classroom setting.Introduction The effectiveness of using simulation-based learning strategy for procedural knowledgeor skills has been reported by many researchers [1]–[3]. Such an approach can “replace andamplify real experiences” through proper guidance to “evoke or replicate substantial aspects ofthe real world” [4]. Simulated environments that can provide the high fidelity immersiveexperience, such as CAVE [5]–[7] or other forms of visualization representation can help thelearners create the necessary cognitive connection [3], [10] between the physical world and thecomputer-generated instance. With the technological advancement in visual computing, simulation-based learningthrough technology such as virtual reality (VR) that
metric reported isthe average quality score produced by the participant.NoveltyThe novelty metric is a measure of the uniqueness of a solution with respect to other (25,solutions generated for the same design problem during that idea generation session26) . The metric utilizes a bin system where solutions are sorted into one or more problemspecific bins. Once all solutions for the session are binned, each bin is assigned a noveltyscore according to the following equation. # 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑖𝑛 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑦 = 1 − 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 # 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠
individual and group training sessions for theeducators involved in curriculum development and design. Each session included a detaileddescription of the project's curriculum design goals, and involved discussions on factual,conceptual and procedural knowledge, knowledge application, and student reflection. Handoutswere provided on methodology, instrumentation, procedure and assessing learning outcomes.The sessions gave instructors an opportunity to state their questions and concerns, and discusstheir long term curriculum development plans. The goal of the project is to develop students’ higher order thinking skills, problemsolving, technical visualization skills, and decision making skills in the context of a data-richlearning environment
(s) as possible. Some of the questions addressed in this study included:What role might distance education play in the future of technical/engineering graphicseducation? Will professional development soon be required to ensure instructors obtain trainingrelated to changes in the field of technical/engineering graphics education? The five maincategories researched in this study were: course offerings, student populations, professionaldevelopment, technical/engineering graphics education, and future research plans5. Somecategories looked at the present status of technical/engineering graphics education, to see whatparts of the previous generation of topics were still taught and to what magnitude. Some surveyquestions offered graphic
. Examples of statements used on the NCLAGES include: 1. “It is useful for me to do lots and lots of problems when learning graphics.” 2. “Learning graphics changes my ideas about how the world works.” 3. “In graphics, it is important for me to make sense out of engineering and design concepts before I can use them correctly.”Seven randomly selected sections of GC 120, Foundations of Graphics, were used in the study atNC State University. GC 120 is an introductory course designed to teach the fundamentals ofengineering/technical graphics. The course is listed on the university’s general educationrequirements as an elective under the Visual and Performing Arts category; therefore, it attractsboth engineering and non-engineering majors
with. This nationalconference could be in conjunction with the newly formed K-12 Outreach Division of the ASEE and could lead toan annual event. A final thought would be that if pre-engineering curricula is going use our discipline as one of themain stays in secondary education, that the EDGD division develop a theme session at it’s annual mid-yearconference that particularly addresses k-12 outreach issues. This session could be for research in the growing fieldof pre-engineering education as it relates to our field, or just graphics education in general, either way, our field ofstudy is as popular as ever in the public schools, as it is in higher education, but no formal mechanism is in place forcommunications between the two groups. If we
studies:The Attitudes and Opinions of Students Toward Technical Graphics: Preliminary SurveyResults17 and Motivation and Strategies for Learning in a Fundamentals of Graphics EducationCourse18. This analysis combines results from the NCLAGES and MSLQ instruments to assistin the identification of underlying processes of the samples. Page 14.16.5Summary statistics (Table 1) of the NCLAGES and MSLQ were calculated to provide a synopsisof the instrument results. The variance (0.28) and standard deviation (0.53) of the MSLQ resultsare minimal in comparison to the variance (1.10) and standard deviation (1.05) of the NCLAGESresults indicating a smaller
andacts as visual map to reinforce the connection of the course topics to one another. The Ganttchart also is an introduction to how to manage a project by planning tasks that need to becompleted in serial and what tasks can be done in parallel to have a distributed workload over thetime period while finishing the project on time.Tasks #1 and #2 are done as individual technical reports. Students do not necessarily come tothe course knowing any of the students in the class. Thus, the first two weeks is a time for thestudents to begin to meet others during the two-hour lab sessions and to force each student to beinvolved in all aspects of writing a technical memo report. Any weaknesses in technical reportwriting and formatting in MS Word are to be
Page 24.215.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Assessment of Students’ Changed Spatial Ability Using Two Different Curriculum Approaches; Technical Drawing Compared to Innovative Product DesignIntroductionImproving student performance on academic tasks in mathematics, science and engineeringappears to occur when students’ spatial visualization skills have been improved. Studies havefound improving spatial visualization can increase success in chemistry (Carter, et.al, 1987)1,reduce math anxiety (Maloney, et.al., 2011)2, improve calculus grades (Sorby, et.al., 2012)3, andincrease retention and success in science and engineering curricula (Potter, et.al., 2006
the semester, butstudents had mixed agreement about whether the sketching activities were helpful for learningcourse material. Our results are compared to previously reported findings from four-yearinstitutions and other community colleges, when available. We highlight promising strategies topromote learning and confidence for diverse student populations learning engineering graphics,which could potentially improve retention at other community colleges and four-yearinstitutions.IntroductionIn an effort to increase access to university education for low- and middle-class families, at least17 states have begun offering opportunities to attend two-year colleges tuition free [1]. Already,roughly 50% of engineers in the workforce with a terminal
classes at Stevens do not rely heavily on these skills or that students can make up for themin other ways, e.g. teamwork. Future work will address these questions.IntroductionSpatial-visualization skills (SVS) are known to be critically important to success and retention inSTEM fields. At the same time, these skills are often learned through life experiences such asplaying sports, or playing with certain toys, rather than being taught explicitly in a formal setting[1-4]. Due to this reliance on life experience, the levels of spatial skills displayed by women andunderrepresented groups are typically lower than that of other student populations. Importantlyhowever, spatial skills can be learned and improved with appropriate training.One of the most
an essential skill. It has been shown to be a goodpredictor of success in several engineering and technology-related disciplines [1] – [5]. An earlystudy from I. M. Smith in 1964 [6] identified at least 84 career areas for which spatial skills areimportant. Women, underrepresented minorities, and non-traditional students have been foundto have somewhat lower spatial visualization skills affecting their performance in STEM fieldsbut after specialized training, they showed improvements in their skills [7] – [10]. A study byUttal, et al. [11] published in 2013 found that more than 200 studies on improvement of spatialskills demonstrated that students who receive extensive training and practice on spatially-relevant skills showed increased
licensure, only 1 of 36 respondent disagreed. Future studies should explore theimpact certification programs are having on engineering professional license.While this work focuses solely on the value of the SOLIDWORKS certification program, similarresearch is needed on other vendor-controlled CAD certifications. Another area to investigatecould include how industry values an applicant who holds a specific CAD certification(s) from aspecific vendor (e.g., SOLIDWORKS) but is applying for a position that uses a different CADsystem (e.g., CREO).LimitationsThe definitions for value and benefit are generally easy to comprehend (see Definitions Section);however, when explored in the context of this study, incorrect assumptions can easily be made.For
,the rubrics have been designed to check the “general appearance and shape.” Significantdeviations from the correct answer model are typically found by the TA graders, however, smallmistakes were often overlooked.Maximizing consistency and accuracy is desired to ensure a quality learning experience andfairness across students. Simply having a “correct” volume or mass does not definitively prove apart has the correct shape. For example, Figure 12 shows that for the three advanced modelingparts in assignment four, the volume of the object was often within 1% of the correct answer yetthe shape was still incorrect; volume is only a fair proxy for accuracy. The CSWA examadministered by SOLIDWORKS uses the mass (which is a function of assigning the
). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017AbstractThis evidence-based practice presentation discusses the teaching of an infographics assignmentto first-year technology majors at a large research institution. Infographics can be powerful andsuccessful methods of presenting large, complex data sets to general audiences, and the growingimportance of visual communication has been documented. With a goal of improving ourinstruction and assessment of visual communication skills, we compare infographics designedand produced by freshman students during Fall 2015 with those produced by Fall 2016 freshmanstudents in the same introductory design course, and investigate whether freshman students’abilities to communicate graphically change or
misconceptionswhich can be useful in evaluating instruction. Researchers involved in science education haveused pre- and post- assessments to measure student learning and validate the need for curriculumrevision [1]. Engineering Graphics has been identified as a field in which the use of a CI couldexpose common misconceptions associated with graphic representation, as well as identify thefundamental concepts that contribute to the generation of those graphics. With varying curriculaacross institutions it can be expected that the implementation of engineering graphics will differ.The development of a standardized instrument to assess the understanding of concepts related toengineering graphics could be beneficial in streamlining or standardizing instruction
feature may have been used where more bricks were used for the outerlayer and less rubble for the inner core at every other section of the base (see Figure 1 for thesection view of the wall). Evidence of the key-in feature was found in eastern Jinshanlingwhere pure rammed earth was used for the inner core.Figure 1: Section view of the wallModeling of the Studied Towers and the WallFor the authors’ earlier research (J. Yang, A. Tan, F. Tan, Parke, & F. Yang, 2016; Yang,Hadipriono Tan, & Tan, 2017), the modeling of the wall and towers was created usingSOLIDWORKS, shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4. SOLIDWORKS modeling can show theconstruction sequence using static images and animation (Figure 4). The animation wascreated using the hide/show
, dougong, intelligent system, graphical simulation, virtual realityI. Introduction The dougong is a well-known and unique characteristic of ancient Chinese architecture, theterm referring to the components located at the intersections of pillars comprising the roofsupport system of ancient Chinese buildings. In Chinese, the word “dougong” consists of twoparts, “dou” and “gong,” denoting the two basic elements of the dougong structure. Specifically,the word “dou” denotes the inverted cap for support, and the word “gong” denotes the bow-likeblock for supporting the load. Fig. 1 shows these two components in a 3-D model of a typicaldougong structure made in Autodesk 3DS MAX. In the structure of ancient buildings, dougongare constructed on
. Horlin, J. Hutchison, J.A. Murray, L. Robson, M.K. Seery, J. MacKay, "Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education”, PLOS Computational Biology, October 1, 2020, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242.[2] D. Schaffhauser, “Educators Feeling Stressed, Anxious, Overwhelmed and Capable”, The Journal: Transforming Education, June 6, 2020, Retrieved from https://thejournal.com/articles/2020/06/02/survey-teachers-feeling-stressed-anxious- overwhelmed-and-capable.aspx.[3] C. Cahill, S. Jackson, N. Summerall, K. Harruna, “Helping Career and Technical Education Programs Meet this Moment”, JFF, September 1, 2020, Retrieved from: https://www.jff.org/what-we-do/impact
stages of the design process, as it allows them toproduce, modify, and refine ideas rapidly [1]. In computer aided design (CAD) education, thisprocess enhances students’ spatial visualization skills [2], as well as improves theircommunication with colleagues when the visualization tool is shared [3]. In particular, freehandsketching [4], or “a sketch done with only the hand and a pencil or pens”, is the quickest way tocommunicate technical information [5], [6]. It allows students to quickly visualize the problem,consider design options, and identify questions where more information is needed [7]. Thesepositive effects of freehand sketching on the design process have led to an improvement on thequality of the design outcomes [8]. As a result
incorrectly giving perfect scores toimperfect submissions due to one of the following: a) lack of time (TA is rushed and overlooks checkpoints of failure) b) lack of knowledge (TA does not know how to examine the checkpoints of failure) c) lack of a complete grading rubric to specify necessary checkpoints of failureAutomated workflowsThe following submission workflows are ranked from most to least ideal:Workflow #1: Remote Evaluation with Automatic FeedbackFigure 4 displays a workflow where students will upload their submission file(s) to a web serverat their convenience, prior to its due date. The program will be tied into the registration systemand generate an automatic e-mail to the student with their grade. If the result is
correlated with success in STEM fields [1-4]. Inaddition, several large scale studies have noted the importance of spatial skills in the inclusionand retention of various underrepresented groups in engineering [5-6]. Spatial skills have alsoproven to be malleable and various methodologies for their improvement have been sharedwithin the engineering community [7-10]. Historically these methods have typically includedworkshop-style approaches completed using dedicated spatial skills curricula and accompanyingresources including sketching and workbook exercises.More recent efforts within the engineering community have developed these interventions increative ways to better engage students, allow for self-study of spatial skills or to simply examinenew
visualization training as well asimportant in technical communication and creativity. The use of a touchscreen allows forautomatic grading of the sketches, as well as providing guidance when requested. The eventualuse of the SVT App could be in a classroom setting, used for independent learning, or part of ahybrid environment where students come to office hours as needed.The SVT App was used in an elective 1-unit course, and 93% of the students recommended thecourse and stayed enrolled for the complete 10 weeks. The students’ comments illustrate howthey enjoyed using the iPad software and how they were able to adjust to sketching using theiPads. Among the target group of students who came into the course with low spatialvisualization skills, some of
reopened at the start of the class so that students could take the third attempt duringclass time. The highest score of the three attempts was recorded in their grade book. • Classroom TeamworkStudents formed a team of 2 to 4 in the class time to collaboratively solve various problems in 10to 15 minutes’ time window. After the completion, all teams were given the opportunity to pick anumber between 1 and 6. A six-sided die was used to determine the winning team whoseselected number must match the generated number on the die. When more than one team had thesame generated number on the die, a rock-paper-scissors game was used to determine the finalwinning team. The winning team got the chance to present their work in front of the class. If
head parameters and port flowareas from an external spreadsheet.Phase OneDuring phase one, students participate in discussions on cylinder head design and port flow overthe course of six one-hour course segments. Key parameters, identified in [5], are includedvalve angle, intake and exhaust valve size, valve seat geometric design, and port area scheduling.An additional three hours per week are dedicated to the initial design process with studentsactively generating CAD geometry.Students are provided handouts containing data on intake and exhaust valve dimensions, valveseat dimensions, and valve spring dimensions. Table 1 below shows representative data. Theyare also able to utilize their own data for a different engine size. Hand drawn
ability to “Create a CAD model of a laminate composite product” and “Perform and validate a simple structural analysis on a laminate composite model using Finite Element Analysis.”• Relationship to MFGE Curriculum Figure 1. MFGE 362 and the MFGE CAD/CAM Curriculum Figure 1 illustrates the relationship of this course to the rest of the CAx intensive courses in the MFGE curriculum. For a description of the complete curriculum see [11]. MFGE 362 builds upon an introduction to CAD class (MFGE 261) where students are introduced to basic parametric modeling, assembly modeling and generative drafting techniques. It supports CAD and CAM experiences in the senior year such as CAD Automation and Advanced CAM
, students may focus on the mechanics of using thesoftware (e.g., clicks of the mouse needed to create a line or a circle) but they may not befostering an understanding of the number and types of dimensions needed to define the shapesthey are generating and how these dimensions are affected by their choice of constraints.Eventually, students will be required to create engineering drawings of the 3D models followingthe standards of ASME [1-2], or the like, and any additional rules set by their instructors. Whencreating an engineering drawing, it is imperative that only the necessary dimensional data beprovided. Providing more dimensional data than necessary or omitting data will cause confusionwhen manufacturing the component. Figure 1 illustrates
learned how to create engineeringdrawing of any part and assembly using proper dimension and tolerance values with SolidWorkstutorials and exercises. Toward the end of the semester the effectiveness of videos was assessedin 3 steps: in step 1, students were provided with a SOLIDWORKS part as shown in figure 2,from our designed mechanical system to generate engineering drawings. This is an ongoingproject. Although we have multiple parts in the system shown in figure 1, only the piston shaftpart in figure 2 with video was ready at the time of assessment. In step 2, fabrication video ofthe same part was then shown and students were asked to edit their drawings if they think it isnecessary based on the video. In step 3, we assessed their engineering
certification exam. Because of the sample size and the dataavailable, t-values were calculated for each of the competencies for each of the exam years:specifically tn-1 = (x – μ) / (s / √n), where tn-1 is a value from the t-distribution with n-1 degreesof freedom, x is the session average, μ is the historical average, and s / √n is the standard errorFigure 1. An exam taker’s performance report.Since the program chose 5% for its level of significance, the size of the rejection region would be.05. And because the rejection region was divided equally among the two tails, the 5% wasdivided into two equal part of 2.5% each. In an examination of the t distribution, the criticalvalues corresponded to the degrees of freedom, which varied annually. This along
Paper ID #30967Development of a Spatial Visualization Assessment Tool for YoungerStudents Using a LegoTM Assembly TaskProf. Nathan Delson, UC San Diego Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is an Associated Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. He received a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and his interests include robotics, biomedical devices, product design, and engineering education. He was a co-founder and past president of Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration Corp.), a company that provides haptics and force feed- back solutions. He is currently co-founder of eGrove Education Inc