, Dec. 2012.[5] D. P. Diaz and R. B. Cartnal, "Students' learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus.," College Teaching, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 130-135, 1999.[6] R. Bass, "Disrupting ourselves: The problem of learning in higher education," Educause Review, pp. 23-33, 21 March 2012.[7] S. E. Bradforth, E. R. Miller, W. R. Dichtel, A. K. Leibovich, A. L. Feig, J. D. Martin, K. S. Bjorkman, Z

Collection

2018 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Dariush H. Zadeh; Shohreh Moini

. O. Obare and J. H. Hageman, “The power and promise of early research,” American Chemical Society, vol. 1231, 2016, ISBN13: 9780841231733, eISBN: 9780841231726, DOI: 10.1021/bk-2016-1231.[3] N. H. Hensel and B. D. Cejda, “Tapping the potential of all, undergraduate research at community colleges,” The Council on Undergraduate Research, 2014 ISBN: 0-941933-50-4.[4] J. Gentile, K. Brenner and A. Stephens, “Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities,” The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The National Academies Press. 2017, doi: 10.17226/24622.[5] T. Landefeld, , “Community college students: An untapped source of future