, anexplosion in a Massey Energy mine in West Virginia killed 29 workers in the worst mineincident in four decades. Also, in 2010, an explosion on the Deep Water off-shore oil platformin the Gulf Coast left 11 dead and caused yet to be understood damage to the environment andeconomy. The fines and lawsuits associated with these three incidents have been and willcontinue to be horrendous2. Process safety management must continue to improve and beadhered to if employees, communities and the environment are to be protected.A revision to the ABET program criteria for chemical engineering programs in January 2012requires that the curriculum “enable graduates to design, analyze, and control physical, chemicaland/or biological processes, and address the
Engineering Education, 2011 Design of a Senior Laboratory Sequence to Guide Students in Multiple Academic Programs Towards Workforce PreparednessAbstractThis paper describes the integration of upper division experiential laboratory and project coursesin the chemical engineering, biological engineering, and environmental engineering programs atOregon State University. Student enrollment has doubled during this 5 year process. The year-long integrated curriculum is built around a theme of “college to career” transition and targets awide array of learning objectives. This paper focuses on three: experimental methodology,communication, and project management. It is demonstrated that the dramatic changes havebeen implemented while successfully
in real settings; and in creating positive learning and work environments. She has a B.S. inEngineering, an M.BA., and has worked in industry for over 18 years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Mapping Assets of Diverse Groups for Chemical Engineering Design Problem Framing AbilityAbstractEngineering programs across the US are engaged in efforts to increase the diversity of theirstudent populations. Despite these efforts, students from groups underrepresented in engineeringare still less likely to persist, relative to their peers. One approach taken is adding design earlierin programs, but faculty sometimes doubt that freshmen and sophomore students have thecapacity to
Engineering and associate dean of Engineering. She is interested in chemical engineering pedagogy, first-year programs, and international education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 How We Teach: Capstone DesignAbstractThe authors present the statistical results of the 2012 AIChE Education Division survey on howchemical engineering courses are taught. This year’s survey covers the capstone design sequenceas defined by each institution. The survey was conducted of faculty members teaching designcourses at their institution during the 2011-2012 academic year. In addition to coveringinstitutions in the United States, the results include a significant number of
cement concrete mixtures and their impact on pavement design and per- formance, pavement response and performance modeling, and pavement preservation. Recent research includes the investigation of design and construction factors on the response and performance of new flexible and rigid pavements (LTPP program), the effectives of precast panels as a rapid repair alternative, the impact of dowel misalignment on the performance of concrete pavements, evaluation of the new ME- PDG for the state of Michigan and the characterization of thermal properties for the various aggregate lithologies in Michigan. Dr. Buch teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in concrete materials and pavement engineering. He is also involved
AC 2007-80: TEACHING OPERABILITY IN UNDERGRADUATE CHEMICALENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATIONThomas Marlin, McMaster University Department of Chemical Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Tom Marlin joined the Department of Chemical Engineering at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, as NSERC Research Professor in Industrial Process Control in 1988. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts in 1972; then, he practiced engineering for 15 years in the chemical and petroleum industries. In 1987, he served as the Visiting Fellow, for the Warren Centre Study located at the University of Sydney, Australia. During the one-year project, a
design education.Prof. Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the process design teaching team, manages the courses and industry interface. Her current research focuses on the application of blended and active learning to design teaching and learning, program content and structure, student assessment, and continuous course improvement techniques. She managed and was a key contributor to a two-year pilot project to
% 20% 10% 0%Figure 9. Coverage of modern topics in KRD courses for 2009-2010 as reported byinstructors.Chemical engineering programs are likely to use this course for ABET outcomes assessment.The fraction of reporting programs using this course for ABET a-k outcomes is shown in Figure10. Page 22.788.12 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, 100% (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data
2006-1119: DESIGNING A PROCESS FOR DEPARTMENT CURRICULARREFORMJefferey Froyd, Texas A&M University Jeff Froyd is a Research Professor in the Center for Teaching Excellence and Director of Academic Development at Texas A&M University. He was Project Director for the Foundation Coalition, one of the NSF Engineering Education Coalitions and now serves as Project Director for “Changing Faculty through Learning Communities,” a project sponsored by the NSF Research on Gender in Science and Engineering Program.Jean Layne, Texas A&M University Jean Layne works as a Program Coordinator and Instructional Consultant in the Center for Teaching Excellence and the Division of
introduces them totopics in engineering ethics in process safety.Student performance is evaluated against established outcomes on a preliminary basis to informfuture versions of the course. In the past three years, this analysis has been used to change groupsizes in the laboratory and build on activity series in professionalism and computerprogramming. This performance was also used to justify a Writing Intensive course designation.Performance continues to be monitored regularly to continuously improve the course.Works Cited1. ABET, Inc. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore, MD : s.n., 2014.2. Fink, L.D. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses.San Francisco : Jossey-Bass
). At present, she has one peer-reviewed publication and has presented her work at three international con- ferences. Her computational skills include Ansys Fluent, GAMS, MATLAB, and Polymath. Her hobbies and interests are singing, cooking, and painting.Dr. Kirti M. Yenkie, Rowan University Dr. Kirti M. Yenkie is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University with 10+ years of experience working in the Process Systems Engineering (PSE) area with applications focusing on Sustainability and Environmental Resource Management. She is leading the Sustainable Design and Systems Medicine Lab (https://yenkiekm.com/), which has capabilities to work with major programming and simulation tools. She holds a
Society34 have web sites with case studies and other materials for teaching engineering ethics. ≠ Process safety modules are available through the Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SAChE) program.35 ≠ The Thomas Register36 is a useful database for equipment vendors. ≠ The EPA makes available exposure assessment tools and models.37Software Resources: ≠ Process simulators typically used in senior design include Aspen Dynamics, Aspen HYSYS, Aspen Plus, Batch Plus, CHEMCAD, PRO/II, SuperPro Designer, and UNISIM. ≠ The Aspen academic suite has several new modules. Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (formerly Icarus Process Evaluator) can be used for interactive equipment sizing as well as
Paper ID #12614Results & Lessons Learned from a Chemical Engineering Freshman DesignLaboratoryProf. Anthony Edward Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and
plants we see today. Perhaps these structures and plants werenot as optimized as those we might be able to design today with all our modern computer designaids. However, what is clear is that senior engineers could not be competent in design without asolid grounding in the engineering fundamentals. Today it may be possible for graduates to usemodern computer aided design programs and achieve an adequate design without a goodunderstanding of the engineering fundamentals involved. If their assumptions and operation ofthese modern software design tools are correct all is well. However without a goodunderstanding of fundamentals they may not realize when an incorrect answer is produced. Theold saying of garbage in, garbage out is even more relevant
alsoreflect upon both the plusses and minuses of this approach from the faculty perspective.IntroductionSenior design is the capping experience in undergraduate chemical engineeringeducation, wherein students undertake a design process compiling elements from each oftheir undergraduate courses. Until recently a course of this nature was specified byABET. While ABET current rules are less proscriptive, there is general agreementamong Chemical Engineering programs that senior design continues to be an importantand required course. The common goals of this course are for students to realize the Page 13.661.2design of a chemical facility
Curriculum Designers, Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 43 (1999). 5. Eckert, Roger E., Applied Statistics: Are Educators Meeting the Challenge, Chemical Engineering Education, p. 122 (spring, 1996). 6. Dorland, Dianne and K. Karen Yin, Teaching Statistics to ChE Students, Chemical Engineering Education, p. 170 (summer, 1997). 7. Hunter, J. Stuart, Applying Statistics to Solving Chemical Problems, CHEMTECH, p. 167 (March 1987). 8. Ludlow, Douglas K., Kirk H. Schultz and John Erjavec, Teaching Statistical Design Using a Laboratory Experiment, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 351 (1995). 9. SUPREM IV http://www-tcad.stanford.edu/tcad/programs/suprem-IV.GS/Book.html 10. FLOODS/FLOOPS http
of Colorado at Boulder. Ms. Ray-Earle oversees under- graduate, graduate, postdoctoral and professional-level research and education programming; additionally she manages corporate sponsor relationships, fiscal budgeting and intellectual property management at the center.Nancy S. Tway, University of Colorado Nancy S. Tway is the Financial Coordinator and Center Assistant for the Colorado Center for Biorefining and Biofuels (C2B2). Ms. Tway holds a B.S degree in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University. Her current duties include accounting functions for the center, planning and administering the C2B2/NSF REU program, and website and newsletter generation
Paper ID #11183Preliminary Evaluation of a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)Program: A Methodology for Examining Student OutcomesD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Esther W Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Esther Gomez is an assistant professor in the Departments of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the
Paper ID #15316Examining Student Outcomes from a Research Experiences for Undergrad-uates (REU) Program: Year Two ResultsD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a
University, Beijing, China, 1999. WORKING EXPERIENCE Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Cal Poly Pomona, 2016 – present. • Teach Process Design and Process Control for senior students. Process/Project Engineer, Wahlco Inc, Santa Ana, CA, 2014-2016. • Lead Urea to Ammonia process development. • Responsible for marketing research review. • Conduct internal and customer factory acceptance test. • Design process control system with PLC/DCS implementation. Project Manager/Senior Engineer, ClearWaterBay Technology Inc. Pomona, CA, 2007-2014. • Managed a Large-scale Refinery Energy Optimization Project, 2012-2014. • Major project in process design: 30+ units and 2 utility systems, with
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
has required that in order to be accredited, engineering programsmust demonstrate evidence of continuous assessment and continuous improvement.Components of a good assessment strategy include:1) Establish goals and desired educational outcomes for the degree program, which mustinclude 11 outcomes2 (designated “A-K”) identified by ABET as essential for allengineering programs.2) Measure whether graduates of the program are attaining the goals and outcomes. Thisprocess is required by ABET Criterion 3.3) Use the data collected in step 2 to identify opportunities for improvement, and modify Page 22.337.2the program accordingly.4) “Close the loop” by
sequential logic, either for a batch process or the startup/shutdown of a continuous process? 6. A process can involve hundreds of process automation devices. How should we analyze a system and synthesize abstraction levels to modularize and simplify the design of process automation? 7. What is the nature of computers? What are their strengths and weaknesses? What are human operator strengths and weaknesses? How do we synthesize automation strategies that utilize the strengths of both computers and operators? 8. How do we communicate control strategies effectively with people who program computers, other engineers, operators and managers? How should we document process automation?The Vocabulary and Grammar of
, Colombia). He received a BS in Chemical Engineering from Uni- versidad America (Bogot´a, Colombia), a M.Sc. from Universidad de los Andes (Bogot´a, Colombia) and a Ph.D. from Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, (Nancy, France). Currently, he lectures on thermodynamic and mid-program project. His research interests include design of colloid systems for application in cosmetic, food, personal care and oil & gas topics. He is member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers.Prof. Jorge Mario Gomez, Universidad de los Andes. Bogot´a - Colombia Jorge Mario Gomez is a Associate Professor and former head of the Chemical Engineering Department at the Universidad de los Andes in Bogot´a - Colombia. He received
Paper ID #25383Work in Progress: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a 1-creditChemical Engineering First-Year SeminarDr. Deborah S. Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time lecturer in the Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in chemical engineering and biotechnology.Mr. Jinwang Zou, University of Maryland, College Park Jinwang Zou is a Ph.D. candidate in the Measurement, Statistics, and Evaluation Program at the University
understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societalcontext5.It has been suggested that problem-based learning and project-oriented learning, which includescapstone design courses, are effective means to achieve these requirements including the ABETcriteria6-9. Mills and Treagust (2003) summarized their observations on the differences betweenproblem-based learning and project-oriented learning as project-oriented learning is moreapplication and professional work based. Thus, it is over a longer time period than problem-basedlearning. Project-oriented courses also include time and resource management, task and roledifferentiation, and more self-motivation and direction in comparison to problem-based learning.Problem-based learning
second-year of study. In the first-year engineering program, there isa two-course sequence where students are introduced to general engineering design. This is donethrough a variety of case studies in modules lasting 3 to 4 weeks.The Chemical and Biological Engineering Department through consultations with stakeholderssuch as students, faculty, alumni and industry saw a need to integrate more engineering designpractice into the second and third years of the undergraduate programs it offers. Based on this,the department has introduced a series of two new second-year undergraduate coursesintroducing engineering science fundamentals and design. These courses integrate some contentfrom courses they replace while also introducing new content
Documentation RequirementsAppendix C: Project Topics Page 22.746.17A Gizmo is a device or program the use of which allows students to discover the engineering /scientific / mathematic principle specified by your customer / professor. Characteristics of aGizmo include: -‐ It is constructed or programmed by your team -‐ It is the result of the Engineering Design Process -‐ It may use pre-fabricated parts, but must use them in a creative or different way from their original source -‐ It is interactive (for teacher / leader or students) -‐ Its total materials cost does not exceed $20Table 1: Examples of Gizmos and Not-GizmosNOT a Gizmo
mitigate team difficulties?MethodsThis study focuses on Senior Design because students work in teams throughout the semesterand 50% of their final grades in the course are team-based rather than individual. Senior Design Page 24.909.4is a capstone design course taken in the final year of the chemical engineering curriculum at alarge, public university in the Midwest. In Senior Design, teams are made up of randomlyselected students with specific attention paid not to isolate female students.11 Female studentsmake up one third of all students in the chemical engineering program. Teams haveapproximately uniform average GPA such that no team is made up
programs. She also has projects with local companies on the topic of process simulations and analysis for environmental remediation. Dr. Rivera was born and raised in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is a first generation engineer and doctor- ate. She completed her bachelor’s and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with five publications and two patent applications on the topic of nanotechnology for environ- mental remediation. Dr. Rivera has close to 10 years of teaching experience in Higher Education and professional training. Before joining IE3, Dr. Rivera was the Assistant Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program at the University of Florida. Dr