succeed in the public and private sector and inacademia, so our assessment data is unlikely to be able to demonstrate success. In fact, sinceour goal was to add a new required course, we could simply assert that we met the goal since thecourse is now required for both electrical and computer engineers. Of course we wish to evaluatethe results and continue to improve the course and the integration with the rest of the curriculum.Despite consistently meeting/exceeding our student learning outcome targets, our exit surveyshave been calling for more hands-on learning. Comments such as “more projects,” “moreexperiential learning,” “more hands-on learning” are the most common free-text response to thesummary question “What specific suggestions can you
educational topics.Dr. Rebecca L. Damron, Oklahoma State University Page 24.87.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Platform for Computer Engineering EducationAbstractThe goal of the Progressive Learning Platform (PLP) pilot project is to design and test a platformto teach students how the underlying hardware building blocks relate to organization andarchitecture of microprocessors. PLP helps students link computer engineering concepts—logicdesign, microprocessors, computer architecture, embedded systems, compilers, operatingsystems, and high-level language constructs—in
Teaching Microcontroller Applications Using Laptop ComputersAbstractThis paper presents an inexpensive technique of teaching an introductory microcontrollerapplications course to technology students in a laptop-based curriculum. The focus of the courseis learning to apply microcontrollers in various control applications. Related topics covered inthe course include assembly language programming and computer architecture. Students in thecourse are each equipped with a laptop computer. The microcontroller platform used in thiscourse is the Microchip PICKit1 development board. This development board features 8- and 14-pin microcontrollers with a 35 word instruction set. This is an ideal platform because the deviceshave enough resources to develop
AC 2009-160: THE EFFECTS OF COMPUTER INTERFACE ON LEARNINGOUTCOMES IN REMOTE-ACCESS LABORATORIESM. Reza Emami, University of TorontoMichael G. Helander, University of Toronto Page 14.1209.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 THE EFFECTS OF COMPUTER INTERFACE ON LEARNING OUTCOMES IN REMOTE ACCESS LABORATORIESAbstractRemote access laboratories are increasingly being integrated into undergraduate engineeringcurricula on a global scale. Despite the vast body of literature dealing with remotely-accessiblelaboratories, the majority of papers have focused on the technical merits of a particularimplementation, rather than on the implications of
laboratory projects was also conducted. Inorder to do this, we designed a final exam in which the course learning outcome 1 was coveredby the problems. We then computed the average points from all the students for the problem(s).The average rating on a scale from 1 to 5 was obtained by dividing the average points by thedesignated points for that problem(s) and then multiplying the result by 5. Outcome 2 wassimilarly assessed based on the student’s adaptive filter labs and projects. The instructorassessment is included in row 3 of Table 3.The rating scores from the student survey and the ones from the instructor were consistent. Therating for course leaning outcome 1 (O1) had a slightly bigger gap, in which the score frominstructor rating was lower
AC 2008-1407: LEARNING ANALOG ELECTRONICS THROUGHPROJECT-BASED INVESTIGATION OF FM COMMUNICATION CIRCUITSOscar Ortiz, LeTourneau University Oscar Ortiz, MS, Oscar Ortiz is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 2002. He received his B.S.E.E. from the state university of West Virginia at Morgantown and his M.S. degree from Northeastern University at Boston, Ma. Prior to joining the faculty at LeTourneau he was involve in several voice and data communication companies. His professional interests include digital signal processing, analog and digital communications. Email: oscarortiz@letu.eduPaul Leiffer
, programmer, and the software development platform in oneplace, this allows the students to develop microcontroller-based systems without using additionaltools. CodeWarrior is a powerful tool for program development and debugging. The basicfeatures of it can be learned in a short time. The microcontroller module is a complete singleboard computer that the students can use directly in their projects. The form factor for the moduleis smaller enough that the projects become truly embedded systems. The project board comeswith a programmer that can flash the microcontroller (9S12C32), in addition to its prototyping Page 13.58.8capabilities. This kit is an
NSF sponsoredproject, entitled “Enhance Computer Network Curriculum using Remote Collaborative Project-based Learning”. The focus of the project is to explore Collaborative Project-based Learning(CPBL) as a pedagogical approach to address the learning issues of under-prepared minoritystudents, and seek effective implementation strategy to extend the pedagogy beyond theclassroom through a remote learning structure. During the three-year project course, a newpedagogical model named as CPBL-beyond-Classroom was developed and its effectiveness hasbeen thoroughly evaluated in iterative classroom implementation. In this paper, we will analyzethis pedagogical model to illustrate how it can address the learning needs of minority students ona commuter
computer or embedded devices tocommunicate with a vehicle using only a standard serial port and a terminal program. Wealso engage students to create their own program by using this interface. Figure 1. OBD to RS232 Interpreter CircuitSince many graduate students do not know how to design a circuit or use a development tool,we ask students to design, build, and test OBD to RS232 Interpreter circuit during the course.Each student builds his own circuit to ensure that everyone can learn this skill. To encouragehigh-level thinking and life-long learning, we do not lead the students step-by-step throughcircuit construction. The students must design a circuit, draw a circuit diagram, selectcomponents from a kit, build the circuit
AC 2011-792: THIRTY YEARS OF RUBE GOLDBERG PROJECTS: ASTUDENT-DRIVEN LEARNING LABORATORY FOR INNOVATIONR. William Graff, LeTourneau University R. William Graff is a professor in the school of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 1975. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Purdue University in electrical engineering. Prior to joining the faculty at LeTourneau, he was assistant professor of electrical engineering at Drexel University for six years, and then at Wilkes College for two years. His professional interests include antennas, microwaves, plasmas, teaching, and ethics.Paul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University PAUL R. LEIFFER, PhD, PE Paul R
requirements, hardware requirements, and softwarerequirements including maintenance are often considered bottlenecks in program expansions, orjust in keeping these programs current. When limited space or funds confine the labenvironment, a stable, yet flexible, laboratory environment that can quickly be configured fornew or updated courses becomes a necessity.CIS, CS, and other technology-based programs rely heavily on computer laboratories to serve asthe major resource for implementing active and project-based learning in a university setting.The literature reviewed shows positive results such as increased student enthusiasm towards theirprograms of study, perceptual and actual increases in students’ knowledge, and development ofdesign and team
Paper ID #17741Adding Hardware Experiments to a First-Year Engineering Computing CourseDr. Kathleen A. Ossman, University of Cincinnati Dr. Kathleen A. Ossman is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She teaches primarily first-year students with a focus on programming and problem solving. Dr. Ossman is interested in active learning, flipped classrooms, and other strategies that help students become self-directed learners.Dr. Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati Gregory Bucks joined the Department of Engineering Education in 2012. He received his BSEE
expensive.The purpose is to create learning environments that enlarge the concept of remotelaboratories that are currently available both in terms of technology infrastructure andpedagogy.Global description of Lab@Home settingLab@home is mainly composed of two parts: the first represents the cloud area and thesecond shows the distributed user stations over computer networks at several sites. Insome cases laboratory devices are hooked on to the computer. For our experiments, theusers are at three different sites and they collaborate to complete a lab work. The Cloudprovides a networked conferencing environment for the participants through a platformnamed BigBlueButton designed as a result of a project on an open source software [1].The software is
significantly provides needed formative feedback and variety in theinstructional environment. The teaching toolbox provides a mechanism for sharing the effort ofcreating and disseminating instructional content. The course specific content is designed to beadapted in part and in whole by instructors at other institutions who desire to use the developedresources without having to create content. The usefulness of the teaching toolbox as an aid tothose, faculty and/or students involved in learning through teaching, who desire to create newcontent however should not be overlooked.I. IntroductionAsynchronous interactive computer-based training is a powerful complement to classroominstruction. While the teaching of core engineering principles requires an
summary of theteachers’ expectations and how they planned to use cloud computing (CC) in their curriculum, asextracted from the application forms submitted by teachers.Reasons for participating in the workshop• Learn about CC technologies, become knowledgeable about CC technologies, stay abreast of the latest technological developments in order to: o Enhance instruction o Make my colleagues aware about CC o Expose students to the latest technologies• Incorporate CC in my curriculum: o To enhance instruction o To learn some technical notions about CC technology itself (this comes from computer technology and computer programming teachers) o To enhance the delivery of educational programs and to empower students to
Paper ID #8998An Examination of the Effects of Contextual Computer-aided Design Exer-cises on Student Modeling PerformanceDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Xiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Prairie View A&M UniversityDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his
to academia, he earned a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2011 at the University of Virginia. His current research interests include machine learning, embedded systems, electrical power systems, and engineering education.Prof. Maite Brandt-Pearce, University of Virginia Maite Brandt-Pearce is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Uni- versity of Virginia. She received her Ph.D. from Rice University in 1993. Her research interests include nonlinear effects in fiber-optics, free-space optical communications, optical networks subject to physical layer degradations, and biomedical and radar signal processing. She has over 150 major publications.Prof. Ronald D. Williams
14.353.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Session XXX Computer-Aided Physical Experimentation for Instrumentation andMeasurements Classes in an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Program Jerry K. Keska Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana Lafayette, LA 70506 AbstractThe goal of this unique laboratory approach was to increase student interest in the subject, toincrease the students’ learning efficiency, and to allow the students to apply
Page 11.516.3programs, did not require courses in electromagnetics other than that contained in sophomorephysics classes. The computer engineering students taking the high-speed design course werehampered by a lack of knowledge in electromagnetics, e.g., coupling mechanisms, passivecomponent frequency variations, and transmission line fundamentals. The inadequate studentbackground resulted in the class material being treated in a “cookbook” fashion that, notsurprisingly, resulted in student learning outcomes that were insufficient to produce a foundationfor future learning or work in high-speed design.Our response was to design a required EMC/SI course for our CPE students. NSF has supportedthis effort which has resulted in better prepared
inclines more towards the computer simulation. 3.36ConclusionsThe cam-follower lab experiment and multi-body simulation thereafter offer a complex andrewarding educational experience to mechanical engineering students. They see severaltransducers in use (strain gages, RVDT, optical-encoder, accelerometer), calibrate three of thesetransducers, and perform computerized data acquisition. In the process students experiment withaliasing in data acquisition and learn how Fast Fourier Transforms can be used to extract thefundamental frequency of a periodic signal. Students then analyze the acquired data, performnumerical integration and differentiation while observing the limitations of the latter. Finally,they use computer
collaborativeenvironment where all learn collectively from each other’s experiences, even the instructor.TeatoL blends computer and mobile smart devices for peer-to-peer interactions to enhancecritical thinking and competencies essential for students to solve ill-structured problems. Themain objective is to understand, develop, implement and evaluate a flat learning environmentutilizing technologies. The focus is on peer learning mode, where students are instructors toshare their experience and then learn from fellow student instructors. In this paper, we presentour initial results and findings from implementation at the University of Oklahoma. We close thepaper with observations from our initial implementations on peer-learning as a network.IntroductionEnabled
earned a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2011 at the University of Virginia. His current research interests include machine learning, embedded systems, electrical power systems, and engineering education.Prof. Joanne Bechta Dugan, University of Virginia Joanne Bechta Dugan is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Director of the Com- puter Engineering Programs at the University of Virginia. Her research focuses on probabilistic assess- ment of the dependability of computer-based systems. She has developed the dynamic fault tree model, which extends the applicability of fault tree analysis to computer systems. Dugan holds a B.A. degree in Mathematics and Computer Science from La Salle
-college bridge program twoweeks prior to the start of the scholar’s first enrollment. Students will also interact with staff fromvarious student support offices to include the Office of Student Success and Retention, the BrooksHealth Center, the Office of Financial Aid, the Career Center and the Miller F. Whitaker Library.Scholars will be assigned seasoned academic advisers who will provide one-on-one interactions andserve as faculty mentors. The Office of Student Success and Retention will provide early interventionfor students struggling in their STEM courses. The CSET-STEM Scholars program will partner with theHonors College to provide tutoring and learning opportunities through study groups.(3) Provide students with optional extra computer
devicessuch as VGA, keyboard, and mouse as a means for exploring interrupts and exception handling. Page 13.1315.136. ConclusionA disjoint learning experience was observed in the two course computer architecture laboratorycurriculum offered at Purdue University - Calumet. The efforts of the undergraduate seniordesign team represented in this paper resulted in an enhanced set of twelve laboratoryassignments and five new design projects. These projects comprehensively reinforce digitalsystems and computer architecture concepts through use of industry-standard software tools inthe design, implementation, verification, and synthesis of a RISC
AC 2012-3563: DESIGN AND COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIAPHRAGM-BASED PIEZORESISTIVE PRESSURE SENSORS FOR INTEGRATIONINTO UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMMr. Alexander Joseph Plotkowski, Grand Valley State UniversityDr. Lihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University Lihong (Heidi) Jiao is currently an Associate Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Com- puting at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. from Nankai University, China and Ph.D in electrical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Her teaching interests include solid state device physics and fabrication, nanotechnology, and fiber optics. Her research activi- ties include fabrication and characterization of
-innovative solutions require theintegration of introductory computer programming and microcontroller functions with electricaland mechanical engineering applications. These unique interdisciplinary activities are designedto reinforce classical control theory learned in a prerequisite course. Students cite the hands-onactivities in course feedback as relevant applications that help develop deeper understanding andgreater appreciation for the theory learned in the classroom. Working through the experiments inorder builds student confidence to solve open-ended problems in interdisciplinary teams. Theinitial assessments of our hands-on approach have been positive.1. IntroductionAt West Point, a Mechatronics course wasdeveloped to teach subject matter
. He can be contacted at: ning.gong@temple.edu.Dr. Brian P. Butz, Temple University Dr. Brian P. Butz is a Professor Emeritus of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. In 1987, Professor Butz founded the Intelligent Systems Application Center (ISAC). This Center provided a focal point within Temple University concentrating on research in intelligent systems. Professor Butz’s research efforts focused on expert/knowledge-based systems and intelligent tutoring systems. He has been the Principal Investigator for projects that immerse users into a particular virtual environment in which they are able to learn both theory and application within a specific subject area. From 1989
evaluation, both personal accountability and team performance wereconsidered. In their open feedback, students claimed the effectiveness of problem-orientedmethod and collaborative learning. Dong and Guo have implemented Collaborative Project-based Learning Model (CPBL) in their undergraduate computer-networking curriculum 9. In theCPBL model, students were required to think collectively to complete the assigned project. Theresults of CPBL implementation demonstrate improvement in students’ acquisition of keyconcepts and hands-on skills. Based on the lessons learnt from the implementation of CPBL,Dong and Guo suggested that effective collaboration would not occur naturally and theinstruction support is needed to help students to engage in
Paper ID #10046Transfer Students: Lessons Learned over 10 YearsDr. Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R.ANDERSON-ROWLAND is the PI of an NSF STEP grant to work with five non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engineers. She also directs three academic scholarship programs, including one for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Computing, Informatics, and Systems Design Engineering, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU
. 4. Anderson, E.E., Sharma, M.P., and Taraban, R., “Application of Active Learning Techniques to Computer- Based Instruction of Introductory Thermodynamics,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002. 5. Light, R.J., Making the Most of College, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2001. 6. P. Tebbe, N. Saucedo, J. Pribyl, and S. Ross “Engaged in Thermodynamics: Addressing the Student to Learning Material Interface”, Paper ID #2011-1445, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2011