tasks as we embark on our effort to establish a ConstructionManagement (CM) Track within our Architectural Engineering Technology (AET) Program.CM Track: Research and develop a track for architecture students interested in pursuing a CM track and careers in a more construction related capacity.CM Track Curriculum: Research and develop the curriculum for the CM track students without jeopardizing our ABET and NAAB accreditations.CM Track Advisor: Advise undergraduate students on CM track. Help CM track students find employment and/or pursue graduate study in construction.CM Track Clubs and Organizations: Encourage and coordinate student involvement in Construction related organizations and clubs, example: Construction Institute (CI) and
-accredited architectural engineering programs in the United States,out of which four four-year Bachelor’s programs were accredited in the last 10 years. It isanticipated that an additional four architectural engineering programs will seek accreditationwithin the next four years. A literature review conducted in 2005 on curriculum content inAmerican architectural engineering programs shows significant agreement on five essentialknowledge areas: mathematics and sciences, general education, engineering, architecture, andtechnical electives (Estrada, 2006). It also demonstrated that variations are mainly related to: a)the duration of the course of study – four-year versus five-year degree programs and b) where theprogram is being housed – in a college
AC 2012-3485: STRATEGIC PLANNING METHODOLOGY WITHIN AR-CHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSDr. Cliff Goodwin, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Cliff is an associate professor of organizational leadership and former chairperson of Computer Infor- mation and Leadership Technology Department. Hehas been on the faculty of the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indianapolis since 1979. His primary teaching emphasis is in the area of leader development. He has conducted research, authored articles, written three textbooks, and presented seminars on a wide variety of topics related to human behavior in organizations. In addition to his uni- versity work, Cliff has acted as a
AC 2007-2280: EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY, A UNION TO FACILITATEENGINEERING LEARNINGMahmoud Alahmad, University of Nebraska-LincolnMatthew Pfannenstiel, University of Nebraska-LincolnDouglas Alvine, Alvine EngineeringClarence Waters, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Page 12.572.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Education and Industry, a Union to Facilitate Engineering LearningAbstractEducation and Industry are critical pillars of society, dependent on each other for growth andprogress. The Architectural Engineering program at the University of Nebraska-Lincolnintegrates a dynamic alliance between these two pillars with a
2006-1096: “PUTTING A FENCE AROUND” ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERINGUNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROJECTSEdmond Saliklis, California Polytechnic State University Page 11.1464.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 “Putting a fence around” architectural engineering undergraduate research projectsBackground and Literature Review: The purpose of this paper is to provide practical suggestions of how to design andmost importantly, how to limit the scope of proposed projects such that that anarchitectural engineering student can successfully participate in undergraduate research.Throughout the paper, the pedagogical benefits of such research
engineering faculty perceived computer modeling, building information modeling,and digital fabrication skills are relevant to the professional preparation of students and theextent to which this perception correlates with other factors and variables. The findingssuggested that while digital design tools were utilized over a broad range of curricular areasfaculty responding to this survey did not place a high priority on skill development with BIM andthat there was a very limited priority placed on course content related to fabrication.Introduction Digital tools have taken on a central role in the architectural design and documentproduction process as applications utilizing object oriented programming have facilitated a shiftfrom the role of
four continents. Shall’s work in this arena has been disseminated widely, including presentations at Third and Fifth International Symposia On Service Learning In Higher Education, lectures at Brown University, the University of Maryland, and the New School for Design, publications by the AIA Press and the University of Indi- anapolis Press and exhibitions at the San Francisco Museum of Art in La Paz, Bolivia, the Sheldon Swope Museum of Art, the Goldstein Museum of Design, the Venice Architecture Biennale and MoMA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 REBUILDING: REDESIGNING HOUSING & RETHINKING PROGRAMS THROUGH DESIGN-BUILD
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Predictors for Success in Construction, Architecture and Architectural Engineering ProgramsAbstract:Universities and colleges with Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (STEM)programs use standardized tests with a variety of names for student placement. The Assessmentand LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) is an assessment tool created by McGraw-Hillwith a mathematics placement module. Similarly, College Board’s Scholastic Aptitude Tests(SAT) and American College Testing (ACT) Inc.’s college entrance exams serve as a basis foradmissions into higher education. Since 2012, the university studied has collected data forEngineering, Architecture
with time. The adaptation of the staff to such change is explored and it hasbeen reflected in the changes to their teaching styles and approaches to thestudents.The conclusion is made that the industry-based staff have influenced the programso that there is a close relation to industry philosophies instilled in the students.That because of this, the research topics undertaken by the students are closelyaligned with practice. These factors have contributed to the continuing success of Page 12.1416.2the program over the years.IntroductionConstruction engineering, as a discipline, can sit uncomfortably within aUniversity faculty. The Construction industry is a
of theprogram’s leadership and faculty in order to guide the program more effectively. The advisorygroups are sometimes used to provide a certain type of membership status, for example inArchitectural Engineering Technology programs often seek out retired construction related firmleaders or potential donors. Keep in mind that advisory groups do not have formal authority togovern the organization, that is, they cannot issue directives that must be followed. Rather,advisory groups serve to make recommendations and/or provide key information, materials, andresources to the program’s leadership.3We have been fortunate to attract industry leaders from different parts of the constructionindustry to actively participate on the advisory board and
of the SketchUp program in 3D awareness by constructionmanagement students.Bibliography1 @Last Software Inc. SketchUp 3D Software. http://www.sketchup.com/2 Batie, David and Danny L. Morton (2001). Computer Graphic Applications for a Construction Document Reading Class. Associated Schools of Construction Annual 2001 Proceedings.3 Cory, Clark A. and Bozell, Dave. (2001) 3D Model for the Architectural Engineering and Construction Industry. GraphiCon 2001 Conference Proceedings.4 Messner, John I, Yerrapathruni, Sai C. M., Barratta, Anthony J., amd Whisker, Vaughn E. (2003) Using Virtual Reality to Improve Construction Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education Annual
AC 2007-2521: TEACHING BEYOND SUSTAINABLE AWARENESS:GRADUATING LEED-ACCREDITED PROFESSIONALSRosemary Kilmer, Purdue University LEED AP, ASID, IDEC. Interior Design Program, Department of Visual and Performing Arts. Rosemary Kilmer has been a professional interior designer and educator for over twenty years. She designs both residential and commercial environments. She began her education in architecture and completed degrees in environmental design, art education and fine arts. She is active in professional design organizations and has served as the Indiana State ASID president and treasurer as well as a National ASID Directory. Professor Kilmer is a NCIDQ-certified designer and has been on
AC 2009-448: DEFINING ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGNJames Mitchell, Drexel University Prof. Mitchell has been Director of Drexel University's Architectural Engineering program since 1988. He was trained originally as an engineer (AB and MS Harvard) and has practiced as a licensed architect. Throughout AY2008-9 he has used a sabbatical year to visit all the US AE programs to explore the teaching of AE Design. Page 14.402.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Defining Architectural Engineering DesignAbstractThe question of what constitutes “Architectural Engineering Design
natural environment; routinelypolluting air, water, and land resources. In response, the study of “Green Engineering andArchitecture” has emerged in an attempt to rectify damages and forge new environmentally-sound construction techniques and technologies. This manuscript provides an overview ofsustainable design as it relates to architecture and engineering within the United States andidentifies education opportunities both domestically and abroad.Keywords: Green Engineering, Sustainable Architectural Design, International EducationIntroductionEnergy consumption, rising cost of petroleum, poor ambient/indoor air quality, severe weather,and global warming are important issues that have been consistently in the news and are likely tohave a
eliminate one course from the five-course sequencerequired of their students in response to a directive to reduce overall program units. The ARCHDepartment requested an explicit integration of structural engineering content into their upperdivision third year studios. The solution, which served both departments, was composed of twoactions. One was to consolidate the content of the final two courses into a single abbreviatedcourse entitled Introduction to Structural Design. This course is being taken by both ARCH andCM students. This created the opportunity to create a course integrated into the third yeararchitecture studios and taken solely by ARCH students. This course, ARCE 316, is entitledStructural Integration in Architecture.The new sequence
suitable to include safety and fire protection aspects into architecture courses, such asmeans of egress, systems and interior finish. These aspects are extremely related toarchitecture. b. Students are limited to one specialization (HVAC Systems Design):The mechanical program is based solely on HVAC systems design. The HVAC program is dividedinto a series of five HVAC courses. Many HVAC engineering aspects are excluded, such as thestudy of smoke management, control systems and the study of airflow in the buildings. c. Absence of building safety and building code related courses:Life safety and building codes are essential for every architectural engineering project (HVAC,plumbing, fire protection or energy). From past experience, I have come
course has been taught twice (once without the use of the tools and asecond time with the tools). The course average exam scores on questions related to the sixaforementioned topics (embedded indicators) and scores of relevant student evaluation questionsare used to assess the effectiveness of the computation tools. The tools will be made availablefor other instructors via the internet.I. IntroductionEarthquake engineering is widely taught in civil and architectural engineering graduate programsaround the country. However, at the undergraduate level, there are few schools that offer acourse in earthquake (or seismic) engineering; though most graduate programs allow qualifiedundergraduates to enroll in a graduate level course as an elective. On
visualization tools. This paper describes an approach for developingrealistic 3D architectural walkthroughs using the “Unreal Engine 2”. The Engine basedwalkthrough allows users to navigate virtual environments from an ultra-realistic first personvantage point, creating the illusion of actually seeing the environment from the character’s pointof view. For architecture students the added realism of these models can enhance understandingof their own design in relation to time, space, environment, and scale. Add interactive elementslike lighting, sound, triggered events, animations, and artificial intelligence and the realism of the3D model can be enhanced even further. Walkthrough visualizations using 3D Game Enginesprovide better and broader
director of Architectural Engineering Program at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). He was re- sponsible for developing the current architectural engineering undergraduate and master’s programs at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). During his stay at IIT, he taught fundamental engineering courses, such as thermodynamics and heat transfer, as well as design courses, such as HVAC, energy, plumbing, fire protection and lighting. Also, he supervise many courses in the frame of interprofessional projects program (IPRO). In few months, Dr. Megri will defend his ”Habilitation” (HDR) degree at Pierre and Marie Curie Univer- sity - Paris VI, Sorbonne Universities
2006-156: EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH IN THE DAYLIGHTING SYSTEMSENGINEERINGKhaled Mansy, Oklahoma State University Khaled A. Mansy is an Assistant Professor in the Architectural Engineering Program, School of Architecture, Oklahoma State University. He earned his Ph.D. from Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, 2001, and has 16 years of teaching experience in professional programs in the USA and Egypt. Dr. Mansy is the PI of the NSF grant awarded to build this daylighting laboratory; the artificial sky dome.Steven O'Hara, Oklahoma State University Steven O’Hara is a Professor of Architectural Engineering, School of Architecture, Oklahoma State University. He received his Bachelor of
entrepreneurship and research. Such spaces foster innovation and problem-solving, providing ample room for the full development of products or ideas. Theyallow students to learn, research, and network with faculty and business leaders fromdifferent disciplines and programs. And they encourage collaboration and experientiallearning for under- and upperclassmen alike.Innovation spaces thus foster entrepreneurship among students in two ways: byallowing them to begin to envision themselves as practicing engineers — and gain therequired skills that will help them get there — and also by helping them engage directlywith community business leaders. Project-based maker spaces that enable students totake initiative and test or develop new concepts, perhaps with an
3.87, for Non-college Student is3.93. Significant Difference Analysis of Major Studied Before Learning Regarding Extension Education Learning: After independent sample t-test, the difference was not significant for those 36 items of Major Studied before Learning (Architecture-related and Non-architecture related) regarding Architecture Teaching Content, Service Quality, and Self-learning Evaluation. (Table 6) For the Architecture Teaching Content, the difference in Major Studied before Learning of students (including architecture, civil engineering, interior design, landscape design, and others) was not significant. All participants with architecture-related and non-architecture related majors believed that the program must add a
engineers.Presently, of the twenty seven percent of scientific and engineering professionals, a large Page 11.9.5majority work “primarily for firms providing architectural, engineering, and relatedservices” 4. As evident in Figure 1, construction related industries are expecting a rise indemand, and this fact proves the necessity of a joint architecture and civil engineeringprogram. Overall, with an expected 11.4 percent growth rate, the structure designindustry will require more programs such as architectural engineering to supplement anincreasing need 5. A major factor of undergraduate engineering studies and education is theAccreditation Board for
preferences for learning?We will seek to answer these questions with further investigation through engineering studentinquiry. The next step is to survey women and men students in the ARCE major to discern ifboth genders are influenced by the proximity of the program within the College of Architectureand Environmental Design versus the College of Engineering. Along with focused questionsregarding perceived strengths in technical topics as well as communication and collaboration,existing measures of learning style modes will be used including identify students learningpreferences in relation to the major. Possible assessments include the Kolb Learning StyleInventory, Myer-Briggs Type Indicator and Felder ‘s Index of Learning Styles. We hope toshow why
of these as Levels 1 through 6 as shown in Table 2. Table 2. Cognitive Domain Knowledge Level 1 Comprehension Level 2 Application Level 3 Analysis Level 4 Synthesis Level 5 Evaluation Level 6 Page 14.1126.3PART 1 Civil Engineering Undergraduate CurriculumThe authors propose that traditional undergraduate programs in Civil Engineering begin at thelower level of Blooms and work up, yet may
(application program interface) or related program, write a report and make a group presentation.The versions of Revit used to teach the students were available at the university as part of anexisting system-wide Autodesk license. The most current versions of these products are knownas Revit Architecture 2008 and Revit Structure 2008, respectively (in addition to Revit Systems2008). Each of the course activities listed above is described in more detail in what follows.BIM Modeling WorkThe hands on modeling work for the course was divided into different AEC disciplines andfocused on the use of the Revit programs for three key civil engineering disciplines: architecture(Revit Building 9), construction management (Revit Building 9) and structural
students’ successes and difficulties in the course may be a result of a slightlydifferent approach to problem solving from that of architects, and a possible underestimation ofan AE’s design abilities and potential for contribution to a project.PaperOur school is one of very few schools in the U.S. in which the architecture and architecturalengineering programs are not only in the same college, but also are within the sameadministrative structure of the School of Architecture. We encourage full integration ofarchitecture and architectural engineering, as each discipline has tremendous potential to learn Page 11.1252.2from the other’s approaches
Paper ID #11266Design for Aging with BIM and Game Engine IntegrationDr. Wei Wu, California State University, Fresno Wei Wu, PhD, LEED AP, CM-BIM, A.M.ASCE, is an Assistant Professor of the Construction Manage- ment Program in Lyles College of Engineering at California State University, Fresno. He received the Bachelor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a focus on Built Environment from Hunan University in China, the Master of Science in Environmental Change and Management at University of Oxford in the UK, and the Doctor of Philosophy in Design, Construction and Planning at University of Florida. He is an associate
describes how engineering programs work from the “groundup” starting at a very detailed level and gradually advancing to systems only at the end of a Page 24.1108.5program, while architectural programs typically use a studio approach which introduces studentsto the design of full projects at an early stage. Courses involving architecture students withengineering content might ideally recognize these two approaches.The new learning outcomes and content were therefore developed using the experience with theearlier courses and goals developed for the new course. The most direct approach to thedevelopment of learning outcomes and content for the new ARCE
their own design in relation to time, space, environment, and scale. Throughthis process, the student develops a deeper understanding of the underground foundation detailsand experiences a procedure that is only possible in the virtual world.Introduction and BackgroundFor any building project in its conceptual, pre-construction or construction phase, various levelsof information in the form of 2D drawings, specifications, 3D images and videos are provided bythe architect/ engineer to the client. The objective here is to offer the client an image whichclosely represents the final product. With time, as observed in any other fields of science andtechnology, visualization techniques have also improved and grown continuously. In this line