example, theproject was to fit inside of the existing SEEDPack, a backpack that includes solar panels topower battery chargers and educational tools5. The SEEDPack can provide 1.5 watts from eachof its three solar panels. Additionally, as the project was to be deployed in developing nations, ithad to be reasonably low cost, and could not rely on electrical infrastructure. Only human powerand the SEEDPack solar panels were acceptable sources of energy. The cost of the kit, limited to$1000, had to support not only the initial materials, but also sufficient replacement parts to beused heavily for roughly a year.The Lab was to provide as many different purification methods as possible, in addition toaddressing the many different ways that the
concepts. Miller (2004) reportedthat a slightly higher proportion of U.S. adults qualify as scientifically literate as compared toadults in Europe and Japan, and he attributed this to the fact that the U.S. is the only major nationthat requires general education science courses for liberal arts students. Hobson (2003)suggested that a scientific literacy course for a nontechnical audience should have four elements:a focus on concept rather than calculation, an “interactive, inquiry-oriented” teaching strategy, aninclusion of scientific findings that define a modern scientific world view, and presentation ofmaterial that is socially relevant. Zografakis et al. (2008) described a project showing thepositive effectiveness of “energy-thrift” education
2008; Barth et al.,2007)11,12, HERE’s co-curricular design takes students from energy audit service projectsthrough sustainability speakers to community service projects for Earth Day (e.g. tree plantingand stream clean-up).The HERE program culminates in a freshman design project that is both part of EM103 andexternal to it. Students in the cohort identify an authentic campus sustainability problem,determine specifications, and design a solution to be implemented in conjunction with the RHITFacilities Operations team. There are scores of potential projects on campus ranging fromlowering electrical costs, reducing waste, and reducing the carbon footprint of the campus.Grant money received from Proctor & Gamble will fund cohort-designed
example of how the EWB model can be incorporated into the curriculum has beendeveloped by Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). In the early 1970s, WPI transitioned to aproject-based curriculum, from which their Global Perspective Program (GPP) was established[2]. This program allows students to travel abroad and work on open-ended projects whilesatisfying general educational and engineering requirements. The program is designed to meetmany of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requirements, andself-evaluation in students’ final reports indicate that off-campus projects are consistently higherquality than those completed on campus [2].The WPI program is specifically geared toward engineering, and while it has been
Paper ID #22698Board 99 : Collaboratively Developing an Introductory InfrastructureSystems Curriculum: The One Water ModuleDr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Philip Parker, Ph.D., P.E., is Program Coordinator for the Environmental Engineering program at the Uni- versity of Wisconsin-Platteville. He is co-author of the textbook ”Introduction to Infrastructure” published in 2012 by Wiley. He has helped lead the recent efforts by the UW-Platteville Civil and Environmental Engineering department to revitalize their curriculum by adding a sophomore-level infrastructure course and integrating
-energy design project. This curriculum model is easily transferable to other engineeringdisciplines. However, academic departments must be cognizant of the potential strain placed onavailable student resources if this model is implemented too broadly.(2) Background Facilitating learning for novice designers can be difficult and a delicate balance between self-directed learning and coaching; the advisor must build the student’s confidence in seeking andovercoming independent intellectual challenges. One of the hardest things to teach is how torecognize and deconstruct a problem. Novice designers may focus on generating solutionsinstead of fully understanding or analyzing a problem.3 Furthermore, Smith et al. suggest thatstudents’ lack of
treatment units, alternativecollection systems, and effluent dispersal and reuse options. During the course, studentsare expected to demonstrate that they can: (1) describe multiple treatment units,collection approaches, and effluent dispersal and reuse options for onsite/decentralizedsanitation; (2) evaluate advantages and disadvantages of options; (3) identify and userelevant design equations; (4) consider socio-cultural contexts; and (5) work in teams towrite a project report and present their findings.In 2016, to help students think holistically about the integration of decentralizedtechnologies in a variety of contexts, a new instructor placed increased emphasis onintegrating non-technical concepts into the course curriculum, to include socio
School of Information Science and Learning Technology (SISLT) in the College of Education at the University of Missouri, Columbia, (USA). Shortly thereafter, she began working with an Environmental Engineering Professor to provide a formative evaluation of his course, using the ABET framework as a lens for assessment. She began researching engineering education, specifically exploring the implementation of Problem-based Learning (PBL) to help prepare students to meet the ABET stan- dards. She is currently working as a graduate assistant for the eThemes project while completing her comprehensive examination, research proposal, and dissertation.Ms. Sara Elizabeth Ringbauer, University of Missouri - Columbia Sara
Page 11.1053.2community of the 21st century2. The element of “taking an active role in the community” hasbeen incorporated into the engineering curriculum through service learning projects that bothsupport the course outcomes and benefit the community. Numerous examples of these type ofresearch and design projects have been described in previous ASEE conference papers andassessment of the service learning projects by community sponsors, faculty, alumni, and studentshas been very positive.3,4,5 However, most of the projects focused on the Greater Hartford areaand do not give the students a perspective of the global challenges they will face throughout theirengineering career.To meet the goal of providing our students with an opportunity to work
AC 2012-4161: A WIRELESS SENSOR NODE POWERED BY SOLAR HAR-VESTER FOR MARINE ENVIRONMENT MONITORING AS A SENIORDESIGN PROJECTDr. Radian G. Belu, Drexel University Radian Belu is Assistant Professor within the Engineering Technology (ET) program at Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA. He is holding the second position as Research Assistant Professor at Desert Research Institute, Renewable Energy Center, Reno, Nev. Before joining Drexel University, Belu held faculty and research positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada, and the United States. He also worked for several years in industry as a project manager and senior consultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and graduate
integrated the design process into the curriculum for each separate course, with specificfocus on certain stages of the design process in each course. Sustainability content in each coursefocused on energy, water, carbon, biodiversity, and food production in the context of global,regional, or local case studies. Design-based content includes project definition, exploration ofsolutions, proposal development, design validation, and reporting through oral and writtencommunication. To assess the first year of this new approach, we conducted pre- and post-surveysfor all students in the cohort. The surveys include content-based material to measure knowledgeattained, as well as perspectives on sustainability in engineering to observe any changes from
Making/ Judgmentdomains. The maximum possible sub-scores are 20 points each. In the Information Collectiondomain the 4 sub-scores are experiment (ES), ideation (EN), knowledge (IS), and imagination(IN). These scores are then used to classify the student into nine different roles. Similarly, in thedecision making domain the four sub-scores are organization (ET), community (EF), analysis(IT), and evaluation (IF), which are used to classify the student into nine different roles. Onlypositive sub-scores are recorded.In 2007, the cognitive survey was given out on the first day of the team landfill project, and thedifferences in personality type discussed to a small degree. The teams had already been formed.The algorithm used to form the teams was
analysis, Content-Knowledge, named in four different levels. These domains andsome examples are represented in Table 3 for Attitude-Behavior and Skills. Figure 3. Domains and components found in the inductive analysis.Table 3 Some project examples for the subdomains for Attitude-Behavior and Skills Frame of Analysis Domain Examples Attitude-Behavior Awareness Nodal points awareness of complexity [29], Eco-Factory [30], and BINKA curriculum (Mindfulness) [31] Sustainability Education in an Environment Social Justice/ values of Diversity
. After research stays at the NASA Ames Research Center/ California and the Georgia Institute of Technology/Atlanta, she gained a doctorate on ”Mathematics in Virtual Knowledge Environments” in 2004. Following a junior professorship (2005-2007) at the TU Berlin with the construction and direction of its media center, she was head of the Institute of Information Technology Services (IITS) for electrical engineering at the University of Stuttgart from May 2007 to May 2009, where she was also the director of the Central Information Technology Services (RUS) at the same time. Some of the main areas of her research are complex IT-systems (e.g. cloud computing, Internet of Things, green IT & ET, semantic web services
AC 2007-318: INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM TEACHING: LESSONS FORENGINEERING INSTRUCTORS FROM A CAPSTONE COURSE INENVIRONMENTAL STUDIESDavid Braun, California Polytechnic State University David Braun is a Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo. He worked at Philips Research Labs in Eindhoven, the Netherlands from 1992 to 1996, after completing the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at U.C. Santa Barbara. Please see www.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/ for information about his courses, teaching interests, and research.Emmit B. Evans, California Polytechnic State University Bud Evans teaches Contemporary Global Political Issues, World Food Systems, the Global Environment
this appreciation out intofuture careers. Over the three-year duration of this project 24 new courses have been introducedinto the university curriculum. Specifically within the Carnegie Institute of Technology (theengineering college), two courses became part of this program to be taught to students withmajors outside the engineering program as a technical elective for arts and humanities degreerequirements.These two engineering courses lend themselves to what has been termed a new “metadiscipline”of sustainability science and engineering1 which merges engineering, environmental, and socialconcepts into an integrated course. Incorporating environmental and social concepts intoengineering courses has been a growing interest for several years
, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19253Dr. Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University Jeong-Hee Kim is Professor of Curriculum Studies and Teacher Education in the Department of Cur- riculum and Instruction at Texas Tech University. Kim is a curriculum theorist, teacher educator, and narrative inquiry methodologist. Her research centers on various epistemological underpinnings of cur- riculum studies, particularly engaging in hermeneutical excavation of the stories of
of PBL. Instructional Science, 1997. 25(6): p. 387-408.13. Kolmos, A. and J.E. Holgaard, Responses to Problem Based and Project Organised Learning from Industry. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 26(3): p. 573-583.14. Pan, W. and J. Allison, Exploring Project Based and Problem Based Learning in Environmental Building Education by Integrating Critical Thinking. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 26(3): p. 547-553.15. Newstetter, W.C., Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: The PBL approach. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2006. 34(2): p. 217-225.16. Yadav, A., et al., Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical
projects byfully measuring the impact of sustainable initiatives and adding value for stakeholders. Page 23.455.8Bibliography1 Eagan P., M. Gustafson and C. Vieth. (2012). Building a Competency Model for Sustainability” in ProceedingsElectronics Goes Green Conference 2012+. Ed. K. Lang, N. Nissen, A. Middendorf and P. Chancerel (FraunhoferVerlag). ISBN 978-3-8396-0439-7.2 McClelland, D.C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.3 Eagan et al. Page 23.455.9
debate has progressedbeyond the existence of global climate change and has begun to focus on solutions, there is atremendous opportunity for engineering students to contribute in significant ways to thesediscussions. Informed participation, however, requires these students to be educated, not just onthe science of global climate change, but on energy and policy as well.The pedagogical approaches proven to increase students’ environmental and energy literacyprovide a framework for strengthening their climate science literacy. Project-based learning hasbeen suggested as the most effective approach for teaching and learning science process skillsand content. 10 The curriculum is generally centered on a relevant real-life problem. Studentslearn and
STEM education, with a focus on engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Dr. Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University Jeong-Hee Kim is Professor of Curriculum Studies and Teacher Education in the Department of Curricu- lum and Instruction at Texas Tech University. Kim is a curriculum theorist, teacher educator, and narra- tive inquiry methodologist. Her research centers on various epistemological underpinnings of curriculum studies, particularly engaging in hermeneutical excavation of the stories of students and teachers around the notion of
associated with developing an outdoor lab for environmental monitoring will belisted. In the following section, the design of LEWAS to overcome these challenges will bereviewed. In the following section, ongoing challenges associated with implementing LEWASwill be listed. Finally attitudinal data collected from students on LEWAS in the freshmanengineering course will be reflected upon and its educational applications in energy andenvironmental sustainability will be discussed.Educational Context of LEWAS and Prior Programming InitiativesA few years before implementation of LEWAS, a number of program-wide hands-on activitieswere developed and implemented in the freshman engineering program of Virginia Tech as aresult of an NSF funded curriculum
curricula along with undergraduate and graduateprogram minors which add value to students’ major fields of study. There is no questionthat the future of human societies on the planet demands a dedication to sustainablepractices like never before. To the extent that university academic programs cancontribute to these present and future oriented activities, a course on industrial ecology isan important addition to a university curriculum.1. Bruntland, G., et al., World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future,Oxford University Press, Oxford, 400 pp. (1987) Page 14.732.52. Hardin, G. “Tragedy of the Commons.” Science, 162, 1243-1248 (1968
University of Colorado Boulder.Twenty-five survey items were used to measure four sub-components of sustainable engineeringmotivation, single items were used to measure global interests and interdisciplinary value, andnine items evaluated consideration for others. Sustainable engineering self-efficacy, value, andnegative attitudes were similar among students in all three majors. Environmental engineeringstudents had higher scores than civil and architectural engineering majors in sustainableengineering affect and overall motivation. Interest in working on projects outside the U.S. washigh, without significant differences between environmental, civil, and architectural engineeringstudents. Interdisciplinary value was the higher among environmental
the LEWAS into freshman- level courses at Virginia Western Community College and a senior level hydrology course at Virginia Tech.Mr. Daniel S Brogan, VIrginia Tech Daniel S. Brogan is a PhD student, advised by Dr. Lohani, in Engineering Education with BS and MS degrees in Electrical Engineering. He has completed several graduate courses in engineering education pertinent to this research. He is the key developer of the OWLS and leads the LEWAS lab development and implementation work. He has mentored two NSF/REU Site students in the LEWAS lab. He assisted in the development and implementation of curricula for introducing the LEWAS at VWCC including the development of pre-test and post-test assessment questions
purposes, they arenot harnessing the full pedagogical potential of LMS tools [15]. The hybrid approach hasresulted in increases in student-led learning [17], enhancements in student achievement,motivation and satisfaction [18, 19] and increases in student enrollment [20]. Research hasindicated that students’ perceptions and attitudes about the hybrid approach compared to face-to-face learning, are favorable and acceptable for the discipline of environmental engineering [21].However, the same study was not able to statistically prove that the hybrid option improved thequality of teaching and learning [21].The current project combined traditional face-to-face lecturing with voluntary on-line tutorials(short PowerPoint videos). Video lectures are
Bhutanese- Nepali Christian Media Ministries, which utilizes online media to address needs in Christian ministries for people in these language groups. Prior to June 2010, he was a graduate student at the University of New Hampshire, where he earned his BS and MS degrees in electrical engineering.Mr. Akshat Kothyari, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Akshat Kothyari is a Ph.D. student in Industrial and Systems Education at Virginia Tech. He received his B.Eng. in Manufacturing Engineering and M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering. His research interests includes theory and application of mathematical programming techniques in solving production and logistics based problems.Dr. Vinod K. Lohani
integration of sustainability intoexisting engineering disciplines is made by Kirby et al: “The future of sustainable design will highly depend on institutions of higher education incorporating green concepts into the curriculum. Academic institutions can contribute to the acceptance of sustainability in architectural and engineering design by offering courses and programs on the subject.”3ABET has also acknowledged the need for the integration of sustainability into engineeringprograms by including it in general criteria. Within the accreditation criteria effective for the2008-2009 accreditation cycle, Criterion 3 (Program Outcomes) specifically addressessustainability within all baccalaureate level programs. Criterion 3
. For example, the LLC at one institution, is a living-learning community forfirst year students focused around deep learning of sustainability.30,31Education should always encompass assessment, and EfS is no exception. Assessment ofaffective outcomes poses challenges. In recent work, McCormick et al.27 developed a surveyinstrument based on Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)17 to measure students’ attitudes towardsustainable engineering. This instrument formed the foundation for this study. EVT posits thatbehaviors are chosen based on an individual’s beliefs about the value of the goal toward whichthe behavior contributes and their expectations for successfully reaching that goal. EVT has beenapplied in educational contexts, and links motivation for