AC 2011-1921: POSTER SESSION FOR TENURE TRACK FACULTYDonald P. Visco, Tennessee Technological UniversityJason M. Keith, Michigan Technological University Jason Keith is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University.Dr. Jeffrey A Nason, Oregon State UniversityRoger C. Lo, Department of Chemical Engineering, California State University, Long Beach Roger C. Lo is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at California State University, Long Beach. He received his PhD from Texas A&M University in May 2008. Roger teaches undergraduate and grad- uate required courses (fluids, math, and transport phenomena) and also numerical analysis using Excel and MATLAB for chemical
them to go to career fair. Three faculty members share their experiences in asimilar research panel organized by the instructor later in the Fall. Some chemical engineering departments might choose to address some of these career issues in a separate 1-‐credit survey course that serves as an overview to the field, with discussions of career paths, panel sessions and roundtable discussions. This is certainly an option some departments might consider. Supporting all our studentsAt the end of every semester, I review all student transcripts and send email messages toabout half our students commending them for improvements in performance orexpressing concern about declines
Q7, knowing what is required toget a good job when they graduate. These results support that the seminar design successfullydelivered the course objectives.In contrast, students enrolled in Material & Energy Balances only showed neutral or negativechanges in most questions over the semester, most notably a statistically significant drop in theirconfidence to obtain a degree in chemical engineering or engineering in general (Q1,Q2).Despite completing a technical introduction to chemical engineering, their knowledge of the fieldof chemical engineering and related career paths did not improve significantly (Q3, Q4); in fact,they had less of an idea of what they wanted to do when they graduated compared to beforetaking the class (Q8). While
first is a general English course, the second is an elective. Whiletechnical communication is an option for this elective, so are courses in fairy-tale literature or thewritings of various ethnicities. Thus, students are not explicitly required to take a course intechnical communication, but rather expected to gain these skills needed for their professionalcareers through other coursework and external experiences. Other departments at the sameinstitution offer discipline-specific courses in technical communication, and informalobservations of the communication skills of senior-level students have suggested that ourdepartment may benefit from such a course. In Spring 2014, we piloted an undergraduate course,Technical and Professional
Paper ID #11972Improving Student Technical Communication via Self ReflectionMr. Kenneth P Mineart, North Carolina State University Kenneth Mineart received his Bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering from the Uni- versity of Iowa. Currently, he is a doctoral student in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he works in the field of block copolymer science with Professor Richard Spontak. Kenneth has regularly served as a graduate teaching assistant for a variety of courses including: Unit Operations Laboratory, Material and Energy Balances, Introduction to
amongstall involved and motivate student engagement and cooperation. This in turn leads to studentsachieving significant technical and non-technical learning outcomes and the course is recognizedby alumni and recruiters as highly effective at preparing students for theworkplace. Furthermore, despite the intense pace and depth and breadth of skills covered andassessed in the course, the fail rate is effectively zero.The course is offered twice each summer, each 6-week session currently accommodating up to84 students, with a Student-to-Professor ratio of up to 12:1 (yes, 7 faculty per session!). Thereare also writing instructors, a lab manager, and at least two TA’s working full- to nearly full-timeto help manage the course. There is 1 experiment per
Paper ID #23631Effect of Online Recorded Video ”Review Session” on Student Test Prepa-ration and Performance for Fluid Mechanics Midterm at a University in theNetherlandsProf. Michael D M Barankin, Colorado School of Mines Michael D. M. Barankin is a Teaching Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Barankin received his B.S. and Ph.D. from the University of CA, Los Angeles in 2002 and 2009, respectively; and he received his M.S., graduating with honors, from the Technical University in Delft, the Netherlands (TU Delft) in 2004. After a post-doctoral appointment at TU Delft through
newsletter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics. Page 26.1739.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Why Not Ask Students to Explain Themselves? Enhancing Conceptual Testing with Technical WritingNote: Based on reviewer comments this paper is submitted to the ASEE 2015 Annual Conference as a “Work-In-Progress” that is intended to be presented at the ChE Division Poster Session.1. IntroductionRecently a great deal of
oxygen conducting mixed oxide membranes and teaching reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. She is now a Teaching Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at CSM. Her primary research focus is in pedagogy, specifically in utilizing online resources and other technology and different teaching methods to increase student engage- ment and reduce/eliminate lecturing in the classroom. She likes to play with her kids, play racquetball, run, bike, swim, and play pool in her free time. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Creating and Facilitating an Engaging, Rigorous, Fully-Online Technical Course (or just Online Content
is obtained via an anonymous formal evaluation and via postings on the website.1. IntroductionThe focus of this paper is to provide an overview of a Workshop on Oral Communication Skillsthat the author has taught for the past two years in the Department of Chemical Engineering atthe National University of Singapore. This non-credit Workshop is required for all graduatestudents in the Department. The Workshop goals are to prepare students to make both formaloral as well as poster technical presentations. Considerations that present special challenges arethat the Workshop involves a relatively large number of students (45-75) from diverse culturalbackgrounds (primarily from China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Middle East) for manyof
-min lecture sessions and a 2-hour laboratory session per week (ChE 4402). Asignificant fraction of the course time was devoted to the work with the microcontroller; to fitthis in some modifications of the original curriculum were necessary. In addition to developing amore economical presentation of the subject matter, the following steps were taken:1. Bode stability analysis was omitted. Stability analysis is done using the poles of a transfer function (Chapter 4 of “Chemical Process Control”1).2. The treatment of second-order systems was reduced to a bare minimum; enough was taught to explain stability, instability and quarter amplitude damping (QAD). (The discussion of first-order systems remained unchanged, as did the discussion
accredited programs [1]. More importantly, asundergraduate engineering students advance further into their careers, they are faced withmultiple tasks that require them to write extensively, whether that be in industry or graduateschool.Currently, in the standard engineering curriculum, undergraduate engineering students are onlyrequired to take a basic writing course, such as Introductory English, and some form of technicalwriting course, which is typically not engineering-specific [2,3]. Other courses that allow thesestudents to practice writing are engineering lab courses that require lab reports. In these labclasses, professors tend to focus on the quality of the technical material rather than the quality ofthe writing [4]. This could be due to a
based oncounting up elements of the structure of the map. Holistic rubrics assign scores to desiredattributes of a map, with subscores generally on a 3- or 4-point scale, while hierarchical rubricsaward points for the number of features, resulting in a score that technically has no upper limit.One example of each type of rubric follows, though several variations on each are available.Besterfield et al. explored the use of concept maps to assess “knowledge integration” inindustrial engineering at the University of Pittsburgh [1]. In their study, after a brief overview ofmind maps and their creation, students were asked to create a mind map of the field of industrialengineering in their second year of study and then again in their fourth year
(from sophomores to graduate student TAs to faculty), but alsoproduce a new generation of alumni better equipped to work in today’s marketplace, whether Page 24.1384.2they choose to work within an existing company or venture out on their own.Rationale for Product Innovation SequenceInnovation is critical to the US economy, a hypothesis advanced by a seemingly endless series ofarticles, reports and blogs.1, 2, 3, 4 The president firmly believes in this message and hasformalized it through “A Strategy for American Innovation: Securing our Economic Growth andProsperity.”5 Here he notes “America’s future economic growth and
develop general members’ teamwork skills.Introduction Teamwork is regarded as one of the most important soft skills by both engineeringgraduates and their employers (1-4). A review of studies surveying engineers across engineeringdisciplines and experience levels found that there are four distinct tiers of importance;communication and teamwork were in the tier with highest importance, while math, science, andengineering knowledge were in the tier second from the bottom (5). Professionals withteamwork skills are desirable because high-performing teams have the potential to becomegreater than the sum of their members, especially when tackling interdisciplinary challenges (2).However, teamwork does not receive adequate emphasis for such an
the increase of quality assurance and regulations set forth by government agencies,recording of data and results will be an important skill for those students to have. For instance,electronic notebooks can comply with CFR Title 21 Part 11: Electronic Records and ElectronicSignatures of the United States Food and Drug Administration.With increase of personal technology and implementation of “cloud” storage, many companiesare implementing some form of electronic laboratory notebooks. • In 1997, Collaborative Electronic Notebook Systems Association (CENSA) was formed through the support of eleven major pharmaceutical and chemical companies. [1] • In 2014, Takeda Pharmaceutical published an article regarding their E-Notebook Project
performances, the missing values (from students whowere absent on scheduled quiz dates or who withdrew from the course), high skewness, non-normal and the percentage form of the outcome variable of interest (quiz score), which isbounded by 0 below and 1 or 100% above. More importantly, the data gathered also includedother factors like “sections”, which corresponds to the different instructors and schedules, andthe interaction between “sections” and “homework type”. We need to control the effects of thesefactors to filter out or isolate the effects of the “homework types” to quiz scores. A way to do thisis to use the binomial generalized linear mixed effect model which is also flexible enough tohandle missing values in the data. The results of the fit
nosignificant change, including data analysis, troubleshooting, and concept application, containedat least one question that was substituted between pre- and post-test. In general, students scoredthe highest in the Safety and Acquire Data categories; most students received full credit for thesequestions which skewed some error bars above 100%.Figure 1: Average student score for each category of the Skills Test administered before and after theLab II course. Error bars represent standard deviation of 66 scores (pre-test) and 65 scores (post-test).Observable decreases were seen in the categories of connecting theory with experimental data (a16 percentage point drop) and knowledge of laboratory equipment (a 14 percentage point drop).Each of these
outcomes c (an ability to design a system to meetdesired needs [new ABET student outcome 2]), d (an ability to function on a team [new ABETstudent outcome 5]), and g (an ability to communicate effectively [new ABET student outcome3], which our program has allied with this sequence of senior design courses [1]. There are alsoa number of secondary objectives that are fulfilled in this design course sequence. These includerecognizing and addressing process safety issues, developing people skills, and introducingtopics relevant to the impending student transition from the academic environment to theprofessional environment, such as the need for life-long learning and the benefits of professionalregistration for chemical engineers. Observations of
microphone2. Videos were produced during the course ofthe semester, with the associated Video Quizzes released about one week prior to the deadline(the date and time of the class session for which the video viewing was necessary).1 While this method is by far the easiest for one without video production experience, it is not without limitations(e.g., the recorded audio is automatically faded in and out during slide transition animations) and it is recommendedthat video production or video screen capture software be used to record audio and video separately. Producingseparate tracks also enables more precisely targeted and/or advanced video editing techniques, helping the instructorto condense the video to a shorter run-time.2 The authors have more
Page 24.1317.10 R ($/y) is the annual revenue or savings from the electricity generated.The factor 0.20 includes a 15% rate of return on investment and a ten-year plant life. Appendix B Design Project GradesheetTeam ______________________ Members:Writing (generally -1 point per error) / 5 Spelling / 5 Grammar / 5 Flow/logical connectedness/clarity / 5 Proper content in proper places (Appendix material in appendix, etc.) / 5 Formatting (Is it a memo? Table labeled? Graph labeled? Etc.) /25 Writing TotalTechnical / 7 Article verification / 8 Regenerative designs / 8 Economic analysis / 2
their final experimental test matrix, identify applicable analyticalneeds/instrumentation, and review data generated by the other groups. All safety considerationswere assessed prior to allowing the students to operate the equipment or use chemicals. At the endof the experience, students were required to complete a final report, make a final presentation, andevaluate the group performance of their teams.Keywords: CSTR, Reaction Engineering Experiment, Unit Ops Lab, open-ended problem, PBLIntroduction and BackgroundThe unit operations laboratory at the University of Dayton covers experiments in the followingcore chemical engineering topics: fluid flow, heat transfer, and separation processes. The studentsperform an additional operability study
Education, 2018 Work-in-Progress: A Framework for Development of Web-based Multimedia Pre-laboratory ExercisesIntroductionEngineering is an applied discipline, and therefore, undergraduate laboratories are considered anessential part of engineering curriculum [1], [2]. Laboratories help reinforce theoretical concepts[3], and improve skills such as problem solving, analytical thinking and technical skills [4]-[6].Other benefits include learning professional skills such as time management, teamwork, effectivewriting and oral communication skills [7]-[11].Despite the potential value of undergraduate laboratories, there is a general agreement that theactual learning outcomes often do not balance the time, effort, and money
marketing approaches…). - Create more opportunities for engineering and business majors to both wear the others “hat”, as well as demonstrate and utilize their own (disciplinary) strengths and Page 22.77.12 knowledge. For example, the data in Figure 1 indicates that the engineering students did not learn as much as the business students in some of the technical sessions. These engineering students might then be more engaged during these sessions if allowed to take more a leadership role in delivering the technical material to and/or interpreting the technical material
Coriolismass flow meter and a vane anemometer that give other readings that can be corrected to thesame mass flow rate as shown in Table 1. The rotameters are Omega Engineering model FL-1503A precision rotameters. The anemometer (model HHF141A-USB) was also obtained fromOmega. The Coriolis meter is a Micro Motion model CMF025 that was generously donated tous by Micro Motion and Pond Technical Sales, Inc. Page 23.126.6Most students found that the Coriolis meter was the easiest to use to establish constant mass flowfor their pressure drop measurements. Most students also understood that the higher pressure atthe first rotameter resulted in a higher
modules are completed, students should: 1. Have a working knowledge on regulatory compliance through good laboratory practices training. 2. Have a working knowledge on safety compliance, risk assessment, and hazard mitigation in a laboratory environment. 3. Understand the risks of regulatory and safety non-compliance. 4. Have functional knowledge to work with professionals in RC and SC areas. 5. Have the ability to write and understand RC and SC documentation. 6. Understand the interplay between technical aspects and compliance aspects of CHE profession.General teaching methodology RC and SC modules are designed to be used in lecture, laboratory or design courses. Allinstruction in these modules was done through
amongst themselves and ask the instructor for help if they had anyconcerns. The instructor went around the class listening to and interacting with thestudents. Whenever a general misconception(s) was noted, the instructor halted theactivities and gave a mini- lecture to correct the misconception(s). The worksheetswere thereafter assigned as individual homework at the end of the class.The 25-question concept tests were posted on the course website on the first day ofclass to be turned in individually on the third day.On the last day, a 90-minute open-book exam on the materials covered in class wasadministered to the students.4.0 Results and discussionTable 1 below shows the results for the multiple-choice concept questions used inthis work. It is
activitywherein teams of three or four are generally established, depending upon the size anddisciplinary distribution of the student body. Because of the interdisciplinary constraints it is noteasy to form teams that are optimized based on skills or interest, so we give interest priority overskills since students always vote to work on topics of interest over topics for which they may be Page 22.958.11best trained. Since student opinion is important, we like to give students a voice in team choiceat this level in their academic training. A typical session involves discussion of interdisciplinarydesign followed by some small group work leading to
301 Fall Transport Phenomena ChE 401 Spring Reactive Process Engineering Senior ChE 501 Fall Dynamics and Modeling ChE 601 Spring Process and Product Design and SafetyThese six Pillar courses take advantage of block scheduling with each course taught five days perweek in two hour sessions – three days for lecture, one day for problem recitation, and one dayfor an associated laboratory course over a fifteen week semester. A new key element of thePillar curriculum, the associated lab course, replaced our two previous 3- and 4-credit senior-year, unit operations laboratory courses with a 1-credit lab taken each semester starting at
are reported to be valuable in their daily life, emphasizing life-longlearning.1. IntroductionChemical engineering curriculum ensures students focus on learning the technical details of theprofession. However, problems in industry always involve much more than just finding technicalsolutions.1 Professional careers require skills such as proposing ideas, developing practicalsolutions, working in teams, meeting deadlines, establishing communication between technicalsupport and suppliers, overseeing financial issues and finally reporting and presentation skills.Very few chemical engineering programs incorporate project management courses that meetrequirements of professional life. Therefore, alterations and additions into the existingcurriculum