2014 Design of a Potable Water Supply System to a Native Village in the Ecuadorian Team 1 Andes. Design and Installation of a Potable Water Supply System to a Native Village in Team 2 Panama. Design of Infrastructure to link Three Hiking/Biking Trails near by the Glenwood Team 3 Bridge. Team 4 Development of a Construction management Plan for the Davis Avenue Bridge.Descriptions of International Service Learning Projects A. Curingue Community – Ecuador Curingue is an indigenous community located in the Ecuadorian Andes Mountains. Home to approximately 300 people, the mountaintop community has no access to running water. Community members currently retrieve their water from a natural source about 1000 feet
Paper ID #23668Using 3-D Printing in a Laboratory Setting to Teach Design PrinciplesDr. Suzette R Burckhard, South Dakota State University Dr. Burckhard earned a BS in Engineering Physics, a BS in Civil Engineering, (both from South Dakota State University) an MS in Physics. an MS in Chemical Engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering with emphasis in Environmental Engineering, from Kansas State University. She has been on staff at South Dakota State University since 1997 in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department where she is a professor and assistant department head. Dr. Burckhard is a member of ASCE, ASEE
learned.Program BackgroundThe University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) was awarded a 3-year NSF-IRES grant toconduct an international research program for a cohort of at least six undergraduate and graduatestudents each year. Each 8-week summer research experience consists of four weeks in aninternational host country and four weeks at UAB. The four weeks abroad are preceded by twoweeks in the U.S. dedicated to orientation, project assignments, project planning, and preparingthe students for the international experience. Following the international experience, the studentsspend a minimum of another two weeks at UAB working on their final research project reports,preparing presentations, and developing manuscripts and posters for presentation at
AC 2008-1531: INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION FOR GEOTECHNICALENGINEERING LABORATORY EXERCISESJames Hanson, California Polytechnic State University Jim Hanson is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University. He is past chair of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin - Madison and taught at Lawrence Technological University for 9 years before joining the faculty at Cal Poly.Senro Kuraoka, Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Senro Kuraoka is Senior Researcher at the Research and Development Center at Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. in Japan. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin
Paper ID #21728Adjusting to the New ABET Criteria 3 and 5: It’s Really Not Very HardDr. Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the Director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy (USMA). He is a registered Professional En- gineer in Virginia. Al Estes received a B.S. degree from USMA in1978, M.S. degrees in StructuralEngi- neering and in Construction Management from Stanford
. Page 26.421.8Furthermore, if the intern did not learn creativity/innovation fundamentals as part of hisor her formal education, the probability of acquiring those basics prior to and evenbeyond licensure is very small.Finally, consider my experience over the past half-dozen years, during which I developeda strong interest in creativity/innovation and have studied, written, and spoken aboutthem. I have encountered mostly lack of interest and some push-back from engineeringorganization leaders and managers.For example, in response to a client’s request to suggest topics I could present orfacilitate at their annual senior manager’s meeting, my ideas included a session on usingneuroscience basics to work smarter which would include ways to be more
by the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE).12 The Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies, published by the International Engineering Alliance (IEA) in June 2013.13 Substantial changes to the content of the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Exam, implemented by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying in conjunction with its transition to a computer-based examination format in 2013.14 Possible changes to Criterion 3 (Student Outcomes) of the ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, which are currently being proposed by the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC).15Inclusion of these latter two items might
: Criterion 3. Student outcomes o (c) an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within a realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability. o (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of solutions in a Page 26.865.5 global, economic, environmental, and societal context. o (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues. Criterion 5. Curriculum o (c) a general education component that complements the technical content of the
, studies have shown that student learning improves when classprojects are presented and reviewed by a much broader audience and that feedback from multiplesources improves overall academic performance4,5. In this study, these motivating factors areincorporated by augmenting “conventional” class projects into web-based projects using anonline platform that makes them accessible to a wider technical audience.Graduate-level civil engineering courses often have a project component. These “conventional”projects give students the opportunity to apply skills and knowledge acquired in the classroom,synthesize information, and independently study a specific topic in greater depth than couldpossibly be accommodated in the allotted contact hours. The
Paper ID #11115Concept Inventory for Engineering Hydrology – Development and Imple-mentationDr. Isaac W Wait, Marshall University Isaac W. Wait is an Associate Professor of Engineering in the Division of Engineering at Marshall Uni- versity in Huntington, West Virginia. He conducts research and teaches courses in water resources and environmental engineering, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Ohio and West Vir- ginia.Dr. E James Nelson, Brigham Young University Page 26.389.1
by theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET), and the National Academy of Engineering (NAE).1-3 Additionally, manyUniversities have incorporated sustainability concepts into civil engineering programs such asCarnegie Mellon University, Syracuse University, and Arizona State University, which havesuccessfully implemented courses in sustainability in Civil Engineering freshman and sophomorecourses.4-8 Sustainability in lower level civil engineering courses is often introduced at aconceptual level in the broad sense of environmental, economic, and social implications ofengineered structures and materials as contrasted to the technical, physics-based course topicsusually present
, iterate calculations and write a technical report from day one. I would explain to the class that these projects are like mini senior design projects. If the students treat it like such, it will not only make for a quality project, but also prepare them for senior design. This project is a challenge. To be honest though, I don’t know what would need to be done to improve the experience as I had a good experience.”Q.7 Other comments/suggestions/complaints. “I have no complaints. I have had the incredible blessing to be an intern/part-time/full-time employ for an amazing engineering firm. There are things that I have learned at the workplace that have made me a better student, but there are things I learned as a student
). Figure 5. Correct response rates for the modified peer instruction sequences divided by course performance Table 3. Learning gains for the modified peer instruction sequences divided by course performanceNumeric ProblemsStudent responses were recorded during the group problem sessions and classified as correct,incorrect, or “Not Enough Time” (NET), which was a permitted response if students ran out ofclass time to arrive at a solution. For each of the two instructional sequences (see Table 1) thepercentage of students answering the numeric problem correctly was calculated using Equation5
identify an appropriate project. Projects need to have a significant deliverable at the end of the 15-week semester so that the students can write a report on their work and make a presentation at the university. 2. Administration: During at least 30 minutes of the three hours that students work in the host company’s/agency’s office a supervising engineer (PE or SE) needs to be available to answer the students’ questions. A name and contact information are necessary so the faculty can keep in touch as needed. 3. Workspace: Students need to be provided workspace (desk, conference table, etc.) for their three hour office attendance sessions. 4. Reference material: Students need to have access to necessary
, whileAlexander and Murphy21 support that expertise requires development of knowledge “coherentlyorganized around key domain concepts and principles” (pg. 566). Consequently, conceptualknowledge is factual, yet structured, complex, and interrelated.Acquiring conceptual knowledge has been described as more than just memorizing facts, butindicates that the learner knows something. For instance, Montfort et al.2 describes thatconceptual knowledge is “internal” and relates knowledge with intuition, stating that “you don’tremember something you understand conceptually, it is just true” (pg. 111). Similarly, Streveleret al.3 recounts that conceptual knowledge provides engineers with “engineering judgment” or“heuristic thinking” that is necessary for them to
the civilengineering curriculum, it is important to focus on teaching methods that encourage criticalthinking and creativity in the students. Students not only need an understanding of sustainabilityto make significant engineering decisions, they also need the critical thinking skills to supplyeffective solutions to complex technical problems.3 In this context, an active learningenvironment around sustainability issues in the civil engineering industry is useful for students todevelop practical skills. 4Active learning techniques can vary from low-risk to high-risk with respect to teacherpreparation, use of classroom time, student interaction, and resulting student learning. High-riskactivities may offer large payoffs in student learning
students. She incorporates a variety of demonstration materials (both traditional and non-traditional) and interactive activities into her lecture-based delivery format.Caroline June Klatman, The Pennsylvania State University Caroline Klatman is a teaching intern within The Architectural Engineering Department at The Pennsyl- vania State University. Under the advisement of Professor Heather Sustersic, she assists in enhancing course material. Her responsibilities often include revising lecture content, incorporating code updates into class material, aiding students in understanding course concepts, and creating homework assign- ments and solutions. Ms. Klatman is able to use her personal experience as a student to offer
(NCEES)," [Online]. Available: http://ncees.org/exams/fe-exam/. [Accessed 23 Jan 2015].[5] A. a. Y. A. Kaw, "Measuring Student Learning Using Initial and Final Concept Test in an STEM Course," International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(4), pp. 435-448, 2012.[6] J. V. Kovach, "Leadership in the ‘Classroom’," Journal For Quality & Participation, vol. 37(1), pp. 39-40., 2014.[7] G. Mason, T. Shuman and K. Cook, "Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course," IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), pp. 430-435., Nov 2013.[8] E. Lemley, "Implementing a Flipped Classroom in Thermodynamics," in 120th American Society for
change by the ASCE Committee onAccreditation on May 22, 2014. It was supported by the Department Heads Coordinating Counciland approved without change by the ASCE Committee on Education on May 26, 2014. Thecommittee’s work was presented at a special session of the CE Division at the American Societyof Engineering Education Annual Conference in Indianapolis in June 2014. The CEPC wasforwarded to ABET on June 3, 2014, approved upon first reading by the ABET-EAC on July 9,2014, and approved upon first reading by the ABET Board of Directors on November 1, 2014. Asof this writing, the proposed changes to the CEPC are in ABET’s formal public review periodscheduled from November 13, 2014 to June 15, 2015. The second readings are scheduled by theABET
specific skills were then elaborated as quantitative and qualitative skills as below:Qualitative learning objectives: 1. Explain what constitutes weak (and strong) technical writing style in a journal paper 2. List the phases of an LCA and explain what is done in each phase 3. Discuss the similarities and differences between EIOLCA and process based LCA 4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of process based and EIOLCA 5. Discuss the similarities and differences between ReCiPe and TRACI impact assessment methods 6. Determine the appropriate functional unit for an LCA 7. List online resources for following LCA literature 8. List names and regions (where they were developed) of major life cycle inventory databases 9. List
, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Education and Training. She previously has served as vice-chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, chair of the ASEE’s Civil Engineering Division, and a member of the Transportation Research Board committees on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Asset Management, and Emerging Technology for Design and Construction. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, and her B.S.E. from Duke University.Dr
accessibility for non-STEM students. 2. Ensure that the course takes a form that can be readily adopted into the engineering and general education curricula of many types of institutions of higher learning. 3. Facilitate dissemination, adoption, and continuous improvement of the courses beyond the audience already being reached.Structures in the Urban Environment is a large-enrollment introductory course that introducesliberal arts and engineering students to the creative discipline of civil and structural engineeringthrough case studies of the works of great engineers and designers. This course is based on theextensive scholarship of Princeton University Professor Emeritus David Billington19–23, recipientof NSF Distinguished Teaching
without End: Economics, Environment, and Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: The International Bank of Reconstruction and Development.4. ASCE, (undated). Sustainability. Available at http://www.asce.org/sustainability/.5. Robinson, M., and Sutterer, K. (2003). Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula. In Session 2615, Proc. 2003 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.6. Allen, D., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews, C. Murphy, and D. Pijawka, (2009). Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report. University of Texas at Austin, Carnegie Mellon University, Arizona State University, 1-155.7. Bielefeldt, A
is the assessment chair and study abroad advisor for her department, the freshman director of the Civil Engineering Division for ASEE, and is the chair of the Continuing Education Committee for the Geo-Institute.Mrs. Kathleen Louise NazarPaul Bonfanti, Villanova University Paul Bonfanti is the Director of Planning and Policy Analysis for Villanova University. In that capacity, he performs quantitative and qualitative research and analysis for the University to inform policy and support strategic decision making. He also serves as an adjunct faculty member in the University’s Department of Public Administration, teaching Non Profit Management and Research and Analysis
. Professional and ethical responsibility - Explain the professional and ethical responsibilities of a civil engineer, and use codes of ethics to determine an appropriate course of action in a situation.Figure 2. (continued from previous page)Next, members of the CTT created one rubric for each of the 24 outcomes, with an exception for(15) Technical Specialization, where one rubric was created for each specialty area in thedepartment. In total, the team created 30 rubrics. The rubrics provide a set of consistent,detailed descriptions of the program learning outcome rubrics in Figure 2. Each rubric breaksone of the program learning outcomes into 3 to 5 performance indicators and articulates what astudent will be able to do at four levels within the
credits that will be required for licensure as a professional engineer in the future – andthat are beyond the requirements of an accredited baccalaureate engineering degree. The chargedirected that specific attention be focused on alternatives such as corporate universities, publicagency professional development programs, professional intensive short courses, and non-engineering degree programs. Simply speaking, the charge is: 1. Define +30 credits in terms of technical and professional practice focus areas. 2. Identify acceptable courses for +30 credits and recommend guidelines and mechanisms to identify future courses. 3. Recommend guidelines and mechanisms to identify means to acquire the +30 from
based on typical international conferenceproceedings format. The specific format was required to introduce students to the typicalrequirements of publishing.In addition to the written report, an oral presentation to the class was required as part of theproject. Duration of the oral presentations was approximately 8-10-minutes, depending onspecific class size and number of sessions devoted to student presentations (typically 2 classsessions). Additional time was allowed in the schedule after each presentation for questions anddiscussion. The entire project was worth approximately 25% of the course grade. The writtenreport accounted for two-thirds of the grade and the presentation for the remaining one-third. Thegeneral timeline and grading
Island International Engineering Program (IEP).3 The Rhode Island IEPseeks to train engineers to be able to operate in the international workplace by earning onedegree in an engineering discipline and one in a foreign language. In a similar, but more focusedway, the Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering uses aprogram called the Joe S. Mundy Global Learning Endowment4 to provide an internationallearning experience for students that may include international research or a summer-long studyabroad. In addition to the significant resources often needed to promote study abroad, there areother curricula actions that affect the perceived ability of institutions to promote globalization-related learning outcomes
. Some teams lacked focus and spent too much time in debating the content and coverage for each lesson. Other teams left with their lessons nearly complete. In the months after the workshop, teams continued to complete their lessons. Lessons 1-3 were completed by October 2016 and the remainder were completed in the Spring of 2017. Internal peer review – once a lesson was completed, the lesson leader shared it with the other two team members and requested feedback. The feedback was then incorporated to improve the lesson. External peer review- once a lesson had completed the internal peer review process, it was sent to 5-7 external peer reviewers. A rubric was provided to reviewers. Reviewers
student. Theother is hired directly from the English department. The lead instructor now takes on a greaterportion of instruction for the writing and presentation segments than in the previous model. Inthe senior-level 4910 course, there are no more external consultants, only the faculty memberand the typical departmental graduate teaching assistant. The junior-level 3100 course is nowtaught exclusively by the CLEAR instructor with no direct involvement of departmental faculty.Basic Set-up of the CvEEN 1000 Introduction to Civil EngineeringThe course meets twice each week for 15 weeks. Although a 2-credit hour course, the classmeets for two 80-minute sessions. Hence, the contact time might appear as though it is a 3-credithour course. However