AC 2012-4762: EVALUATION OF DYKNOW IN A CHEMICAL ENGI-NEERING CURRICULUMDr. Allen Hersel, Trine University Page 25.6.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Evaluation of DYKNOW in a ChE Curriculum (Poster)In the fall of 2008, all professors at small Midwestern University were given a Toshiba Tablet PCPortege m400, with the intent of increasing technology use in the classroom. A Tablet PC differs froma regular laptop PC, in that it allows the user to rotate the display 180 degrees to cover up theintegrated keyboard. In this mode, the user interface is
numerous awards for both teaching and advising, including being named as an NCSU Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor, the ASEE Raymond W. Fahien Award, the John Wiley Premier Award for Engineering Education Courseware, NCSU Fac- ulty Advising Award, National Effective Teaching Institute Fellow, NCSU Alumni Outstanding Teacher Award, George H. Blessis Outstanding Undergraduate Advisor Award, ASEE Southeastern Section New Teacher Award, and ASEE-ERM Apprentice Faculty Grant Award. Bullard’s research interests lie in the area of educational scholarship, including teaching and advising effectiveness, academic integrity, process design instruction, and the integration of writing, speaking, and computing within the
engineeringefficacy scale, and a chemical engineering multidisciplinary scale. This allows robust evaluationof how the merger of traditional chemical engineering subjects with advanced nanotechnologyand biotechnology topics using a degree-project approach may better prepare students for today’sincreasingly molecular-oriented workplace.Introduction Education in Chemical Engineering (ChE) education is currently facing a crossroads.There is a disconnect between the curriculum (which is largely focused on unit operations, e.g.,heat exchangers, distillation columns, etc., and heavily geared towards commodity chemicals)and faculty research (which has recently emphasized nano- and bio-technology). Furthermore,there is a disparity between the courses
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A New Assessment Method to Easily Identify Areas Needing Improvement in Course-level Learning OutcomesIntroductionAssessment of student proficiency in expected outcomes, whether on the course or programlevel, is an important aspect of curriculum development in engineering programs. The reasonsfor such assessment range from desires to improve student learning to fulfilling requirements ofvarious accreditation bodies. But regardless of the reasons, the challenge is to develop suitablemetrics that can clearly identify areas that need improvement.In order to assess student learning, the Department of Chemical Engineering at Brigham YoungUniversity has outlined multiple
Paper ID #9491A Systematic Approach to Prepare for ABET AccreditationDr. Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University Vincent Wilczynski is the Deputy Dean of the School of Engineering & Applied Science at Yale Univer- sity. As the Deputy Dean, Dr. Wilczynski helps plan and implement all academic initiatives at the School. In addition, he manages the School’s teaching and research resources and facilities, including establishing the Yale Center for Engineering Innovation and Design. Previously Dr. Wilczynski served as the Dean of Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. Dr. Wilczynski served in fellowships at the MIT
Paper ID #30631Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Controlto Chemical EngineersDr. Thomas Andrew Meadowcroft, Rowan University I am a Chemical Engineer, receiving my Bachelors degree from the University of Toronto and my Masters and PhD from M.I.T. I was a M.I.T. Chemical Engineering Practice School Station Director for 2 years following graduation, then went to work in industry. I worked for Union Camp, International Paper, General Electric, Omnova, and Dover Chemical as a Process Engineer, Process Design Engineer, and Process Control Engineer for 25 years. I began teaching as an adjunct at the
Paper ID #14452The Solve - Personalize - Integrate - Think Approach in the Process ControlClassroomDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduc- tion to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control and modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarna- tions: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment and professional
AC 2009-29: IDEAS TO CONSIDER FOR NEW CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATORS: PART 2 (COURSES OFFERED LATER IN THE CURRICULUM)Jason Keith, Michigan Technological University Jason Keith is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. He received his B.S.ChE from the University of Akron in 1995, and his Ph.D from the University of Notre Dame in 2001. His current research interests include reactor stability, alternative energy, and engineering education. He is the 2008 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational Scholarship.David Silverstein, University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is currently the PJC
. Nottis, Bucknell University Dr. Nottis is an Educational Psychologist and Professor of Education at Bucknell University. Her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education, approached from the perspec- tive of Human Constructivism. She has authored several publications and given numerous presentations on the generation of analogies, misconceptions, and facilitating learning in science and engineering educa- tion. She has been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He
Paper ID #15996Enhancing Conceptual Testing with Technical WritingDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he teaches Material and Energy Balances, Unit Operations, Transport Phenomena and Mathematical / Computational Methods. He is the recipient of the 2014 NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, 2014 ASEE Southeastern Section Outstanding New Teacher Award, and currently serves as the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division’s newsletter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research
biofuel education in engineering. To help bridge this gap, we have been creatingeducational materials that systematically integrate biofuels technology into undergraduatechemical engineering curriculum. The modular approach we proposed aims to address some ofthe major obstacles of introducing biofuel education into chemical engineering curricula.1 IntroductionIt has been argued that advanced biofuel industry will have significant impact on U.S. economicrecovery and its transition to a sustainable green economy. The U.S. National Academies haveidentified renewable energy as a national scientific strategy aimed at replacing the oil-basedrefinery and transitioning to a green economy. 1 In addition, as shown in a 2009 BiotechnologyIndustry
AC 2008-322: ENHANCING THE UNDERGRADUATE CHEMICALENGINEERING CURRICULUM WITH AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS SAFETYAPPROACHBruce Vaughen, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Visiting Assistant Professor Chemical Engineering Department Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, CM55 Terre Haute, IN 47803 812.877.8813 Page 13.556.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Enhancing the Under gr aduate Chemical Engineer ing Cur r iculum with an Industr ial Pr ocess Safety Appr oachAbstractThis paper summarizes the industrial process risk analysis approach that was used to enhance achemical engineering unit operations
Paper ID #6766Efficient and Effective Instruction in Process Simulation Across the ChemicalEngineering CurriculumDr. Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University Dr. Rebecca K. Toghiani is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at MSU. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. all in Chemical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. She re- ceived the 1996 Dow Outstanding New Faculty Award and the 2005 Outstanding Teaching Award from the ASEE Southeastern Section. A John Grisham Master Teacher at MSU, she is an inaugural member of the Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A new motivation and perspective on teaching simulation and design: The development of a dynamic process model in conjunction with an operator training simulator (OTS)IntroductionDuring the past five years, the author was involved, as part of a team of researchers anddevelopers, in building an Operator Training Simulator (OTS) for an Integrated GasificationCombined Cycle (IGCC) power plant. In a companion project, a 3-D fully Immersive TrainingSystem (ITS) was developed for the same IGCC power plant OTS. During this process, theeducational potential of both the OTS and ITS became evident and provides the motivation forthis paper.Traditional process/plant
the field of algorithm visualization, which explores technology and pedagogical approaches that enhance human understanding of computer algorithms. He is also one of the leaders of a national effort, funded by the National Science Foundation CPATH and CCLI programs, to adapt studio-based instructional methods for undergraduate computing education and chemical engineering education.Mr. Adam Scott Carter, Washington State University Page 23.1298.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Use of Studio-based Learning in a Material/Energy Balance ClassFor more than a century
. in computer and information science from the University of Oregon in 1993 and 1999. Having previously served both as a Postdoc and Assistant Professor at the University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hundhausen is presently an Associate Professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University, where he directs the Human-centered Environments for Learning and Programming (HELP) Lab (http://helplab.org/). Recipient of more than $2 million in funding from the National Science Foundation, including a CAREER Award, Hundhausen applies the methods of human-computer interaction to the design and empirical evaluation of software environments and pedagogical approaches to improve learning and
policies and procedures, diverse student populations, preparing for the first classsessions, and essential communication skills for the classroom. The day ended with a networkingsession and a resource fair. Second, an engineering specific half-day orientation followed oneweek later. This session included GTAs from chemical engineering, bioengineering,environmental engineering, civil engineering, and construction engineering management. Thegoal of this session was to have GTAs value their role in instruction and understand how theirresponsibilities fit into the educational approach to facilitate student learning. The group ofapproximately 40 GTAs was divided into four subgroups that rotated around interactive sessionsled by faculty with assistance
in our country and how can we provide solutions through ourgraduates?The information gathered in the process of answering the previous questions provided us withthe elements that captured well the consensus within the task force group set by the Departmentfor this purpose. These include: § Chemical engineering in Colombia needs to move from a purely process-based program to a balance mix between product and process design. § The so-called enabling sciences: Biology, Mathematics, Chemistry and Physics are already well engrained in our current curriculum. § A new set of organizing engineering principles needs to be established. The approach based on molecular transformations, multi
2006-1214: PROCESS CONTROL: A RELEVANT APPROACHBarry Barkel, University of Michigan Lecturer in Chemical Engineering, University of MichiganPeter Woolf, University of Michigan Assistant Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Page 11.1026.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006IntroductionInformation from many sources, including both new and past graduates, employers andeven from a sitting chairman of the AIChE, suggested that the process control course atthe University of Michigan was not relevant to the workplace that our graduates wereentering. We also conducted interviews with experts
operations. This paper specifically demonstrates each method andpresents the results of student outcomes.Background and MotivationEvery semester it seems as if there is a major chemical process safety incident reported whichends up in our classes as a teachable moment. Faculty in chemical engineering courses often takenote of the incident, discussing it in class and perhaps following up with assignments to reinforcethe importance of process safety to aspiring engineers. While this ad-hoc approach has doubtlessoccurred for years, the ABET program criteria for Chemical Engineering and similarly namedprograms now reads “The curriculum must include the engineering application of these basicsciences to the design, analysis, and control of chemical
expanding role of chemical engineering in pharmaceutical productiondemands the inclusion of pharma-related concepts in chemical engineering courses throughoutthe curriculum. Successful curriculum improvement requires a new approach to integratingconcepts of batch processing, solid-liquid separation techniques, solid-solid particulateprocessing, drug formulation and delivery, and technology at the nano-scale. Students must havea solid grasp of chemical engineering fundamentals and the perspective necessary to worksuccessfully side-by-side with pharmacists, pharmacologists, medicinal chemists, and materialschemists in this highly multidisciplinary field.The field of pharmaceutical engineering is quite broad and involves the manufacture of the
research, and innovative approaches to teaching.Dr. Krista M Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State Uni- versity in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between the two. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Chemical Engineering Major Selection throughout
AC 2011-244: STUDENT LEARNING AND THE CONTINUOUS PROGRAMIMPROVEMENT PROCESS IN A CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMHoward S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Kimmel is Professor of Chemical Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology in Newark, NJ, and Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs. He has been Executive Driector for the Center for Pre-College Programs at NJIT for over 30 years. Dr. Kimmel has had numerous NSF grants and State grants focusing on professional development, curriculum, and assessment. In addition, he is a member of the assessment committee for Chemical Engineering.Angelo J. Perna, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr.Angelo J. Perna is professor of Chemical and
requirements (Burke and Snyder – 2008). Doing so can help inspire and engage this newage of students who are more used to digital tools and devices. Even the more traditional learnercan use the sites as an opportunity to gain understanding in new technology, which can becomeskills for future careers. Other work have utilized video technology with Chemical Engineering students.Liberatore has utilized YouTube to relate course topics to real world applications (Liberatore –2010). Falconer and colleagues have compiled screencasts where a narrator goes over aparticular chemical engineering concept, or a detailed problem solution (Falconer 2009 and 2012).A recent paper from JEE states that students who use screencasts and perceive their benefit
AC 2007-139: A STUDENT-CENTERED APPROACH TO THE STOICHIOMETRYCOURSELisa Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa G. Bullard received her BS in ChE from NC State and her Ph.D. in ChE from Carnegie Mellon. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chemical Company from 1991-2000. At N.C. State, she is currently the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Chemical Engineering. Her research interests include curriculum development, information literacy, and the integration of teaming, writing, and speaking into the undergraduate curriculum.Richard Felder, North Carolina State University Dr. Richard M. Felder is the Hoechst Celanese Professor Emeritus of Chemical
present the basics of implementing a pillars-style curriculum and report on ourongoing assessment of student learning and knowledge integration using this framework. Theassessment is “ongoing”, in part, because the new curriculum has been evolving with time.Also, and more importantly, as this curriculum is one of the first of its kind, our somewhatunique assessment requirements necessitate development of new tools as we go. Specifically,it is critical that our curriculum be evaluated not only for its effectiveness in enhancing theability of students to engage in systems thinking (knowledge integration), but also to specifi-cally assess the impact of this type of curriculum on students’ performance in conceptualizing(chemical) engineering
AC 2011-2314: PREPARATION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS IN THEMULTI-LEVEL CURRICULUM STRUCTUREPhD Valeriy Solomonov, Lomonosov Moscow State Academy of Fine Chemical Technology (MITHT)PhD Olga Belyaeva, Lomonosov Moscow State Academy of Fine Chemical Technology (MITHT)Prof. Alla Frolkova, Lomonosov Moscow State Academy of Fine Chemical Technology (MITHT) Page 22.1170.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Preparation of chemical engineers in the multi-level curriculum structureThe training of specialists in science-based technologies as the basis for stable
AC 2010-2416: BRINGING RESEARCH INTO THE CLASSROOM:CONCEPTUALLY NEW HEAT-EXCHANGE CARTRIDGE FOR CHEMICALENGINEERING EDUCATION.Baba Abdul, Washington State University Baba Abdul obtained an MSc in Chemical Engineering from the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria Nigeria in 2005. He has had some work experience in the chemical process industries, mainly petroleum refining and solids processing. He is part of the faculty at ABU. He is currently working on a PhD that includes elements of Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer in Helico-symmetric channels, and Engineering Education at the Washington State University, Pullman WA. 509-335-9625;davab@wsu.edu.David Thiessen, Washington State University
Paper ID #6320A Comparison of Peer Evaluation Methods in Capstone DesignDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Joshua Enszer is a full-time lecturer in Chemical Engineering at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control and modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic port- folios as a means for assessment and professional development, implementation
andapplying new technologies. In this paper, we provide• An approach to provide focussed course options and electives in a stream, which could be modified for other stream topics• A recommendation for the division of PSE topics between required and elective courses• A description of advanced PSE topics and how they can be delivered within the chemical engineering curriculumWe begin by explaining our view of the topics included in PSE stream, with a brief comparisonwith a few prominent alternative definitions of PSE, and we address the need for a clearlydefined stream, rather than a selection of courses. Then, we define PSE learning goals, andpresent the sequence of courses that address these goals. We