Paper ID #41719”Ima Nmadu”: Building Academic Success Through Relationships—A BlackCivil Engineering Ph.D. Student’s Autoethnographic InsightsMiss Mary Ifeoma Nwanua, University of Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024"Ima Nmadu": Building Academic Success Through Relationships - A BlackCivil Engineering Ph.D. Student's Autoethnographic Insights Mary Ifeoma NwanuaDivision: Graduate StudiesAbstractThe need to diversify the engineering workforce is a national imperative, emphasizing broadeningparticipation and fostering inclusivity. Achieving this goal necessitates
results – at least in part – from the primarily localized focus of previous research focusing on only a single domain (e.g., one academic department, only institutional academic policies, and not institutional culture, or on faculty experiences alone), one point in time, and through the lens of primarily sociocultural and cultural-historical perspectives despite calls for systems analyses. Typical research also focuses on learning outcomes, pathways, relationships, identities, and motivations separately (i.e., not as parts of systems or as multiple interrelated aspects of development more broadly) and passively (i.e., typically from the perspectives of faculty and not students
Paper ID #43481”How You Got Me Messed Up”: A Critical Analysis of Doctoral EngineeringEducation through the Lens of Black PhD CandidatesMrs. Crystal Alicia Nattoo, Stanford University Crystal Nattoo (she/her) is a first-generation college student from South Florida. She graduated with her bachelors from the University of Miami in 2019 as an Electrical Engineering (EE) major and Graphic Design minor. She then received her EE M.S. degree at Stanford University in 2021, and is currently continuing in the EE Ph.D program. Her current research focuses on the fabrication and characterization of flexible sensors and circuits using
next cohort.To aid in the recruitment of mentors, they were offered an honorarium because of the timecommitment required beyond a traditional mentoring program. Fig. 1. Social media post to recruit participants.Trainings and OrientationsOrientations were offered to both mentors and mentees and are described below.Mentor TrainingMentors were trained to guide and coach their mentees through the GSAP and give feedbackalong the way on everything from creating a strong personal statement to how to handlemitigating factors like a low GPA. These meetings were recorded for mentors that were not ableto attend live.The orientation had the goals of creating community among the mentors, overview of theprogram content and timeline
Professional Development Course Series for all engineering graduate students. Assanah’s research focuses on synthesizing hydrogels to mimic the mechanical behavior of the brain matter and investigate the cellular response to injury. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Cultivating Scientific Communication Skills through Professional Development Course Series for the Graduate CurriculumBritney Russell, University of ConnecticutBritney Russell is a doctoral student in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Universityof Connecticut. She was a teaching assistant for the First Year Experience, ScientificCommunication, and Engineering Internships and Careers in Industry courses that
Conferences.[22] Eun, B., The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizingVygotsky's theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory 2019 51 (1), 18-30DOI:10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941 https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941.[23] Siddique, Z.; Panchal, J.; Schaefer, D.; Haroon, S.; Allen, J. K.; Mistree, F. In Competencies forInnovating in the 21st Century, ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences andComputers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2012; pp 185-196.[24] National Academies of Sciences, E.; Medicine, Advancing Antiracism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusionin STEMM Organizations: Beyond Broadening Participation. The National Academies Press
miserable,depicting these negative themes through combinations of text and images called memes. Memesin this context are a symbolic language that is used to convey cultural ideas through establishedtemplates that draw from pop-culture media and various youth subcultures. Through thismedium, graduate student share and process their experiences communally, using memes as acoping mechanism. Collectively, students tend to acknowledge that the culture around graduateschool is bad, identifying excessive workloads, under pay, difficult advisor relationships, and anunhealthy glorification of “grind culture”. However, less is known about how students navigateand respond to this culture.In this work, we performed a mixed method study triangulating survey and
Paper ID #43390Increasing Teaching Efficacy in Engineering Graduate Students through theDevelopment and Facilitation of Summer Middle and High School STEMExperienceDr. Jamie R. Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a faculty member in the Engineering and Computing Education Program. She is the Associate Director STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT). She also serves as the Director for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to
collective impact activities that expand the national pipeline into STEM careers. College student development and Faculty career development are central themes across her body of work.Dr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant- funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEMPraveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Char- lotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University. She is also the Co-Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering at Louisiana Tech.Mr. Casey Kidd, Louisiana Tech University Casey Kidd is a graduate student in the College of Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. His focus is on project-based learning. He earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in Spring of 2004.Mrs. Lindsay K. Gouedy, Louisiana Tech University Lindsay Gouedy is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, serving as a National Security Fellow at Air Force Global Strike Command, specializing in virtual reality (VR) training methodologies. Concurrently
(RQs): RQ1: How effective is the first iteration of workshops in fostering student learning outcomes in intercultural competence, community-engaged practice, and qualitative data analysis? RQ2: How did the workshops promote transdisciplinary approaches to climate change solutions?Future environmental professionals will need a broad understanding of the dynamicrelationships across natural, social, and engineering systems. These workshops represent ascalable curriculum that can be offered to graduate students from diverse disciplines as a co-curricular dimension to their degree plans. Through the completion of these workshops, theintent is to help grow students as future environmental professionals who will
disaster losses and promote collective well-being 10 .Going beyond conceptualization into implementation needs coherent methodologies anddedicated training programs in STEM education. The United States National Science Foundation(NSF) is aware of this need. NSF is currently administering a funding program to support NSFResearch Traineeship Programs (NRT) which are “dedicated to effective training of STEMgraduate students in high priority interdisciplinary or convergent research areas 11 .” NorthAmerican research universities are designing graduate programs with similar objectives. Forinstance, one university implemented a year-long research experience to teach graduate andundergraduate students about interdisciplinary research, responsible conduct
Alabama. She also has a bachelor’s and master’s degree in industrial engineering from Anna University and Auburn University, respectively.Ms. Kourtney Rogers Gruner, Texas A&M University Ms. Kourtney Gruner is the Assistant Director of the Master of Industrial Distribution (MID) program in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution (ETID) in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. With over 17 years of higher education program experience in Engineering, Kourtney has a wide range of experience in recruitment and outreach, learning and development, event planning, advising, student services, and faculty development. She serves the MID Program and its students through
experiences and the graduate student role in them,more studies need to be done focusing on the unique role of the graduate student as bridgementor within a mentoring triad. A better understanding of the role of graduate students as bridgementors can lead to better preparation for undergraduate research experiences and thereforebetter outcomes for all stakeholders.References[1] B. L. Montgomery and S. C. Page, Mentoring beyond hierarchies: Multi-Mentor Systems and Models, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/25568/Montgomery%20and%20Page%20- %20Mentoring.pdf (accessed Nov. 20, 2023).[2] Sobieraj, K. S., & Kajfez, R. L. (2020, June). Using Qualitative Techniques to Understand the Types of Undergraduate Research Mentorship. In 2020
post- 1. Population targeted are graduates K-12 students or 2. Mention of workforce undergraduates development program 2. Does not mention 3. A program based in the United workforce development States program 4. Eliminate book reviews, non-peer 3. Literature is non-peer- reviewed papers, talks, technical reviewed reports, and datasets
, as reasoning and emotion are ofteninterwoven. Newly enrolled doctoral candidates were asked to explain ‘why a PhD’ usingLEGO® pieces to help them express beyond words, with constructions, through similes andmetaphors. The use of LEGO® was intentional for two reasons: it gave them a visual andkinesthetic outlet for enhancing and deepening their reflections and message; and it put themat ease, in ‘play mode’, which allowed them to access aspects of their psyche not typicallyexploited in technical conversations. They constructed stories, created characters, andproduced metaphors to channel and express what their motivations, drives and purpose were.The most common types of metaphors used were visual, ontological and spatially related.Their
, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. She is the recipient ofthe Robert Newby Award for Diversity Efforts, the Central Michigan University College ofGraduate Studies 2019 Outstanding Dissertation Award, a Central Michigan UniversityDepartment of Educational Leadership Faculty Endowed Award and is consistently motivated bythe distinction of her University of the West Indies Most All-Round Social Policy Student award.Dr Benjamin is a previous New York City Teaching Fellow and a current member of theinaugural American Society for Engineering Education Post-Doctoral E-Fellowship. Through herscholarship, she explores matters related to minoritized
Paper ID #41393Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT): Addressing the National AcademiesRecommendationsDr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant-funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEM teaching and learning.Praveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Charlotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational
understand how the instruments work. That really gives you an idea, I mean, of how these things work in the field and what processes you need to go through physically. It's one thing to just sit there and learn about it, but it's another thing to actually go there and experience it. And I think that helps you connect the dots more. [Student A]While students believed that the demonstrations contributed to their learning of the coursecontent, students had no comment on the implications for building trust and community.Students were then asked about the utility of GSRSs for community building, including whetherthese games made students more willing to speak up later on in class, and whether they helpedstudents to become more
opportunities, especiallythrough teaching assistantships, are thought to be abundant, ensuring financial support for doctoralstudents. Communication of expectations is maintained largely through the graduate coordinator'sefforts, but participants express a need for the availability of structured procedures and establishedprotocols for addressing more serious issues or concerns. While a certain level of unfamiliaritywith climate surveys still exists, there are doubts about their transparency and accountability, withlimited mechanisms for feedback beyond annual reports and surveys.In comparison, it is of interest to note that faculty and doctoral students emphasized differentcomponents or areas of similar issues. The faculty perspective emphasizes a
the success of this project.References 1. V. L. Baker and K. A. Griffin, “Beyond mentoring and advising: Toward understanding the role of faculty ‘developers’ in student success.,” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2–8, 2010. 2. K. M. Thomas, L. A. Willis, and J. Davis, “Mentoring minority graduate students: Issues and strategies for institutions, faculty, and students,” Equal Opportunities International, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 178–192, 2007. 3. L. F. Alcocer and A. Martinez, “Mentoring hispanic students: A literature review,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 393–401, 2017. 4. I. Villanueva, L. Gelles, M. Di Stefano, B. Smith, R. Tull, S. Lord, L
and nature. She is fascinated with how people and organizations learn and develop in ways that enable them to thrive. Rebecca’s career began in environmental education and outreach at places like the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and at a university in China, where her primary assignment as a Peace Corps Volunteer was environmental education. In 2009, she went on to work with the Institute of Environmental Decisions at ETH Zurich and, then, to earn her PhD at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, studying out-of-classroom science education. In 2017, she joined the Wisconsin Evaluation Collaborative, where she continues to support education programs through research and evaluation. She has published and
tointroduce students to a wide range of services and resources that are freely available through theuniversity such as mental health services and financial literacy. A secondary goal is to developthe incoming graduate student’s network at the university and beyond their departmentalresources. With such a short period of time with the students (about 6 weeks), the program aimsfor a balanced approach towards goals in resource recognition and career preparation andnetworking. As can be seen in Table 2, there are numerous activities, resources, seminars/workshopsthat can be introduced to incoming graduate students. This is to highlight that this programmingcan be easily tailored depending on what the graduate programs would like to highlight for
developmental psychology at the University of Wisconsin—Madison. She uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to understand psychological gender differences, how they develop and shape participation in STEM, and how we can intervene to expand women’s and girl’s participation in STEM. She has written extensively on implementing intersectionality within social sciences research and adapting quantitative as well as qualitative methods to do so. Else-Quest is currently PI on two grants from the National Science Foundation, both focused on developing and implementing interventions to improve girls’ and women’s participation and persistence in STEM education from elementary school through doctoral training. In
,” Assessment & Evaluation in HigherEducation, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 523-539, 2022.[14] Guy Curtis, Margot McNeill, Christine Slade, Kell Tremayne, Rowena Harper, KiataRundle, “Moving beyond self-reports to estimate the prevalence of commercial contractcheating: an Australian study,” Studies in Higher Education, Volume 47, Issue 9, pp 1844-1856,2022.[15] Timothy K. Daty (2021), “Cheating from a distance: An Examination of AcademicDishonesty Among University Students” [Doctoral dissertation, Digital Commons, University ofNew Haven].https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=dissertations[16] P. Ruffins, “A real fear,” Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 24(2), 17–19, 2007.[17] P. Vitasari, M. N. A. Wahab, A
. Potvin., Z. Hazari., and R. Lock. “Understanding Engineering Identity Through Structural Equation Modeling,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), October 2013, pp. 50-56. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6684787.[11] N. W. Brickhouse, P. Lowery, and K. Schultz, “What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 441–458, May 2000.[12] Ergonomics of human-system interaction, ISO 9241-11:2018, International Organization for Standardization, 2018. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html.[13] B. Nunnally and D. Farkas. UX Research: Practical Rechniques for Designing
also believe that near-peer mentors understand problems that studentsencounter with peers in the classroom, such as in navigating group settings, and can help thestudents improve their communication skills [5]. Participation in near-peer mentoring programshelp students learn to be self-sufficient and comfortable performing their classwork by utilizingskills learned from their mentors [6]. Mentees often appreciate the individualized attention theyreceive from a mentor that an instructor may not have the time or capacity to provide [4].Beyond the classroom setting, students who underwent near-peer mentoring felt more connectedto their college campus [4] and more comfortable in extending a personal connection to theirmentors than to their
implementation details for this intervention.2.1 Learning to Read Academic PapersIn terms of how to read scientific papers, there is a small set of research papers related to the topicbroadly in the domain of graduate education, reading groups, literature searches, and focus paperson how to teach this skill. Reading comprehension is a broad topic in K-12 education andhigher-education research but is beyond the scope of this work. As for information on how to readscientific papers, there are some online articles such as “How to (seriously) read a scientificpaper” (Accessed January 10th, 2024 - http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/03/how-seriously-read-scientific-paper).From a graduate engineering education perspective, Jenkins et al. [17] in their
experimental techniques to investigate optimal modes of propulsion, spanning interests in both bioinspired propulsion and classical aviation. In her role as Co-Director of CPET, Meredith works at the Center for Teaching, Learning, and Outreach to coordinate and lead a variety of workshops, speakers, discussion groups, and more. These events support a community of graduate students and postdocs passionate about becoming effective educators through an improved understanding of research-based pedagogy.Jacqueline Rose Tawney, California Institute of Technology This author was an equal first author contributor to this work. Jacqueline Tawney is a Ph.D. candidate in GALCIT (Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California
university, hereafter referred to as ABC University.ABC University was over 1000 miles from my home of Columbus and admittedly, I struggledliving on my own for the first time in a new city. Family is central to my identity andhomesickness made passing the difficult first semester graduate chemical engineering coursesnear impossible. At 21 years of age, I was barely making it through my PhD program the firstfew months. I hoped things would turn around as I acclimated to the city and was paired with aresearch advisor the following semester. I was looking forward to joining a good lab culture likethe one I had at my undergraduate institution and gaining some additional social support.My second semester I was paired with an advisor that matched my