diverse perspectives to bear on complex, real-world problems. In this paper, we explore the outcomes of such a collaborative effort among teams of university students and the World Bank to develop a technical solution to the long-standing problem of identifying the most vulnerable school building infrastructures in hard-to-reach areas of developing countries. Worldwide, natural disasters like earthquakes and cyclones put more than a million school buildings at risk of collapse, and an estimated 875 million children and teachers at risk of harm. Together with the Global Program for Safer Schools of the World Bank, the student teams worked across classrooms and disciplines to design a tool that
engineering. A solution may be found with the recent advances inAugmented Reality (AR) technology that is widely employed in education setting (Akçayır &Akçayır, 2017). Augmented reality (AR) is an interactive experience that combines a real-worldenvironment with computer-generated elements in the real world (Azuma et al., 2001;Wikipedia, 2021). The AR system has three features: a combination of real and virtual worlds,real-time interaction, and accurate 3D registration of virtual and real objects.AR was first employed as a training tool for airline and Air Force pilots during the early 1900s(Akçayır & Akçayır, 2017). Since then, it has been widely used in every school level from K-12(Chen & Tsai, 2012; Chiang, Yang, & Hwang, 2014
sensitive whereas VR-Skope is not. The VR application is designed as a first-person game experience allowing the students experience the virtual walk Figure 2: AR-Skope application's interface showing navigation instructions.through from any remote location.The AR-Skope is an augmentationof a virtual world on top of the realenvironment, requiring the user’sphysical attendance on site.Another significant differencebetween the two applications is thatthe AR application is developedusing minimum virtual overlayssince it utilizes the real world tocomplete the experience (seeFigure 2). The VR environment Figure
, technology and future," 1996.[4] R. Schroeder, "Virtual reality in the real world: history, applications and projections," Futures, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 963-973, 1993.[5] C. Cruz-Neira, D. J. Sandin, T. A. DeFanti, R. V. Kenyon, and J. C. Hart, "The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment," Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 64- 73, 1992.[6] (2019, February 1). university of Minnesota_School of Architecture [Online]. Available: http://arch.design.umn.edu/studentwork/course/3250/virtual-reality.html.[7] (2019, February 1). University of Michigan_ Architecture [Online]. Available: http://taubmancollege.umich.edu/students/course-list/architecture-409-virtual-realities
formed,a real-world application is connected to it. The Theorizing phase is designed to assist the intuitivegeneration of conceptual understanding. In this phase, students were required to use simulationsoftware to experiment and expand their structural understanding. In particular, two educationalprograms were used: Pull Me Push Me and Truss me! The first one is an interactive app that allows themanipulation of structural forms to help in understanding how structures respond to loads. By draggingthe mouse and pulling the structure in different directions, the app simulates load conditions andresponse (reactions) (Fig. 2b). Small variables were progressively changed, which allowed students tograsp dissimilarities in the behavior of the structure
], there remain challenges associated with studentengagement that has led to less STEM graduates in recent years. Therefore, it has becomenecessary to address student engagement by fully immersing learners in real world context todevelop more challenging examples that relate their coursework to real life experiences [4].Another concerning fact is that between 400 to 800 Million of today’s jobs will be automated by2030 [5], which means that technology will become a vital tool that students must master. USDepartment of Commerce projects that 40% of existing jobs are in danger of shifting toautomation within 10 Years [6]. It is imminent that educators realize that the timewornpedagogies do not encourage student engagement, nor prepare for their
understanding of how systemshandle certain loadings and assessment of how these systems are applied in structures 3) theunderstanding of American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) methods to determine theappropriate loading criteria for structural design. An emphasis of this course aims to teachstudents how to use their understanding of structural systems as a tool for creative problemsolving, and to shift thinking away from structural engineering as a series of operationalsteps. This strategy is achieved by integrating a series of active learning exercisesintermingled with lecture materials. Further, real-world examples are woven into the lecturesand exercises to forge connection between the diagrammatic way engineers talk aboutloading and real-world
intra-disciplinary curriculum, which acts as a nexus to developskills with real-world implications [5]. This approach is student-centered, and it fostersintegrative learning and performance-based assessment; thus, it shows a significant potential toimprove CM pedagogy and develop students’ soft skills [6]. A similar vertically integrativeproblem-based learning framework was implemented between undergraduate CM students andgraduate civil engineering students at Arizona State University in a face to face environment;through such learning framework, students’ soft skills improved, as well as their intent to pursuean advanced degree and to stay in the major [7]. Such an integrative approach has also beenfound to be effective in other studies
,sharing inquiry, scholarly objectives, and practical application [8]. The shift from multi-disciplinary to interdisciplinary or meta-disciplinary instruction has been recognized as a methodthat allows design and STEM students to “uncover and acquire a cohesive set of concepts,competencies, and dispositions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)that they transfer and apply in both academic and real-world contexts” [9]. One of the benefits ofthe meta-disciplinary approach is that it enables students to develop a shared and commonunderstanding of systems-level ecological frameworks and urban design models that are requiredwhen collaborating on eco-district design project. In a traditional multidisciplinary approachwhere people
experience where students focus onintegrated solutions that require careful coordination of various design decisions, study of the synergies andtradeoffs each decision and convergence of disciplinary expertise to reach a holistic yet balanced design.This paper discusses how the studio courses can mutually support cross-disciplinary collaboration ofarchitecture, landscape architecture, architectural engineering students by providing mission driven lensesinformed by real-world issues and clients. Discussion points in the paper include course outcomes,collaborative mechanisms for multi-disciplinary instruction – both in-person and remote, teaching studentsto focus on the mission of the project, format of the course and generalizable trends on the
lumber as they saw thecorrelations between the overall dimension and the individual lumber. Also, they studied howsize and proportion correspond to the function of space. They inspected the corner joinery detailand noted the types of fasteners and the cuts made for the angular joints, as shown in figure 1.4.This observation provided a chance to see the real-world application of the details, components,assembly, and fabrication of a full-scale structure first-hand.Figure 1.3 Parsons School of Design, temporary street furniture on the corner Figure 1.4 Corner detail of the structureof 13th St. and Fifth Avenue, New York CityAnother field trip took place at the High Line [6] in New York City, as seen in figures 1.5 & 1.6.The High Line park
modelling by students in addition toprovided model templates. Examples of parametric modelling use in real-world projects will alsobe presented, connecting classroom techniques to application in professional activities. The projectschedule will also be adjusted to allow more time to practice modelling iterations.In conclusion, the methodology presented in this study helped to improve students' understandingof temporary structures in concrete applications. The introduction of parametric BIM softwareallowed students improve technical skills while increasing coursework motivation. Future studieswill continue to improve these methods while expanding benefits of 3D digital models to include,for example, structural analysis, quantity take-offs, and cost
details. Beth has her Master’s of Science degree in Architecture from the Illinois Institute of Technology and her Bachelor’s of Architecture degree from Ball State University. Additionally, she continues to practice architecture through her own company, Muse Design. She enjoys the synergistic relationship between her role as a professor and her role as an architect, and believes that this hybrid provides real world practicality into the classroom on a daily basis.Mrs. Kathryn Elizabeth Roche, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Fostering Civic Identity in Architectural Technology Students through the Evaluation of Critical Reflection in Service Learning
rays heat their objects. Discuss with students how radiation from the sun transferred heat and light to an object. The difference between light and heat is discussed.Discussion Questions:Complementary and comprehensive discussion questions are discussed after the threephenomena are introduced. Example of such questions are: What are some real-world examples of conduction, convection, and radiation? How are conduction, convection, and radiation similar and different? Explain situations, where all these phenomena: conduction, convection, and radiation are discussed. Discuss the very basics of the fundamental equations and explain that numerical methods (computer program) are needed to solve
, storytelling; formentioning some of them. Different institutions have implemented a Challenge Based Learningprograms (CBL) [2][3]. This model is based on the application of these learning methods and theidea that students are no longer required to only acquire information but encourage them toparticipate, interact and actively apply the knowledge obtained in classroom, developing theircognitive abilities. The resolution of challenges in real life is an intrinsic factor of theseprograms, it is necessary to go beyond the theory. With this purpose, construction site visits havebecome an even more relevant to the academic agenda.From an emotional perspective, during 2020 - 2021, lecturers and students have been subject ofhighly elevated levels of anxiety
department routinely collects data on student assessment ofcoverage and confidence. Comparison of the mean student ratings of coverage and confidencebetween 2018 and 2019 was determined for each learning outcome. Coverage indicates how wellthe course addressed the intended learning outcomes, while confidence reflects if the studentsfeel well prepared to implement their learning in the real world. This paper also presents studentfeedback on a selection of strategies used in the course for fall 2019.Given that this is the only course the students will take in construction scheduling, most studentswill learn the concepts for the first time. The learning objectives are focused on helping studentsunderstand the basics and gain deeper understanding and
design courses deserve a renewed sense of importance as students strive to concludethe academic experience and prepare themselves for transition to professional practice [10, 20,28]. It is an ABET accreditation requirement within AE Programs that graduates have a synthesislevel of knowledge in one of the four traditional AE disciplines (HVAC, Lighting/electrical,Construction, or Structural), with appropriate levels of application and comprehension of the otherthree disciplines [30]. Capstones provide excellent mechanisms for developing new leadersamongst the cohort of graduating students in these areas [26,30].Many researchers such as Dutson et al. [12]; Labossière and Roy [21]; and Todd et al. [32] haverevealed that there is significant
inconnection with course development at Farmingdale State College. The applicable fundingincludes the Students First Grants, the Applied Learning Development Incentive, and the annualSummer Scholarship Support. The Students First Grants provide support for improvingclassroom teaching, learning through activities outside of the classroom, and assessment ofpedagogies. Applied Learning Development Incentive supports co-curricular activities thatallow students to apply knowledge gained traditionally from classrooms to a hands-on and/orreal-world setting. Lastly, the annual Summer Scholarship Support provides an opportunity forfaculty to conduct preliminary research, develop a framework for a pilot project, developpedagogical strategies, explore assessment
effective. This gives the students a real-world problem andprovides the flexibility for the instructor to add or delete modules when a software system isoutdated or a new one is introduced. The project-based technique also allows other students tolearn from one another rather than relying completely on the instructor’s expertise. Lastly, do notfocus the course on mastering software systems; instead focus on understanding BIM workflowsand how the tools relate to construction processes. As mentioned previously, BIM is an integralprocess and tool that has an impact on all stages of construction. It is important to understandthese influences and focus student training on critical thinking and how software systems can beused to solve construction or
that facilitates interdisciplinarycommunication in real-time is becoming adopted [12]. They specifically point to BluebeamRevu, Procore, BIM 360, and PlanGrid as examples of document management tools that areavailable to use. As Deigert and Brady state, using such software improves response timeefficiency and accuracy in both design and construction. Furthermore, a “paperless process”addresses environmental and financial concerns by eliminating the printing, shipping, andstorage of documents.There are benefits in the realm of education as well. August et al. (2016) state that there isminimal cost to educators and learners using a virtual lab compared to real world labs [13].The only costs associated with their setup were the costs of
University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineer- ing Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advi- sory and Editorial boards for many International
has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Prof. Omar Youssef, University of Arizona Dr. Omar Youssef is a Lecturer at University of Arizona (UofA), College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture, and the School of Sustainable Built Environments. A Building Scientist in the Institute on Place and Wellbeing Performance. An Architecture Designer in Practice focusing on Environmental Application within the Industry. Dr. Youssef has extensive industry experience of constructed large-scale projects. Omar’s interdisciplinary background combines between Architecture Practice, Environmental Sciences, Health and
, transportation, and reuse. Aseries of prototype designs are presented to illustrate their design features and efficiency.The paper also discusses how an architectural curriculum may be enhanced by infusing service-learning and real-world opportunities by including studios and seminars on disaster-relief shelterdesign and education. They may be offered to students in architecture, urban planning, social work,education and allied disciplines. The outcome of these courses may be developed as educationalaids for use in schools, local communities and for the general public in order to help with theunderstanding of local conditions, potential disasters, design strategies and prototype shelterdesigns.Key Words: disaster-relief, shelter, modularity
intervened into higher education in March 2020due to the COVID-19 pandemic [1] and subsequently altered the original course design. Facultyspend a considerable amount of time developing their courses, which are uniquely suited for thein-person, seated, learning experience. We may coordinate our courses using an instructionaldesign model such as the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, andEvaluation) [2]. The ADDIE and other instructional systems design methods align the learningobjectives, instruction, student outcomes, and assessment techniques. A problem arises when theoriginal instructional design method is no longer applicable. The governmental and institutionalreactions created a sea change effect for courses originally
-defined outcomesituated with a contextually rich task requiring students to solve several problems which whenconsidered in their entirety showcase student mastery of several concepts of various STEMsubjects.” [33, p. 4] Throughout the STEM PBL, students will learn the engineering designprocess, which will guide them in systematically solving problems. Studies have shown benefitsin the implementation of project-based learning (PBL) or STEM PBL. Benefits include supportstudents to better apply theoretical knowledge to practice [34], improve students’ attitude andacademic performance [33],[35], students can better learn science concepts [36], and project-based learning provides students with opportunities to engage in real-world activities.[37
subject and to learn about one’s own strengths and weaknesses as alearner-learning how to learn from experience” (p. 22).16With construction education, it is very difficult to take experiences commonly found in the ebband flow of the construction field and simulate them in an academic setting. Gier and Hurdinvestigated different approaches to active learning to enhance student engagement in theclassroom. They suggested when students were engaged in real world scenarios, they were moreactively engaged in learning the concepts being taught.9 Similarly, Sims stated that anexperiential approach addresses three challenges in diversity education, “providing a holisticeducation, the dilemma of individualism and equality in the classroom, and providing a