Construction Engineering Technology Program Assessment FrameworkAbstractWith the ultimate goal of engineering programs to improve student learning, this paper presentsthe assessment framework developed, adopted, and implemented by the ConstructionEngineering Technology (CET) program at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.The framework is set up to measure the attainment of both the Program Educational Objectives(PEOs) and Students Outcomes (SOs), as required by the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET). The assessment of the PEOs was conducted through indirect measuresincluding surveys to alumni and industry advisory council. The assessment of SOs
, several studies have identified the lack of awareness about careers inconstruction to young women as an important factor that influences women’s participation inconstruction [8], [13], [16]. Moore & Gloeckner [16] suggest that to recruit more females inconstruction-related degree programs, it is important to educate and partner with careercounselors and college advisors and hold information sessions about the construction industryand careers in construction the high-school level. This could diminish the construction industry’sstereotype image and help attract and retain more female students to construction programs.This lack of awareness can be offset by having a family member (especially fathers) who worksin the construction industry [26
construction professionals deal with adiverse group of professionals in architecture, engineering and construction. In addition, there isan expectation within the construction industry of 18% growth in the use of Design-Builddelivery method over the years of 2018 to 2021 [2]. Design-Build can be considered a morecollaborative delivery method than Design-Bid-Build due to the engagement of contractor anddesigner during the initial development of a project. The rise in use of more collaborativedelivery methods, such as Design-Build, Construction Management at Risk, Integrated ProjectDelivery, as well as previous research [3], [4] indicates the need for improving collaborationfrom an industry perspective. Additionally, construction programs are aware of
Paper ID #25251Developing a Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient andSustainable InfrastructureProf. Carla Lopez del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Carla Lopez del Puerto is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying at The University of Puerto Rico - Mayag¨uez.Prof. Humberto Eduardo Cavallin, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus Experienced Faculty with a demonstrated history of working in the higher education industry. Strong education professional with a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) focused in Design Theory and Methods in Architecture from
Con- struction Management. Saeed completed his PhD in Construction Management while he got a master of science in Management Information Systems. He is continuing his research on simulation to provide a comprehensive supplementary method in construction management education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Thirty-Hour Safety Course for Construction Technology Academic ProgramsConstruction safety is an important aspect of every construction project in the United States.Safety training is provided by construction industry companies for individuals involved withsafety programs as professional development, non-credit courses, seminars and in-companytraining classes. The safety training
, creativity and innovation in construction. .Dr. George D. Ford, Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi State’s Building Construction Science (BCS) pro- gram. Dr. Ford has 15 years of industrial experience including corporate work, and 16 years of teaching experience at the post-secondary level.Ms. Tori Thompson, Mississippi State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Is Summer Semester Effective Enough in Studio-based Construction Programs? Saeed Rokooei, Ph.D., PMP, George Ford, Ed.D., PE, Tori Thompson Mississippi State UniversityAbstractLecture and lab course formats are still
Department. He received Doctorate in Engineering from University of Nebraska –Lincoln. He is a recipient of 1. Outstanding Ed- ucator Award – Region II, in 2016 and Construction Excellence in Teaching Award for Region II in 2013 presented by the Associated Schools of Construction. Dr. Meadati serves as a Graduate Program Co- ordinator and played vital role in obtaining the initial accreditation and re-accreditation for Construction Management Masters’ Program. He received outstanding dissertation award from University of Nebraska- Lincoln in 2008. Dr. Meadati’s research interests include Building Information Model (BIM), BIM applications in Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) education, 3D laser scanning
inclusion criteria for the research was universities with both ACCE andNAAB programs.. In addition to ACCE/NAAB collaborations, both sides indicated collaboratingwith others, such as industry professionals, engineering programs, business programs, etc. Figure 3: ACCE & NAAB Collaborations by student disciplineQualitative responses related to the type of experience and instruments for assessment wereanalyzed using constant-comparative reductionist approach to identify themes within theresponses. An example of this analysis is included in Table 2. Generally, the responses showedthat all programs are using project-based approaches, except for one response. The types ofprojects range from tactile physical building type projects to conceptual
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student Perception as a Planning Input in a Project-Based Construction Program Saeed Rokooei, Ph.D., PMP and Greg Hall, Ph.D., AIA, NCARB Mississippi State UniversityAbstractThis paper addresses the results of the first stage of a study that explores different factorsimpacting students’ perception in a construction program that presents content through aninnovative curricular model—studio-based learning. While there are disciplines outside of thosethat traditionally embrace studio-based learning such as architecture, art, and design, theapplication of this method to construction is limited. The
of Science and Technology. He is a visiting professor at the Bamenda University Cameroon, His interests are in Structural Mechanics, strength of material for sustainable construction, Bridge Construction. He has written and published several studies in collaboration with faculty in the research area of strength of material. He is an active member of the Cameroonian Association of Civil Engineer (CACE) also an active member of American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE).He was a Co-PI on a USDA proposal, Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program 2014 also, serve as Co-PI on a DWC Myrtle beach water management, he is a Reviewer for the technical journal (IJME).Dr. Christian A. Bock Hyeng may be reached at
, anddeveloping and implementing an academic program that will meet the Canadian professionalengineering accreditation requirements while at the same time exposing the students in asufficient depth to related fields not classically considered to be engineering. While there islimited information available to quantify the success of the program to date, the paper doesdiscuss a promising qualitative assessment of the abilities of the students in this program to besuccessful in teamwork oriented projects and to deal in creative ways with challenging, open-ended problems. Future plans to address the need to obtain quantifiable measures of success interms of achieving the desired program outcomes will also be outlined.1.0 IntroductionIn the fall of 2018, a new
. Additionally, by exposing theyoungest of students to construction in an exciting hands-on digital activity (El-adaway, 2015),the field of construction becomes alive, and interesting to students, potentially putting them on apath towards careers in construction, or related STEM fields.MethodologyThe methodology of the study involved administering two pre post surveys. The first was aconstruction interest inventory, and the second was a careers interest assessment developed byMnCareers (mn.gov/mmb/careers/).The participants of the study consisted of two sample treatment populations, and a comparablecontrol population. The treatment groups consisted of students from grades 3 – 6. They opted into the study, as it was a voluntary after school program. The
generalengineering. This course may serve a number of purposes including an orientation to thedifferent engineering disciplines or civil engineering sub-disciplines, opportunities to networkwith other engineering students, and exposure to student success tools and tips. A game theauthors developed presents construction engineering in the introductory class both as a branch ofcivil engineering and as a newly offered degree program at their institution. The game simulatesthe work environment and substantial decision points faced by construction engineers. Surveysgauge the students’ self-reported technical understanding and emotional affinity for constructionengineering before and after a module of an introduction to construction engineering lesson
engineering education is helping students develop effectiveelectronic graphical communication skills to convey their design solutions. Many undergraduatecivil and architectural engineering programs address this at the document creation stage byteaching Autodesk AutoCAD or Revit to create 2-D or 3-D structural design files. However,students tend to have limited exposure to commercial software for document management andmarkup that allows for coordination between the engineer, architect, and contractor teams.Bluebeam Revu is one such software that has emerged as an industry standard for annotation andmarkup of engineering design documents.Previous educational studies on the use of Bluebeam have been in construction managementcourses where students
occupational information site [3] developed under the sponsorship ofthe office of the Employment and Training Administration within the US Department ofLabor, the job descriptions that relate to construction safety positions include Health & SafetyEngineers and Occupational Health and safety Specialists/Technicians. The descriptions forthese jobs are as follows: • Health & Safety Engineers: “Promote worksite or product safety by applying knowledge of industrial processes, mechanics, chemistry, psychology, and industrial health and safety laws.” [4] • Occupational Health and Safety Specialists: “Review, evaluate, and analyze work environments and design programs and procedures to control, eliminate, and prevent
students may predominantly learn from on-the-job experience, as different from a combination of on-the-job experience and in-classroom experience. The necessary prerequisites should be made available tostudents to fill the learning gaps, and the coverage of the prerequisites should go farenough. The objective of this paper is to evaluate current practice and make necessarymodifications to the construction materials and methods course (a lower-level course) tobetter prepare students in the construction related programs. The research follows aqualitative research method. The research evaluated the need for prerequisites, as wellas the need to design prerequisite courses with relevant course content. A synthesis ofcurrent materials covered in the
of construction students so that they can excel in their preferred roles in theconstruction industry.IntroductionConstruction students look forward to graduation with aspirations of full-time employment thatwill allow them to be responsible citizens and contributors to the construction industry.Considering that the construction industry is a broad and dynamic field with many different rolesand responsibilities, students who graduate from construction programs have a wide range ofopportunities and gain employment in various sectors of the construction industry [1]. Roles forpotential employment available for construction undergraduate students include project engineers,project managers, program managers, quantity surveyor, estimators
, challenging, and result in tangible outcomes in the short term. Building Construction Science program at Mississippi State University offers a summer program to increase students' interest in construction careers. This summer program attracted high school students from different areas of the state of Mississippi who had limited, if any, exposure to construction related career fields. The main goal of this program was to introduce construction science and trades to students through a small-sized construction project. This gave students a first-hand encounter with construction trades, increased their construction knowledge, and provided information from construction instructors and
Paper ID #33297Direct Assessment of Student Learning OutcomesDr. Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, University of Texas at San AntonioDr. Guntulu S. Hatipkarasulu, Texas State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMESINTRODUCTIONAssessment of learning outcomes for academic programs is an essential part of quality controland quality assurance. In the last three decades, the learning outcome assessment subject hasbeen discussed on various platforms and became an essential part of the higher education system.A 2009 survey of higher education
first one was expanding technical knowledge. Sarah indicated that “I was blessed to be put with an amazing team. Each person, no matter their status, was very helpful and eager to play a role in advancing my knowledge.” She emphasized the importance of getting “real- world experience” and stated, “It’s important to know how it relates to the actual world.” The second highlighted point was growing the professional network. This is a crucial outcome of the CEL program, which lasts for a longer period. Realization of this benefit through the lens of students encourages them to consider their time and efforts during their CEL program as a long investment that may bring them further opportunities. Noah acknowledged such
students was 19% higher than that of the freshmen. This was statistically significant(p<0.05) and provided an indication that the construction program had somewhat contributed tothe improvement of students’ SL skills; however, additional curriculum improvements arenecessary to improve SL skills of construction students. The students’ best test performance wasrelated to identifying valid science arguments and evaluating the misuse of scientific data; whiletheir weakest performance was related to their somewhat weak quantitative aptitude. TheirTOSLS problem solving quantitative scores were significantly (p<0.001) lower than TOSLSvalid scientific argument scores. These results correlated well with departmental data associatedwith students
from University of Nebraska –Lincoln. He is a recipient of 1. Outstanding Ed- ucator Award – Region II, in 2016 and Construction Excellence in Teaching Award for Region II in 2013 presented by the Associated Schools of Construction. Dr. Meadati serves as a Graduate Program Co- ordinator and played vital role in obtaining the initial accreditation and re-accreditation for Construction Management Masters’ Program. He received outstanding dissertation award from University of Nebraska- Lincoln in 2008. Dr. Meadati’s research interests include Building Information Model (BIM), BIM applications in Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) education, 3D laser scanning, Radio frequency Identification (RFID) and
Boise State University [8], and at several stages in a revised curriculum at CaliforniaState University, Fresno [9]. These are just some of the wide variety of approaches being used tocombine service and learning with hands on projects.To investigate the types of capstone experiences in construction education programs, the postedcurricula and courses of all (27) bachelor’s ABET [10] Engineering Technology (ETAC)construction programs were reviewed. Nearly all the programs had an obvious course related toa capstone experience or senior project. Many of the course descriptions included some kind ofteamwork, project design, construction management scenarios, reports and presentations.Although one other program referred to experiential learning, our
Education, 2020 A Construction Management Competition as the Basis of a Capstone Culminating EventCulminating design events serve as a hallmark of most undergraduate engineering programs.This paper presents a case study of a novel approach to conduct a compressed-timeframeculminating event just prior to graduation. The event is designed to leverage best practices inliterature related to team-building, competitions, student leadership, real-project case studies, andhigh-impact practices. The culminating event takes place at the conclusion of a two-semestercapstone sequence. In the middle of this two-semester sequence, 12 students from a class ofroughly 40-50 participate in the intercollegiate Associated Schools of
implement the change to the program? And what are the obstacles to this change?Research MethodA survey was designed and disseminated online through the Qualtrics platform. The survey wascirculated to the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) mailing list that contains the emailsof about nine hundred construction professionals, both academic and practitioners. The lattergroup consisted mostly of industry professionals serving on the Industry Advisory Boards (IAB)of these programs, thus possessing both the professional experience and the exposure to theacademic program intricacies and details. The survey contained questions related todemographics and the roles of the respondents, their years of experience in constructioneducation or the
Paper ID #32675Work in Progress: Gaming Our Way to Increased Math Self-efficacy andOpening the Gate to STEM MajorsDr. Krishna Prasad Kisi, Texas State University Krishna P. Kisi, holds a Ph.D. in Engineering from University of Nebraska-Lincoln, MS in Construction Management from University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and a Bachelor in Civil Engineering from Tribhuvan University. He has several years of teaching experience at U.S. colleges, universities, and international institutes. He has taught over 15 different construction related courses. He is a registered Professional Engineer at Texas. His research interests includes
Sustainable Design and Construction(SDC) in the construction management program from two universities, Kennesaw State University(KSU) and the University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver), in construction major or minor. Themajority of survey respondents were from construction or civil engineering major. But there wasone student from CU Denver who was in a dual degree program. Table 1 shows the demographicsdata of both universities. Most students (75%) who study in construction at both universities weremale and did not have a minor. The most significant difference in demographics between thestudents at KSU and CU Denver was related to ethnicity. For the work experience, the similaritiesare there were about 50% to 60% of students in both universities had
Engineering Technology Programs, and her research focus is in student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: talley@txstate.eduDr. Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University B.J. Spencer, Ph.D. Dr. Spencer is an Assistant of Professor of Practice and the Construction Science and Management (CSM) Program Coordinator in the Department of Engineering Technology at Texas State University where she focuses on the architectural courses, VDCO, and is the internship coordinator. In 2017, she obtained her Ph.D. in Education from Texas State University with the emphasis on professional education. A registered Architect in the State of Texas, she received a Master of Architecture from
educationopportunities. Universities throughout the nation are developing successful programs to providingtraining in FM, from certifications to master degrees. The University of Oklahoma is locatedgeographically within two hundred miles of three large metropolitan cities. Industry relations andsupport have been a large factor in the success of FM programs. The paper's objective is to performan exploratory study of the FM educational opportunities at the University of Oklahoma. Usingpast research, a survey was created and circulated to local FM associations for data collection. Themethodology presented provides direction for future regional studies related to the FM industry.Responses are used to identify area FM demographics, education requirements within FM
, project management, strategic planning, preconstruction, and sustaining the built environment. At Purdue, Benhart also leads the Healthcare Construction Management program and works with the first ASHE (American Society of Healthcare Engineering) student chapter. His position allows him to further develop construction education in the built environment and be an in- dustry advocate for the next generation of builders. He is also very involved in field supervision training programs, both at Purdue and on the national level. He focuses on the sustainability of our industry by mentoring the retiring baby boomers with new foremen and superintendents. Benhart also has an exten- sive resume in industry. His previous position