. Mauricio Reyes Gallardo, Universidad de Valpara´ıso, Chile Mauricio Reyes Gallardo is associate professor at Universidad de Valpara´ıso. He is Civil Engineer and has a Master degree in Disaster Management . His research is focused on several topics related to disasters and coastal engineering, bussines continuity planning, disaster education for resilience and risk management. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Promoting Tsunami Risk Awareness Through Service Learning and the Application of the Disaster Imagination Game (DIG) in Ocean Engineering: an Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Years LaterAbstractThe Disaster Imagination Game (DIG) is a Japanese method to promote
education, offering Exploring the innovative application of the Participatory Action This project spans multiple institutions and disciplines, engaging evaluating, which promotes continuous improvement and transformative necessary structure while accommodating the flexibility required to Learning and Action Research (PALAR) framework in undergraduate, graduate, and faculty participants in a collaborative research social change. address real-world complexities and foster innovative solutions. engineering education, this research addresses complex effort. Communication challenges are addressed through structured yet dynamic social
teams on anopen-ended design project that draws on the student’s entire academic experience with emphasison idea generation, design and implementation of a system, and the application of engineeringethical decision-making and social responsibilities. Students are encouraged to choose projectsthat tackle real-world problems through industry or community-sponsored projects.To help the students find community projects to work on, we reached out to both the CEO and thedirector of the Safe Community Institute of Crime Stoppers of Houston to discuss ways ofcollaboration. We were welcomed by their team, and they showed great interest in our missionstatement – SAFE. After several mutual visits, brainstorming meetings with our senior students,faculty
. Student InvolvementAs previously mentioned, community engagement in engineering education is key because itbridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world applications. Student involvementis a key focus of our neighborhood revitalization initiative, and it offers a multitude of benefits toour students [5], including: • Preparing students for professional practice by engaging them in some of the nation’s most difficult and enduring challenges. • Exposing students to interdisciplinary work fostering innovation and collaboration and encouraging students to think critically, creatively, and holistically. • Developing students’ research capacities and skills. • Reinforcing students’ team work skills and expose
anincrease in structure would have benefitted the teams, working through the challenges promotedgrowth in their research and design abilities. As one team wrote in their final report, “We havehad a very positive experience with this internship... the internship was a very beneficialexperience because it offered a lot of flexibility which gave us a lot of room to learn and grow.”The project connected students in engineering to different perspectives by giving them exposureto a real-world application and connections to a local community-oriented industry. The hands-on experience broadened their understanding of practical applications of engineering, creating avaluable learning experience that went beyond the classroom.This project was initiated by the
areas such as teamwork, programming, to several key tools and resources: Educational and teamand hardware development to create innovative Internet of productivity tools: Participants learn to use Slack, GitHub, andThings (IoT) products. The support continues throughout the Canvas, an educational Learning Management System (LMS).24-hour event, with resources readily available to assist teamsin overcoming any technical challenges they encounter. This Support staff access: Participants have direct access to supportsetup aims to simulate real-world problem-solving scenarios that staff through a dedicated team base. Cloud technology
education can provide tools to students to grow and explore interests inrelated academic and career pathways, we lack conceptual models and empirical research on howstudents shape and grow their interests, attitudes, and knowledge of the clean energy economybased on their learning and interactions with mentors and peers. To fill this theoretical andpractical gap, we present a research-based practice implemented in Alabama; the AlabamaEnergy Transformation Initiative (AETI) developed energy science and management training forsecondary and higher education and explored its potential to build inclusive and just pathways toa clean energy economy. In this research, we address the following research questions. ● How does the hands-on, real-world, and
students were not specifically asked about this coursemodule, but rather voluntary comments that relate to the course module were identifyingduring a review of the historic data. Some students found the Diplomacy Lab project tobe inappropriate for a course (i.e., “… I think it is unacceptable to force students toparticipate…”, and other students found the use of a real world example invaluable (i.e.,“… this was excellent exposure to a topic that I was not overly familiar with … I reallydid enjoy and what I came here for, being forced to learn, use my brain and use my skillsthat I have developed over time.”) A nearly ideal response was offered by a student in2020 Spring offering of 5650 Public Health, where the student attributed this module –and
enacting them as tools for centering the needs, experiences, and perspectives of therecipients of the designed products in each step of their project. In consideration of spaceconstraints, we present some exemplary findings.Framing Meaningful ProblemsThe problems pursued on HCD come from brainstorming sessions in which the participants arechallenged to think about real-world problems where their involvement can make a difference.However, the initial ideas selected generally go through a process of refinement. Problems areiteratively reframed in an inquiry process until designers arrive at a relatively stable problemstatement. Anya describes the team problem-framing process: Over the course of like the next few weeks, like the very beginning
Educational EcosystemModel (C-EEEM) was distilled (Wood et al., 2020). The C-EEEM program has three coreelements which are multi-scale collaborative infrastructure, student learning for STEM andsocial responsibility, and neighborhood asset-based community development. The long-termrelationship development with community partners, which forms the collaborative infrastructure,enables the real-world application of learning by students to co-create projects addressingcommunity challenges. These elements distinguish C-EEEM from many other STEM project-based learning models.In the first phase of the framework, the project team consisting of students and communitypartners is identified. In the second phase, from the pool of potential research projects
targeted flyers and referrals from past participants, and has garnereda much larger pool of applicants. However, for the cohort described in this paper, we werepleased to recruit a large percentage of female students. Women tend to show a greater interest insolving societal issues [24], and real-world design problems may help draw women to participate[7]. It is also worth nothing that we recruited a high number of trainees with a disability, who arealso considered an underrepresented group in higher education [25]. This is aligned with a recentstudy finding that student researchers with a disability are drawn to the intersection of academiaand community
latter. Abundant research suggests that bringing communities into the design process may result in products and processes much better suited to communities' needs and may protect local cultures and natural environments [2]. These positive results are tied to individuals' lived experiences; people and communities have valuable expertise about what it is like to live in their part of the world. They may have expertise in how to engage with the land, weather, culture, politics, and the built environment grown up around them.I n most cases, engineers treat community knowledge as external to the design process. But when communities are left out, technologies are often designed in ways that do not
communities had already defined (or they help themdefine), or the students do the bulk of the work in gathering information and drafting grantproposals, such as those for the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).Relevant literature Land Grant universities have a duty to serve their communities [12], and university-community partnerships provide a range of opportunities for various stakeholders - students,instructors, and community members - to serve communities generally. Service learning is oneapproach where students earn course credit, learn real-world skills, and apply those skills incontext while benefitting communities [13]. Benefits to students have been documented in avariety of fields including education and STEM [1], [2]. Yet more
partnership were to boost retentionand durable skills development among engineering students and to encourage young people toconsider their potential for a career in engineering. The curriculum materials used weredeveloped by PBS and accompanied its television show Design Squad (now Design SquadNation). It is “high-energy, high-drama reality TV that lets kids show off their smarts as theydesign and build working solutions for real-world clients—people who are hungry for cleverideas from a new generation of innovators” (U.S. National Science Foundation, 2010). Thecreators also developed a companion website which features materials that may be used byparents to supplement at home, by educators as a teaching resource, or by mentors forcommunity outreach
sustainable development challenges [5].The mission of the Humanitarian Engineering (HE) Program at The Ohio State University (OSU)as stated within the program mission document is to “educate students on the application ofscience and engineering to address complex societal challenges with an emphasis oncollaborating with communities to achieve their desired vision of well-being through acurriculum grounded in proven theories of sustainable development and applied engineeringand socio-cultural learning experiences.”The Humanitarian Engineering (HE) minor was created specifically with the intention of trainingstudents to develop the skillsets required to address complex societal challenges, with studentlearning outcomes related to development of
, this pedagogy often takes a form illustrated by a Modelof Project-Based Community Engagement [4] and has been growing in popularity for capstonedesign courses and other applications [5,6]. Previous findings have shown significant benefits fromcommunity-engaged learning experiences in developing a broad range of skills that are critical forengineers [7], including teamwork and communication [8], becoming self-directed and life-longlearners [9], and developing design skills [10]. However, there have also been calls for additionalresearch on the perspectives of community partners as well as holistic assessments of programs[11].Within this space, Engineers Without Borders USA (EWB-USA) is one of the largest players, with5,600 student participants
the most definitive outcome of this study. Regardless of whether theactivities provided real-world applications in a modeled setting (e.g., EnviroScapes) or actualpractice-based lab procedures (e.g., Compressive Strength Test of Concrete), elementary studentsand college student participants found value in the exercises. In the development of outreachprograms, researchers have long noted the positive impact of performing hands-on activities toengage students and promote interest [12, 13, 14]. Recent studies have found benefits in thepractical application of virtual hands-on activities but based on this study’s results, engagementand interactions in a face-to-face environment were critical to the positive outcomes experienced[15]. Moreover
Scholarship (CES) or Community Engaged Research (CER). Ultimately, high qualityCE can span all of the traditional faculty activities of teaching, research, and service. While thisis a win-win in terms of beneficial impacts, it can also pose challenges in the faculty promotionand tenure process where academia traditionally compartmentalizes these activities and research-intensive institutions place outsized weight on the importance of research. In STEM fields,fundamental research (including laboratory experiments and numerical modeling) is oftenviewed as more scholarly than applied research. CES/CER is at risk of being devalued undertraditional academic standards [5-6] given its dual purpose of real-world benefits forcommunities.CES is increasingly
knowledge over experientialknowledge and other knowledges. (1.2) She sees these institutional requirements as barriers toovercome if research is aimed at responding to real-world needs. Key research participants fromthe targeted local groups should have the opportunity to become Thesis Committee members, astheir views and input could be as relevant as any other member. Another barrier she found isrelated to the need for more allocation of time and resources for designing and implementing RTactivities within graduate programs. Particularly in her MS program, she found support andmotivation throughout her research and writing process, which was sufficient to include RTconsiderations before, during, and after the publication of her thesis. However
standards, NSPE’sconsistent anti-union stance lays bare a clear bias to the needs of industry and the capitalist modeof production at the expense of the collective bargaining power of engineers as workers. NSPE isan influential organization in the codification of engineering rules of practice, so it is valuable todeconstruct their application of their code of ethics to justify anti-union arguments.As workers tasked with materializing social visions, engineers in the United States, and thetechnical knowledge they hold, are significant forces of production in modern society [4]. Whendescribing the relations of production between engineers and the instruments and resources theyuse to produce goods in US society, or means of production, Riley explains