Development, 43(5), 614-631.[8] Gates, A. Q., Teller, P. J., Bernat, A., Delgado, N., & Della‐Piana, C. K. (1999). Expanding participation in undergraduate research using the affinity group model. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 409-414.[9] Baum, Sandy and Steele, Patricia. (2017, January 11). Who Goes to Graduate School and Who Succeeds? AccessLex Institute Research Paper No. 17-01. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2898458Appendix 1. The research-oriented topic in the course project increased your programming skills. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 2. The research-oriented project topic helped increase your programming skills more than other
Education, 2007 The Current Generation of Integrated Engineering Curriculum - Assessment After Two Years of ImplementationAbstractIn September of 2004 our university adopted the Multidisciplinary Engineering FoundationSpiral Curriculum as the basis for disciplinary engineering programs in Chemical, Civil,Electrical, Mechanical and General Engineering. The curriculum includes a sequence of firstand second year engineering courses, matched closely with the development of students’mathematical sophistication and analytical capabilities and integrated with course work in thesciences. Students develop a conceptual understanding of engineering basics in this series ofcourses which stress practical applications of these principles.The
revisited. What worked well for one generation of students may not beadequate for the preparation of today’s engineering graduates who must be increasinglyinnovative and adaptive1,2. Engineering education endeavors to match the best students with thebest learning techniques, and must also be creative in adapting and adopting new pedagogicalmethods.Other disciplines can be one of the best resources for engineering educators looking for newteaching techniques to fit the unique demands on today’s engineers. Because they are alsotechnical fields, the sciences can be a fitting source. Like engineers, scientists are required toknow not only their material, but current trends in research, methods, and publication. One waythat some of the sciences prepare
engineers from industry with advanced degrees, who describe theinteresting work they are doing because of their graduate degree; encouraging students oninternships to notice what jobs are done by BSE employees and what work is done by employeeswith a graduate degree; and talking to freshmen and transfer students about graduate school assoon as they matriculate into the Fulton School. The students are also encouraged to do researchas an undergraduate which can sometimes lead to a graduate thesis topic. Hearing industryengineers with graduate degrees dispels the myth that a PhD in Engineering is only good forsomeone in academia.The methods described in this paper were used to generate a 40% rate for non-transferengineering and computer science
Paper ID #19611Through ’Collaborative Autoethnography’: Researchers Explore Their Roleas Participants in Characterizing the Identities of Engineering EducationGraduate Students in CanadaMs. Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Jillian Seniuk Cicek is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education in the Faculty of Graduate Studies, and a research assistant and sessional instructor for the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. Her areas of investigation include exploring innovative ways to teach and assess the
Conference. Detailed summaries of each of the 8topics covered, generated from the Facilitators’ summaries and the Flip Chart notes, are includedin the Appendix. Also included there is a “Summary of Summaries” which attempts to capturethe common threads across all the specific topics. The current discussion is based on thissummary of summaries.Current State Positives:First and foremost, the current state of engineering education does supply industry withgraduates who have the technical competence they need. This is seen as an absolute necessitywhich must not be lost sight of when seeking change. In a closely related vein, the current statesuccessfully addresses most of the core demands of accreditation, particularly those“professional criteria” set
Paper ID #33691Self Reflection of Engineering Majors in General Chemistry IIDr. Patricia Muisener, Stevens Institute of Technology Dr. Patricia Muisener is an Associate Teaching Professor and Associate Chair of Graduate and Undergrad- uate Education in the Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department at Stevens Institute of Technology. She teaches and coordinates the General Chemistry I and II course sequence. She was previously at the University of South Florida as a faculty member and Assistant Chair in the Chemistry Department. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from University of Massachusetts at Amherst and a M.S
Page 11.335.8interacting with upper-level administrators at the university were recommended activities. Also,engineering education faculty new to campus presented their programs of research, and speakersfrom various campus resources spoke on topics of interest to graduate students (Table 2).The SEMINAR course learning objectives are: COURSE LEARNING OBJECTIVESAs a result of taking this course, the participants will develop the knowledge and skills to:1. Define my role in the engineering education community2. Identify and interact with members of the engineering education community at the local and national level3. Identify and utilize resources that will help me successfully complete my doctoral program4
complete the graduate degree (Table 3). These interest scales are composed mostlyof simple items such as “I like doing research,” but also items about interesting “engineeringwork” and “research topic” (Table 2). Clearly, graduate students should be engaged incoursework, projects and research that interests them. The mean of engineering interest isparticularly high (4.27, Table 3), which is to be expected among a group that has completedundergraduate degrees and made the decision to pursue additional engineering education. Thekey to intervention may be math/science competence, which focuses on the ability to apply mathand science to problems using relationships, models and analysis. Respondents’ confidence inthese skills was both higher than in
topics that are discussed during the financial planning moduleIn the Predict phase, students use the application interface to map out various financial decisionpaths of their life after graduation. Whether they are continuing their education or full-timeemployment, the application adjusts according to expected salary. It also allows the option ofsimulating extreme life events, including losing or never obtaining a job post-graduation.Students input various credits and debits that they may experience over the next few years basedon their decisions. A snapshot of the tool’s interface with sample student input is shown inFigure 4. The tool outputs a visual 3-year summary of the student’s simulated financial future,depicted in Figure 5
AC 2012-4514: LOW-SES FIRST-GENERATION STUDENTS’ DECISIONTO PURSUE ENGINEERINGMs. Michele L. Strutz, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michele L. Strutz is a 2009 NSF Graduate Research Fellow and will graduate this summer with her Ph.D. in engineering education and a secondary doctoral focus in gifted and talented education from Purdue University. Strutz’s research interests include stEm talent development and identification. Prior to completing her master’s degrees in gifted and talented education and in curriculum and instruction, Strutz worked as an engineer for 13 years in Laser Jet Printer product development and marketing at Hewlett Packard Co., computer systems design at Arthur Andersen & Co., sulfuric
Paper ID #13225Examining Interruptions in a Student’s Solution Generating Process for In-dicators of Conceptual KnowledgeChristian Anderson Arbogast, Oregon State University Christian Arbogast is a graduate student in the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing En- gineering at Oregon State University. His academic and research interests include examining the change in conceptual understanding among undergraduate students in engineering programs and the mechanical design process.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State UniversityDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in
AC 2010-118: SUPPORTS AND BARRIERS THAT RECENT ENGINEERINGGRADUATES EXPERIENCE IN THE WORKPLACESamantha Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a second year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her Masters in Mechanical Engineering. Her research interests include engineering education and design for manufacturing. She earned a BS in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University in 2008.Russell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Russell Korte is an Assistant Professor of Human Resource Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is currently a Fellow with the iFoundry project in the College of Engineering at
Lisa Romkey serves as Senior Lecturer, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of En- gineering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Romkey plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and implementation of various teaching and learning initiatives. Romkey is cross-appointed with the Department of Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning at OISE/UT, and teaches undergraduate courses in engineering and society, and graduate courses in engineering education. Romkey’s current doctoral re- search focuses on teaching practices in engineering and the integration of an STSE (science, technology, society, and the
Page 14.1305.1 Automation, "The Office of the Future", North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979 and he published the first popular paper on email (Datamation, 1977). He holds a B.Sc. in Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Maryland.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Page 14.1305.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Use of Tablet PCs to Generate Class Discussion and Facilitate Deeper UnderstandingAbstract:At ASEE 2008, we reported encouraging results from our use of Tablet PCs in teachingcomplex information structures in wireless
AC 2012-3131: DO STUDENTS DREAM BEYOND LEDS? INNOVATIVEQUALITIES OF IDEAS GENERATED BY FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSNicholas D. Fila, Purdue University Nicholas D. Fila is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the School of Engineering Educa- tion at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois. He has published conference papers on cooperative learning and team innovation. His research focuses on teamwork, innovation, and laboratory education.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Director of Assessment Research for
, EvalTools R 6 for faculty, E learning with EvalTools R 6 for students, ABET accreditation process. He is Digital Integrated Quality Management Systems Expert for Automated Academic Student Outcomes based Assessments Methodology specializing in EvalTools R 6 by MAKTEAM Inc.Dr. William G. Spady, International Network for OBE Dr. Spady has been a leading pioneer in Outcome Based thinking and implementation for 45 years. As a Ph.D. graduate of the U. of Chicago in 1967, he was introduced to the seminal work of Benjamin Bloom in 1968 and transformed its fundamentals into a comprehensive paradigm-shifting system of educational transformation that he has shared through his 8 books, dozens of published papers, and countless pre
AC 2009-321: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: A TOOL FORSTUDENTS PURSUING A GRADUATE DEGREE IN ENGINEERINGGymama Slaughter, Virginia State UniversityToni Harris, Virginia State UniversityKabongo Ngandu, Virginia State UniversityKeith Williamson, Virginia State UniversityKwame Adom, Virginia State University Page 14.1290.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Undergraduate Research Experience: A Tool for Student Pursuing a Graduate Degree in EngineeringKey Words: Undergraduate Research Experience, Mentoring, Graduate Degree inEngineeringAbstractMany engineering programs across the country have witnessed large numbers of students leavingtheir
engineering education. This additionally impacts who stays inacademia and teaches undergraduate engineering courses, which has further implications forstudent learning and representation in the field.In general, single institution datasets (such as the one in our study) are less highly regarded thanmulti-institution datasets because the data and findings are typically less generalizable. Priorexamples of good single institution studies of graduate students focused on doctoral studentinstitutional choice (Bersola, Stolzenberg, Love, & Fosnacht, 2014) and retention and time-to-degree completion (Nerad & Cerny, 1993). However, the level of detail regarding fundingprovided in our single institution dataset has potential to fill in some gaps
understand better the context of the inadequacies described by employers, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with newly hired new graduates of engineering programs.Specifically, we examined the work experiences of newly hired engineers having less than twoyears employment at a large, U.S.-based manufacturing company. This is the period duringwhich new employees encounter and learn the specific expectations and requirements of the joband are arguably the most aware of any differences between their engineering education andengineering practice. This is also the time when new engineers become socialized into thepractice of engineering in organizational settings. Research indicates that this is a critical periodfor new employees in general as
, University of Colorado, Boulder Alyssa Nicole Berg is currently an undergraduate in mechanical engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She is interested in the energy field and plans on attending graduate school. Page 25.678.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Graduate Students Mentoring Undergraduates in Research: Attitudes and Reflections about These ExperiencesOne-on-one mentoring relationships between 1st or 2nd year engineering undergraduate studentsand graduate student mentors were established and monitored during a semester-long formalresearch
American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Mobile Teaching: Merging Smart Phones, Cloud, and Desktop to Achieve Content- specific Instruction in a Generic EnvironmentAbstractMany educational institutions face a similar problem today: the necessity to reorganize teachingand lab space to improve facility utilization. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical StatueUniversity (NCA&T) made the difficult decision to eliminate dedicated labs and classrooms forcontent-specific instruction. Labs and classrooms previously equipped with private networks andcustom operating systems were replaced with a single large classroom equipped with thin
Paper ID #33175Negotiating Belongingness: A Longitudinal Narrative Inquiry of a LatinaFirst-generation College Student’s Experience in the Engineering CultureDr. Dina Verd´ın, Arizona State University Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education Systems and Design in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial En- gineering and PhD in Engineering Education. Her research broadly focuses on broadening participation in engineering by
to resolve their career indecision – an individual’s inability to make a career decision(Gati, Krausz & Osipow, 1996) –may be “less committed to their career, experience lesssatisfaction, and generally fail to become active contributors to society despite their extensiveaccumulation of knowledge and education” (Daniels, Stewart, Stupnisky, Perry, & LoVerso,2011, p. 410).While some students have problems with choosing a career, there are other students whoknow exactly what they want to do immediately after graduation. To gain a deeperunderstanding of career decisions, the current study investigates the following researchquestions (RQs) based on survey data from undergraduate engineering students in the U.S.:RQ 1: How certain are
graduate education, online engineering cognition and learning, and engineer- ing communication. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Capturing Narratives of Graduate Engineering Attrition through Online Forum MiningAbstract: This research paper presents methods by which researchers can harvest data from socialmedia forums as a way to gain insight on sensitive issues or populations. In the present research,we are interested in studying doctoral attrition, which is a complex and multifaceted phenomenonthat poses practical significance to funding agencies, advisors, and students themselves. Samplingnon-completers is difficult, and researchers generally find it difficult to
his work in Michigan, Taylor completed his Baccalaureate at the University of California, Irvine. As a teaching post-doctoral fellow, Taylor is heavily involved in education-based re- search efforts in the chemistry department while also serving as an instructor for the Introductory Organic Chemistry course. Page 26.1092.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Leveraging Reflection to Deepen Engineering Graduate Student Instructor Professional Development1. IntroductionPreparing graduate student instructors (GSI) to teach engineering students
AC 2012-3860: GRADUATE STUDENTS: INFLUENTIAL AGENTS OF SO-CIAL CAPITAL FOR ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHERSDr. Julie P. Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of engineering and science education with a joint appoint- ment in the School of Materials Science and Engineering. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of under-represented students in engineering. Trenor is a recent NSF CAREER award winner for her research entitled ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.”Matthew K. Miller, Clemson University Matthew K. Miller is a Ph.D. student and
Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She received her Bachelor’s degree from Franklin & Marshall College in physics and women and gender studies.Dr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including inter- and mul- tidisciplinary graduate education, online engineering cognition and learning, and engineering
AC 2009-1042: I’M GRADUATING THIS YEAR! SO WHAT IS AN ENGINEERANYWAY?Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich recently joined Virginia Tech after completing her doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science with a concentration in Metallurgy. Additionally Dr. Matusovich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experience in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Dr. Matusovich’s research interests include
and teaching assistants in the College of Engineering. She can be contacted at ser163@psu.edu.Natalia Kapli, Pennsylvania State University Natalia Kapli is a Ph.D. Candidate in Instructional Systems at the Pennsylvania State University. She works as a graduate assistant with Leonhard Center at College of Engineering. Her research interests include development of expertise, active learning, and motivation. She can be contacted at nvk104@psu.edu. Page 13.196.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Investigation of the Relationship between Graduate Teaching Assistant