Paper ID #19946The Role of Trust in Collaborative Research Settings: Opportunities for Fu-ture Research in Graduate Engineering EducationCarey WhitehairDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is a Research Associate in the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engi- neering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including
Paper ID #10779Snapshot of an interdisciplinary graduate engineering education experienceTasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tasha Zephirin is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is currently a participant in the National Science Foundation sponsored Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training in Magnetic and Nanostructured Materials (IGERT-MNM) program-a collaborative ef- fort between Purdue University, Cornell University and Norfolk State University. Her research interests include the development, evaluation, and assessment of co-curricular and extra
Paper ID #26257Putting Discussion-Based Engineering Education Courses OnlineDr. Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University Audeen Fentiman is the Crowley Family Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She served as Associate Dean of Engineering for Graduate Education and Interdisciplinary Programs at Purdue from 2006 through 2017. Dr. Fentiman is a Fellow of the American Nuclear Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Materials
India.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice
AC 2010-2158: IMPROVING FUTURE FACULTY WITH GRADUATEENGINEERING EDUCATIONAndrea Burrows, The University of CincinnatiAnant Kukreti, The University of CincinnatiMike Borowczak, The University of CincinnatiAmr Safwat, The University of Cincinnati Page 15.696.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Improving Future Faculty with Graduate Engineering EducationAbstractOne of the major missing links in today’s graduate engineering curriculum is the lack ofeffective preparation of students who plan on entering into academia upon graduation. Whileclasses exist to prepare future engineering faculty, these classes are often taught by currentfaculty members with limited breadth
-authored the paper nominated by the ASEE Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for ASEE Best PIC Paper for 2018. Most recently, she received her school’s Award for Excellence in Mentoring, Award for Leadership, and a 2019 award from the College of Engineering as an Outstanding Faculty Mentor of Engineering Graduate Stu- dents. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
further information by reading articles and booksabout various empirically tested teaching methodologies.For these reasons, it is important to expose prospective engineering faculty toconstructive discussions of effective engineering education pedagogy and theory. In thepracticum course discussed in this paper, discussions about active learning approacheswere supplemented by relevant literature reading assignments. In addition, the GTAsreflected on their teaching practices and experiences to improve student learning. Thisallowed the GTAs to collaboratively analyze their implemented teaching methodologieswith their peers. This form of formative assessment further facilitated modification ofvarious active learning approaches to best fit in
University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $11.4 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received the William Elgin Wickenden Award for the Best Paper in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and multiple conference Best Paper awards. Dr. Ohland is Chair of ASEE’s Educational Research and Methods division and an At-Large member
read andreflected on the co-operative inquiry method before and was keen to explore the inquiry domain:experiences of ESL students in the engineering education discipline. Then, the initiatorresearcher called for collaborators who were likely to share the keenness of the topic. After the collaborators responded to the initiator’s call, the initiator talked to eachindividual separately and discussed the goal in mind and asked for their insights and feedback.The first meeting was then scheduled and all the researchers participated. We talked about theindividual’s interest in this topic, the detail of what this co-operative inquiry is in terms ofdefining the phases of experiencing and reflecting and the procedures for conducting the
AC 2012-5183: EASING INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN ORIEN-TATION PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSStephanie Cutler, Virginia TechWalter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a Graduate Assistant and doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His pri- mary research interests focus on diversity and student retention. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Page 26.1608.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Tricks of the
: ● Commitment to a shared domain of interest and sense of belonging may be supported through sharing motivations for becoming an engineering education researcher, personal experiences of impact and persistence in the face of challenges, and learning and collaboration strategies. ● Building relationships and community interactions may be supported through creating opportunities for diverse interactions that support deep discussion and personal connections, and sharing experiences with navigating the community and collaborating with others who may have different backgrounds and experiences. ● Shared repertoires of practice may be supported through sharing stories that reveal the nature of
other’s scholarly, professional and personal development through collaboration, encouragement, knowledge sharing, and critical and reflective analysis as we contribute to the engineering education discipline. Page 25.677.2About GEECSThe first meeting of what would become GEECS was held in early 2010 through the facilitationof two engineering education faculty members. The goal was to provide a space and opportunityfor collaboration among EER graduate students in both engineering education departments andthose who were dispersed among contributing disciplines. From 2010 to 2011, the organizationformalized, selected a name, and
engineering backgrounds. Inculcating AM education at the undergraduate, graduate,and professional levels could be a thought catalyst for engineering majors from diversebackgrounds and enable collaboration within different engineering sciences. The purpose of thispaper is to review literature surrounding of additive manufacturing education, with particularfocus on graduate education as a venue to educate a specialized expert workforce. Further, weidentify several key areas where foundational engineering education research can help to highlightand shape AM as an emergent field, including opportunities for learning science, online education,and workforce development; the development of interdisciplinary and agile expertise; andconsidering belongingness
of practice for Mechanical Engineering faculty dedicated to continuous quality improvement in pedagogy; and leading and evaluating emerging educational technology innovations such as digital badges, adaptive learning, and learning analytics. She conducts research related to the scholarship of teaching and learning in Mechanical Engineering in order to improve practice in the department and con- tribute to the national and international Engineering Education research community through presentations and publications.Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University and is the
suggests the needto develop faculty interaction with students. While these environments are known to be morenurturing than predominantly white institutions, maybe they have become too relaxed inaggressively guiding students towards degree completion. Until there is a shift in the HBCUenvironment (faculty interaction) on the undergraduate level, there will continue to be a lack ofgraduate level degrees offered and earned at these institutions compared to PWIs.Bibliography1. Splitt, F.G. The Challenge to Change: on realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education. April 2003.2. Anderson, M.S. (1996). “Collaboration, the Doctoral Experience, and the Departmental Environment.” Review of Higher
Materials Shared University Research Committee; Ph.D. Recruiting Coordinator for IBM’s Systems Technology Division; and executive sponsor for 3M division’s student programs. He has published and presented widely in areas of surface science, electronic materials and processes, project management, and industry/university relations. He holds 4 patents and has received awards for excellence in technical innovation (IBM), technical authorship (IBM), teaching (University of Colorado), and scholarship (National Science Foundation). Page 14.666.1© American Society for Engineering Education
at Purdue University. Her research interests include vocational choice in engineering, human-artifact interaction, and engineering and public policy.Ms. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship. Page 25.621.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Exploring the Reasons for Collaboration and Cooperation among Graduate Student
Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Engineering Institute – A Collaborative Graduate Education and Research ProgramAbstractLos Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD)have taken the unprecedented step of creating a collaborative, multi-disciplinary graduateeducation program and associated research agenda called the Engineering Institute. Thetechnology thrust of the Engineering Institute is damage prognosis, a multidisciplinaryengineering science concerned with assessing the current condition and predicting the remaininglife of a wide variety of structural systems. The mission of the Engineering Institute is todevelop a comprehensive approach for
even hard to get recognition for a sabbatical in industry … Please understand that I am not criticizing the current faculty. I am one of them, and I respect my colleagues greatly. Rather, I am criticizing a system that prevents us from enriching faculty with a complementary set of experiences and talents.”B) Responsive Universities ─Relevancy to the Creative Professions in the 21st CenturyThe National Collaborative agrees with president Wulf’s point of view of the need for watershed reformin the U.S. system of engineering education and suggests as the Kellogg Commission has pointed out ─in order to remain relevant to their constituencies, and to be more effective ─ universities must change.2Whereas universities have traditionally
AC 2007-342: FACULTY REWARD SYSTEM REFORM FOR ADVANCEMENT OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR INNOVATION:REVISITING THE URGENCY FOR REFORMDennis Depew, Purdue University DENNIS R. DEPEW is dean of the college of technology, Purdue University.Gary Bertoline, Purdue University GARY R. BERTOLINE is professor and assistant dean for graduate studies of the college of technology, Purdue University.Mark Schuver, Purdue University MARK T. SCHUVER is director of the Rolls-Royce-Purdue Master’s degree program, Purdue University.Donald Keating, University of South Carolina DONALD A. KEATING is associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of South Carolina, and chair ASEE-Graduate
early career development responsibilities to reach their creative andinnovative potentials, to do “over-the-horizon” engineering, and to become creators, innovatorsand leaders of new technology innovations throughout their professional careers, then thisrequires universities to create a new type of professional education for lifelong learning as alogical progression of growth beyond the professional masters level.3.2 Reshaping Professional Engineering Education for Creative PracticeTo meet the challenge, the National Collaborative Task Force is engaged in a complex projectthat requires a total systems approach. The stakes to enhance the innovative capacity of the U.S.engineering workforce for competitiveness are high.Broad sweeping changes are
26.204.1 tunity to present at a regional and national conference and she has conducted research internationally. In addition, Ms. Hester is a licensed graduate social worker (LGSW) in the state of Maryland and pro- vides outpatient mental health treatment to members in underserved communities. Contact information: shawnisha@gmail.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An NSF AGEP Program’s Unintended Effect on Broadening Participation: Transforming “Non-STEM” Graduate Students into Engineering Education Faculty, Researchers, K-12 Educators, and Advocates Introduction The National Science Foundation’s Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP
Paper ID #19209Knowing Our Story: Framing a Cooperative Inquiry Project to Explore thePersonal Growth of Graduate Students in Engineering EducationMr. Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Richard J. Aleong is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his M.A.Sc. and B.Sc.E in Mechanical and Materials Engineering from Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada. His research interests are focused on integrative thinking and design, interdisciplinary collaboration, and curriculum development to support students’ personal and professional learning
AC 2009-623: STRENGTHENING THE U.S. ENGINEERING WORKFORCE FORTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION: PROFESSIONAL GRADUATE ENGINEERINGEDUCATION THAT SUPPORTS THE METHOD ENGINEERS USE TO CREATE,DEVELOP, AND INNOVATE NEW TECHNOLOGYThomas Stanford, University of South CarolinaDonald Keating, University of South CarolinaRoger Olson, Rolls-Royce Corporation Page 14.1077.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Strengthening the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Technology Innovation:Professional Graduate Engineering Education that Supports the MethodEngineers Use to Create, Develop, and Innovate New Technology1. IntroductionThe National Collaborative is creating and implementing a new model
AC 2008-557: GRADUATE LEARNING THROUGH ENGAGEMENT:EXPERIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING STATION DESIGNJeffrey Marston, Western Carolina UniversityBrian Howell, Western Carolina UniversityJames Zhang, Western Carolina UniversityRoger Clapp, WATR Page 13.650.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008Graduate Learning through Engagement: Experience in Environmental Remote Sensing Station Design Jeffrey Marston†, Brian Howell†, James Z. Zhang†, and Roger B. Clapp‡ † Department of Engineering and Technology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723 ‡ Watershed Association of the Tuckaseegee River, Bryson City, NC
directs the Graduate Student Professional Development program and instructs Purdue’s Preparing Future Faculty course and the Preparing Future Professionals course, designed to facilitate graduate students transition into faculty positions and non-academic positions respectively. Lynch’s re- search focuses on doctoral student engagement and assessment of doctoral student learning outcomes in identified best practices, including mentoring, developing effective writing strategies, orientations and transition courses, and doctoral student professional development.Jiabin Zhu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jiabin Zhu is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She obtained a B.S. in
development center for a multi-national glass company. Page 14.890.1Eric Skaar, Clemson University Eric C. Skaar holds B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Ceramic and Materials Engineering from Alfred University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. Dr. Skaar has over 20 years of experience in the Ceramic and Materials Engineering field, including 16 years in his current© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 position as a faculty member of the Gilbert C. Robinson Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Clemson University. He has served for two years as a staff
teaching environment. Page 14.654.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 GRADUATE EDUCATION IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT: SUCCESS ONLINE ABSTRACTThis paper will describe the use of videoconferencing software to present synchronous distancelearning graduate classes in a construction management department at a Purdue university.Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional allows the faculty to use a hybrid synchronous, interactivedelivery model for this department’s masters program. Synchronous distance education connectsstudents and professors in real-time. It allows
AC 2009-510: GROWING PAINS: MANAGING RAPID GROWTH IN AGRADUATE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMJoy Colwell, Purdue University, Calumet Page 14.661.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Growing Pains: Managing Rapid Growth in a Graduate Engineering Technology ProgramAbstractThe School of Technology at Purdue University Calumet offers a newly approved Master ofScience degree in Technology. The Master’s program has experienced dramatic growth, withthe enrollment of graduate students rising in a few short months from 28 in Spring 08 to 69 inFall 08. This paper will explore the growth in enrollments, and discuss the challenges andmethods