Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Annie Elisabeth Simpson, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Amy Huynh, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Totonto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Paper ID #15201Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North Amer-ican UniversitiesMr. Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is a Leadership Programming Consultant with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto where he develops leadership programs and industry partnerships for engineers. His research interests include engineering leadership, organizational culture, and higher education. Mike has a Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation from the University of Waterloo and a BASc in

Conference Session

Curriculum in Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynne Cowe Falls, University of Calgary; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Gord Aker P.Eng. PCC, Logical Leadership

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Transportation Association of CanadaRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn is a Master’s student researching engineering leadership education at the University of Calgary. She graduated from Manufacturing Engineering in 2011 and worked in industry for a few years before returning to school.Mr. Gord Aker P.Eng. PCC, Logical Leadership Gord Aker, P.Eng. is a Professional Engineer and Executive Coach. In addition to his graduate degree in engineering, he holds the Professional Certified Coach credential from the International Coach Federation (ICF). With over 22 years of organizational leadership experience, in 2006 Aker started Logical Leader- ship with the objective of helping people discover, develop and deploy their innate

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard J. Schuhmann, The Landing School; Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University; Jack V. Matson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Jeffrey G. Soper, Montreux School of Business; Donald H. Horner Jr., Jacksonville University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

over time.IntroductionThe Engineering Leadership Development Program at The Pennsylvania State University wasone of the pioneering university-level leadership development programs in the world. Foundedin 1995 as an initiative of the Leonard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, theProgram has graduated over 600 students with an 18 credit-hour minor in EngineeringLeadership Development.A study conducted by Purdue University suggested that today’s engineering leader must be well-versed in three dimensions, namely technical, professional, and global skills.1 While the initialfocus of the Penn State Program was to address professional skill development, over the past 10years, global competency skill development has been robustly

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Canada published a similar policy paper—Leading a Canadian future: The newEngineer in Society, to support leadership and professional skills education in Canadian facultiesof engineering 3. These two national calls for change have been formalized through learningoutcomes (graduate attributes) generated by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) in the United States and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board(CEAB) in Canada 1, 2, 7. While engineering practice has historically blended technical,communication and interpersonal skills 8-12, the recent era of accountability in higher educationhas marked these competencies as legitimate features of engineering education.An increasing number of professors, instructors and

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Qin Zhu, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

emerge and are viewed on these project teams. Using a discursivepsychological approach, the researchers examine what characteristics the students find mostsalient about a leader on their particular project team. The researchers investigate some of thequalities that emerge across the participants to generate a notion of what students in thisengineering education context think about leadership and its role in engineering educationprograms. The authors also consider how leadership is perceived and handled in project teamsinforms our understanding of how leadership can be taught and learned and how young engineerscan develop those essential skills in today’s complex and fluid work environment.Leadership in Small Project TeamsCommunication is a

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fu Zhongli, National University of Defense Technology; Huang Zhang, NUDT in China; Tong Wu, Center for National Security and Strategic Studies (CNSSS), National University of Defense Technology (NUDT); Lini ZHOU, Center for National Security and Strategic Studies, National University of Defense Technology; Jianchuan Li, National University of Defense Technology; Lian Lin, National University of Defense Technology; wang yang, Continuing Education College, National University of Defense Technolgy(NUDT)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

improved understanding. The results from the themes andcategories generated from the Engineering professionals’ definitions would be useful indeveloping and improving engineering leadership education programs. According to the analysis done in the paper and in the application of curriculum designfor the cultivation of engineering masters in the control engineering, the case shows that thethought of experts and professors, in the engineering field, treating courses as the key pointsand the engineering practice as the goal to cultivate engineering masters is very clear, andthey have personal experience about the shortage in the current engineering mastercultivating system. Providing students with integrated engineering leadership experiences

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim G. Kotnour, University of Central Florida; Charles H. Reilly, University of Central Florida; John A. Selter, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

the leadership skills across all disciplines and students. The challengeis that the “leadership” concepts and courses cannot be substituted in for the engineering andtechnical courses. The eli2 concepts are layered into the curriculum through 3 options: 1) Infuse into existing courses for awareness 2) Make available for general use 3) Provide as additional “above and beyond” courses. Page 24.774.7Table 3Summary of eli2 Program Elements Student Role Role of eli2 Program Elements Infusion Approach Learning the Most from Infuse Concepts • Case studies and discussion topics

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Ronald R. Ulseth, Iron Range Engineering; Dan Ewert

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

a two-year, project-based program that allows students with two-yearcollege degrees to complete a bachelor’s degree in engineering. The program is a partnershipbetween a community college and a state university, separated geographically by severalhundred miles. The program takes place at the community college, targeting students in that partof the state and responding to the needs of local industries. Because of the complex nature of theinstitutional partnership, as well as the project-based, team-focused emphasis, the program servesas an innovative model for engineering education.IntroductionThe engineering profession is becoming steadily more global in nature,1 creating the need forengineering education to develop a graduate who is

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

. (2012). Engineering Professionals’ Expectations of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 12, 60–70.[5] Farr, J., & Brazil, D. (2009). Leadership Skills Development for Engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3. http://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2009.11431792[6] Hartmann, B., Stephens, C., Jahren, C. (2015). Surveying industry needs for leadership in entry-level engineering positions. American Society for Engineering Education.[7] Male, S. a. (2005). Generic Engineering Competencies : A Review and Modelling Approach. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(1), 25–51.[8] Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2009). Re-engineering graduate skills – a case

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

of possessing leadership skills. In general, they do notdefine in depth the problem their programs are designed to solve or the need their programmeets. Where they do articulate the problem, it seems largely a problem of going beyondtraditional engineering education. This perspective is illustrated in the statements of purposesummarized in the table below.Gordon Engineering A purely technical engineering education is insufficient toLeadership Program (MIT) prepare engineering graduates for optimal effectiveness in industry. Transforming this expertise into real products and systems demands the development of additional capabilities

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre Dame; Gary Allen Gilot P.E., University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

University of Notre Dame. She holds a BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and a MS and PhD in Chemical Engineering from Notre Dame. Her research focuses primarily on Engineering Education issues, especially focused within the first-year engineering experience.Mr. Gary Allen Gilot P.E., University of Notre Dame Gary A. Gilot is the Director of Engineering Leadership and Community Engagement at the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. Gary is a Fellow at the University Center for Social Concerns. Gary earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Clarkson Uni- versity in Upstate New York (1978), and Masters in Business Administration from

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Ed Frauenheim, Great Place to Work Institute; Steven C. Currall, Southern Methodist University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

California Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. In addition, Good Company earned the 2012 Gold Nautilus Book Award in the Business/Leadership category. Ed has spoken to live and broadcast audiences on subjects including innovation strategy, corporate social responsibility and the future of work. Along with Organized Innovation co-authors Sara Jansen Perry and Emily M. Hunter, Ed delivered a day-long workshop on the principles of the book to affiliates of the Baylor Research and Innovation Collaborative at Baylor University. Ed graduated cum laude from Princeton University with a degree in History. He earned a Master’s Degree in Education from the University of California at Berkeley. Ed lives in San

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

leadership education program for graduating seniors in engineering (at aspecific university) is interviewing established leaders. Through the interview, small groups ofstudents prepare for and engage the established leader to explore the leader’s characteristics,experiences, and methods of leadership. Surveys have found this a more meaningful learningexperience for the students than traditional lecturing by the leader/speaker. Further, developmentof interviewing skills and improved understanding of the value of asking better questions hasalso been shown to increase student confidence in their ability to communicate, listen, andreflect.Development of questioning and interview techniques was used to improve communication andengagement in freshmen

Conference Session

Curriculum in Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University; Meghan Daly, James Madison University; Cairo Jahan Lakil Sherrell, James Madison University; Thomas Atcheson Ware; Diane L. Foucar-Szocki, College of Education, James Madison University; Justin J. Henriques, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

, students will present their reviews and lead discussions of theselected articles.Book (2) or (1) reviews - Read and review a selected book on leadership, leadership theory,teaching leadership, leadership pedagogy, engineering leadership, and engineering leadershipeducation. Write a short amazon.com-style review (complete with star rating) from the point ofview of an engineering educator, including the background of the author(s), overall objective,intended audience, clarity of topics presented, and usefulness of book for an engineeringeducator. (i.e. Were examples or specific applications offered that you can actually use in yourfuture career as an engineering?)Personal Statement Presentation – Personal statements are general a part of the

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development: Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Tools

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. S.. Shelley, California State University, Long Beach; Kenneth Wayne Santarelli P.E., California State University, Long Beach; Christopher R. Warren, California State University, Long Beach; Amelia Bahrami, California State University, Long Beach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

teamworkskills,, and ABET2 accreditation criteria and engineering educational literature1 also support theneed for leadership skill student learning outcomes generally in engineering undergraduateprograms. The pragmatic philosophical approach, or experimentalism, according to Creswell3,facilitates understanding of specific problems, opens possibilities, different world-views,different assumptions, and allows alternatives for data collection and analysis. The programsupports the application of active learning strategies, bench marking of industry practices, andprovides a variety of tools to develop the desired student outcomes.Leadership Development Design The economics of running a small targeted program and the desire to graduate students ina

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Paper ID #7314Purdue University’s Engineering Leadership Program: Addressing the Short-fall of Engineering Leadership EducationAmadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede is a master’s student in civil engineering at Purdue University and a graduate research assistant for Engineering Leadership at Purdue’s newly created engineering leadership development pro- gram.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Monica F. Cox is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and is the inaugural director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, Virginia Tech; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

advanced, the need for leaderswith technical expertise to link technology and policy for sound, sustainable policy decisionscontinues to rise. Preparing the next generation of engineers to serve in societal leadership rolesis imperative if the United States is to maintain its global technological and financial edge; thisclaim is well documented by engineering educators, practitioners, and the Department ofDefense1-5.The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) 3 has called for a refinement to the education offuture engineers, setting a goal for having them more broadly educated and preparing them to“be leaders in business and public service.” 3 This call for more well-rounded engineers isnecessary to facilitate their preparation to serve in

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas; Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development, Engineering Leadership Development Division, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Immediate Past-President of WEPAN, was PI on Tech’s NSF ADVANCE grant, a member of the mathematical and statistical so- cieties Joint Committee on Women, and advises a variety of women and girl-serving STEM projects and organizations. She is a past Vice President of ASEE and current Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Dr. Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas Kim LaScola Needy is Dean of the Graduate School and International Education at the University of Arkansas. Prior to this appointment she was Department Head and 21st Century Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Pittsburgh

Conference Session

Insights and Practices for Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Paper ID #18730First Impressions: Evaluating Student Performance in Demonstrating Engi-neering LeadershipDr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Handley is currently the Associate Director of Engineering Leadership Outreach in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs at Penn State University. Meg received her PhD from Penn State University in Workforce Education where she studied interpersonal behaviors associated with engineering leadership. At Penn State, Meg teaches in the undergraduate Engineering Leadership Development Minor and the Engineering Leadership

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yazmin Montoya, LEAD; Aaron Eduardo Pacheco Rimada, University of Texas, El Paso; Erwin Ignacio Delgado, Univerity of Texas, El Paso ; Isaiah Nathaniel Webb; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

between traditional engineering education and what they will really experience in industry. Her research interests span the areas of engineering education, biomechanics, and product design methodology. Page 26.502.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing Leaders by Putting Students in the Curriculum Development Driver SeatAbstract   Upon graduation, engineers entering the workforce are not always trained to work in acollaborative environment where a detailed understanding of common business, projectmanagement, and leadership

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary B. Vollaro, Western New England University; Robert R. Klein, Western New England University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

leadershipprograms, Tonkay, G., and Zimmers, E.9 remarked that they “migrated their honors engineeringleadership program to the general engineering population because they found it was the middleof the class (who) tended to do quite well years after graduation, often advancing into positionsof leadership.”Although engineering leadership is viewed as important to a student’s professional skill set, thereare issues: limited room in engineering curriculums to dedicate time for a leadership course(s) 10;or engineering faculty may lack the background and training to effectively teach team skills tothe students11. These problems provide the impetus for new and innovative engineeringleadership programs.With leadership so closely intertwined with personal traits of

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Niño, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

nations. Ni˜no has published on the topics of organi- zational culture, courage, ethics, and the development of management and leadership skills. He holds a Ph.D. in Management from the University of Texas at Austin, where he also earned his B.A., B.B.A., and M.A. degrees. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing Engineering Leaders Using a Reflective Autobiographical Exercise David Niño, Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyThis paper describes an autobiographical exercise that helps engineering students build self-awareness of their distinctive leadership strengths and

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

organizations, served as a Director of Engineering in Worldwide Operations and a Product Line Director running a program management organization. Prior to joining Northeastern University, he was Senior Director of Product Management at the Satcon Technology Corporation, a leading maker of commercial solar inverters. Mr. Klosterman received a BSECE from the University of Cincinnati in 1983, and an SM in Engineering and Management from MIT in 2000 as a fellow in the Systems Design and Management (SDM) Program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing a Professional and Personal Network as a Method for Deepening Lessons in Engineering Leadership1

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Joshua Schmidt, Brigham Young University; Anton E. Bowden, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Outcomes Criterion Professional Skills from ABET General Criterion 3 3d An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 3f An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3g An ability to communicate effectively 3h The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context 3i A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning 3j A knowledge of contemporary issuesABET outcomes clearly demonstrate a focus on core technical skills as well as other skillsincluding leadership as indicated in Table 1.Preparing engineering graduates with the leadership skills necessary for real

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede is an MBA candidate in the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University. He obtained a

Conference Session

Insights and Practices for Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan R. Parkinson, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Randall Davies, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

given previously. It was felt that BYU students had high leadership potential and couldbenefit from some instruction and emphasis on this topic. Indeed, given the investment beingmade by others in their education (tuition at BYU is heavily subsidized), they were expected tobe leaders. Thus it was decided that all students should have some leadership training.Taking the class does not delay their graduation, as it counts for two general education (GE)requirements. However, it does preclude taking another GE course.The logistics, however, were daunting. Teaching this course to all students in the college meantproviding about 12 sections per year with 60-80 students in each section. The college startedslowly in 2006 with two sections per year and

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Lauderdale King, STEM Talent Expansion Program at LSU; Samantha Noelle Fadrigalan; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Summer Dann , Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

rates as well as supporting faculty with development of effective learning and teaching pedagogies. Page 24.1352.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Utilizing a Student Organization to Create a Self-Sustaining Mentorship Program in Engineering The goal of STEM Talent Expansion program at Louisiana State University (LSU) is toincrease the number of students graduating from the College of Engineering by providingcommunity building activities and programs between incoming students and the college staff,faculty and upper-class students. This

Conference Session

Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia; Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division, Minorities in Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering

. As part ofthis group, I regularly train men, both on- and off-campus, to better serve as gender equity allies.I am a member of the Commission on the Status of Women Faculty, a committee that works todevelop and enhance gender-equitable policies at North Dakota State University. I am primaryauthor of a series of broadly distributed advocacy tips, have participated in a national webinar onengaging male faculty as gender equity allies, and have given several conference presentationson the same topics. Additionally, I currently serve on the planning committee for the NSF-funded project Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE), which has thegoal of enhancing women participation and success in engineering programs.Dr. Holmes: I

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development: Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Tools

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Hu Yu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Tianyi Zheng, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Paper ID #18746Engineering Leadership in a Chinese Industrial Context: An Exploration us-ing the Four Capabilities ModelDr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013.Miss Hu Yu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yu Hu is a graduate student at the

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Carlson-Dakes, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Gregory W Harrington, Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ of Wisconsin - Madison

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

  Leadership development in tight times: Expanding our educational reach without watering it downAbstractThis paper addresses a challenge many universities face: How can we meet increasingdemands for undergraduate leadership development during a time of dwindling resources?Our alumni and industry partners tell us we need to graduate students with more leadershipexperience – yet we encounter a confluence of conflicting factors that make it difficult torespond accordingly. Leadership development is a long-term process in which studentsbenefit from early and ongoing engagement throughout college. Recommendations by theNational Academy of Engineering reinforce educational research that shows learning isenhanced by smaller classes, more direct