additive innovation cycle focused on pedagogy? a. How are pedagogical risk taking and other teaching related outcomes (e.g., self- efficacy in instruction) influenced by participation in an additive innovation cycle focused on pedagogy? b. How do additional outcomes (e.g., sense of belonging to academic community, job satisfaction, etc.) among individual instructors arise from participating in an additive innovation cycle focused on pedagogy? c. How are these outcomes associated with particular phases of the additive innovation cycle?Data SourcesA cohort of 15 non-tenure track instructors were engaged in a professional development programbased on
, B. M. Wallen, and J. A. Starke, “An Environmental Engineering Sequence: Deliberately Addressing and Evaluating Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge (presentation & 6-page paper),” presented at the 2017 Mid-Atlantic Section Fall Conference, 2017.[3] S. Dexter, E. Buchanan, K. Dins, K. R. Fleischmann, and K. Miller, “Characterizing the Need for Graduate Ethics Education,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 153–158, doi: 10.1145/2445196.2445245.[4] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015
and procedures for handling assessments.References [1] ABET | ABET accreditation. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/. [2] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET, en-US. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/. [3] N. E. Adams, “Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives,” Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 152–153, Jul. 2015, issn: 1536-5050. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010. [4] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, 1st ed. Longman, 1956. [5] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active
analysis will only include data from three of the fourinstitutions being studied in the larger project.MeasuresThe two main outcome variables in the analyses presented here are (a) students’ reenrollment inthe subsequent semester, persistence and (b) cumulative Grade Point Average, GPA. Both ofthese measures are obtained from the institutional analysis office or enrollment managementoffice at each of the three participating institutions.The survey operationalizes the concepts of engineering identity, sense of belonging andcommitment to field by asking students how much they agree with a series of statements(developed and validated in previous research), which we then used to develop indices. Allvariables are calculated by taking the mean across
://www.myersbriggs.org/[5] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2001). Engineering Criteria2000 Third Edition: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States.Baltimore: ABET.[6] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofengineering in the new century. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.[7] National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing andemploying America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.[8] Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and practice. E-Content Generic Vendor. 1999.[9] Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B.,and Kelarestani, M
learning in mathematics. ERIC Clearinghouse, 2003.[8] X. Xia, C. Lu, and B. Wang, “Research on mathematics instruction experiment based problem posing,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 153–163, 2008.[9] M. Wang, B. Wu, N.-S. Chen, and J. M. Spector, “Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment,” Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 293–306, 2013.[10] J. Piaget, Piaget’s theory. Wiley, New York, NY, 1970.[11] L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and language. MIT press, 2012.[12] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1984.[13] N. M. Dixon, D. Adams, and R. Cullins, “Learning style
Considerations in STEM Fields.” Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX. June 14-17, 2009, AC 2009-517. [4] Dorie, B. L., Jones, T. R., and M. E. Cardella. “Parents as Critical Influence: Insights From Five Different Studies (Other)” Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 15-18, 2014. Paper ID: 10554 [5] Carnasciali, M., & Thompson, A. E., & Thomas, T. J. (2013, June), “Factors influencing students' choice of engineering major.” Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. June 23-26, 2013. https
hover their mouse cursor over thequestion text to see the answer. In Figure 1b, students were invited to click on multiple choiceanswers until they found the correct one, receiving immediate feedback on each click. Studentswere asked to record these responses in the submission sheet required for each practicum.The treatment group received a lab manual with more interactive questions than the controlgroup. The control group received a manual that was similar to those used in previous years: itcontained instructions with a few basic interactive questions. The number of additionalinteractive questions was different in each lab: practicum 2B included 13 more questions in thetreatment manual, Practicum 2C included 4 more questions, Practicum 2D
of Writing Lab, TecLabs, Tecnologico deMonterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work.References[1] S. Ghanta, "Augmenting soft skills in engineering students," J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control. Syst., vol. 11,(Special Issue 6), pp. 1720-1722, 2019.[2] M. Debnath et al, "4 - Role of soft skills in engineering education: students' perceptions andfeedback," pp. 61-82, 2012. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-645-6.50004-5. 9[3] M. Abdous, B. R. Facer and C. Yen, "Academic effectiveness of podcasting: A comparative study ofintegrated versus supplemental use of podcasting in second language classes," Computers & Education,vol. 58, (1), pp. 43-52, 2012. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016
actuators to track the sun so the solar face canhave optimal light exposure. The Arduino was used to code the relationship between thephotoresistors and the actuators. So the code focuses the actuators towards the resistor receivingthe highest voltage. See Figure 11. Fig. 11. PhotoresistorsV. Integration and test results A. Battery charging Had a battery with low voltage plugged in since we know that battery would be low on chargeand we can check that it charged by checking the voltage. Normally for a battery used you wouldneed a coulomb meter to see how many electrons were available to be used B. Voltmeter Easily we compared the readout of a known working voltmeter to our own. It varied
. This is exacerbated when the project work extends over multiple termsand teams have unique projects. Giving students some agency in team and project selection isone way to improve their project experience. This paper examines two key questions: (a) Whatis the best way to incorporate student interests into the team-forming process? (b) What impactdoes the team-forming process have on the student experience throughout the project?We consider two different approaches to giving students agency in the team formation / projectselection process that have been implemented in our capstone course. One approach has facultyforming teams outside of class based on student surveys of project interests, skills, timeavailability, and team preferences. The
Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, vol. 9, (S1), no. 4, 2017.[3] A. Barr, K. Bird, B. Castleman, and W. Skimmyhorn, “A comparison of postsecondary outcomes for Army service members, veterans, and civilians,” EdWorking Paper, no.19-50, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://edworkingpapers.com/ai19-50 2019. [Accessed May 1, 2020].[4] J. Coll and E. Weiss, “Military culture and veteran transition.” Caring for the Military, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 10-19, 2016.[5] K. Jones, “Understanding transition experiences of combat veterans attending community college,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 107-123, 2016.[6] D. Perkins, K. Aronson, N. Morgan, J. Bleser, D. Vogt, D., L. Copeland
here.The questions given to the IEEE club are given below. Note that the “a” questions (1a, 2a, etc.)are “generic” to courses (and associated labs), while the corresponding “b” questions (1b, 2b,etc.) are specific to the big_blinky lab/tutorial. Very similar “a” questions were used for the EGR101 students, except modified to refer to “this course” instead of “my courses”, and using“engineering” instead of “ECE”. But the “b” questions were identical.1a. The lab work I do for my courses is relevant to my learning.1b. The big_blinky lab/tutorial was relevant to my learning.2a. Doing the labs from my engineering courses is interesting to me.2b. Doing the big_blinky lab/tutorial was interesting to me.3a. The labs for my courses show me how to problem
, s=1where 1, there exists b ∈ S s.t. as,i = ab,ia Zs,i = 0, elseS is the set of all students, as,i indicates the response of student s to question i, and ia is the associatedquestion for restrictive question i.Isolation QuestionsIsolation questions allow users to prevent groups in which students with a specified majority responseoutnumber other students. For example, studies in STEM courses have shown that female students reporthigher self-confidence and are more likely to major in a course’s subject if placed in groups with a higherpercentage of women, and student outcomes for all students in a group improve as the percentage ofwomen in
explored on a 2D display or via a VR headset (if available); b. Processes in the virtual (simulation) environment that include multiple stations, and com- prise technical as well as organizational aspects; c. A set of products or entities that flow throughout the virtual environment and are processed (e.g., manufactured, assembled, stored, transported); d. A didactical concept that comprises formal and informal learning, enabled by own actions of the learners during and after virtual site visits/field trips based on remote active-learning instead of on-site learning. These represent problems/projects inspired by real-world situa- tions that the learner may face at future workplace.Since I-SBL essentially involves PBL
Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a
more motivated to complete multiple rotations.Future WorkFuture work is to expand this data beyond a single institution to look for other contextualinfluences on student views. This will help build better descriptions or find additional uniquegroups. Additionally, this expanded work can help identify how institutional or corporatecultures could be impacting the co-op experience.References[1] R. S. Lindenmeyer, “A comparison study of the academic progress of the cooperative and the four year student,” J. Coop. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 8–18, 1967.[2] B. F. Blair, M. Millea, and J. Hammer, “The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic Performance and Compensation of Engieering Majors,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 333
Paper ID #30319Scaffolded Laboratory Sequence: Mechanics LabDr. Natasha Smith P.E., University of Virginia Dr. Smith is an Associate Professor at the University of Virginia c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Scaffolded Laboratory Sequence: Mechanics LabAbstractLaboratory courses are a platform for students to practice skills essential to the engineering pro-fession. They also foster lower-level learning (e.g. understanding of fundamental concepts) andhigher-level synthesis and creativity. The undergraduate programs for Mechanical and Aerospace(MAE) Engineering at the University of Virginia
. Virtual reality providesimmersive and collaborative technique for students to take part into and work as a group on whatthey learnt in the course class.3. Modeling with SolidWorksSolidWorks is a computer aided design and engineering software used to create and simulate 3Dmodels. Students were instructed to design a small-scale wind turbine in SolidWorks consisting offive different parts: base, stem, turbine, axil and blade. Students decide on their respective modelsafter experimenting with different number and various shapes of turbine blades as shown in Figures2-4. Figure 2 shows wind turbine designed by students with 3 blades. Figure 3 shows wind turbinedesigned by students with 6 blades. Figure 3 (a) design is turbine with flat blades and (b
Education Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2000, vol. 2.[15] D. Narayan and P. Petesch, "Agency, opportunity structure, and poverty escapes," Moving Out of Poverty: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Mobility, pp. 1-44, 2007.[16] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, 2014.[17] M. E. Jordan and R. R. McDaniel Jr, "Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity," Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 490-536, 2014.[18] V. Svihla, T. B. Peele-Eady, and Y. Chen, "Agency in framing design problems " in AERA Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON
, before starting their engineering studies, reported coming from one ormore of the following: a) military, b) vocational / technical school, c) full-time job, d) part-timejob, or e) another academic major at ODU.Materials The current study adopted a demands-resources conceptual and measurement framework[15] to examine perceived demands and resources to success of engineering students. Theanonymous, online survey contained measures of personal/school demands and resources, as wellas outcomes of interest. Personal demands. Personal demands were measured with eight variables consisting of26 items. The personal demands of difficulties with time management, difficulty stayingorganized, difficulty paying attention, difficulty prioritizing
thesepopulations are created at random—can easily mask these effects. Future research isrecommended to look more specifically at disciplinary versus general engineering designtopics, as well as student perception and grades on particular content areas as opposed tothe overall course.References[1] M. J. Seiler, V. L. Seiler, and D. Chiang, “Professor, Student, and Course Attributes thatContribute to Successful Teaching Evaluations,” Financ. Pract. Educ., 1999.[2] R. B. Bausell and C. R. Bausell, “Student Ratings and Various Instructional Variablesfrom a Within-Instructor Perspective,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 167–177, 1979.[3] T. M. Heckert, A. Latier, A. Ringwald, and B. Silvey, “Relation of Course, Instructor,and Student
indicate a useful aspect or takeaway of the training.Figure 1. Trainings were perceived well by participants in immediate post-training surveys. a) Extent ofsatisfaction of training content (n = 483), level of interaction (n = 484), facilitators (n = 487), and trainingoverall (n = 484). Percentages indicate the sum of “good,” “very good,” and “excellent” responses. b)Perceptions of amount of interaction (n = 490), level of content (n = 490), and length of training (n =485).Follow-up Survey ResponsesThe online follow-up survey was sent to the target population (graduate students, faculty, andstaff in the department) ~6 months after the last training. A total of 104 people completed thesurvey, 97 of whom participated in the training (although the
follow-on group. It would providevaluable experience to the students if more clients could be recruited from the community.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the following ME students who participated in this project: Arlint,A., Durbin, T., Hayes, T.S., Jefferson, S., Jewett, S., Maltbie, J., Mihalec, B., Milne, S., Richards,T., Ward, M., and Willard, J..References[1] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D.K. Anthony. “A survey ofcapstone engineering courses in North American,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84,pp.165-174, April 1995.[2] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen. “A review of literature onteaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” Journal
,” American Institutes for Research, 2007.[3] A. Andrews, and J. Brown, “The effects of math anxiety,” Education, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 362-370, 2015.[4] K. W. Choe, J. B. Jenifer, C. Rozek, M. Berman, and S. L. Beilock, “Calculated Avoidance: Math Anxiety Predicts Math Avoidance in Effort-based Decision-making,” 2019.[5] G. Ramirez, E. A. Gunderson, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock, “Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school,” Journal of Cognition and Development, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 187-202, 2013.[6] C. Holden, “Female math anxiety on the wane,” Science, vol. 236, pp. 660-662, 1987.[7] S. L. Beilock, E. A. Gunderson, G. Ramirez, and S. C
for each iteration per group) – see appendix A • Handouts with options for (a) semi-truck transportation; (b) routes from prefabrication factory to construction site; and (c) site hoisting equipment for on-site assembly. Handouts (a) and (b) are for the second iteration, and hand out (c) is for the third iteration (one hand-out per group).Summary of activity procedures: Students are given a short presentation on prefabrication and modular construction andthen asked to work in pairs during the activity. If a mixed age group is present for the activity, itis suggested to pair students so that older students work with younger students to help themthrough the process. • Initial prompt: with site plan and
Paper ID #29720WIP Adopting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Upper Level EngineeringElectromagnetics CourseDr. Matthew Garett Young, Arkansas Tech University Matthew G. Young received his B. Sc. in Electrical Engineering from Arkansas Tech University in 2009. He obtained his M. Sc. in Microelectronics-Photonics at the University of Arkansas in 2012. For his M. Sc. studies, he focused on the growth of silicon nanowires via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In August of 2016, he joined the faculty at Arkansas Tech University as an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering. His Ph.D. was completed at the
and ethics trainings (question 2),thoughts about morality (question 3), and the ethical dilemma presented in the episode (question4). Table 1: Personal Reflection Work Sheet The Office "Business Ethics" Personal Reflection Questions. 1. At the start of the episode Holly implies that her meeting won’t be interesting because she’ll have to read from a binder. a. What are your expectations for our ethics module? b. What do you think we’ll talk about? c. Are you excited? How would you rate your excitement on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high) 2. Dunder Mifflin initiates the ethics seminar after misconduct from its corporate leaders. a. Are you familiar with real-life
example of evaluation of the damages of a dwelling in Chietla. The evaluationwas developed by the students and supervised by professors with knowledge in the field. a) b) Figure 2: Evaluation of the damages on the dwellings: a) student developing a survey, and b) structural damages on the building.4.1.2 Objective of the projectThe objective of this project is to develop a sustainable building design of a residential unit thatincorporates the elements of bioclimatic design and it is designed according to the socioculturalcharacteristics of the community. This project aims to provide a design that implements passivestrategies for thermal comfort optimization, such as
evaluation data are shown in Table 1 and listed in Fig. 1. They arerespectively about (a) the instructor had clear policies (e.g., grading, attendance, and assignments);(b) the instructor provided useful feedback on my progress within the course; (c) the instructor waswell prepared for in class meetings; (d) examinations and other assignments reflected stated courseobjectives and course material; (e) the instructor was successful in clarifying difficult concepts; (f)the instructor was well prepared for online class sessions and activities.Strongly disagree 1 ----- 5 Strongly agree INSTRUCTOR HAS CLEAR POLICIES INSTRUCTOR PROVIDED FEEDBACK 2018 Fall 2019 Spring