the double-bind: WIE and MEP Programs and servingthe needs of women of color in engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/18963[3] T. Holloman, W.C. Lee, J. London, A. Halkiyo, G. Jew, and B. Watford (2018). A historicaland policy perspective on broadening participation in STEM: Insights from National Reports(1974–2016). Paper presented at The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference, Crystal City, VA. Retrieved from http://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10080892[4] C. D. Matt (2007, June), Wepan History And Current Update Paper presented at 2007Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2125[5] K. Moore
/15348431.2019.1648269[5] Palmer, R. & Gasman, M., “It takes a village to raise a child”: The role of social capital inpromoting academic success for African American Men at a Black College, Journal of CollegeStudent Development 49/1 (2008): 52-70.[6] Becker, H. & Carper, J. The development of an identification with an occupation, AmericanJournal of Sociology 61/4 (1956): 289-298.[7] Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A., Boys in white: Student culture in medicalschool. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.[8] AAMC, Diversity in Medical Education. Report, 2016. Online.https://www.aamcdiversityfactsandfigures2016.org/. (Accessed 2/3/2020)[9] Sarah Appelhans
outcomes.) The change in outcomes did not affectthe course objectives, but only the mapping of the outcomes. Since the principles of studentachievement are generally preserved from one set of outcomes to the other, and in the interest ofconsistency in evaluation across the course offerings, the evaluation will be based on themapping to the 2018-2019 cycle presented in Table 3.Table 3. Course objectives for CON 357 mapped to ABET program outcomes. ABET program outcomes Course objectives a b c d e f g h i 1. explain the estimation process for construction projects, including bid X preparation, project
experiential learning project. Future such projects willconcentrate on the design of mini-processor belonging to other processor families.References[1] Dua, R., “Digital System Design - 8051 Microcontrollers Home Page” January 2015.[online]. Available: http://web.mst.edu/~rdua/Digital%20Systems%20Design.htm [Accessed:December 30, 2019][2] Marshall, M., Moss, A., Garringer, L. G., & Dua, R. (2015, June), “WIMP51 Processor:Envisioning and Recreating the Platform for Implementing Student Design Projects”, Paperpresented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.10.18260/p.25078[3] Hur, B. (2019, June), “ARM Cortex M4F-based, Microcontroller-based, and Laboratory-oriented Course Development in Higher Education”, Paper
University of California, San Diego sserslev@ucsd.edu Madison Edwards Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California, San Diego m4edward@ucsd.edu Abstract This study explores how industry internships, paired with scaffolded reflection, shape student attitudes and learning behaviors. Building upon the literature on student motivation, we seek to answer the following question: how do internships influence student attitudes towards their studies and their future approaches towards learning? Data at three critical points in a student
-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem- Solving Learning Outcome,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 65-94, 1997.[3] W. Hung, “Team‐based complex problem solving: A collective cognition perspective,” Educational Technology Research & Development, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 365-384, 2013.[4] X. Ge, and S.M. Land, “Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 51 no. 1, pp. 21–38, 2003.[5] C.E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?” Educational Psychology Review, pp. 235–266, 2004.[6] B. Barron, “When smart groups fail
Paper ID #29694Embedding Teacher Professional Learning into the Student-Focused GEARUPEngineering Summer Camp (Evaluation)Ryan Barlow, Utah State University Ryan Barlow obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Utah in 2012 and his Master’s Degree in Science Education from the University of Maryland in 2016. He is currently a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Utah State University where his research focuses on continuing professional development of engineering educators.Dr. Max L Longhurst, Utah State University Dr. Longhurst is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in
Paper ID #30061Hey, You Got Business in My Engineering! : Collaborating to SupportEntrepreneurship ResearchMs. Kelly Giles, James Madison University Libraries Kelly Giles is the Applied Sciences Librarian at James Madison University. She serves as liaison librar- ian to the departments of Engineering, Computer Science, Geographic Science, Integrated Science and Technology, and Intelligence Analysis. She holds an MA in Library and Information Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a BA from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College.Ms. Elizabeth Price, James Madison University Libraries Elizabeth Price is the Business
] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, M. J. Miller, M. E. Cusick, L. T. Penn, and N. N. Truong,“Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.,” J.Couns. Psychol., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 17–35, 2018.[7] K. Dlouhy and T. Biemann, “Path dependence in occupational careers: Understandingoccupational mobility development throughout individuals’ careers,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 104,pp. 86–97, Feb. 2018.[8] A. Brown, J. Bimrose, S.-A. Barnes, and D. Hughes, “The role of career adaptabilities formid-career changers,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 754–761, Jun. 2012.[9] E. Koehn, “Practitioner and Student Recommendations for
0.093 Yes *Alienation 0.68 *2.520455 *2.542208 0.785 Yes * denotes failure of one or more research goals: subscale a) did not receive a score of >4 (<2 for alienation) and/or b) was significantly different between halves of the semesterTen of the twelve subfactors of positive interdependence did not yield significant results,suggesting that the individual and group-focused halves of the semester did not significantlydiffer, and are therefore worth further scrutiny (see Table 2): positive goal interdependence(p=0.184), resource interdependence (p=0.257), teacher academic support (p=0.063), teacherpersonal support (p=0.124), student academic support (p=0.100), student personal support(p=0.221
High Impact Practices (HIPs) in STEM Courses Huanying (Helen) Gu, N. Sertac Artan, Ziqian Dong, Reza Amineh, Houwei Cao, Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology, New York, NYAbstractHigh-Impact Practices (HIPs) will ensure that students have access to well-designed, engagingacademic experiences. Incorporating HIPs into courses can increase student engagement andlearning. The HIPs approach promotes active learning characterized by: a) an emphasis onthe interaction of students with their instructor through in-class activities; b) collaborativeinstruction between the student, the instructor and peers about substantive matters; c)instruction providing
Paper ID #30184Development of Employability Skills in Engineering Disciplines throughCo-opMs. Haaniyah Ali, York University Haaniyah Ali is a Mechanical Engineering undergraduate student from York University, class of 2020. She has worked on engineering co-op education research projects since September 2018 and presented her first paper at a conference in June 2019. She is passionate about understanding the co-op education system, to provide the best experience for students. She is also very involved in her school community and works with students and faculty alike to improve community engagement.Dr. Jeffrey Harris, York
), pp. 99-109, 1987.5. Northeastern University (2014). “Innovation imperative: Portrait of Generation Z,” Northeastern University 4th Annual Innovation Poll.6. J. A. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, 2011, 12 pp. https://peer.asee.org/188097. R. S. Harichandran, D. J. Adams, J. Nocito-Gobel, M. A. Collura, A. E. Thompson, W. D. Harding, and N. O. Erdil, “An integrated approach to developing technical communication skills in engineering students,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, Paper 8570, 2014, 19 pp. https://peer.asee.org/20060
in graduate teacher preparation for a faculty career,” Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 97-105, 2001.[6] E. P. Bettinger, B. T. Long, and E. S. Taylor, “When inputs are outputs: The case of graduate student instructors,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 52, pp. 63-76, 2016.[7] S. Rivera, “A summer institute for STEM graduate teaching assistants,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 28-32, 2018.
Paper ID #29409Kindergartners’ Engagement in an Epistemic Practice of Engineering:Persisting and Learning from Failure (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy and Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple formal and informal settings. As a K- 8 pre-service teacher educator, she
attracting and retaining diverse candidates? There was no clear answer to this question. Most groups acknowledged that the BSET programs were probably less diverse than even traditional engineering degree programs. Some school representatives said, “Our school is better than most,” but there was no data on this question.10. What is your primary source for finding faculty? B) How have you overcome challenges? C)Have you hired traditional faculty and offered them the opportunity to work in industry over the summer? Faculty hiring was widely acknowledged as a big problem. Some institutions require PhD-level candidates and 3+ years industry experience which is extremely difficult to find. In addition, most academic institutions don’t
lowest enrollments andwould more naturally be in growth mode.Another common aspect is that both Departments include another degree program (ElectricalEngineering for Computer Engineering and Software Engineering for Computer Science) whilethe other two Departments in the School offer a single undergraduate program (Biomedical,Mechanical Engineering).The origin of the 3.0 GPA requirement in the policy is that B level (3.0 GPA) coursework isrequired for students to join the Fast Track program, a program that allows undergraduates toenroll in graduate classes. As with Fast Track, it was felt that something higher than “goodstanding” (i.e. C-level work or 2.0 GPA) would be appropriate to avoid lowering the quality ofthe programs by flooding them
. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 311-334.
Paper ID #30080Qualitative and Quantitative Impact of Metacognitive Interventions inSupplemental Instruction SessionsMiss Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin Nisha coordinates Supplemental Instruction at the Sanger Learning Center. She received her B.S. in cell and molecular biology from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007 and her M.S. in biology from Texas A&M University in 2012. During her time at Texas A&M, she was a teaching assistant for several undergraduate biology classes, worked for the Center for Teaching Excellence, and conducted research on improving student motivation and performance in
Timeline Term Phase Activities Participant Recruitment and Instrument Fall 2019 Preparation Development Instructor Surveys, Student Surveys, and Winter/Spring 2020 Pre-Intervention Classroom Observations No Workshop - Control Workshop A- Active Learning Only (AL) Summer 2020 Intervention Workshop B- Active Learning Plus (AL+) Instructor Surveys, Student Surveys, and Fall 2020 Post-Intervention Classroom ObservationsPhase 1- Preparation
Paper ID #29647Towards the Effective Implementation of Collaborative Problem Solving inUndergraduate Engineering Classrooms: Co-Designing Guidelines forTeaching AssistantsDr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign A Postdoc Research Associate at the Siebel Center for Design at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign; studies the role of the teacher in collaborative problem solving in STEM classroomsDr. LuEttaMae Lawrence, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign LuEttaMae Lawrence has a PhD in Education from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in Digital Environments for Learning
applications,” IEEE communications surveys and tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347-2376, June 2015.2. I. U. Din, M. Guizani, S. Hassan, B. Kim, M. K. Khan, M. Atiquzzaman, and S. H. Ahmed, “The Internet of Things: A review of enabled technologies and future challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 7606-7640, December 2018.3. P. V. Dudhe, N. V. Kadam. R. M. Hushangabade, M. S. Deshmukh, “Internet of Things (IOT): An overview and its applications,” in Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing, Aug. 2017, India.4. McKinsey Global Institute, “By 2025, Internet of things applications could have $11 trillion impact,” https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview/in-the-news/by-2025-internet-of-things
School Chil- dren Interest in STEM Work In Progress - Everyday Engineering Discovery Program : Motivating Middle School Children Interest in STEM,” 2015.[6] X. Kong, K. P. Dabney, and R. H. Tai, “The Association Between Science Summer Camps and Career Interest in International Journal of Science Education , Part B : Communication and Public Engagement The Association Between Science Summer Camps and Career Interest in Science and Engineering,” no. February, 2013, doi: 10.1080/21548455.2012.760856.[7] J. Wai, D. Lubinski, C. P. Benbow, and J. H. Steiger, “Accomplishment in Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM ) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose : A 25-Year Longitudinal
to which students actually achieve thelearning goals of the course. And most students do perform well in CE 4200, which is notunexpected for mature undergraduate students in an upper-division course. From inceptionthrough 16 semesters of instruction, the percentage of students who “passed” the course with agrade of “C” or better varied from 90% to 100%, average 97%. The overall course gradebreakdown per semester was “A”: 19% to 78%, average 47%; “B”: 15% to 66%, average 41%;“C”: 0% to 16%, average 10%; “D”: 0% to 7%, average 1%; and “F”: 0% to 7%, average 1%. As regards assignments, Figure 3 identifies that learning exercises for CE 4200 includefive writing assignments, two quizzes, six bonus assignments, the Mock FE Exam, and the
strengths might be a viable option to foster an increase instudent engineering identity.AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by the National Science Foundation Award # 1744006. The authors aregrateful to the help provided by the following research students at Angelo State University: JesseLee, Maria Ochoa, Austin Poole, Nicholas Manrique and Timmons (TJ) Spies.References[1] M. Cooley (1989). "Human-centered Systems." Designing Human-centred Technology, 133–143. Springer.[2] M. Garbuio, & M. Dressel (2019). 6 Building Blocks of Successful Innovation: HowEntrepreneurial Leaders Design Innovative Futures. Routledge.[3] P. Polak (2008). Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional Methods Fail. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.[4] B. Amadei (2014
environment." Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, 2015, pp. 15-33.[5] A. F. McKenna, J. Froyd, C. Judson King, T. Litzinger, and E. Seymour, “The complexities of transforming engineering higher education,” Report on Forum on Characterizing the Impact and Diffusion of Transformative Engineering Education Innovations, National Academy of Engineering, 2011. Available from https://www.nae.edu/Projects/CASEE/CASEEProjects/26183/26293.aspx[6] J. A. Leydens, “ Sociotechnical communication in engineering: An exploration and unveiling of common myths,” Engineering Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-9.[7] H. Loshbaugh and B. Claar, “Geeks are chic: Cultural identity and engineering students’ pathways to the profession,” In Proceedings
is the main area of her expertise, which has enabled her a) to investigate growth trajectories of motivation and career choices; b) to identify opportunity gaps within underserved groups; and c) to evaluate and improve educational interventions in STEM. One of her original studies validating a motivation scale for engineering students was recently published in the Journal of Engineering Education. With the exper- tise in quantitative research methodology, she is engaged in collaborative research with entrepreneurship education and other interdisciplinary programs.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation
] Yalvac, B., Smith, H. D., Troy J. B., and Hirsch, P. (2007) "Promoting Advanced WritingSkills in an Upper-Level Engineering Class," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2,pp. 117-128.[6] Manuel-Dupont, S. (1996) "Writing-Across-the-Curriculum in an Engineering Program,"Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 35-40.[7] Magley, A. and Furse, C. (2008) "Lab Report Writing (and Teaching!) Made Easy," in ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.[8] Kim, D. and Olson, W. M. (2015) "Improving Student Lab Report Writing Performances inMaterials and Manufacturing Laboratory Courses by Implementing a Rhetorical Approach toWriting." in Proceedings of the 2015 American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference
Paper ID #30063To Start or Not: Impact of Engineering Students’ Engagement inEntrepreneurship Competitive Activities on their EntrepreneurialIntentionsMiss Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yaxin Huang received a Bachelor’s degree in English language and literature from Hohai University of China (2018), and is studying for a Master’s degree in higher education at SJTU. Her research interest includes engineering students’ international learning experiences, innovation and entrepreneurship edu- cation.Prof. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
., David. “The German Energiewende – History, Targets, Policies and Challenges.”Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, vol. 3, no. 4, 2012, pp. 223–233.,www.jstor.org/stable/24324660. Accessed 2 Feb. 2020.[4] H. A. Linstone, A. J. Meltsner, M. Adelson, A. Mysior, L. Umbdenstock, B. Clary and J.Shuman, “The multiple perspective concept with applications to technology assessment andother decision areas,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 20(4), pp. 275–325,1981.[5] R. Adams, D. Evangelou, L. English, A. D. De Figueiredo, N. Mousoulides, A. L. Pawley, C.Schiefellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J. M. Trenor, and D. M. Wilson, “Multiple perspectives onengaging future engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, pp. 48-88, 2011