Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy. He received his BS in Civil Engineering from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1998, his MS in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado in 2000, and his PhD in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2011.Dr. James B. Pocock, United States Air Force Academy James Pocock is a professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy. His interests include architectural and engineering educations, and sustainable architecture, engineering and construction in the developing world.Lt. Col. M. Mark Russell P.E., DFCE c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #28290Architectural Design as a way for Civil Engineers to Learn BuildingSystems and BIMDr. James B. Pocock, U.S. Air Force Academy James Pocock is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy. His interests include architectural and engineering education, and sustainable architecture, engineering and construction in the developing world.Dr. Patrick Charles Suermann PE, Texas A&M University Dr. Patrick C. Suermann, PE, LEED AP, Lt Col, USAF, ret., is the Department Head of the largest Con- struction Science program in the nation at Texas A&M
betterunderstanding about the function and layout of the building. Lastly, this building does not containany private areas, such as dormitory rooms, so students were allowed to examine the entirebuilding in detail. (a) ARC Building Exterior (b) Elevation - Drawing Figure 2. Images of the ARC Building (Photo Courtesy of Ohio University)The building has a gross area of 101,850 sq. ft. with five different levels: the area of the lowerlevel is 13,400 sq. ft.; the area of the 1st floor is 27,700 sq. ft.; the area of the 2nd floor is 23,750 sq.ft.; the area of the 3rd floor is 25,500 sq. ft.; and the area of the mechanical penthouse is 11,500 sq.ft.Project Team OrganizationIn order to provide a necessary
for Architecture," in ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, Tampa , 2019.[2] M. P. a. R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 04, pp. 123-137, 2006.[3] B. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[4] B. Duch, S. E. Groh and D. E. Allen, The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Sterling, Virginia: Stylus, 2001.[5] S. o. C. Environment, "Parsons Street Seat," Design Build, Parsons School of Design, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.parsonsstreetseats.com/.[6] T. H. Line, "The High Line," The High Line, [Online]. Available: https://www.thehighline.org/.[7
Residential Construction Commercial Construction Infrastructure Construction A. Have you heard BIM (Building Information Modeling) in the last ten years? B. Please select where you have heard BIM? Figure 1: Students’ first exposure to BIMTo determine the students’ familiarity and competency with BIM, students in the CM program were askedto evaluate and rate their familiarity and competency of BIM on a scale of 1 (lowest) – 5 (highest). Figure2 shows the students’ familiarity and competency level with BIM. The results of the BIM familiarity andcompetency indicated that many of the responded students had the average and low levels of
course is limited to 30students and in total, 280 students have participated in the courses Mechanics of Structures I andMechanics of Structures II, taught by one of the authors of this work over the last ten years.ObjectivesThe main objective of this work is to propose a model that incorporates several elements to atraditionally theoretical course that makes it more attractive to students, especially toArchitecture students. According to our records, it is not uncommon that more than thirty percentof students fail the course in their first attempt. The evaluation of the course is usually the sumof: a) Marks of two partial exams b) Mark of collaborative work and homework c) Mark of the final examThe two partial exams usually account for
. 1, pp. 334-356, 2018.[10] T. Hadikusumo and B. W. Aksorn, "Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects," Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 709-727, 2008.[11] Literary Devices, "Vignette," 2020. [Online]. Available: https://literarydevices.net/vignette/. [Accessed 1 February 2020].[12] D. S. Sink and G. L. Smith, Jr., "A Systems Model of Organizational Performance," in Organizaional Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox, Washington, DC, National Research Council, 1994.[13] Duffka School of Economics, "Productivty Activity," 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.duffka.com/home/welcome-mrp-mrc/c219/class-activities/productivity- activity. [Accessed 1
Food Average (out of 5) 4 4.19 4.38 3.85 3.67 4.43 4.38 4.43 4.52 3.85 4In the next section, participants were asked to what extent possible different factors can impact them tochoose construction as their major. A 5-level Likert scale (1: Very Low, 5: Very High) was used to ratethe items (Figure 7). Possible factors included the following items: A. Salary B. Nature of construction activities C. To join a family company D. Someone among my parents/friends/relatives is in the construction industry E. Someone among my parents
, 2, 34-42.[6] Pinter-Wollman, N., Penn, A., Theraulaz, G., & Fiore, S. M. (2018). Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B37320170232[7] Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(3), 459-480.[8] Yocom, K., Proksch, G., Born, B., & Tyman, S. K. (2012). The built environments laboratory: An interdisciplinary framework for studio education in the planning and design disciplines. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(2), 8-25.
Reinforced Concrete Design Class. Associated Schools of Construction Annual International Conference Proceedings. ASC Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.5. Carns, D. & Plugge, P.W. (2010). Creating and Utilizing a “Working Model Heat Pump” to Enhance Student Learning in a Construction Management Program. ASC Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.6. Carter, M., Gehrig, B., & Smithwick, J. (2018). Collaborative Learning Methods in Construction Management Education. ASC Proceedings of the 54th Annual International Conference, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.7. Cornelius, S., Gordon, C., & Ackland, A
focus on classroom and social aspects ofthe pre-major college experience is designed to gain a clear picture of students’ stumbling pointsso that future work can design an intervention using empirical research to ameliorate theseissues.ReferencesAdams, G., Garcia, D.M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. (2006). The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 602-615.Barrett, T. W., Pizzico, T. W., Levy, B., and Nagel, R. L. (2015) A Review of University Maker Spaces. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a
Paper ID #28672Challenges and Opportunities Observed in the Implementation of a NewArchitectural Engineering Undergraduate Academic ProgramProf. Scott Walbridge P.E., University of Waterloo Scott Walbridge has been a professor in the University of Waterloo’s Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering since 2006. Prior to that, he completed his doctoral studies at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), and his bachelor’s and master’s degrees at the University of Alberta. Be- tween his master’s and doctoral studies, he worked as a structural engineering consultant for 2.5 years in Edmonton, Canada
Paper ID #29219Bringing Building Information Modeling (BIM) into the Process forBuilding Structure Design CoursesProf. John J Phillips P.E., Oklahoma State University JOHN PHILLIPS, a registered engineer and associate professor of architectural engineering, practiced as a structural engineer for nine years before returning to his alma mater to teach at Oklahoma State University. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses to architecture, architectural engineering, and civil engineering students that include Statics, Analysis I, Foundations, Timbers, Steel, Concrete, Masonry, Steel II, Concrete II, Steel III, Concrete III
Paper ID #29779Implementing Bluebeam Software in Architectural Engineering Design CoursesMichael James Deigert P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoDr. Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Anahid Behrouzi is an assistant professor of architectural engineering at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo. She has been involved with STEM education beginning in 2003 as a volunteer and summer instructor with the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. She has been engaged with undergraduate/graduate course delivery in the topic areas of engineering
Students A B 2 meetings per week | Basic mechanical, electrical CM 3 1-hhour lecture + 1- and plumbing course for 31 50% 50% 23301 Credits hour lab per meeting constructors and architects 4 meetings per week | Design studio for CM 6 2 1-hour lectures + 2 construction-oriented students 6 80% 20% 33000 Credits 4-hour studios (Residential Focus) CM 2 2-hour lectures and 2 Introductory design and 8 Hour 20000 2-hour labs over 2 construction integration
among construction industrystudents to a) evaluate their experience of natural disasters, b) examine the source of knowledgeof resilience on natural disasters, c) measure knowledge of post-disaster evacuation, and d)evaluate disaster preparation from university education. The study found that the population of thestudent body existed that had not experienced a natural disaster and were unaware of its impactseither on a personal or familial basis. Further, the majority of the responding students felt that theirmajor(s) and universities did not prepare them in terms of handling natural disasters and extremeweather events. Finally, a correlation was found between the location students live and a desire forknowledge about extreme weather events at
. 1 2 3 4 5DC7 Critical thinking courses are important to my career. 1 2 3 4 5DC8 Calculus courses are not applicable after graduation. 1 2 3 4 5DC9 English Literature courses are meaningful to me. 1 2 3 4 5DC10. My degree is required for my career path. 1 2 3 4 5Questions in reference to self-reporting grades are as follows.Self-report your average grades for the following course types:1. Major courses A B C D 5. Calculus A B C D2. Critical Thinking A B C D 6. Humanities A B C D3. Structures A B C D
have regarding work zones and TTCprimary components, an illustration of a TTC zone with a stationary right lane closure on adivided highway was presented (see Figure 2). The text of the warning signs was shown inSpanish as required by local statutes. Lines A, B, C, and D refer to strategic points in the TTCzone. Line A identifies the start of the advance warning area (i.e., the position of the firstwarning sign shown to drivers). Line B was positioned at the last sign of the advance warningarea. Line C represents the beginning of the transition area (i.e., the start of the right-lanemerging taper). Line D marks the start of the activity area. Using these four lines as references,subjects were asked to identify: where the construction work zone
. Gerber, and K. Ku (2011). “The pace of technological innovation inarchitecture, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into thecurricula.” J. Inform. Technol. Constr, 16, 411–432.[5] B. T. Johnson, and D. E. Gunderson (2009). “Educating Students concerning recent trends inAEC: A survey of ASC member programs.”Associated Schools of Construction: Proc., 45thAnnual Conf., Proc., 45thASCAnnualConf., T.Sulbaran, ed., Univ. of Southern Mississippi,Hattiesburg, MS.[6] Wu, W., Mayo, G., McCuen, T. L., Issa, R. R., & Smith, D. K. (2018). Building InformationModeling Body of Knowledge. I: Background, Framework, and Initial Development. ASCEJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8).[7] L. Wang, F. Leite
growing cities," Waste Management, vol. 83, pp. 1-5, Jan 2019.[3] A. Morello, Issa, R. R. A., Franz, B., "Exploratory Study of Recruitment and Retention of Women in the Construction Industry," American Society of Civil Engineer, 2018.[4] J. Jung, Caffarella, R. S., "Advancing Cultural Knowledge: Experiential Learning International Graduate Study Training Programs in the Health and STEM Disciplines," in Adult Education Research Conference, 2010.[5] C. A. Webster, D. F. Stodden, R. L. Carson, C. Egan, and D. Nesbitt, "Integrative Public Health-Aligned Physical Education and Implications for the Professional Preparation of Future Teachers and Teacher Educators/Researchers in the Field," Quest, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 457-474, 2016.[6
, “Communication Trends in Engineering Firms: Implications for Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 1999.[11] J. V. Farr and B. A. Bowman, “Abet accreditation of engineering management programs: Contemporary and future issues,” EMJ - Eng. Manag. J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 7–13, 1999, doi: 10.1080/10429247.1999.11415044.[12] M. Elzomor and O. Youssef, “Coupling Haptic Learning with Technology To Advance Informal STEM Pedagogies,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ.[13] Stata.com, “Ologit — Ordered logistic regression.”[14] D. Kumrow and B. Dahlen, “Is Peer Review an Effective Approach for Evaluating Teachers?,” Clear. House A J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 238–241
Simulation,” buildsim. [Online]. Available: https://www.buildsim.io/. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].[10]. “WINNERS ANNOUNCED Energy Modeling Olympiad 2019,” The Energy Simulation Academy. [Online]. Available: https://simulate.energy/blog/77352/olympiad2019. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].[11]. P. B. Cobbinah, E. Gaisie, N. Y. Oppong-Yeboah, and D. O. Anim, “Kumasi: Towards a sustainable and resilient cityscape,” Cities, vol. 97, p. 102567, 2020.[12]. F. Abdelfattah, “Sustainable development practices and its effect on green buildings,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 410, p. 012065, 2020.[13]. N. Chalfoun, O. Youssef, E. Engy "Research, development, and optimization of schematic
.[7] A. Al-Bayati, M. Namian, and K. Alomari, “Construction Stakeholders’ Perception toward the Success Factors of Construction Projects.” Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE) 2019.[8] D. P. Gilkey, C. L. D. Puerto, T. Keefe, P. Bigelow, R. Herron, J. Rosecrance, and P. Chen, “Comparative Analysis of Safety Culture Perceptions among HomeSafe Managers and Workers in Residential Construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 138, no. 9, pp. 1044–1052, 2012.[9] E. Jazayeri, H. Liu and G. B. Dadi, “Perception differences between contractors and owners regarding drivers of construction safety.” Journal of Safety Engineering, 6(2): 29-39 DOI: 10.5923/j.safety.20170602.02, 2017.[10] J. Dawes
Week No. Topic 1 Study of extreme environments and planetary conditions (Earth, Moon and Mars) 2 Infrastructure planning and transportation 3 Potential sites and in-situ resources 4 Health, well-being, safety, and comfort 5 Energy efficiency of structures 6 Overview of outer space structures and habitat case studies (built and unbuilt) 7 - 12 Habitat Design A. Habitat types and program requirements B. Deployable structures i. Geometric design and connection detailing ii. Optimal structures: packaging
solutions for the activitiesif necessary. The activities were created to assist both the students and the instructor inidentifying any points of confusion or misconception in the previous sessions. Two hypotheseswere proposed to address the question stated in the introduction: Students perceived more participation in in-class review activities with the use of the cloud-based SRS in the subject section (H1). There were significant differences in actual and perceived learning between the control and subject sections (H2). (a) Lesson 22 review activity in PowerPoint in (b) Lesson 22 review activity in Poll Everywhere in the control section the subject section Figure 1. An example of in
Paper ID #30553Engaging Students Through Concrete Beam FabricationProf. Christina McCoy SE, RA, Oklahoma State University Professor McCoy is a licensed Structural Engineer and Architect. She holds a Bachelor Degree in Archi- tectural Engineering and a Bachelor in Architecture from Oklahoma State University. She holds a Masters of Science in Architecture from the University of Cincinnati and Masters of Civil Engineering (Structural Emphasis) from the University of Kansas. She worked in the structural engineering profession for 10 years before joining the full-time Architectural Engineering faculty at Oklahoma State
: Create Spaces to Highlight Local TalentAbstractThe paper will focus on a two-semester service-learning project in which ArchitecturalTechnology Students are partnering with a local entity called Reclaiming Community. Reclaimis a subsidiary of a larger local organization with a mission to bring about sustainableregeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment through their Art Shedinitiative. Each semester will develop a separate set of shed designs, with separate assessmentmethods and outcomes. The over-arching goal of the project is revitalizing the neighborhoodsthat will house these sheds, and encourage the love of art and design in area. Sheds are designedwith the intent that after a
including construction schedul- ing, planning and control and sustainable building construction and design. Her research is in sustainable built environments, occupant comfort and behavior, indoor environmental quality, and building energy consumption. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Importance of Active Learning in an Undergraduate Course in Construction SchedulingAbstractStudents in construction majors require a variety of skills and knowledge to thrive and leadchange in the industry. The learning process should incorporate strategies that ensure studentsacquire knowledge in the right environment, using up-to-date tools and technology that willsupport