. Page 15.895.9Bibliography1. Hassan Farhangi. The Path of the Smart Grid. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, January/February 2010, pp. 18 - 282. Ilya Grinberg, John A. Stratton, Frank Pietryga, and James Maxwell. Improvements in Electric Power Systems Curricula: Developing Continuous Improvement Plan. Proceedings of 2005 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR, June 12 - 15, 20053. U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Recovery Act – Workforce Training for Electric Power Sector. Funding Opportunity Number: DE-FOA-00001524. U.S. Power and Energy Engineering Workforce Collaborative. Preparing the U.S. Foundation for Future Electric Energy Systems: A Strong Power
. Page 23.1069.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Smart Grid, Industry Trends and Power Engineering EducationAbstract: This paper discusses smart grid applications as well as the current industry trends andwhat employers are seeking in power engineers of the 21st century, which will help evolve thesmart gird vision of the future. The traditional power engineering curriculum is analyzed,followed by discussion on what the industry is looking for in power engineering educationmoving forward into the future. Based on industry feedback, key areas of engineering studieshave been identified that needs to be incorporated into the existing power engineering curriculumto better align with industry
energy and power systems, there are criticalneeds for professionals and engineers that can deal with current and future energy challenges andare able to operate modern power and energy systems. On the other and, the recent changes tothe electric power industry through deregulation and restructuring have had considerable effectson power and energy engineering education, both domestically and internationally. In the light ofthese changes, there is even more imperative need for industry-academia collaboration in thepower and energy engineering education. While, the industry benefits by having access to alarger pool of qualified power engineers with practical experiences, the academia can increasethe revenue, decrease financial burden on the
2.6. ConclusionThe QFT was demonstrated to be a robust strategy to develop higher order thinking skills,collaboration skills, and to facilitate student-centered, independent learning and research. Thepresent work focuses on Renewable Energy Engineering topics, but the methodology can beapplied to Engineering education in general, and in disparate disciplines and subject areas.Breaking down a long-term goal (e.g. term paper) into frequent and periodic deliverablesenhances student’s accountability, confidence, and learning skills, while also mitigatingplagiarism. Students’ overall view of the cultivated learning environment is well represented bythe positive influence on course evaluations.It is advisable to make students familiar with the
Canyons c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15777Kathleen Alfano has a Ph.D. from UCLA and has served as the Director of the California Consortiumfor Engineering Advances in Technological Education (CREATE) based at College of the Canyons since1996. She directs and is Principal Investigator for the National Science Foundation (NSF) AdvancedTechnological Education (ATE) CREATE Renewable Energy Center of Excellence. As Director of CRE-ATE, she is involved in efforts across the United States and internationally to define and implement credittechnician curricula in many areas of renewable energy
applications. She joined Mississippi State University as a Research Faculty in August 2006, after spending one year in a post-doctoral position at the University of South Carolina. At her current position, she is currently combining her research activities in power engineering with her teaching activities. She participated in the team of professors who taught an Electric Ship related class and she is currently offering a course that focuses on power modeling and simulation. Page 12.1276.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Ship-to-Shore Collaborations: Integrating Research of Shipboard Power
of curricula for active , design pedagogy, and assessment of professional skills.Dr. Dev S. Shrestha, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Shrestha is an Associate professor at Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department at the University of Idaho.Mr. Russell Scott Smith, University of Idaho Energy Plant Energy Plant Supervisor/Manager since 2002 Page 26.357.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Collaboration between Senior Design Students and Campus Facilities Staff in Creating a Viable Cogeneration Design for the Campus Wood-Fired BoilerAbstract An
System. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Design and Construction of An Aesthetically Pleasing Vertical Axis WindTurbine (APVAWT) – A Case Study of Art and Engineering Collaboration in Engineering Capstone CourseAbstractThis paper proposes an enhanced approach for the capstone design course, as a part of theundergraduate engineering curriculum, through collaboration of art and engineering by designingand building an Aesthetically Pleasing Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (APVAWT). Suchcollaboration brings creativity to art and engineering students through an interdisciplinary projectconsidering both functionality and beauty for wind generation system.In order to assist the capstone
. Page 24.154.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An energy assessment of a large grain storage and transfer facility in Michigan: An industry, university and public utility company collaborative effort resulting in energy savings outcomesABSTRACT: In the spring of 2012 Lawrence Technological University was approached by DTEEnergy (the local utility company) with funding to have students and faculty work on an appliedresearch project with the Michigan Agricultural Commodities, Inc. (MAC) to undertake anenergy assessment of the MAC Marlette, MI facilities. The MAC is a private company in thebusiness of buying, selling, storage and distribution of agricultural commodities such
of the IEEE and a member of the honor society of Phi Kappa Phi.Mansour Tahernezhadi, Northern Illinois University Page 25.1066.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Problem-Based Learning in the Training of Middle and High School Teachers in Alternative EnergyAbstract: The Emerging Technology Institute (ETI) is a collaborative project of Northern IllinoisUniversity, Rockford Public School District, West Aurora Unit School District, Rich TownshipHigh School District, and Harlem Consolidated School District supported by the Illinois
engineering educators communicate directly to the teachers about both fundamental andemerging concepts [3-5]. This allows the teachers to collaborate to format this newly-acquiredengineering knowledge into a portable format. This project provides middle school and highschool science, math and technology teachers with hands-on interdisciplinary experience withfaculty in state-of-the-art laboratories of alternative energy, nanotechnology, fuel cell, andmodern manufacturing. The ETI started in summer 2010, and has a period of three years. Thispaper is mainly focused on the subject of alternative energy within the ETI.Fundamental Concepts of Electricity and Power Fundamental concepts of electricity and alternative energy systems were taught to
. Page 24.364.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Design and Implementation of a 1kW Photovoltaic System as a Training InfrastructureAbstractThe Solar Instructor Training Network (SITN) program of the South-Central Region is one ofeight nationwide regions that are funded by the U.S. Department of Energy to train instructorshow to teach implementation of solar photovoltaic systems. One of the eight regions is theSouth-Central Region led by the Energy Institute at Houston Community College-North East,collaborating with Ontility the first 3 ½ years and now Janet Hughes Solar Consulting (solarenergy training providers) and the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC). The primarygoal of the project is
years starting in the Spring of 2012. Ryan currently works as a Research Assistant in the Combustion and Energy Research Laboratory (COMER). His current research is focused on new catalyst development, ceramic materials for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), combustion, energy conversion, fuel cell modeling, fuel cell technology applications and system design. Ryan is a Syracuse University Graduate Fellow and an Astronaut Scholar. Page 26.505.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing T-Shaped Professional Engineers through an Advance Energy
. Karayaka’s research interests include power engineering education, ocean wave energy harvesting, identification, modeling and control for electrical machines and smart grid. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Istanbul Technical University in Control and Computer Engineering and his PhD degree in Electrical Engineering from The Ohio State University.Dr. Sung Joon Suk, Western Carolina University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Air entrapment issues in piping for a small hydroelectric station in western North CarolinaAbstract-A team from Western Carolina University’s Rapid Center in Cullowhee, NorthCarolina visited a local fish farm to
, and F. Wayno, Collaboration to Facilitate Research and Education in a Transitioning Electric PowerIndustry, International Energy Journal, Vol. 6(1), Part 4, June 2005, pp 4-151 to 4-164.13. A. Pahwa, D. M. Grenbacher, S. K. Starrett, and M. M. Morcos, Distance Learning for Power Professionals,IEEE Power and Energy, Jan./Feb. 2005, pp 53-66.14. R. E. Fehr, A Model Curriculum for Power Engineering, 2008 IEEE Power Engineering, pp.1-5.15. H. Mealkki, and J. V. Paater, Curriculum planning in energy engineering education, Journal of CleanerProduction, Vol. 106, 2015, pp. 292-299.16. G. G. Karady, and K. A. Nigim, Improve Learning Efficiency by Using General Purpose Mathematics Softwarein Power Engineering, IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, Vol. 18(3
address is jskim@knue.ac.krVINOD K. LOHANI is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at VirginiaPolytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering fromVirginia Tech in 1995. His areas of research include engineering education, international collaboration andhydrology & water resources.References[1] Lohani, V.K., Sanders, M., Wildman, T., Connor, J., Mallikarjunan, K., Dillaha, T., Muffo, J., Knott,T.W., Lo, J., Loganthan, G.V., Adel, G., Wolfe, M.L., Goff, R., Gregg, M., Chang, M., Agblevor, F.,Vaughn, D., Cundiff, J., Fx, E., Griffin, H., and Magliaro, S. “From BEEVT to DLR NSF SupportedEngineering Education Projects at Virginia Tech” Proc. 2005 ASEE Annual
Analysis for Shipboard Applications,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Power Engineering General Meeting, Tampa, Florida, June 2007.27. Noel N. Schulz, Herbert L. Ginn III, Stanislaw Gryzbowski, Anurag Srivastava and Jimena Bastos, “Ship-To- Shore Collaborations: Integrating Research Of Shipboard Power Systems Into Today’s Power Engineering Research Activities,” Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference for the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 2007. Page 14.226.10
- sentations (including over 30 invited seminars in Korea, Japan, China, Germany, and United States). He is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and astronautics (AIAA) and served as a Board of the Combustion Institute. He is a recipient of the Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE) Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award, LCS Faculty Excellence Award, CEA Reid Miller Excellence Award and WSU MME Excellence in Teaching Award. He has also been named AIAA’s Spotlight Member of the Month and awarded the WSU Faculty Excellence Recognition Program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring T-Shaped Professional Skill Development in Graduate
order to prevent students from being seriously overburdenedand confused. Professional life today is increasingly interdisciplinary and challenges engineers tolearn to interact with others, to give and accept criticism, and also to listen to and understandalternative viewpoints. However, collaboration is a process, and students need help to practiceteamwork skills like conversing and listening, leadership, conflict management, decision making,confidence building, and finding compromises. However, strong and solid engineering and basicsciences knowledge and conceptual thinking are now considered more important than before.Project-based learning has been proven to be an attractive and effective method which canimprove engineering education
Page 15.357.3shows what types of applications fuel cells can be used for.Renewable energy engineering education at the University of _____Several courses in renewable energy technologies are offered at the University of _____,including Methods of Hydrogen Production and Storage through the chemical engineeringdepartment, as well as an electrical engineering elective titled Renewable Energy Systems. Bothare open to upper level undergraduates and graduate students in electrical and chemicalengineering, and both feature fuel cell education. Furthermore, a collaborative graduate programin Sustainable Energy Engineering was recently established at the University. Each of theseeducational offerings could likely benefit from increased student
Paper ID #31612An Evaluation of Focused Outreach and Recruiting Efforts in aNuclear-Related Workforce Development ProgramDr. Hayrettin B Karayaka, Western Carolina University Bora Karayaka is an Associate Professor at the College of Engineering and Technology, Western Carolina University. He has worked as a Senior Engineer for smart grid and wireless communication industries for over ten years. He is currently responsible for teaching electric power engineering courses in the college. Dr. Karayaka’s research interests include power engineering education, energy generation, identification, modeling and control for
, IT, nanotechnology etc. Now that the energy, ingeneral and electric power, in particular, has the highest priority globally, the academia needs tomake up for the lost time, while financially constrained at the same time. Not only government-industry-university partnership is the only option, but also collaborations between academicinstitutions are indispensable, if we are to answer the call of duty.Bibliography 1. Ilya Grinberg, Mohammed Safiuddin, Chilukuri K. Mohan, and Steve Macho. Multi-Institutional Approach to Engineering Education. Proceedings of 2010 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY, June 20 -23, 2010 Page 25.956.10
and Collaboration in LEEDProfessional Accreditation. American School of Construction 2009Cidell, Juile (2009). Building Green: The Emerging Geography of LEED-Certified Buildingsand Professionals’, the Professional Geographer, 61:2Consulting-Specifying Engineer, (August 2008), Vol. 44, Issue 2, p 25-25Darwish M. Muge & Agnello F. Mary (2009) Sustainability or Green: Challenges and Changesfor Educators and the Engineering Curriculum. American Society for Engineering Education,2009DesignIntelligence. 2007. LEED accredited professionals. [WWW Document] URLhttp://www.dinet/article.php?article_id=622Jucker R. (2002). Our common Illiteracy Education as if the earth and People Mattered:Frankfurt, M., Oxford, New York: Lang 2002
conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 RESEARCH-BASED TEACHING IN UNDERGRADUATE THERMOFLUID MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COURSES IN A PRIMARY UNDERGRADUATE UNIVERSITY Farshid Zabihian California State University, Sacramento Sacramento, California, U.S.AAbstractThis paper presents the author’s approach to use open-ended research and design projects assupplement to traditional teaching in undergraduate thermofluid mechanical engineering courses.It is widely accepted that teaching and research in higher education, especially in engineeringprograms, should support and supplement each
Conference, June 14, 2014,Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. Next Generation Science Standards, http://www.nextgenscience.org/implementation, accessed on 12/10/2014. 4. F. C. Berry, P. S. DiPiazza and S. L. Sauer, “The future of electrical and computer engineering education," IEEETransaction on Education, Vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 467-476, 2003. 5. G. Gross, G.T. Heydt, P. Sauer P. and V. Vittal, “Some reflections on the status and trends in power engineeringeducation, IERE Workshop: The next generation of power engineers and researchers”, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,10 Oct. 2003. 6. G. Joós, “Training Future Power Engineers”, IEEE Power and Energy, Jan./Feb. 2005, pp 38-47. 7. D. Ray, and F. Wayno, “Collaboration to Facilitate Research and Education in a
pages)8. G.F. Reed, G.F., A Powerful Initiative at Pitt – The University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering Power & Energy Initiative: Building Engineering Education and Research Partnerships through Academic- Industry Collaboration, IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, Vol. 6( 2), March/April, 2008.9. G.T. Heydt, M. Kezunovic, P.W. Sauer, A. Bose, J.D. McCalley, C. Singh, W.T. Jewell, D.J. Ray, V. Vittal, Professional resources to implement the “smart grid”, in Proc. of North American Power Symposium (NAPS), pp. 1-8, 2009.10. L. Hirst, Transforming engineering education: creating interdisciplinary skills for complex global environments, in Proc. of IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary
limited in engineering education [7]. However, it has been shown that students fromdifferent backgrounds, cultures, and learning styles can hugely benefit from service learningexperience [9-12].Service learning as a pedagogical tool is gradually gaining momentum in engineering programsacross the country [7]. Service learning is typically in the form of either direct service or project-based activities. The latter approach is dominant in engineering service learning. A quick reviewof published articles in engineering service learning indicates that great majority of the utilizationof service learning in engineering education is in the form of implementing engineering projectsfor underprivileged communities. A rare exception in this regard is Traum
2006-874: INTEGRATION OF LOW-POWER DIGITAL CIRCUITRY INTOUNDERGRADUATE CURRICULAGlenn Ellis, Smith CollegeSarah Wodin-Schwartz, Smith CollegeBaaba Andam, Smith CollegeIsrael Koren, University of Massachusetts-AmherstC. Mani Krishna, University of Massachusetts-AmherstC. Andras Moritz, University of Massachusetts-Amherst Page 11.803.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Integration of Low-Power Digital Circuitry into Undergraduate CurriculaI. IntroductionPower-aware computing has become in recent years a significant area of research anddevelopment in both academia and industry1,2. Various techniques for reducing the
EnergyEfficiency,” the 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26 - 29, 2016, New Orleans, LA.[3] Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, Richard Chiou, Radian G. Belu, Oscar H. Salcedo, Aditya Akundi, Eric D. Smith,“Enhancement of Green Energy Manufacturing Engineering Education Through Project-based Learning andLeadership Workshops,” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in Indianapolis, Indiana for the 122ndAnnual Conference & Exposition, June 14 - 17, 2015. Seattle, WA, USA.[4] Floyd, R. (2018, August), Renewable Energy Study Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Conferences - Conference forIndustry and Education Collaboration / San Antonio proceedings, San Antonio.[5] Richard Chiou, Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, Radian G. Belu, Michael G. Mauk, M. Eric Carr, and