is no meaning outside of a person’s perception. Weconstruct our understanding of the world through our own realities: “[K]nowledge refers toconceptual structures that epistemic agents, given the range of present experience withintheir tradition of thought and language, consider viable” (Von Glasersfeld, 1989, p. 124;italics in original). Thus, knowledge is contextual, contingent, and subject to interpretation.Constructivism informs the thematic analysis of this study by considering the statements ofthe research participant to be their own construction of what diversity means and how itimpacts education. During the analysis I made efforts to ensure the authentic voice of theparticipant.Constructivism also has implications for data analysis
psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Eric A. Vance, Virginia Tech Dr. Eric Vance is an assistant research professor of statistics at Virginia Tech. He is the Director of LISA, Virginia Tech’s Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Statistical Analysis, which met with 1324 clients last year to help them use statistics to solve real-world problems in their research. LISA’s primary mission is to train statisticians to become interdisciplinary collaborators, and since its reformation in 2008, it has trained and mentored 173 statistics students to communicate and collaborate with non
pathways to inform education for future engineers?RQ2. What can we learn about the pathways of Makers through the qualitative research approach, constructivist grounded theory, utilizing artifact elicitation interview and critical incident interview methods?This research, guided by RQ1 and RQ2, is situated within a broader four-year study exploresmaking as a means of engaging both current engineering students as well as adults and pre-college students in the engineering landscape described in The Engineer of 2020, ABET a-k, and21st Century Skills.The study was designed with Crotty’s17 four elements of a research study (epistemology
transitions and retention of underrepresented students in engineering and also research about engineering global preparedness and engineering innovation. She also has research expertise in STEM K-12 and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group
Paper ID #11396Synthesis of Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Out of Class InvolvementMs. Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech Rongrong Yu is a PhD student at the Educational Research and Evaluation Program in School of Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil &
changes of global competency levels of engineeringundergraduate students and how it is influenced by different factors through time. A conceptualmodel differs from the formal structures of hypothesis testing in the sense that it is exploratory innature. That is, it looks to uncover any existing relationships between the considered variables,based either in theory or in empirical evidence, instead of testing the magnitude or direction ofhypothesized relationships 15. Our model proposes that students entering an engineering programmay already have certain levels of global competency, and that these potential differences arecritical in designing strategies and interventions at the college-level. In our model, these baselinelevels are influenced by
represented the most advantageous combination ofthese criteria. During the think-aloud sessions these three participants began many of their phrases withthe word, “So,…” These declarative statements sounded very matter-of-fact and purposeful as ifto say, “Here is what I am going to do…” As a result, these participants sounded very confidentin their approaches as they worked step-by-step through the problem. These statements seem toindicate that they had a clear plan for the problem in mind. Each of these three participants spentless time on the problem compared to the others (with the exception of Joshua, who only gavethe problem a superficial treatment and never moved beyond material selection). The linear anddeterministic approaches of
extensive background in science education includes experiences as both a middle school and high school science teacher, teaching science at elementary through graduate level, developing formative as- sessment instruments, teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in science and science education, working with high-risk youth in alternative education centers, working in science museums, designing and facilitating online courses, multimedia curriculum development, and leading and researching profes- sional learning for educators. The Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) honored Dr. Spiegel for his efforts in teacher education with the Innovation in Teaching Science Teachers award (1997). Dr
AC 2012-3131: DO STUDENTS DREAM BEYOND LEDS? INNOVATIVEQUALITIES OF IDEAS GENERATED BY FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSNicholas D. Fila, Purdue University Nicholas D. Fila is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the School of Engineering Educa- tion at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois. He has published conference papers on cooperative learning and team innovation. His research focuses on teamwork, innovation, and laboratory education.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Director of Assessment Research for
Paper ID #13374Beyond Sectionality and into Sizeness or How Course Size Effects Grades:An Exploration of the MultipleInstitution Database for Investigating Engi-neering Longitudinal Development through Hierarchal Linear ModelsDr. George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette George D. Ricco is the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineer- ing and Applied Science. He completed his doctorate in engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Previously, he received a M.S. in earth and planetary sciences studying geospatial imaging and a M.S. in physics
AC 2012-4153: EXPLORING CYBERLEARNING THROUGH A NSF LENSMrs. Jeremi S. London, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeremi London is a graduate student at Purdue University. She is pursuing a M.S. in industrial engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She completed this study as a 2011 Summer Scholar in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation. Acknowledgements: London offers special thanks to her mentors, Drs. Don Millard, Lee Zia, and Victor Piotrowski, for inspiring this study and for their guidance throughout this experience. She also acknowledges the Quality Education for Minorities (QEM) Network for sponsoring her internship. Finally, she is grateful for Ingram London’s
Paper ID #12565Problematizing Best Practices for Pairing in K-12 Student Design TeamsMs. Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park Gina Quan is a doctoral candidate in Physics Education Research at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. She graduated in 2012 with a B.A. in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests include understanding community and identity formation, unpacking students’ re- lationships to design, and cultivating institutional change. Ms. Quan is also a founding member of the Access Network, a research-practice community dedicated to fostering supportive
learning gathered from student evaluation of teaching surveys.AbstractAssessment and evaluation of student learning are important considerations for EngineeringTechnology programs. ABET-TAC standards require that educational objectives and outcomesbe chosen by the program and its constituents, measured by various means, and that the resultsbe used to improve the program. The data that is collected should be triangulated in somefashion for the results to be considered valid. A large part of our program’s data assessmentmethods can be classified as direct assessment, that is, using tests, papers, homework, and labexercises that measure the student’s learning or achievement of Criterion 3 a-k student outcomes.We collect data all through the
-efficacy is necessary.The target population for the use of the TESS is the K-12 teachers in the United States. However,the sample for this study consists of the teachers in fourteen states. Thus, the result of this studyhas limitation in generalizability to make inferences beyond the sample characteristics of thisstudy. In addition, the sample size of this study was marginal to conduct an EFA. Thus, theresults based on the EFA may not be fairly reliable representation of the factor structure of theTESS. Thus, a CFA will warrant finalization of the items and factor structure of the TESS.Therefore, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is planned to be applied with a new data setfrom over 200 teachers. In addition, item analyses based on classical
managers are frustrated at the lack of progress on a problem despitetheir best efforts to install the Six Sigma process because Six Sigma in no way addresses thecritically important creativity step.True creativity requires that innovators increase their creative energy and allow this energy tohelp sufficiently sample idea space. We propose a mechanism to increase and focus creativeenergy specifically for scientists and engineers. Despite their aversion to creative energy,scientists and engineers do understand the sampling of other variable spaces with variousalgorithms. For centuries, scientists and engineers have understood how to manipulate thermalenergy to efficiently move through the state space of both ancient and modern materials
individual student considerations shouldalso influence program design [4]. Prior studies on individual student experiences haveemployed relatively similar methodologies: interviewing small samples of students withsupplemented insight from student journals and instructor observations. The current study seeksto complement this previous work by introducing a different method for exploring studentpathways through global programs.Mixed Methods: A Pragmatic Form of InquiryAs a distinct methodology [11], mixed methods approaches enable researchers to drawinferences beyond what a single paradigm (e.g., quantitative or qualitative) can offer. Eachparadigm has unique strengths; the qualitative paradigm emphasizes inductive inquiry andexploration, while
. Liu, D. Byrne, and L. Devendorf, “Design for collaborative survival: An inquiry into human-fungi relationships,” Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc., vol. 2018-April, pp. 1–13, 2018.[16] W. Odom, R. Wakkary, Y. K. Lim, A. Desjardins, B. Hengeveld, and R. Banks, “From research prototype to research product,” Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc., pp. 2549–2561, 2016.[17] S. Hauser, D. Oogjes, R. Wakkary, and P. P. Verbeek, “An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products,” DIS 2018 - Proc. 2018 Des. Interact. Syst. Conf., pp. 459–472, 2018.[18] S. Hyysalo, C. Kohtala, P. Helminen, S. Mäkinen, V. Miettinen, and L. Muurinen, “Collaborative futuring with and by
one’s skills and experiences beyond the classroom. Astudy was conducted at NYU Tandon School of Engineering and found students lack support inidentifying and developing their career pathways. This study indicates that a combinede-portfolio and micro-credentialing platform could benefit students by a) providing students witha tool to reflect on and showcase their experiences, b) matching students with upper-class andalumni mentors in career pathways they are interested in, and c) providing them with curatedlists of on-campus and experiential opportunities and micro-credentials that would support theircareer pathways.IntroductionEvery student’s experience through engineering school culminates in different results -- students’future pathways range
linked, as space itself can impose a limit on thetools it can house. Certain aspects, such as funding, can include multiple approaches, such aslooking at the overall revenue for space (quantitative) while also considering the restrictions onusage that funding may have (qualitative). For example, makerspace funded through State fundsor Govt. sources cannot be utilized to benefit a specific for-profit private company ororganization directly. Hence, the ability of tangible assets to impact a specific community alsodepends on elements that govern the continuity of the space.When looking at a makerspace without its physical assets, all that remains are the people makingthe space function. Access is always a huge element of a makerspace, as what
Paper ID #19667Engaging Engineers in Inclusive Cultural Change Through a New Method,Articulating a Succinct DescriptionEmily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. She is involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of Engineering ranging from student support programs, faculty bias awareness trainings, and inclusive cultural change. She is a recent Industrial and Systems Engineering graduate from Ohio State University, where she was also very involved with
Page 22.1440.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Development of an Instructional and Assessment Tool From Student Work on a Model-Eliciting ActivityAbstractModel-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) are interdisciplinary, engineering based problems set in arealistic context with a client. MEAs allow researchers and teachers to observe students’development of conceptual models as they go through the cycle of express, test, and revise withtheir solutions. MEAs are being used increasingly in K-College level classes. Research tools thatcan be used for instruction and assessment with MEAs are needed. This paper will describe thedevelopment of such a research tool. Cognitive Task
Paper ID #30927Examining Pathways into Graduate School through Stewardship TheoryMr. Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University, University Park First-year graduate student at Pennsylvania State University in the mechanical engineering department. Previously a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University based in Searcy, Arkansas. Current research interests include graduate school attrition and Stewardship Theory as applied to higher education.Dr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in
interactive computer game as well as through hands-on exhibitcomponents. The computer games were designed to be deployable both within thephysical exhibit as well as online, to extend the outreach beyond the exhibit’s physicallocation (see Figure 1).The first game in the series, Design Station, invites the visitor to help employees of adesign firm as they attempt to design a pen that will sell well. The visitor engages inmarket research and uses the results of that research to select pen components likely toplease members of the market. The second game in the series, Some Assembly Required,introduces visitors to several characters engaged in different occupational roles related tomanufacturing, such as a manufacturing engineer, a machine technician
AC 2011-735: THE NATURE OF TEACHER KNOWLEDGE OF AND SELF-EFFICACY IN TEACHING ENGINEERING DESIGN IN A STOMP CLASS-ROOMElsa Head, Tufts UniversityDr. Morgan M Hynes, Tufts University Page 22.1483.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Nature of Teacher Knowledge of and Self-Efficacy in Teaching Engineering Design in a STOMP ClassroomCurriculum standards increasingly feature engineering as a requirement for K-12 students. Thisis a content area in which most K-12 teachers have little to no background; therefore, providingsupport is critical for successful implementation. In an effort to provide
Paper ID #33752The PEERSIST Project: Promoting Engineering Persistence Through Peer-ledStudy GroupsMs. Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona State University Thien Ta is a doctoral student of Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. She obtained her B.S., and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering. She has taught for Cao Thang technical college for seven years in Vietnam. She is currently a graduate research associate for the Entrepreneurial Mindset initiative at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her doctoral research focuses on Entrepreneurship Education and Innovation in
Paper ID #29491WIP: What does it mean to mentor? Conceptions of mentoring in K12outreach programsMs. Sabina Anne Schill, University of Colorado, Boulder Sabina is an environmental engineering PhD student at the University of Colorado Boulder. She received her BS in Physics from Westminster College, SLC in 2015, and spent a year tutoring K-12 students in math before entering graduate school. Sabina participated in the NSF-funded GK-12 Fellowship program in 2016-2017, and in 2019-2020 was a recipient of CU Boulder’s Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in STEM Education.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt P.E., University of Colorado
grades and class ranks are better predictors of first-year college grades than students’ SATscores.11-12 More recently, secondary and post-secondary educators question whetherstandardized test scores predict grades beyond the first year through to obtaining collegedegrees.13-14 Thirty-seven different studies have shown consistent gender bias in standardizedtests, with a typical finding that women’s college grades are under-predicted by the SATstandardized test.15 In particular, Wainer and Steinberg found that males score 35 points higheron SAT Math than females who earn the same grades in the same college math courses.16 Also,various studies have found no common pattern to the results for validity and prediction of SATfor different racial/ethnic
Paper ID #11875Continuously Improving a Diversity-Bolstering System through IntegratingQuantitative and Qualitative Engineering GoldShirt Program FacetsJacquelyn F. Sullivan Ph.D., University of Colorado, Boulder As Associate Dean for Inclusive Excellence, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering GoldShirt Program to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier stu- dents not admitted through the standard admissions process . Sullivan was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Edu- cation. She
AC 2011-2096: EXPLORING CURRICULUM FLEXIBILITY AND COM-PLIANCE THROUGH THE USE OF A METRIC FOR CURRICULAR PRO-GRESSIONGeorge D Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette George D. Ricco is a doctoral student in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. He previ- ously received an MS in Earth and Planetary Sciences studying geospatial imaging and an MS in Physics studying high-pressure, high-temperature FT-IR spectroscopy in heavy water, both from the University of California at Santa Cruz. He has a BSE in Engineering Physics with a concentration in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University. His academic interests include longitudinal analysis, visualization, semantics, team formation
AC 2012-4264: CRYSTALLIZED IDENTITY: A LOOK AT IDENTITY DE-VELOPMENT THROUGH CROSS-DISCIPLINARY EXPERIENCES IN EN-GINEERINGMr. Tiago R. Forin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tiago Forin is a Ph.D. student in engineering education at Purdue University. Forin has received his B.S. in civil engineering from Florida State University in 2006 and his M.S. in environmental engineering from Purdue University in 2008. Forin currently does research in cross-disciplinary experiences in engineering in the XRoads Research Group headed by Dr. Robin Adams of Purdue University. Forin also has an interest in global service design and has participated in the Global Engineering program at Purdue.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West