Paper ID #31471Hands-On Cybersecurity Curriculum using a Modular Training KitMr. Asmit De, The Pennsylvania State University Asmit De is a PhD Candidate in Computer Engineering at PennState. His research interest is in developing secure hardware and architectures for mitigating system vulnerabilities. Asmit received his B. Tech degree in Computer Science and Engineering from National Institute of Technology Durgapur, India in 2014. He worked as a Software Engineer in the enterprise mobile security team at Samsung R&D Institute, India from 2014 to 2015. He has also worked as a Design Engineer Intern in the SoC Template
toinstill interest in advanced manufacturing research and careers among undergraduate students. Theprogram recruits 10 students each year and provides them with an opportunity to work on anadvanced manufacturing research project under the guidance of a faculty and a graduate studentmentor. The following are the main objectives of this program: a) improve research skills of thestudents in STEM fields in general, and in the fields of advanced manufacturing in particular; b)enhance student’s interest in advanced manufacturing as it relates to graduate education or industrycareer; c) provide guidance to students on their graduate school selections and applications; and d)provide the participants with engineering innovation and entrepreneurship
2=ˆ (1) 11H 1 ( 01 − 11 ) , so finally that Cˆ NOT(1,2 ) ˆ (1) H= 11 1 ( 01 − 10 ) . 2 2MATLAB codeBelow is an example of MATLAB code to perform a simulated measurement of a ket. A columnvector is passed to the ket_measure function, the function returns an integer from 1 to 4corresponding to the amplitudes of the ket. If the ket is ψ = a 00 + b 01 + c 10 + d 11 , thenthe probability of returning a 1, corresponding to the state 00 is a a = a . The
. Harrop and B. Turpin, “A study exploring learners' informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences,” New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol.19, no.1, pp.58-77. 2013[4] G. Matthews and G. Walton, “Strategic development of university library space: Widening the influence,” New Library World, vol.115, no.5/6, pp.237-249, 2014.[5] M.D. Riddle and K. Souter, “Designing informal learning spaces using student perspectives,” Journal of Learning Spaces, vol.1, no.2, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152692. [Accessed Feb.2, 2020].[6] D.J. Mallon III, “Making their place: Identifying the transformation of college space to student place, a study of individual student
interview with STEM Excellence coordinators and teacher while thelatter included a structured survey instrument completed by students about their experiences inthe program and general demographic data. At the end of the academic year, teachers performeda supplementary online survey. Findings suggest that students and teachers shared satisfactionwith involvement in the program, and that they thought about their work more creatively andobjectively. Analysis of focus group responses and open-ended survey data gave rise to threeprimary themes describing the perspectives of educators on their STEM Excellence programexperiences: (a) Increased understanding, (b) Increased recognition, and (c) Enhancedawareness. Results also showed that the impression of
objectives are to keep themodules complete and independent so that they can be easily integrated into the courses. Eachmodule package consists of instructions, lab exercises and solutions, and assessment methods.The modules were also designed to incorporate the National Initiative for CybersecurityEducation (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (NCWF) topics of Cyber Threat andVulnerabilities, Risk Management and Software Reverse Engineering [9].The purpose of this paper is a) to describe a set of six security modules that was implemented ina Computer Science 1 course during the fall semester of 2019 at Texas A&M University-SanAntonio and b) to report the results of evaluating teaching effectiveness of implementing thesecurity modules with
NUEN PETE (b) Number of Students from each Major. Figure 2. Main Engineering Majors Taking Class in Spring Terms 2016 2017 2018 2019 80% Spring 60% DFQ 40% 20% 0% BAEN CHEN ELEN ENGE INEN NUEN PETE (a) DFQ rates per Major. 2016 2017 2018 2019 120
(MATLAB),rearrange topics, and slow down delivery. The result is a course that many students rave about asthey are taking calculus and physics, and best yet, their average course GPA shows a half-to-fullletter grade improvement, which bodes well for retention.References[1] N. Klingbeil, K. High, M. Keller, I. White, B. Brummel, J. Daily, R. Cheville and J. Wolk, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: Highlights from a CCLI Phase 3 Initiative," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[2] N. Klingbeil, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education," [Online]. Available: https://engineering-computer-science.wright.edu/research/the-wright-state-model-for- engineering
: (a) current knowledge, (b) a scale on perceptions ofentrepreneurship, (c) practice, (d) team and business model, and (e) program evaluation (post-survey only).Among those several sections, this study only utilized the data from perceptions ofentrepreneurship on the scale and practice of customer interview skills captured in open-endedquestions. As shown in Table 2, the scale was designed to assess student perceptions of the sixconstructs indicated by 33 items: (1) interest in entrepreneurship, (2) confidence in valueproposition, (3) self-efficacy in entrepreneurship, (4) self-efficacy in marketing/businessplanning, (5) self-efficacy in customer interview skills, and (6) current status of technology andbusiness model. As an attribute-focused
help associate academic needs with the necessary faculty trainingin a way that instructors are well prepared to present lecture materials for fundamentals insustainable development. Particularly, instructors will be able to incorporate systems thinking anddesign thinking in an interdisciplinary prospective. Additionally, outcomes will give foundationsto advance research and education in sustainable development in engineering. The developedlearning objectives for the introduction to sustainable development in engineering practice follow: a. Recognize what sustainable development is in engineering practice. b. Discuss the basics of the historical development and societal importance of sustainable development in
. Original manual directional valve. Figure 4. New solenoid directional valve.The solenoid directional valve has three positions, outlet A on, all closed, and outlet B on. It hastwo 110V AC solenoids that are mounted to both end of the valve to move the spool inside of thevalve to change the positions. When the left one is energized, outlet A is connected to thecompressed air supply (and B to the exhaust hole), thus retracts the position. When the right oneis energized, it extends the piston instead. When both are deenergized, both outlets are blocked,and the piston chamber can retain its pressure, so piston retains its current position.Electro-Pneumatic RegulatorA proportional electro-pneumatic regulator from SMC is used to regulate the air
from Auburn University in 2014. He is a contributor to the Australian Maths Trust, and member of the MASAMU international research group for mathematics.Dr. Carl Pettis Carl S. Pettis, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Al- abama State University Administrative role: Interim Associate Provost Office of Academic Affairs Alabama State UniversityDr. Uma Kannan Dr. Uma Kannan is Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems in the College of Business Administration at Alabama State University, where she has taught since 2017. She received her Ph.D. degree in Cybersecurity from Auburn University in 2017. She specialized in Cybersecurity, particularly on
Paper ID #32128Best 2019 PIC IV Paper : Student Views on their Role in Society as anEngineer and Relevant Ethical IssuesDr. Angela R Bielefeldt P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a
., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007.[3] S. Bante, and E. Hilton, and K. Talley, and K. Shryock, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “Board 65: Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix Pedagogy,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32398[4] B. Williford, and M. Runyon, and J. Cherian, and W. Li, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “A Framework for Motivating Sketching Practice with Sketch-based Gameplay,” in Chi Play ’19, Barcelona, Spain, October 22-25, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3311350.3347175.[5] R. Brooks, and J. Koh, and S. Polsley, and T. Hammond, “Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment
: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, 41:4, 212-218,4) Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay.5) Fink, L.D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. 2nd Edition. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.6) Randolph, G. B. “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach.” Journal of Engineering Education. ASEE. Vol. 89, No. 2. April 2000. pp. 119-122.7) Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. “Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering
engineering doctoral student pursuing research on the development and dissemination of low-cost, hands-on learning modules displaying heat and mass transfer concepts in a highly visual, interactive format. Graduated from Washington State University with a B.S. in chemical engineering in 2017 and with an M.S. focused on potentiometric biosensing in 2018.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is a Professor of
;T RED project. Withthis, we can course-correct and adjust to provide an optimal learning experience for our students. References[1] S. Chandrasekaran, J. M. Long and M. A. Joordens, "Evaluation of student learning outcomesin fourth year engineering mechatronics through design based learning curriculum," in 2015IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, Oct 2015, pp. 1-7.[2] C. E. Hmelo-silver, "Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?"Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, (3), pp. 235-266, 2004.[3] T. N. Walton, S. B. Knisley and M. B. A. McCullough, "Board 154: Model-building inengineering education," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June
Murzi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. Natasha B. Watts
. Servo motor vi. Raspberry Pi 3B+Fig. 2 shows the components in detail. Camera Servo motor DC motors Ultrasonic sensor Line follower sensors (a) (b)Figure 2: Hardware components of the robot car project: (a) line follower sensors
and worked as a hardware development engineer and an IT strategic planner in the industry.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She studies design learning in college and pre-college education. She is the editor of the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education (JPEER) and serves on the editorial board of Science Education.Dr. LINDSEY B PAYNE, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Lindsey Payne is a Director in the Office of Engagement at Purdue University coordinating service- learning programs and initiatives. She has a courtesy appointment in
individualcapstone project level based upon Pembridge and Paretti’s functional taxonomy [38] . Thequestions, based upon a 5 point Likert scale, were customized for the contextual setting ofcapstone and organized into five areas:1. Individual Student Interests a. My faculty advisor actively promotes my individual educational/engineering development. b. My faculty advisor adapts project guidance based upon individual student interests and capabilities.2. Technical Guidance a. My faculty advisor is engaged in and aware of the technical aspects of my project. b. My faculty advisor helped guide the team in finding relevant technical information. c. My faculty advisor provided specific technical knowledge related to
that could be reasonably incorporatedinto courses that support undergraduate students with little-to-no design experience, (b) effortsthat map to the emphasis areas for this new BME program, (c) student-learning assessmenttechniques that have proved useful in these hands-on contexts, and (d) projects that would makeinteresting recruiting examples for high school students considering such a program. The overallgoal of this work is to allow lessons learned from these earlier efforts to inform projects offeredas part of this new BME curriculum. This paper presents (1) an overview of this new curriculum,(2) the skillsets that this new BME program intentionally addresses and the courses that willsupport that skillset development, (3) BME project
Paper ID #30464Results of an Intro to Mechanics Course Designed to Support StudentSuccess in Physics I and Foundational Engineering CoursesProf. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of engineering education projects. He is currently the Director of the First-Year Experience program at ECST (FYrE@ECST) and coordinates engineering education activities
: building a conceptual model of a case study of bias in biomedicalengineeringStudents were grouped into pairs and asked to write an 800-1000 word case study for aneducated but non-technical audience. By this point in time, students were familiar with basicconservation principles (mass, energy, etc.) as well as the dynamics involved in working in pairsand small groups (2-4 students). The requirements were as follows: 1. Identification of an historical incidence of bias in biomedical engineering or biomedicine 2. A description of: a. the medical need/problem that the designers were trying to solve b. the design that was developed to solve the problem 3. An analysis of how bias impacted the design, leading to shortcomings 4
A Build torso -- B Build legs -- C Connect legs B D Attach legs C, A E Build arms -- F Attach arms D, E G Attach head & mask F H Attach launcher & disk GTasks A, B, and E had no precedence requirements. Task C, G, and H only needed the precedingtask’s work to complete their own. Task D needed both Tasks A and C’s completed work andTask F needed both Task D and E’s completed work. This fact
, procedure, observed data,calculated results/graphs, and discussion and questions – the new section was structured to includespecific instructions for each segment.III. Lab Procedure and CalculationsPROCEDURES 1. Verify that the following Equipment and Materials are available: a. Riehle 60,000 in-lb. torsion testing machine and accessories b. Cylindrical A36 steel bar (approximately 32” x 1”) c. Digital caliper and yardstick to measure bar 2. Prepare the Test Bar a. Begin by measuring the test bar and recording its dimensions. Don't forget to record the accuracy of all measurements. Create the following Table to insert your data
success in STEM through psychological stress, inter- rupted STEM career trajectories, impostor phenomenon, and other debilitating race-related trauma for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx doctoral students.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education
engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Mr. Joseph Murphy, University of California, Los Angeles Joseph Murphy is a graduate student of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles whose research interests include the mobilization of college knowledge, and the role of institutional agents in promoting college access to STEM programs. He received a B.S. in Sociology from Clemson University.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy
, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education.Dr. LINDSEY B PAYNE, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Lindsey Payne is a Director in the Office of Engagement at Purdue University coordinating service- learning programs and initiatives. She has a courtesy appointment in Environmental and Ecological En- gineering where she teaches a service-learning course in which interdisciplinary teams of students collab- oratively identify stormwater management problems, co-design solutions, maintain budgets, and evaluate impacts with community partners. Dr. Payne’s research sits at the
Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, vol. 2016-June, doi: 10.18260/p.26944.[6] C. M. Gray, L. De Cresce El Debs, M. Exter, and T. S. Krause, “Instructional strategies for incorporating empathy in transdisciplinary technology education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, vol. 2016-June.[7] J. Strobel, J. Hess, R. Pan, and C. A. Wachter Morris, “Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers,” Eng. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–159, 2013, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2013.814136.[8] B. Wachowicz, K. Lewandowska, A. Popek, W. Karwowski, and T. Marek, “Empathy and Modern Technology: A Neuroergonomics Perspective