architecturaleducation and to set the stage for more rigorous research experiments.MethodologyThe intent of this study was to probe the surface of this topic in order to establisha research direction on model making. Therefore, along with the above literaturestudy, the author used two methods to gain answers to the questions posed at thebeginning of this paper.At the outset, a review was conducted of the top undergraduate architecturalschools in the United States to determine if hand-built models were being utilized Page 13.445.4as design and teaching tools. The rankings of architecture schools by the DesignFutures Council was used to determine which schools to review11. In
AC 2010-1858: INTRODUCTORY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING EDUCATIONTHROUGH COMPUTATIONAL AND PHYSICAL MODEL BUILDINGPowell Draper, Manhattan CollegeEdward Segal, Simpson Gumpertz & HegerRobert Sicurelli, Princeton University Page 15.810.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Introductory Structural Engineering Education through Computational and Physical Model BuildingIntroductionThis project explored new ways of teaching introductory structural engineering concepts throughcomputational and physical model building. An educational project was organized in whichstudents would study actual structures, create accurate computer models of their geometry
studies that look at thequalities of the physical environment and the way people living in these environmentsexperience them (Groat, Wang 9 ). Much too often, however, the technology side of architecturefollows the lead of engineering-like quantitative studies that examine the scientific realm of Page 12.1260.4technology. Qualitative research adds color and texture to the field (Shumer 10 ), creating awhole new praxis and pedagogical area of experimentation. From the outset, our team realized that we needed to acquire ways and means ofdocumenting our experiences in the field. Ethnography appeared to be a sensible selection inthis instance
computer models had an advantage over flat orperspective drawings in 2-dimensions (2D), but add that they were perceived by students as moredifficult to work with than hands-on models. 18 There appears to be research on the spatialability benefits of using physical models and computer generated model images in non-designlecture courses. However there is minimal data on the effects of student-created models on thedevelopment of their spatial intelligence.Course Background:First semester freshmen in our department programs – Architectural Engineering Technologyand Construction Management Engineering Technology – take 2 non-design courses, namelyGraphics I and Material and Methods of Construction I. The Graphics I course is a 2 creditcourse
AC 2007-216: INDEPENDENT STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITIONS AND THEASSESSMENT DILEMMAJoseph Betz, State University of New York JOSEPH A. BETZ is Professor of Architecture at the State University of New York College of Technology at Farmingdale and a licensed architect. He is currently the Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division for ASEE. He received his undergraduate and professional degrees in architecture from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and his post-professional degree in architecture from Columbia University. He is a recipient of the SUNY Chancellor's Award for Excellence in Teaching
AC 2009-2385: DIGITAL SIMULATIONS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURESWITH THE USE OF PHYSICALLY BASED DYNAMICSAndrzej Zarzycki, New Jersey Institute of Technology Page 14.492.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Digital Simulations of Architectural Structures with the use of Physically Based DynamicsRecent developments in digital design have brought new tectonic freedom into architecture.These emerging tectonic trends, combined with research into new material and fabricationtechnologies, make it possible to purse imaginative and unique designs that were not possible adecade ago. While digital tools allow for a broader
2006-156: EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH IN THE DAYLIGHTING SYSTEMSENGINEERINGKhaled Mansy, Oklahoma State University Khaled A. Mansy is an Assistant Professor in the Architectural Engineering Program, School of Architecture, Oklahoma State University. He earned his Ph.D. from Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, 2001, and has 16 years of teaching experience in professional programs in the USA and Egypt. Dr. Mansy is the PI of the NSF grant awarded to build this daylighting laboratory; the artificial sky dome.Steven O'Hara, Oklahoma State University Steven O’Hara is a Professor of Architectural Engineering, School of Architecture, Oklahoma State University. He received his Bachelor of
most important prevalent mechanism to examinethe quality of teaching and effectiveness of professors. A research study was conducted in SPSUConstruction Department to examine the teaching effectiveness. The spatial transferability of thefaculty evaluation mechanisms, without regard to spatial socio-cultural differences, is discussedin this study based on the collected data and following a thorough literature review. It was foundthat the ratings of a large percentage of construction students were positively influenced whentheir exam grades were inflated; the entire course material was not covered during the semester;a project was not assigned to the course; and students were allowed to arrive late as well asabsent from class from time to time
Research Institute). 3. Flynn, J. E., & Spencer, T.J. (1977). The Effect of light source color on user impression and satisfaction. (Research Project Report of the Illuminating Engineering Research Institute). 4. Flynn, J. E., Segil, A. W., & Steffy, G. R. (1988). Architectural Interior Systems. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 5. Hawkes, R. J., Loe, D. L., & Rowlands, E. (1979). A note towards the understanding of lighting quality. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 8, 111-120. 6. Rowlands, E., Loe, D. L., McIntosh, R. M., & Mansfield, K. P. (1985). Lighting adequacy and quality in office interiors by consideration of subjective assessment and physical measurement. CIE Journal
Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno and a M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Washington.John W. Lawson, Architectural Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Page 23.1137.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching Architecture, Engineering and Construction Disciplines: Using Various Pedagogical Styles to Unify the Learning ProcessAbstractThe Architectural Engineering Department at the California Polytechnic State University, SanLuis Obispo (Cal Poly) teaches introductory sophomore level statics and
with time. The adaptation of the staff to such change is explored and it hasbeen reflected in the changes to their teaching styles and approaches to thestudents.The conclusion is made that the industry-based staff have influenced the programso that there is a close relation to industry philosophies instilled in the students.That because of this, the research topics undertaken by the students are closelyaligned with practice. These factors have contributed to the continuing success of Page 12.1416.2the program over the years.IntroductionConstruction engineering, as a discipline, can sit uncomfortably within aUniversity faculty. The Construction industry is a
Paper ID #7739Contextual Learning Concepts Drive Architectural Education to Partner withIndustryMs. Shahnaz J. Aly, Western Kentucky University Shahnaz Aly, LEED AP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Architectural and Manufacturing Sciences at Western kentucky University. She has 3 years of experience in teaching and research, and 10 years professional experience in the architectural and construction industry. She is a registered architect in India. She earned her undergraduate degree in architecture from L.S. Raheja School of Architecture, Master of Architecture from Texas A & M University along with a
2006-974: INTEGRATING STUDY ABROAD AND COOPERATIVE EDUCATION:A CASE STUDYStan Guidera, Bowling Green State University DR. STAN GUIDERA is an Associate Professor in the Architecture/Environmental Design Studies Program in the College of Technology at Bowling Green State University. He teaches design studios, advanced CAD and computer modeling courses, and advanced computer rendering and animation classes. He is a registered architect and has used computer-aided design extensively in design studios as well as in professional practice. Page 11.793.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
structuralbehavior (11%).In 1994, Daniel L. Faoro at the University of North Dakota surveyed facultymembers teaching structures in schools of architecture. Surveys were sent to 117schools and 58 responses were received. Over 60% of the respondents hadgraduate degrees in engineering, approximately one quarter of them hadprofessional degrees in architecture. 10% of respondents reported that seismicdesign was their primary research area. Many different structures textbooks werein use; no book on seismic design was mentioned as a required or recommendedtext for structures courses. 28% reported having elective seminars on specializedstructures topics; but only one school reported offering a seminar on seismicdesign. 11% reported that the studio curriculum at
Page 12.344.2content to and from the faculty and student, this hybrid course format relies partly onelectronic media and partly on face-to-face traditional teaching methods. It will examineand compare the results of traditional teaching methods in these fields to those of hybrideducation, and investigate the improvements this process also has on the pedagogy.The premise of this paper is based on one course in particular that was the neophytehybrid course in the Design Technology Program at the Purdue School of Engineering &Technology on the Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis campus, focusingon architectural technology and interior design technology. This course was based onteaching computer aided design techniques using Auto
AC 2007-254: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF E-LEARNING IN AUNIVERSITYMing-yin Chan, Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKwok-wai Mui, Hong Kong Polytechnic University Page 12.696.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learningAbstract Computer assisted instruction and assessment is increasingly being adopted withinthe university sector to complement more traditional methods of teaching and learning.Much focus is often given to the advantages of exploiting technology, and the ability tostore, manipulate and report data. However, teachers and trainers are increasingly aware thatstudents and learners are beginning
engineering innovations such as cars, airplanes and trainscontributed to this condition by situating physical ‘displacement’ and ‘movement’ at the centerof the architectural design lexicon. “Space has since become such an integral part of our thinkingabout architecture that we are practically incapable of thinking about it at all without putting ourmain emphasis in the spatial displacement of the subject in time.”3 The frequency with whichstudents, architects and engineers use the word “space” when intending to speak about“architecture” is evidence of precisely this condition.A result of this excessive reliance on “space” has been the over emphasis of “form” inarchitectural design and an increasing neglect of the material specificity attendant to the
Design program for Ivy Tech Community College Columbus between 2006 and 2009. His research interests are: temporary shelter systems for post-disaster relief, living and working in extremely small environments, human-product - environment interaction, product development and usability, and human-centered design. Page 22.446.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011DESIGNING STEM KIOSKS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDENT PROJECT TO TEACH ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORSAbstractThis paper explains how sophomore-level Interior Design students in a three-dimensional studioclass were involved in
, Ken Mccown, and ChrisTaylor. "Designing/Building/Learning." Journal of Architectural Education 55.3 (2002): 174-179. Print.11 Hinson, David. “Design as Research Learning from Doing in the Design-Build Studio.” Journal ofArchitectural Education 61.1 (2007): 23-26. Print.12 Folan, John. “Exclusively Mutual.” Performative Practices: Architecture and Engineering in the 21stCentury, edited by William Braham & Kiel Moe. ACSA Teachers Conference. New York City, 2011.13 Simkins, Scott. Just-in-time teaching: across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, Va.: StylusPub. 2010. Print.14 Realm B, 2009 Conditions for Accreditation, The National Architectural Accrediting Board, Inc.Approved 7/10/09.15 Ibid.16 Haley, Kathleen. ”Students
full-time with Affiliated Engineers, Inc., a nationally recognized engineering consulting firm in Madison, Wis., where she held several roles, including Project Manager, Project Engineer, Commissioning Agent, Conference Speaker, and Business Development/Planner. She also collaborated with the University of Wisconsin, Construc- tion Engineering & Management, as an Adjunct Faculty member, teaching one course each fall semester related to building systems from 2002-2007. Vogt was awarded the 2008 National Electrical Contractors Association Faculty Award for her instruction and mentoring of construction science students in CNS535 Electrical & Lighting, a course focused on the electrical exposure and education of
). Architectureteaching content of the architecture program, service quality, and self-learning evaluationwere analyzed. Questionnaires and statistical analysis were performed to understand thelearning outcome of students, and their perceptions toward the program and the teaching ofextension education. The research questions were designed to explore and describeperceptions of students at a leading technological university in Taiwan. Specifically, theresearch addressed the perceptions of students regarding extension education of architectureand the primary factors that affect successful learning in the extension education context. Thisstudy explored and discovered perceptions of extension education students of architecturemajor regarding the following: (a
teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in concrete, steel, timber and masonry. He is a registered civil engineer and a registered structural engineer in the state of California. Dr. Mwangi is a member of the Structural Engineers Association of Central California, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, the Structural Engineers Institute and active member of The Masonry Society (TMS), serving as a voting member on the Masonry Standards Joint Committee and on the TMS’s Technical Activities Committee. Dr. Mwangi is a certified Disaster Service Worker (Safety Assessment Program) for the state of California Emergency Management Agency. His other interests are in post-disaster
AC 2012-4324: TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION: THE USE OF CUTTINGEDGE NUMERICAL METHODS IN TEACHING STRUCTURES TO AR-CHITECTS.Dr. Sinead C. Mac Namara, Syracuse UniversityProf. James K. Guest, Johns Hopkins University Jamie Guest is an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at Johns Hopkins University. His research and teaching interests focus on topology optimization and structural engineering. He received his M.S.E. and Ph.D. from Princeton University and B.S.E. from University of Pennsylvania, all in civil engineering. Page 25.1363.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Use
. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1997.Prof. Brent Nuttall P.E., California Polytechnic State University Professor Nuttall has 25 years experience as both a practicing engineer and engineering professor. He is currently a tenured professor at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo where his teaching focus is on structural and seismic design for engineers, architects and construction management students. His professional experience includes the design of many high profile new construction and renovation projects including the Getty Villa Museum, Cathedral of our Lady of the Angels, Dodger Stadium Renovation and Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Restoration.Jill Nelson P.E., California
AC 2011-2611: ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM ANDHVAC SYSTEMS CAPSTONE DESIGNAhmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming Dr. Ahmed Cherif Megri, associate professor of architectural engineering at the University of Wyoming (UW), teaches several HVAC and energy courses. Dr. Megri is also teaching a course titled ”Compre- hensive Performance of Building Envelope and HVAC Systems” for Summer School at UW, and ”Smoke and Fire Dynamics” during summer session at Concordia University, Canada. His research areas include airflow modeling, zonal modeling, energy modeling, and artificial intelligence modeling using the support vector machine learning approach. Prior to his actual position at UW, he was an assistant
AC 2009-1724: COLLABORATIVE TEACHING TO CREATE INTEGRATEDBUILDING ENVELOPESKevin Dong, California Polytechnic State University Page 14.338.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Collaborative Teaching to Create Integrated Building EnvelopesAs a former practitioner the rewards for offering courses that expose students to the principlesand issues surrounding design in a context that emulates real world situations is invaluable. Twoyears ago an idea developed into a course which includes students from three differentdisciplines; architecture, architectural engineering, and construction management, as well as,faculty from these same disciplines to create an all
2006-2523: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE / ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNChristopher Jarrett, Georgia Institute of Technology Chris Jarrett is Associate Director and Associate Professor of the Architecture Program at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He teaches courses on architecture and ecology, eco-tectonics, and graduate design studios addressing a range of contemporary green topics. Page 11.594.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Environmental Science / Environmental DesignAbstractEnvironmental science has formed the central part of ecological discourse in architecture. It hasbeen the
AC 2011-875: LESSONS MISSED: WHERE IS THE LEARNING ABOUTTEACHING IN STUDY ABROAD?David Jan Cowan, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Cowan is the Director of and an Associate Professor in the Architectural Technology Program within the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He teaches courses in residential and commercial construction, facilities management, building systems and interior design. His research interests lie in the areas of disaster reconstruction, BIM (Build- ing Information Modeling), visualization, sustainable community and construction practices, international service learning and energy simulation. He is a
AC 2012-5413: EMBRACING THE PAST: USING HISTORICAL STRUC-TURES TO TEACH ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALSRobert J. Dermody A.I.A., Roger Williams University Robert J. Dermody is an Associate Professor in the School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preserva- tion at Roger Williams University in Bristol, R.I. His background bridges the realms of architecture and engineering. He earned a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a master’s of architecture degree with a concentration in structures from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Dermody teaches both studios and lecture courses focusing on architectural structures and is a licensed architect in Massachusetts
” when designing and in particular when developing a set of working drawings. This paperexplores this notion and discusses the development of a commercial construction course thatrelies upon first hand experience to teach the fundamentals of renovation design. In doing so itinvolved students in an “adopt a building” program in which each student used an existingbuilding as a case study for the development of their project. The research questions in thisinstance were: 1. Is using an adopted building an effective method for teaching commercial construction? 2. Does using an adopted building help in the production of a set of working drawings? 3. What specific drawings in a set of working drawings are most influenced by