Paper ID #38851Literature Exploration of Graduate Student Well-Being as Related toAdvisingDr. Liesl Klein, Villanova University Liesl Krause-Klein is a assistant teaching professor at Villanova University in their electrical and computer engineering department. She graduated from Purdue University’s Polytechnic institute in 2022. Her research focused on student well-being. She is currently in charge of curriculum for capstone projects within her department.Dr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Greg J. Strimel, Ph.D., is an associate professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation and program
leadership roles, related to the design and/or delivery of an US Eng Ed PhDprogram. Program selection was restricted to Engineering Education PhD degree programs in theUS and it excluded programs with any integration of other disciplines and focus areas in the titlee.g., Science Technology Engineering Mathematics Education PhD programs. The focus onleaders, such as program directors and/or coordinators, resonates with perspectives of doctoraleducation leadership that Prewitt espoused [10]. Prewitt argued that unlike pre-doctoralqualifications, the design and delivery of PhD programs is shaped by a broad spectrum ofinstitutional and national leaders who control entry into PhD programs, doctoral training,publication outlets, career development, and
meeting this national need. It is alsoimportant to delineate between these groups as it relates to equity and broadening participationfrom a financial perspective: Whereas 90% of STEM PhD students receive institutional funding[2], Master’s students are not as likely to receive funding. Half of STEM Master’s students relyon borrowing to fund their graduate education, and the “lack of adequate financial support” is oneof the top three reasons for dropping out of a STEM Master’s program [3]. In addition to a greatersocietal benefit to the STEM labor force and the students themselves [4], students as individualsalso benefit from earning an Engineering Master’s degree as it pertains to increasing contentknowledge, research skills, technical skills, an
focuses on the neural mechanisms underlying steady state flight control in Drosophila melanogaster. She has been involved in numerous educational outreach programs throughout her undergraduate and graduate career, and held a leadership position in the GALCIT graduate student council. She earned her M.S. from Caltech in Aeronautics in 2019, and her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University in 2018.James Ragan, California Institute of Technology James Ragan is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Autonomous Robotics and Controls Lab working with Professor Soon-Jo Chung. His research activities include developing algorithms that enable spacecraft to perform autonomous fault detection, including in multi-agent or
connect with other engineers who were members of the same communities. One respondent stated: “I really liked meeting another Latino engineer or STEM major at my school. I go to a predominantly white institution, so it is very difficult to find people from my culture with the same identity that I could relate to, and that can also give me guidance and a mentorship relationship.” Another said, “I would say the biggest thing for me was probably meeting another black and brown professional in the academia space. I often feel it's hard for us to get into those areas, especially the higher positions like Ph.Ds.”Participant Suggestions for Program EnhancementsDuring the focus group, participants were also asked for
, including (a) technicalcompetency; (b) legal knowledge including technical vocabulary and legal procedures; and (c)interpersonal skills including the ability to communicate technical information to the people fromnon-engineering background. However, the student survey results indicated that many studentslack such skills and there is a pressing need to teach them those skills in graduate programs.Additionally, the results highlighted that only 4 out of 72 ACCE institutions which consist of5.6% of the accredited degree programs offered courses that are related to forensic engineering.With growing concern for climate change impact and deterioration of infrastructure such asbridges and buildings, the workforce demand for forensic engineers is expected
databases was based on our goal tosynthesize education-related literature within engineering by structuring a search that yieldsmultidisciplinary results. The systematized literature review included an initial screening of 567abstracts and resulted in the synthesis of 23 papers. We identified the characteristics and commongoals of these programs. The workforce training programs were classified into three themes: (1)personal qualities and abilities, (2) interpersonal skills, and (3) professional competencies.The findings shed light into: (1) the need to prepare engineering Ph.D. students in professionalskills, given its lack of mention in workforce training programs; (2) the efforts that have gone intopreparing engineering Ph.D. students in cutting
Paper ID #38332GRADS (Graduate & Advance Degree Students) Mentoring Groups: Build-ing aSupporting Community for Hispanic Graduate Students in STEMDr. Dayna L. Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dr. Dayna L. Mart´ınez currently serves as a Director of Research & Innovation at SHPE. In this role, she oversees the Equipando Padres program, pre-college programming, graduate programming, faculty development, as well as different aspects of research and data analysis. An industrial engineer by training, before joining SHPE, Dayna was a faculty member in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
fall 2022. The students in this study were enrolled in different programs offered by twodepartments in the College of Engineering and Computing: Accelerated Master of AppliedInformation Technology (AIT) program, Master of AIT program, Master of Data AnalyticsEngineering (DAEN), and Ph.D. in Information Technology (IT).Context. The 16-week AIT courses were designed similarly by following the principles ofinquiry-based learning to address the challenges of the workplace by creating a collaborativemultidisciplinary research environment for STEM graduate students. Students can take thecourses in various order. However, the type of research they are doing is different in each course.The goal of instruction was to introduce students to
adjustments to US culture [8,9,10]. While international students do face challengesrelated to their citizenship status, and concomitant communication issues that necessarily shouldbe supported within their Ph.D. program, the existence of dedicated communication coursesalong with the GWC at our university appears to have provided a useful support to addressinggeneral writing and speaking issues.MethodologyThis paper provides descriptive data about two communications courses, including experientialinformation around efforts to build communications supports for Ph.D. engineering students inlight of their communications-related challenges. These two elective courses have beensustained over time; students noting that they have improved their works-in
is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underrepresented students in doctoral engineering programs.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the inter- section between motivation and identity, first-year engineering programs, mixed
remains one of the highest among allundergraduate students (Science and engineering indicators, 2006 ; Tinto, 1993). This leads tolow ranking in terms of the supply of STEM professionals and threatens the nation's economicdominance in the global marketplace. As a result, a considerable amount of research has beengenerated to develop intervention and preventative initiatives, including mentorship programsthat address the primary causes of student attrition from STEM fields. Less than half of students who enroll in STEM undergraduate programs as first-yearstudents graduate with a STEM degree at the national level (Hayes et al., 2009). In part as aresult of these high attrition rates, the United States has a consistently low ranking in terms
Paper ID #43538A New Personalized Learning Approach Towards Graduate STEM Education:A Pilot in Chemical EngineeringDr. April A. Dukes, University of Pittsburgh Dr. April Dukes is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL at the University of Pittsburgh. April’s research and teaching efforts engage graduate students, postdocs, and faculty to inform and support systemic change toward excellence and inclusivity in higher education.Ms. Valerie E. Kerr, University of Pittsburgh Valerie E. Kerr serves as the Graduate
not yet addressed the specialized needs of foreign-born graduate-level multilingual students1 for whom English is an additional language. Forgraduate students in engineering, one of the biggest challenges is to write about theirscientific research in English-medium publications (e.g., conferences, journals, reports).However, students’ abilities to write scholarly and effectively in an Anglo-American contextvary greatly when they enter the graduate programs [6]. This case is further complicated by asubstantial enrollment of multilingual graduate students, who possess even more variablewriting experience in different cultural contexts [4].Besides coping with a heterogeneous writing experience in engineering, graduate programsshould also attend
about the online experience and the efficacy of it.In the further comments section of the survey that was distributed to respondents, they had manycomments about their graduate experience. The following comments were specifically related toonline coursework: Student 1: My wife is in the military so having a flexible 100% online curriculum was the most important to me. Student 2: Engineering online is a great program for engineers looking to complete a masters degree while working full time. I have really enjoyed it and can say nothing bad about the program. Student 3: This is my first online degree that I'm taking, so it is an interesting learning curve compared to physically being in class
graduate student experiences and satisfaction levels at KennesawState University, specifically those of Construction Management graduate students. Theexperiences examined will focus on academic (educational) and non-academic (support) areas sothat recommendations can be made to satisfy those needs better and thereby recruit and retainmore international graduate students in STEM programs such as architecture and constructionmanagement.The study will use a survey method to determine international graduate students' experience withessential issues related to academic and non-academic areas. This research explores severalaspects relating to international students’ recruitment, such as cultural differences and studentneeds regarding accommodation
Paper ID #43390Increasing Teaching Efficacy in Engineering Graduate Students through theDevelopment and Facilitation of Summer Middle and High School STEMExperienceDr. Jamie R. Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a faculty member in the Engineering and Computing Education Program. She is the Associate Director STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT). She also serves as the Director for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to
, they needpreparation programs that can facilitate their knowledge of what they teach, how to teach, and howto leverage the growing technological affordances while teaching [2]. TPACK is an important framework that defines teachers’ knowledge domains for teachingeffectively with technology [3]. It integrates the pedagogical, content, and technologicalknowledge domains and focuses on the connections between these domains [4], [5]. Such aframework can assist scholars in understanding and measuring the development of knowledge thatteachers need to design, implement and evaluate learning experiences with new and advanceddigital technologies [6]. In engineering, GTAs’ preparation programs are becoming more essential given
previously identified by other researchers when working withgraduate students, where research writing-related support is found to be different from personalsupport [8], [9], [14], [38], further validating our EFA findings.Limitations and Future Work While the survey was disseminated at a large institution with various engineeringprograms, the sample considered in this study varies greatly by program and discipline. Thus,future work will see to the dissemination of our final instrument to engineering graduateprograms at various institutions to obtain a larger, and more balanced, sample that will allow usto further explore the predictive relationship between our constructs more fully. In addition, amore balanced sample will allow us to perform
Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: What if they choose: Surfacing insights associated with a pedagogy for doctoral educationIntroductionIs it possible to create a doctoral learning experience that is grounded on participants readingwhat they choose? Why would this be of interest
Ph.D. research at Texas A&M University, Dr. RDr. Mesbah Uddin, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Mesbah Uddin is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte’s Williams States Lee College of Engineering. He is currently leading Charlotte’s new multidisciplinary public-private research partnership initiative, Digital Design and Opti- mization (DDO), which is intended to strengthen Charlotte’s connections to North Carolina defense and security-related companies interested in multidisciplinary advanced manufacturing, engineering design and optimization, computer science and cybersecurity, and manufacturing innovation. He is currently
Institute. Prior to this position, he was a professor at in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include robotics, nonlinear control, machine vision, and engineering education. Dr. Gans earned his BS in electrical engi- neering from Case Western Reserve University in 1999, his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering in 2002 and his Ph.D. in systems and entrepreneurial engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign in 2005.Mr. Jeff Glenn Edwards, University of Texas at Dallas Jeff Glenn Edwards is a doctoral candidate in the History of Ideas program at the University of Texas at Dallas. He has taught philosophy in higher
, internship or co-op experiences and managing research programs. She earned her PhD in Chemistry from Penn State, conducted postdoctoral research at Wake Forest’s School of Medicine. She received her B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Buffalo. Since coming back to Penn State in 2014, she has directed the Chemistry Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) programs and worked on numerous student success programs at the undergrad and graduate level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Graduate Research Experience and Transitioning to Grad School (GREaT GradS): A New Approach to Graduate-School Onboarding for Marginalized GroupsAbstract:After
and Planetary Science, Physics,Computer Science, and Material Science and Engineering. Among the 14 students, ten studentswere pursuing a PhD, three were enrolled in a MA-level program, and one was an undergraduatestudent in an accelerated 4+1 BA/MA program. The majority of the students (10 students) werenon-native English speakers, while the remaining four students were native English speakers.The students were comprised of 5 men and 9 women. After the course, students were emailed toget permission to feature examples and excerpts from their articles in this paper.2.2 CourseDuring the semester-long course, students first read the article “On the Problem and Promise ofMetaphor Use in Science and Science Communication” and responded to the
GrantOpportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) established in 1995 [6], and Industry-University Cooperative Research Center (IUCRC) [7]. In spite of these programs running fordecades, the interaction between universities and companies was not progressing fast enough.Therefore, a few years ago NSF’s Directorates for Education and Human Resources; Engineering;and Computer and Information Science and Engineering introduced ‘Non-Academic ResearchInternships for Graduate Students (INTERN)’. Even the critics of Stokes’ model have recognizedthat ‘working with industry can provide tremendous benefits and generate many new questions offundamental importance’ [5].A key aspect that is absent in these various analyses of research has been the education
Fall 2020, with 75 studentsparticipating. Cohorts have ranged from eight students in Fall 2020 to 16 students in Spring2023. Most students were in the first three years of their graduate program, with approximately25% each in years 1- 3; another 25% had been in the program for four or more years Studentsrepresented 12 different majors (see Table 2).Table 2. GAPS Course Students’ Majors (n=75) Students' majors Students (n=75) Materials Science and Engineering 32% Chemical and Biological Engineering 23% Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering 11% Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering 9% Civil, Construction, and Environmental 9
interests and ac- tivities center on gaining a better understanding of the process-structure-property-performance relations of structural materials through advanced multiscale theoretical framework and integrated computational and experimental methods. To date, Dr. Liu has published nearly 250 peer reviewed publications, includ- ing more than 130 peer reviewed journal articles, and received 2 patents. He has been the PI and co-PI for over 40 research projects funded by NSF, DOD, DOE, NASA, FAA, Louisiana Board of Regents, and industry with a total amount over $15.5M. Dr. Liu has served on review panels for many NSF, DOD, NASA, and DOE programs. Dr. Liu received the Junior Faculty Researcher of the Year of the College of
Telecommunications and formerly Associate to the Dean for Research and Grad- uate Study at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell. He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from New York University, a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of NewYork, and a Ph.D. in Acoustics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Upon graduation he became an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. In 1987 he joined the Department Electrical and Computer Engineering at UMASS Lowell as its Analog Devices Career Development Professor. Dr. Thompson has served on the executive boards of the Cooperative Research Fellowship program of Bell
, Hispanic, Native American),who are historically underrepresented among STEM degree earners. The author team includesfive people who identified as women. Two of these women are engineers, one is an educator, andtwo are social scientists. The author team also includes five people who identified as men. Threeof these men are engineers, and two of these men are social scientists. As such, we have first-person experiences that allow us to relate to women in STEM. Moreover, four of the authorshold dual citizenship and have first-person experiences that allow us to relate to being anoutsider. The author team has been involved in the development, implementation, and evaluationof the NRT program at our university. All the team members have research and
of community and belonging in the field of engineering. Prof. Goodman has experience teaching 4th, 11th, and 12th grade science, and has worked for two science education nonprofits.Dr. Gail P. Baxter, Stevens Institute of Technology Gail P. Baxter is the Co-Director, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts and manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-bas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Three-Pronged Approach to Support Active Learning in the Graduate ClassroomAbstract:Many graduate courses are the ideal size for