elements, consideringthe differing needs of those elements, and seeking design solutions to meet those needs equitablyare all crucial to the success of public infrastructure. Failure to understand these responsibilities… can result in a failed civil engineering solution that underserves all or segments of acommunity.” Further, “the application of DEI principles is neither “political” nor “liberalprogressive ideology.” It is a professional skill essential to civil engineering design for a diversepublic” [9].Given the new ABET CEPC and increasing social concern, undergraduate civil engineeringprograms are increasingly seeking ways to integrate DEI topics into their curricula. Examples ofcompliance provided in the ASCE Commentary document [10
company. Many companies have internal resources for reporting ethical concerns. This might be a compliance hotline, an ethics officer, or a supervisor higher in the chain of command. 4. It's important for Kaylee to keep a record of all communications and events related to this issue. This includes documenting the PM's request, her attempts to address it, and any communication with internal resources or others. 5. If the situation remains unresolved and falsification of billable hours continues, Kaylee may need to consider a difficult decision. This could involve escalating the issue to a higher authority or even seeking a new position within a more ethical company.Closing notes: While career advancement is
framework with detailed explanations and extensive resources will be madeavailable on the CIT-E Website later in 2024 after revisions and an evaluation. While this paperfocuses on how the framework can be used, a companion paper provides the details of theframework and its development [17]. The use of this framework will aid in eliminating barriers,real or perceived, that faculty may have concerning their lack of expertise or discomfort withoverarching topics of social justice related to infrastructure. In addition, several complete lessonoutlines are being developed and will also be made available for use by anyone interestedthrough the CIT-E website. The outline of the framework includes:Step 1. Select a topic or an issue to be addressed
suggests a formalized methodology that other institutions can use iffound in the same situation.Some challenges are that initial information from university leadership can be sparse or overlyrestrictive; programs are dependent on each other for general education and support courses; thedesired outcomes at various levels are different; and the curriculum conversion schedule seemslike a long time to make a transition, but it is not. In reality, any creative thinking must be donevery early in the process as the final years are filled with approval processes, new coursedescriptions, revised catalog and new articulation agreements with the community colleges.Many express concerns about the three-year transition period where students experience
importance of educatingfuture generations of engineers with respect to coastal resiliency has become increasinglyobvious. There are uncertainties in the future levels of greenhouse gases and the predictivemodels of future climate that make it difficult to define the statistics of future climate andweather extremes [3, 4]. The planning and design of new coastal infrastructure must consider thefuture climate to ensure a safe and resilient design. Therefore, it is the responsibility of not onlyindustry, but also of academic institutions to educate students (future leaders) about theimportance of mitigating the impacts of climate change and developing appropriate solutions.In 2016, the civil and environmental engineering faculty at the CGA recognized
among educators. Some faculty have completely banned AI use in theircourses, while others embrace AI as a new learning tool [6].The emergence of AI is prompting civil engineering faculty to reflect on whether we shouldadjust our educational approaches. For civil engineering faculty at accredited institutions, wemust look to ABET for guidance [9]. While the current guidelines do not address specific toolsand methodologies, it seems reasonable to expect that AI may become part of standard practiceused to solve engineering problems (addressing ABET Student Outcome 1). The application ofAI may also be useful in developing engineering designs that are holistic and meet a variety ofpublic needs (addressing ABET Student Outcome 2). Communication
. Different example methods can be seen in the faculty narratives. (2) Mentors should listen to the ideas and concerns of their mentees. This was uniformly important throughout the faculty narratives. All faculty mentioned methods to increase student interest in the project/field and support their self-efficacy as researchers. Further, the student survey, regardless of student gender, emphasized the importance of mentor “personal consideration.” (3) Mentors should provide career support, particularly for female mentees. While all undergraduate students should receive some level of career support, the female students surveyed indicated this as the most important role of the faculty research mentor
PtD. The two obstacles are the lack ofknowledge among practitioners and the absence of training materials. Thus, it is recommendedthat these obstacles be overcome strategically. Following the survey recommendations, the nextstep in enhancing PtD utilization involves developing educational modules in collaboration withcivil engineering design faculty and other stakeholders. Hence, these modules will meet therequirements of diverse civil engineering disciplines and address potential concerns. Additionally,they will fulfill industry requirements by incorporating the perspectives and input of practitionerswho are potential implementers of PtD in their planning, design, or construction processes. Thus,the modules should address the target
are consistent with employing a CoP as a theory of change, more evidence isneeded to scale the change.Recent funding and new membership have created opportunities for the CoP to lead change at amuch broader level across civil and environmental engineering education (CEE) in the U.S. A2021 survey of CIT-E members suggested that civil engineering faculty members both areinterested in incorporating issues of diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice into courses andcurricula and are looking for help with how to do so effectively [4]. The survey also revealedthat while the CoP is more diverse in terms of gender than the civil engineering faculty in theU.S., engaging colleagues more intentionally with greater attention to other dimensions
. Austin, TX. 78751. krishnak@utexas.eduAbstractThis paper discusses murder mysteries-based teaching as a basis for forensic case studies-basedlearning in Geotechnical Engineering. In this method, students are introduced to an engineeringfailure related to the topic and then asked to identify potential reasons for failure, rank potentialcauses, and explore a new concept cooperatively. Through this process, studentscomprehensively understand the fundamental principles they later encounter in abstract concepts.This approach solves a common issue with traditional teaching methods that present abstractconcepts before providing real-world examples, which can hinder student learning. By usingengaging and relevant forensic case studies upfront, this
California, Irvine (Irvine, California) and a B.S. from the University of Florida (Gainesville, Florida). She teaches graduate classes on transportation planning and transportation data analysis. Dr. Hernandez is the faculty advisor for the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and a member of ITE. Her research focuses on new and advanced technology applications in transportation systems engineering and is cen- tered on developing tools and methods to collect and analyze freight and commercial vehicle operations data for long range freight planning. Her project portfolio includes work for the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the National Science Foundation
accredited underABET must include some explicit instruction on DEI issues.There are number of intersections among engineering ethics and DEI [15]. The AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE) strongly integrated DEI concerns into its Code of Ethics in2017 [16], with the addition of Fundamental Canon 8 (Appendix). These DEI issues wereretained in the current 2020 version of the Code of Ethics [17], integrated under practices withrespect to Society: “f. treat all persons with respect, dignity, and fairness, and reject all forms of discrimination and harassment; g. acknowledge the diverse historical, social, and cultural needs of the community, and incorporate these considerations in their work;”and Peers: “d
living on the land were forcibly removed [8].In CA, large water projects moved water from areas of the state that have access to surface waterto the Los Angeles metropolitan area and large farms, leaving communities dry that once whererich with water, such as the Owens Valley. These projects do not serve the small communitiesthrough CA housing farm workers and other necessary laborers around the state, leaving them todepend on well water [7].Though issues with injustice may seem like a past problem, without understanding how and whythese problems were built into engineering designs, addressing the impact engineering projectshave had on communities, and changing the way engineers design new products and systems,such injustice may
, the results do provide some empirical support for the following practices in designingand implementing service learning projects in Civil Engineering to maximize student learningeffectiveness:1) Students need to fully understand the community or the client they serve, including their needsand concerns. Direct interactions with the client, who is also the service recipient, helps toenhance students’ understanding of social issues and provide direct feedback on the value andeffectiveness of the service they provide. Through communication with the client, the service tobe performed can be perceived by students as something meaningful that will bring about realbenefits to the community or the people they serve. It gives students incentive to
, in the SJPSsection concerning the Beliefs regarding the engineering culture and the social role of theengineering profession, we revised the item Un ingeniero responsable educa a otros acerca dela temática medioambiental (A responsible engineer educates others about environmental issues)to A responsible civil engineer educates others about environmental issues associated with theplanning, design and implementation of civil engineering projects. This modification allowed usto capture not only civil engineers’ responsibility and action but also the practice of civilengineering in relation to this action. In the same way, we adapted the items of the ESJS to civilengineers instead of general engineering. For example, the item I believe it is
Colorado. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Case Study: Civil Engineering Student Mental Health and Watching Football?Summary: This paper reviews the mental health crisis among college students, describes amental health unit in a first-year civil engineering seminar course, and shares student views. Anunexpected finding was that students discussed the role of watching football in boosting theirwell-being. Faculty should be aware that student mental health is a significant concern andencourage students to develop a healthy balance of activities beyond school and work. Movingengineering away from its stress culture may help improve student well-being and
) [Source: https://www.laneysiegner.com/climate-literacy-assessment] [*Rubric: Students should list at least one recognized climate adaptationstrategy, and it should be grounded in/make sense for the city, town, or locale selected.]III. Climate Change Engagement Section:[Source: https://www.laneysiegner.com/climate-literacy-assessment]:“The first 4 questions are from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communications (YPCCC)new shortened 4-question survey for the American public to determine their level of concern andengagement with the issue of climate change. You can take the survey online here for an analysisof your results and where you fit in the “Six Americas” spectrum:http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/sassy/.**Note
Military Academy, West Point Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is the Director of the Civil Engineering Division and Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York.Elizabeth BristowDr. Mark Evans, United States Military Academy, West Point Dr. Mark Evans, PE, F. ASCE is Professor of Geotechnical Engineering in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at The United States Military Academy, West Point. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Why Students Select the Civil Engineering MajorAbstractUnderstanding why students select their intended major can help faculty to
, faculty and institutional services woven intoa course's structure [2]. The function of a learning community in the higher education classroomis to facilitate a culture of collaborative learning between students and instructors in theuniversity setting. Learning communities encourage a joint effort to solve problems as acommunity, with every member being given the opportunity to contribute their expertise, gainnew perspectives, and work together to discover new ways of thinking and understanding [2].Moreover, the presence of a learning community facilitates a sense of belonging in students,where belonging is defined as the “degree to which an individual feels respected, valued,accepted, and needed by a defined group” and identified as a “key
Paper ID #36811Refining Instructional Modules for Engineering Lab Writing Using aCommunity of Practice ApproachDr. Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 15 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He im- plements classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of a
University of Nebraska, Omaha and Western Michigan University, USA. Prof. Yehia is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of Nebraska and Michigan. He is the Co-developer of the newly conductive concrete application for deicing operations. His research interests include behaviour of reinforced and prestressed concrete, composite structures, special concrete, infrastructure management systems and engineering database management and information technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Low Enrollment in Civil Engineering Departments: Exploring High Technology as a Potential SolutionAbstractThere is a recurring issue of low enrollments across
Paper ID #36735Future World Vision Integrated into a First-Year Civil Engineering CourseDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, En- vironmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering program. She has previously served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty di- rector of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning
the CEBOK3 totheir students [10]. It also defines the role industry plays to help engineering graduates advancein their career and fulfill the outcomes defined in the CEBOK3 that are not attained throughformal education. A faculty-focused infographic explains the important role faculty play inpreparing their students for the rest of their professional career [11]. ASCE also offers severalother resources concerning career growth and the CEBOK3 [12-15].To further assist in this effort, faculty are encouraged to invite speakers from ASCE committeesto review the "Engineer Tomorrow" initiative and the “roadmap” to their professional careerdevelopment with their students to help build strong connections between what's being coveredin the classroom
withintraditional courses. Some universities employ upper-level electives, clubs, or even independentstudy experiences to teach sustainability principles to undergraduates. Many courses dedicatedto sustainable development are limited to graduate programs. In this paper, we present theresults of a faculty team’s efforts to design a new course on sustainable infrastructuredevelopment as a part of undergraduate civil engineering curricula. We conduct benchmarkingwith existing programs that teach infrastructure and sustainable development as explicit courseswithin civil engineering. We crosswalk the pedagogical framework within the American Societyof Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Model to thedraft syllabus and
sustainability in the curricula; 3) integrating sustainability as a concept in currentdiscipline-based units and redesigning the essence of the unit considering sustainabilityconsiderations; and 4) designing new programs as part of faculties and schools targetedexclusively at sustainability topics. These four changes include components of two of the threetypical ‘phases of pedagogy activity’ described by Desha et al. [9] that compose engineeringcurriculum renewals towards sustainability, known as ad hoc exploration and the flagshipapproach. These two phases exemplify changes where there is an initial commitment to includesustainability topics, but the curriculum remains almost unaltered. Desha et al. included anadditional phase called integration, when
material (e.g., when they address assigned homework).Office hours outside of class suffer from logistical difficulties associated with aligning time of availabilitywith times of student need. Further, the students most in need of help are often least likely to seek it out.The traditional environment often has a competitive aspect in which the only measure of success is anexam grade.The course redesign process involved a period of planning and discussion among the faculty assigned toteach the courses and some faculty who taught the downstream courses that depend most directly on theoutcomes from the mechanics courses. Implementation of the new course elements was gradual.Dynamics was the first course to undergo the complete redesign. This choice
concern when she discussedthe classic “sink or swim” (Vik, 2001, p. 112) method often utilized by faculty – forming teams,stepping back, and expecting performance to follow. Lingard and Barkataki (2011) went furtherby identifying specific team dynamics issues that can stem from little guidance or interaction. Intheir systematic review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education, Riebe, Girardi, and Whitsed(2016) acknowledge the challenges faculty face in finding the most effective strategies andpedagogical tools across a sea of disciplines, student and faculty variables, and organizationalassumptions and contexts. These phenomena have contributed to a continued gap betweengraduate preparation and employer-perceived readiness (Ellis et al., 2018
studypopulation of 210 students. This study will be of interest to faculty and administrators that havean interest in or debate concerning the use of student-generated equation sheets in theirrespective courses.IntroductionAt the United States Military Academy, students are required to take a three-course engineeringsequence (CES) to support their academic interests [1]. These three courses are mandatory forthose students that do not major in one of the engineering disciplines, while the courses areotherwise incorporated into the academic programs for those students majoring in engineering.The options for the CES include infrastructure, cyber, robotics, environmental, nuclear, andsystems engineering. The purpose behind the inclusion of these courses is
New Faculty Excellence in Teaching Award and the 2013 Outstanding Young Alumni Award for the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech.Lynden Damon Crosbie ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Implementation of a Hands-On Timber Truss Design Project in Structural AnalysisAbstractMany undergraduate civil engineering programs do not offer timber design courses in theircurriculum. However, timber design is commonly used for low-to-midrise buildings, pedestrianbridges, and residential construction. The timber design and construction industry that producesthese projects benefits from civil engineering programs including timber design in theircurriculum. Exposure to timber
Paper ID #39349Lessons Learned from a Game-Based Learning Intervention in CivilEngineeringDr. Casper Harteveld, Northeastern University Dr. Casper Harteveld is an Associate Professor of Game Design at Northeastern University, has affili- ated appointments in Computer Science, Electrical & Computer Engineering, Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, and with the School of Law, and works closely with faculty in Marine Science and Public Policy. His research focuses on using games to study and improve decision-making, and through these efforts both to advance our knowledge and to engage a broad cross-section of people