, emotional, and self-reflective livesof engineers themselves that fail to “fit into” prevailing professional paradigms of thought andpractice.Cannons refers then not only to military annihilation but also to the systematic drowning out ofvoices/perspectives that diverge from, challenge, or oppose the engineering status quo. Wepropose that these voices and perspectives are essential for the development of technically andmorally robust engineering research and practice. In fact, they are the very thing that wouldenable engineering to truly hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public, andrealize philosopher Charles Harris’ proposed ideal of bettering “the material basis of humanwell-being or quality of life.”3This paper engages in a
bring aboutthese demarcations of worthy practitioner from unworthy. As Slaton3 describes, materialsstandards and specifications surrounding materials testing after 1900 indirectly denigrated thetechnical capacities of traditional artisans in American building trades; these written instrumentsdid not say explicitly that such artisans were incapable of any particular activity, but conveyedthrough their selection of optimized practices that only the activities of degree holding engineerscould constitute reliable practice. Similarly, engineering codes of ethics connote that only thoseassociated with their use have the potential for proper technical conduct. In the normal conductof engineering business, nobody would expect that a mechanic would or
Paper ID #19748A Longitudinal Study of the Perception of Academic Integrity among Stu-dents and FacultyTeresa Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics, the dynamics of complex structures, and the use of laser Doppler vibrometry for characterization of such structures including percussion instruments, land- mines/IED, and coupled resonator arrays.Dr. Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina
electives). One might explain this with a sandwich theory of program course designin which the first-year and final-year design courses contain the “non-technical” material, and theintervening second and third years are reserved for technical content stripped of contextualdiscussions on topics like ethics.Introduction Ethical engineering practices form a linchpin of modern society. Ask anyone who boughta Volkswagen diesel with the emissions test cheat controls whether they would unquestioninglybuy from that company again, and then extrapolate that across all economic standards ifengineers in every industry decided to forego ethical behavior – an entire area of economicresearch considers this question of the importance of trust in social
faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustain- ability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational
Paper ID #31443WIP: Ethical Responsibility Formation of Students in a NuclearEngineering Course through Inquiry LearningMs. Minha R. Ha, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University Minha is a PhD Candidate in Mechanical Engineering, conducting a qualitative study of design engineers in cross-disciplinary settings. She aims to support the enhancement of socio-technical integration in engineering design, at the inquiry and decision making levels. Minha enjoys teaching and studying the ethics and equity issues in the engineering context. She is a regular volunteer in the community, mentoring girls and participating STEM
Paper ID #10060The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision-making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Quali-tative MethodsQin Zhu, Purdue University Qin Zhu is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His main re- search interests include global/comparative/international engineering education, engineering education policy, and engineering ethics. He received his BS degree in material sciences and engineering and first PhD degree in philosophy of science and technology (engineering ethics) both from Dalian University of Technology
University of Idaho, the Land-Grant College for the State of Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State UniversityDr. Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Beyerlein is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho where he serves as the coordinator for an inter-disciplinary capstone design sequence that draws students from across the College of Engineering. Over the last ten years, he has been part of several NSF grants that have developed assessment instruments focused on professional skills and piloted these with capstone design students.Prof. Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jay McCormack
online classroom by way of using other’s opinions or theories, borrowing statisticsor illustrative material, and submitting projects using others’ material withoutacknowledgment8. To this end, it is the instructor’s responsibility to help studentsunderstand the importance of academic integrity8.This discourse provided a background to shape an understanding of the ethical andsocietal implications of internet-based engineering education as summarized throughcurrent literature. Moving forward, the authors summarize the thoughts and opinions ofcurrent undergraduate students, graduate students and faculty members in Mechanical,Civil, Electrical, Chemical, and Environmental Engineering. The opinions were collectedat a medium sized technological
distributed than in most other developed countries; as a result, the United States Page 12.616.5fares particularly well in measures of average material well being that do not place weighton equality aspects.On comprehensive measures such as the UN Human Development Index the United Statesis always in the top ten, currently ranking number ten, though generally ranked lower thanthe Scandinavian countries, Ireland, Belgium, Canada, Australia, and (until recently) Japan;Canada and Norway have alternately held the top spot for some time. On the HumanPoverty Index the US is ranked worst among the selection of 17 wealthiest countries,scoring poorly on all counts
Paper ID #19886Teaching Ethics in the Context of Engineering Courses: A Blended Approachof Theory and PracticeDr. Geoff Pfeifer, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Geoff Pfeifer is Associate Teaching Professor of Philosophy at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He teaches and publishes in the areas of social and political philosophy, applied ethics, and global justice. His work has appeared in Human Studies, The European Legacy, and The Journal of Global Ethics. He is also the author of a number of book chapters as well as The New Materialism: Althusser, Badiou, and ˇ zek (Routledge, 2015). Additionally he is co-editor of
Paper ID #19706Curing the Cheating Epidemic? A Multi-site International Comparison ofPerspectives on Academic Integrity and the Way We ”Cure” by TeachingTeresa Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics, the dynamics of complex structures, and the use of laser Doppler vibrometry for characterization of such structures including percussion instruments, land- mines/IED, and coupled
Education at Virginia Tech. She is currently serving a AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests focus on interdisciplinary faculty members and graduate students in engineering and science, with engineering education as a specific case. Dr. Borrego holds U.S. NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) awards for her engineering education research. Dr. Borrego has developed and taught graduate level courses in engi- neering education research methods and assessment from 2005-2010. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is
students ofappropriate teaming behavior. Second, the Peer Evaluation of Teamwork provides insight intohow students are experiencing the teaming skills of the other members of their team. The authorshave data from similar project-based courses and will be able to benchmark the teamingbehaviors of the group receiving explicit instruction in teaming skills with other quasi-controlgroups which have not had exposure to teaming instruction.The final mechanism for assign student learning is a post-project exit interview in which detailedqualitative data are collected to understand nuances of student learning. The instructor uses ananalytical rubric to evaluate student responses from the exit interview.Examples of assessment instruments as well as the
Paper ID #23781Interim Results of a Longitudinal, Multi-site Survey of Perceptions of Aca-demic IntegrityMr. Samson Pepe Goodrich, East Carolina University Samson is a junior studying bioprocess engineering at East Carolina University.Dr. Teresa Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics, the dynamics of complex structures, and the use of laser Doppler vibrometry for characterization of
protecting society and all the people.” Asa result, courses like Solid Waste were “embedded with ethics.” Students in the focus groupcontrasted this with other disciplines. For example, one student started in mechanical engineeringwhere “a lot of the classes were really just technical and we didn’t go over the ethics of whetheror not this was responsible.” The student described this lack of ethical consideration as his“qualm with the major.” Another student in Capstone Design had a similar experience and noted,“I was aerospace for two years and didn’t hear ethics once.” This perceived disconnectionbetween the material and its application was the primary motivation for switching majors sincehe “wanted to do something where I wasn’t nervous about my
, yeah. It’s a hard thing tobalance.” From this experience, Benson reported learning that “you're not always going to see aperfect commitment to ethics in industry.” He also pointed out that even though there is a code ofethics for chemical engineers, “nobody sticks to that 100%. That’s not real. That’s an ideal.”Phineas: “You need to tell them”Phineas, a senior in materials engineering at Purdue, discussed her year-long co-op experiencewith an automotive supplier. She more specifically shared a number of insights about whatcolleagues in her co-op firm referred to as “black-boxing.” She explained that this involveddeciding which information to share with a customer and which information to hold back: So like the customer doesn’t need to
Lecturer and a Science and Engineering Education Fellow at the Mechanical Engi- neering Department, Stanford University. She recently completed her PhD from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue where she focused on identifying and developing leadership and other socio-technical capabilities among engineering students and professionals. She is passionate about improving engineering education and practice and has been working in the areas of innovation, leadership development, diversity, equity, and inclusion, ethics, and, faculty development. Previously, she also worked for companies including Deloitte, Sprint, ProStem and Credit Suisse, both as an internal and external research consultant focusing on areas of
that highparticipation in student organizations leads to growth in empathy [17]. Empathy has beensuggested to play an important role in ethical decision-making processes and ethicaldevelopment of engineering students [25] [26] [27]. This paper contributes to this knowledge byinvestigating whether participation in more organizations enhances students’ ethicaldevelopment. Student organizations are also a way for students to develop social capital [16] [28]. Astudy examining campus organization involvement of international students as a mechanism forsocial capital development suggested that students who participated in major-based organizationshad larger, less dense, more diverse networks that lead to social network, which are
the PACE-1 Study [2, 3], involved asurvey of 643 undergraduate engineering and pre-engineering students at eleven institutions,ranging from community colleges to large research universities. This study attempted todetermine what is student cheating, how often does cheating occur, why do students cheat, andwhat methods can be used to reduce or stop cheating.The PACE-1 Study’s findings included the observation that students were able to rationalizecheating behavior using instructor-based neutralizations such as “the instructor did an inadequatejob” or “the instructor assigned too much material”. This correlated well in the study with thestudents’ belief that it is the instructor’s responsibility to limit cheating and not the students’.This
power and renewable energy systems.Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is an Associate Professor in Electrical Engineering and holds an adjunct appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Washington. She received her B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia In- stitute of Technology, both in Electrical Engineering. She also holds an M.Ed. from the University of Washington (2008). Her research interests cover affective outcomes in engineering education as well as (chemical and biological) sensors research which cross-over into her work in community based partner- ships and community outreach
AC 2011-1735: DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING ETHICS COURSEDiana Bairaktarova, Purdue University, West Lafayette Diana Bairaktorova is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She hold BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering from Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria and an MBA from Hamline University, St. Paul, Minnesota. She has 7 years of professional experience, working as a Module Design and MMIC Test Engineer at TLC Precision Wafer Technology in Minneapolis, MN and as an Operations Engineer at Napco International in Hopkins, MN.Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Demetra Evangelou is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the School of Engineering
Paper ID #16629Perception of Academic Integrity among Students and Faculty: A Compari-son of the Ethical Gray AreaDr. Teresa J. Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics and the dynamics of complex structures. She uses op- tical measurement systems (laser Doppler vibrometry) for characterization of a wide variety of targets including percussion instruments, landmines/IED, and coupled
attitudes amongundergraduate engineers enrolled in a course specifically focused on BID.MethodsThe BID class used in this study was an undergraduate multidisciplinary special topics course,cross-listed in biology, polymer textile and fiber engineering, industrial and systems engineering,materials science and engineering, and mechanical engineering. The distribution of engineeringstudents in the class was 1 electrical, 13 biomedical, 8 industrial and systems, 13 mechanical,and 3 materials science. There were also 7 biology students, but they were not part of the studydescribed here.The beginning portion of the course consisted of general introductory lectures on BID, designmethodology, and tools and techniques specific to BID, as well as class
AC 2012-3181: COMPARING ENGINEERING STUDENT USE OF SOLU-TION MANUALS AND STUDENT/FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ACA-DEMIC DISHONESTYMs. Angela L. Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello, Principal Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, instructs freshmen and sophomore engineering courses via distance education to students at the USU regional campuses. Minichiello is a registered professional Mechanical Engineer and has more than 15 years industry experience as a practicing engineer. She holds a B.S.M.E. degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and a M.S.M.E. degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research interests include adult learning
Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, assessment, and faculty development. Dr. Litzinger has more than 50 publications related to engineering education including lead authorship of an invited article in the 100th Anniversary issue of JEE and for an invited chapter on translation of research to practice for the first edition of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. He serves as an Associate Editor for Advances in Engineering Education and on the Advisory Board for the Journal of Engineering Education. He was selected as a
the process prior to class. Then, in class, students complete short in-class activitiesbefore applying that knowledge to their team’s design challenge.To incorporate engineering ethics into EGR 101, a joint faculty and student team with expertisein engineering and ethics developed the described materials. After establishing learningoutcomes, the team targeted different steps of the engineering design process to situate ethicaldiscussions. The team utilized the very same design process to develop course modules thatwould achieve these learning outcomes. Ultimately, the team created four engineering ethicsmodules that include videos and short in-class activities. Implemented in Fall 2020, the modulescorrespond with and are embedded within the
learning modules,13 an increasing number of ethicstexts, and online resources such as those provided by The Online Ethics Center for Engineeringand Science at Case Western Reserve University.14 Rather, our purpose is to spark thought in thehope that existing material can be improved upon and new material and approaches can bedeveloped.Organization of the PaperThe paper begins with a brief review of the attorney’s code of ethical conduct, the American BarAssociation’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Second, other sources of authority andadvice available to lawyers on ethical issues are described. Third, the ethics curriculum in legaleducation is discussed. Fourth, the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination that mostlawyers are
effort requires considerable time and effort. There are about 340 colleges and universities that offer bachelor’s degree programs in engineering that are accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), and about 240 colleges that offer accredited bachelor’s degree programs in engineering technology [U.S. Department of Labor and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002-2003]. There are about 14 different branches of engineering: aerospace; agricultural; biomedical; chemical; civil; computer hardware; electrical and electronics (except computer); environmental; industrial (including health and safety); materials; mechanical; mining and geological (including mining safety); nuclear; and petroleum engineering [U.S
AC 2007-14: ASSESSMENT OF ETHICS MODULES IN AN ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a