Paper ID #32760A Leadership-Development Ecosystem for Engineering Graduate StudentsTeresa J. Didiano, University of Toronto Teresa Didiano is the Graduate Professional Development Coordinator at the Troost Institute for Lead- ership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She designs and coordinates leadership and professional development programs for graduate students and postdoctoral fellows to explore diverse career pathways. Teresa has an HBSc and MSc from the University of Toronto, and Life Skills Coach- ing Certification from George Brown College. She also is a certified MBTI Practitioner and recently
Paper ID #29286Wisdom through Adversity: Situated Leadership Learning of EngineeringLeadersDr. Andrea Chan, Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) Andrea Chan is a Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr
student-centered education.The student success initiative reported here is being instituted at UTEP to engage, grow andsupport students across all colleges, divisions and departments. This includes engineering studentsand those pursuing the Engineering Leadership Degree, a recently pioneered undergraduateprogram [7]. This effort initially grew as a response to ongoing institutional assessments (see forexample, CIERP, [8]) on continuous quality and improvement. The assessments are conductedthrough a University-wide collaboration with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schoolsre-accreditation, and occur over several cycles. As such, the University accepts a strict standard ofaccountability for institutional effectiveness as it “educates
, CAE, Aff.M.ASCE, is a Senior Manager in the Professional and Technical Advancement Department at the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). She serves as the ASCE staff contact for the Committee on Developing Leaders (CDL), charged with providing, promoting, and assuring engage- ment in leadership opportunities for civil engineers. Susan also works on a team to create and present original presentations on professional, leadership, and management topics/skills for engineers as volun- teer leaders and project leaders. Prior to her current role she worked in ASCE’s Technical Advancement and Continuing Education departments. Susan holds a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from Longwood University and is currently
University) asking, “How do youdefine leadership in an engineering context?” The results were analyzed using qualitativecontent analysis, and four themes emerged: lead and influence others, personal effectiveness,engineering competency, and collaboration. Based on these results, combined with relevantknowledge from literature, this paper proposes a definition of engineering leadership thathighlights the importance of both the engineering and the leadership aspects, thereby providingclearer direction for fostering leadership skills in our future engineers. The definition willprovide engineering leadership educators with a better understanding of how to emphasize theimportance of engineering leadership, and how to integrate it into a general
],illustrated below (Figure 1). Figure 1. Northeastern University's fourteen-point framework for leadership development [17]Similarly, Iowa State University’s Engineering Leadership Program developed a LeadershipModel via a collaboration between engineering faculty, staff, and students [18]. It includes eightlearning outcomes: 1. An ability to function on interdisciplinary teams 2. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3. An ability to communicate effectively 4. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context 5. A recognition of the need for, and the ability to engage in, life-long learning 6. An ability to create a
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Military Leadership for Engineers: A Comprehensive Look at Leadership from Army Doctrine to Engineering Course WorkAbstractEngineers and engineering educators realize that engineering is a team effort and leadership isinherent to a team’s success. Engineering project completion from ideation to implementationrequires engineers to provide influence in an often-complicated group of multi-disciplinaryprofessionals. In other words, leading is inherent to success as an engineer. ABET recognizes thisreality with student outcome number five where students must demonstrate, “an ability to functioneffectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative
Paper ID #25598Counting Past Two: Engineers’ Leadership Learning TrajectoriesDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a
must help engineering leadership studentsdevelop a growth mindset and discover the sophistication of mind to celebrate diversity, equity,and inclusion in their daily lives, school, and workplace. This requires us to consider inclusiveleadership as a foundational approach to engineering leadership development.Inclusive leadership has been shown to positively impact team performance, decision-making,collaboration, innovation, and motivation. Inclusive leaders celebrate differences and recognizeand challenge attacks on DEI. As engineering leadership educators, we must lead by example,model inclusive leadership behavior, and have courage to infuse these concepts into ourcurriculum.This paper assembles the collective thoughts, perspectives
Paper ID #23040Understanding the Perceived Impact of Engineers’ Leadership Experiencesin CollegeDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engi- neering from Montana State University (MSU). He is Associate Professor in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering and Associate Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of
Paper ID #21520The Engineering Leader of the Future: Research and PerspectivesDr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Meg Handley is currently the Associate Director for Engineering Leadership Outreach at Penn State University. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on interpersonal behaviors and their impact on engineering leadership potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing
ourstudents. Dave Bayless and Ron Bennett were leading these efforts within ASEE and shared thespecific experiences of this conference with ASEE leadership to help strengthen the legitimacyof their final petition to start a new division. On June of that same year, ASEE’s leadership votedto approve the addition of our new LEAD division. And with this division, our community ofengineering leadership educators would now have a new and much larger space to begin toconvene, collaborate, and publish our shared interests and contributions. This is why I thinkthose 2014 events marked a turning point for our larger academic field of engineering leadership.Our achievements: 2014-2021Leadership, like inventions, are created to solve problems. One of the
Engineering. He has over 13 years of experience working in industry where he learned how important hands-on education and professional development are for preparing students to succeed in the workplace.Dr. Heidi Reeder, Boise State University Heidi Reeder is the Director of the Leadership Certificate programs in the College of Innovation and Design at Boise State University, and a Professor of Communication. As a social scientist her research interests include leadership, commitment, gender, and pedagogy. Her articles have been published in top communication and social psychology journals including Sex Roles, Communication Monographs, and the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. She earned a B.S. in communication
Paper ID #22197Evolution of Leadership Behaviors During Two-Semester Capstone DesignCourse in Mechanical EngineeringRebecca Komarek, University of Colorado, Boulder Rebecca Komarek is the Assistant Director of the Idea Forge and Managing Director of Catalyze CU at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has taught in the areas of education research and leadership development and served as a design team adviser. She is earning her PhD in engineering education with a focus on leadership development.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at
with the NASA Johnson Space Center. He received the IEEE Third Millennium Award, and projects he helped lead re- ceived the NSPE Outstanding Engineering Achievement Award and R&D 100 Award. He is a Registered Professional Engineer and earned the Project Management Professional Certification.Prof. Dennis Arthur Conners c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Systems Thinking Concepts and Applications for Engineering Leadership DevelopmentAbstract Many important and worthwhile initiatives in engineering leadership development focus onthe development of communication, social, and business skills among engineers [1]. Theobjective of this paper
. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Dr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Meg Handley is currently the Associate Director for Engineering Leadership Outreach at Penn State University. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg holds a PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on interpersonal behaviors and their impact on engineering leadership potential
leadership learningresearch, we generate a list of recommendations for engineering educators, industry leaders andengineering leadership researchers.Introduction: Reviewing the literature CoP (community of practice) styleLave and Wenger’s notion that workplace learning takes place in a Community of Practice (CoP)helped us characterize our collaborative literature review experiment as a simultaneous processof learning and professional socialization [4]. A summer reading group—initiated by ourDirector and Senior Research Associate—began with two objectives: 1) to generate a literaturereview for the next phase of our engineering leadership project and 2) to build cohesion in ourexpanding, interdisciplinary research team. We sent out invitations to five
in- crease energy saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Dr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University Meg Handley is currently the Associate Director for Engineering Leadership Outreach at Penn State University. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on interpersonal behaviors and their
Paper ID #29532Using Competing Values Framework to map the Development of Leadershipskills as Capstone Design students Transition to the WorkplaceMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a bachelors degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. As an Engineering Education researcher, he is interested in enhancing professional competencies for engineering workforce development in academia and
Technol- ogy, as well as 3D Virtual Construction Design & Management. I am a reviewer or member of several professional organizations, such as ASCE, NASTT, and ASC. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Students’ Teamwork Assessment based on Reflection, Peer Evaluations and Psychological SafetyAbstractEngineering projects involve a variety of stakeholders: some work within the engineering andconstruction field, while others do not. These projects entail complex technical facets and facechallenges due to scheduling concerns, budget constraints, conflicting viewpoints, orperformance issues. To prepare engineering students for
. Colbry also conducts research in computational education and high performance comput- ing. From 2009 until 2015, Dr. Colbry worked for the Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research (iCER) as a computational consultant and Director of the HPCC. Dr. Colbry collaborates with scientists from multiple disciplines including Engineering, Toxicology, Plant and Soil Sciences, Zoology, Mathematics, Statistics and Biology. Recent projects include research in Image Phenomics; developing a commercially-viable large scale, cloud based image pathology tool; and helping develop methods for measuring the Carbon stored inside of soil. Dr. Colbry has taught a range of courses, including; communication ”soft” skills, tools for computational
, advisors.) He was the technical administrator of the State of Ohio’s Coal Research Consortium, funded by the Ohio Coal Development Office, from 2000-2007. He consults for several industrial, financial and legal firms. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Missouri and Ohio and a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and of the National Academy of Inventors. He has twice won the Ohio University Russ College of Engineering’s Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching Award. He is also the founding Director of the American Society for Engineering Education’s Division for Engineering Leadership Development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering
Paper ID #30042A Narrative Inquiry into Pedagogical Approaches that Support theDevelopment of Transversal Skills in Engineering StudentsDr. Michele Norton, Texas A&M University Recent PhD graduate from Texas A&M University. Currently working across four NSF funded grants related to STEM education and other funded grants related to Engineering Education and developing leaders in Engineering. Research interests include design-based learning, transversal skills, creativity, engineering education, holistic education, and teams.Dr. Behbood Ben Zoghi, Texas A&M University Ben Zoghi is the Victor H. Thompson endowed
necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. P. Davis and K. M. Eisenhardt, “Rotating Leadership and Collaborative Innovation: Recombination Processes in Symbiotic Relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 159–201, Jun. 2011.[2] J. Ramazani and G. Jergeas, “Project managers and the journey from good to great: The benefits of investment in project management training and education,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 41–52, Jan. 2015.[3] L. H. Lynn and H. Salzman, “Collaborative Advantage: Globalization of Innovation and Engineering,” Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 894348, Apr. 2006.[4] Read “The Engineer
learning, inquiry-based laboratory instruction, and any ini- tiative that empowers students to do hands-on learning. Additional service interests include teaching and leadership training for graduate students, enhancing communication education for undergraduate en- gineering students, developing evidence-based design project team formation strategies, and improving engineering design curricula.Dr. Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Molly H. Goldstein is an engineering design educator and researcher at University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. She previously worked as an environmental engineer specializing in air quality influencing her focus in engineering design with environmental
Paper ID #27452A Continual Improvement Process for Teaching Leadership and InnovationWithin a Community of PracticeProf. Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design In the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the process design teaching team, manages the courses and industry interface. Her current research focuses on the application of blended and active learning to
Champaign. Her current research is in engineering education with a focus on curriculum development and retention of female and minority students in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Development of Leadership and Communication Skills in an Experiential Learning Project Management CourseAbstract Engineering students are equipped with technical knowledge and skills in order to solvereal-world problems. However, it has become increasingly clear that engineering students alsorequire training in non-technical skills beyond the technical knowledge and analytical skillstraditionally taught in engineering undergraduate
detection and manipulation of various cell types. One application in particular was to design an electrically-driven cell focusing microfluidic device to be used in conjunction with an optical waveguide for environmental-based applications. Although, she has held a number of positions in industry with companies such as: Dow Corning, Johns Manville and Hospira, her passion lies in teaching, mentoring undergraduate students and promoting excellence in education for engineers.Mr. David Bowles, Louisiana State University David ”Boz” Bowles is an Assistant Director of Academic Affairs for the College of Engineering, where he coordinates the Communications Across the Curriculum program for the College. He also manages the
Havan, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMs. Charlotte HathawayDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and Director of Instructional Laborato- ries in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, and engi- neering education. He oversees undergraduate laboratories in fluid mechanics and heat transfer. Pedagog- ically, Dr. Johnson employs evidence-based writing instruction, active learning, inquiry-based laboratory instruction, and initiatives that empower students to do hands-on
studentswho may need, yet not see the value of, leadership education. Further, engineering students whopursue careers outside of the mainstream engineering industry pathways, such as research orentrepreneurship, often do not automatically see the value in leadership and management trainingin college; they perceive these programs to be aimed just at careers in industry. Therefore, theobjective of this paper is to introduce the approach that one university is employing to revamp anddevelop a new credentialed curriculum in engineering leadership aimed at students with broadcareer interests. There are two facets of this new certificate program, and it aims to create acompelling experience that attracts an increasing number of engineering undergraduates