Paper ID #18013Industrial Engineering Beyond Numbers: Optimizing under EthicsDr. Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech Dr. Alejandro Salado is an assistant professor of systems science and systems engineering with the Grado Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on unveiling the scientific foundations of systems engineering and using them to improve systems engineering practice. Before joining academia, Alejandro spent over ten years as a systems engineer in the space industry. He is a recipient of the Fabrycky-Blanchard Award for Systems Engineering Research and the Fulbright
AC 2012-4343: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EDUCATION THROUGH PAR-TICIPATION IN ENGINEERING COMPETITIONSDr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Texas A&M International University Fernando Gonzalez is an Assistant Professor of engineering at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas. Previously, he was a technical staff member at Los Alamos National Laboratory and an Assistant Professor at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, Fla. Gonzalez holds a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include intelligent control of autonomous systems, robotics, and modeling and simulation
Paper ID #12229From College to K-12: Adapting Industrial Engineering Classroom Exercisesfor Outreach PurposesDia St. John, University of Arkansas Dia St. John is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas where she also earned her B.S.I.E. and M.S.I.E. She is a member of IIE and serves as presi- dent for the Arkansas Student Chapter of INFORMS. This is her first submission to ASEE.Mr. Eric Specking, University of Arkansas Eric Specking serves as the Director of Undergraduate Recruitment for the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. He directs the engineering
Paper ID #8784Introducing Flexibility in an Engineering Curriculum Through Student De-signed Elective ProgramsDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University. He is an Assistant Professor of Industrial and Management Engineering at Montana State where his primary research interests are engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement with
work in Agile software development.Key words: Agile methodology, virtual teaching assistant, user experience design, web-service.IntroductionA Hispanic serving institution, such as Texas A&M International University (TAMIU), intends aMinority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) with the objective to reducethe class drop rate by 50% for early college education in engineering, mathematics, and physicscurriculums. The objective will be achieved through the development and implementation of avisual teaching assistant system across eight target courses to assists the students in learning andenhancing course materials beyond the classrooms.According to the enrollment in fall 2011 the university has more than 7,037 students who
like Black/African American and Hispanic groups earn only one-fifth the number ofscience and engineering degrees that white students do [15]. These gaps persist beyond college.While women and minorities make up more than half of the U.S. population, they are much lesslikely to pursue professional careers in STEM fields [16]. At the rate that STEM jobs aregrowing, more women and minorities will need to study STEM fields to keep up with the rapidchanges of innovation and technology.How students perceive the usefulness of course content affects their enthusiasm in the classroomand as a result, their eagerness to continue pursuit of their STEM majors [4]. The largest loss ofIowa State University (ISU) students in STEM disciplines occurs within the
Boix-Mansilla model iscaptured in four dimensions: 1. Purpose: students must understand the reason why multiple disciplines are necessary to solve a given problem 2. Disciplinary Grounding: students must have fundamental knowledge from all of the disciplines needed 3. Integration: students must know how to integrate the different worldviews, approaches, and tools used by the different disciplines 4. Critical Awareness: students must be able to reflect on the appropriateness and utility of taking an interdisciplinary approach for a given problem.Students apply for the LEP at East Central State University at the end of their first year and, ifaccepted, are in the program from their sophomore through senior years
AC 2010-535: IMPROVING INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CAREER EFFICACYTHROUGH INTRODUCTORY COURSE DESIGNLesley Strawderman, Mississippi State UniversityLaura Ruff, Mississippi State University Page 15.697.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Improving Industrial Engineering Career Efficacy through Introductory Course DesignAbstractThis study seeks to further examine self-efficacy beliefs of engineering students beyond theirfirst-year experience. Specifically, this study focuses on career efficacy, or student perceptionsof their ability to succeed in a particular career field. A 41-question survey was distributed toundergraduate
market over a period of time.References[1] J. Jones and J. Schmitt, “A college degree is no guarantee,” Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) 2014.[2] Bernd Schulz, “The Importance of Soft Skills: Education beyond Academic Knowledge,” Journal of Language & Communication, 2008.[3] S. Chikumba, “Development of soft engineering skills for industrial engineering technologists through effective mentoring,” WACE 17th World Conference on Cooperative & Work-Integrated Education, 2011.[4] H. Rao, Workers Can’t Find Jobs, Jobs Can’t Find Workers: Solving the Talent Paradox., Lynn University, 2015.[5] H. Darabi, E. Douzali, F. S. M. Karim, S. T. Harford, and H. Johnson, “Life after university for
students’ problem solving.ApproachAs described previously, the successful strategies that integrate product and services offeringsdemonstrated by industry inspired the redesign of approach to the organization and delivery ofcore elements of the industrial engineering curriculum so that students understand, discover andpractice the connectedness and mutual dependencies of these core subjects in the successfulrealization and delivery of goods and services. As shown in Figure 1, a real complex productprovides the context for activities underpinning product-based learning. Figure 1. Integration and synthesis through a real complex product.For example, entering juniors in IME will have activities attached to Design and
” [8]. The focus of this paper is Undergraduate Senior Design or Capstone projects (SDP). AnSDP is a culminating experience for undergraduate students, usually taking place during their lastyear of studies in the US education system. Their intent is to allow students to put into practice theengineering competences that they have acquired during their studies to solve a realistic problem.However, we contend that most programs center on establishing realism through the definition ofthe problem, and miss evaluating the realism exhibited by the solutions students develop. In order to study this gap further, this paper investigates whether the solutions that studentsdevelop as part of their SDP’s poses characteristics that are
AC 2012-3473: BIOMIMICRY INNOVATION AS A TOOL FOR DESIGNDr. Terri M. Lynch-Caris, Kettering University Terri Lynch-Caris, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Department at Kettering University and a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Michigan. She serves as the Director for the Center of Excellence in Teaching and Learning at Kettering. Her areas of interest in teaching and research include ergonomics and human modeling, statistics, work design and lean princi- ples, supply chain management, and environmental sustainability.Dr. Jonathan Weaver, University of Detroit MercyDr. Darrell K. Kleinke, University of Detroit Mercy Darrell Kleinke has more than 25 years of
manufacturing, inventory control, procurement, import and export. Research areas: Ergonomics and Human factors, Usability Engineering, Engineering Education, Cyber- Physical SystemsDr. Tycho K. Fredericks, Western Michigan University Dr. Tycho K. Fredericks is a Professor in the Department of Industrial and Entrepreneurial Engineering & Engineering Management at Western Michigan University. Dr. Fredericks has 18 years of experience working with healthcare professionals on product design and evaluation, and workload assessment. Addi- tionally, he serves as Director of the Human Performance Institute and has been a gubernatorial appointee to various safety committees in the State of Michigan. He has been a member of
). Page 25.1227.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Systems Engineering Competency The Missing Course in Engineering EducationABSTRACT This paper addresses the need for and proposes solutions to bolster thecompetency of the engineering professionals at two levels: 1) strengthen undergraduate andgraduate level engineering education to include a robust Systems Engineering(SE) problemsolving / solution development course and 2) shift the Systems Engineering paradigm found inmany organizations through education and training to employ scalable SE methodologies forprojects ranging in size from small to large complex systems. The objective is to educate
. The flowchart or table should be included in the Self-StudyCriterion 1 Section to describe the process; this would require less text and be easy for theprogram evaluator to follow (“a picture is worth a thousand words”).Criterion 3: Student Outcomes (SOs) ABET defines student outcomes as “what students are expected to know and be able todo by the time of graduation; these relate to the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that studentsacquire as they progress through the program.” The EAC defines student outcomes as a – k forall engineering programs. Using process thinking, student outcomes are therequirements/specifications that the output must meet at final inspection. Student outcomes mustprepare graduates to attain the PEOs. A simple L
Luisa Feliciano (Graduate Research and Innovation Center-GRIC), Aidsa Santiago (Materials Science and Engineering Department) and William J. Frey(UPRM School of Business) who actively collaborated in the editing process.References"Carin" Chuang, K., & Chen, K. (2013). Designing Service Learning Project in System Analysis and Design Course. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(2), 47- 60.Castro-Sitiriche, M., Papadopoulos, C., Frey, W., Santiago-Roman, A., & Jimenez, L. (2014, September 1). National Science Foundation Grant #1449489. Retrieved September 27, 2016, from Cultivating Responsible Wellbeing in STEM: Social Engagement through Personal Ethics: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch
state of acceptance of products or services relative to how they aredeveloped, produced, and utilized by customers.3.1 A Modern Interpretation of QualityQuality is the resultant of a vector of factors and attributes that equate to the value of the way anitem is developed, produced, and used by customers. Garvin4 proposed eight dimensions fordefining quality through characteristics relative to the manufacturer, customer, and a third partysuch as a product dealer. These are listed in Table 3.1. Table 1. Product Quality Dimensions from Garvin4 Dimension Description1 Performance Operational performance of the product2 Durability Ultimate amount of use before deterioration or failure beyond
mediated communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings, Information and Management, 18, 1-13.19. George, J., Easton, G., Nunamaker, J.F., Northcraft, G. 1990. A study of collaborative groupwork with and without computer based support, Information Systems Research, 1, 394-415.20. Grenier, R., Metes, G. 1995. Going virtual, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.21. Hedberg, B., Dahlgren, G., Hansson, J., Olve, N-G. 1997. Virtual organizations and beyond: Discover imaginary systems, Wiley, New York, NY.22. Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., Turoff, M. 1986. Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face to face versus
in the report score. This iscontrary to project experiences in the workplace, where project development is an iterativeprocess that frequently benefits from critical response from colleagues, supervisors, and clients.Thus, the authors wished to incorporate a more explicit review-revise process into the classproject framework, both to improve the quality of work initially submitted and to give students amore accurate sense of the process of iteration. Initially, this was attempted through “projectreview” sessions spread throughout the semester, where student groups were required to presentthe instructor a draft of their latest report and describe their project status. However, students stillprimarily utilized these activities to assess what
-based learning, transportation, logistics, and aviation infrastructure issues.Sherion Jackson, East Carolina University Dr. Sherion Jackson is currently an Instructional Technology Consultant in the College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina University, where she oversees production of online training courses according to best practices. Throughout the past 35 years, Dr. Jackson has served as an educational consultant, SACS Reviewer, K-8th school principal, taught 2nd, 4th, grades and 7th & 8th grade math in the public school system in several districts across the United States and taught a cadre of graduate level courses using face-to-face, on-line and distance
identify the outcomes of a project originally designed in 1955and how those outcomes and expectations are aligned to meet the department outcomes andABET standards of today. The course identifies and addresses using more than one assessmenttool that translates well to the department and ABET standards for assessment.A Historical perspectiveDuring the 1954-1955 academic year at South Dakota State University, George HarveyWakeman defined a project that would offer the mechanical engineering students, and otherswho enrolled in the machining course, a laboratory experience. He would not have known thathis curriculum design would last for 50 years and beyond. The uniqueness of his prototype andhis attention to the design experience has stood the test
Paper ID #28954Creating a Community of Practice for Operations Research by Co-creatinga High Impact Executive Education Program in IndiaDr. Venugopalan Kovaichelvan, TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, TVS Motor Company Ltd Dr. V. KOVAICHELVAN is the Director of TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, the Corporate University of TVS Motor Company Limited, India. The Institute focus on holistic development of talent through career lifecycle of the employees with focus on functional & professional skills, cultural capabil- ities, collective capabilities, support business strategy and Corporate Social
private discussion with theProgram Evaluators (PEVs), followed by a joint luncheon with the entire ABET visiting team,faculty members, select students, alumni, and administrators.Preparing the ABET Self Study Document The next step in the ABET assessment process was to begin developing the self-studydocument, which would serve as the primary review document, leading up to the site visit itself.This document had to be submitted to ABET not later than July 1st, to enable the ProgramEvaluators (PEVs) and Team Chair to review the program prior to their site visit, typicallyscheduled during the September through December timeframe. The TAMUC IndustrialEngineering self study document was modeled after the Engineering Self Study
, D. P., Winton, C., Weinberg, J. B., “Beyond Botball: A Software Oriented Robotics Challenge forUndergraduate Education”, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org), 2007.11. Deek, F.P., H. Kimmel, and J.A. McHugh, “Pedagogical Changes in the Delivery of the First-Course inComputer Science: Problem Solving, then Programming”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 3, 1998,pp. 313-320.12. Eskandari, H., S. Sala-Diakanda, S. Furterer, L. Rabelo, L. Crumpton-Young, and K. Williams, “Enhancing theUndergraduate Industrial Engineering Curriculum: Defining Desired Characteristics and Emerging Topics”,Education & Training, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2007, pp 45-55.13. Mackie, C., “Promoting STEM (Science, Technology
Exploratory Learning with Games and Simulations within the Curriculum be Most Effectively Evaluated?”, Computers & Education, 46, pp. 249-264, 2006.16. Squire, K., “Video Games in Education”, International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulations, 2(1), 2003.17. Oden, J., Belytcshko, T., Fish, J., Hughes, T., Johnson, C., Keyes, D., Laub, A., Petzold, L., Srolovitz, D., and Yip, S. (2006). Simulation-based engineering science: revolutionizing engineering science through simulation. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel on Simulation-Based Engineering Science. Page 22.628.10
for systems engineering programs. However, the 2011-12EAC accreditation cycle documentation does not list any actual verbiage that proposes adefinition beyond the general criteria for all engineering programs. The definition of “systemsengineering” espoused in this paper is an interdisciplinary collaborative approach to designthat integrates various engineering specialties into the goal of realizing complex products orprocesses. However, whatever the formal definition, all would agree that a systems engineeringapproach is valuable for all practicing engineers to appreciate.This paper describes the introduction of the concepts of systems engineering to students in amechanical engineering junior-level required thermo/fluids course through the
ofeducational experience that extends beyond just pure technical content and include skills such ascommunication, leadership, management, professional responsibility and public policy.However, traditional tenured and tenure-track faculty (TTTF) who lack industrial experiencemay lack some of these skills. According to a recent study conducted by Waltman, et al.6, full-time NTTF often cited the opportunity to focus on teaching as a reason for choosing their jobover tenure-track positions. They have often expressed high satisfaction with their teaching joband how they enjoy working with students and expressed their desire to make a difference in Page
Departmental Level Reform Programin 2002 to develop and evaluate the Departmental Reform Strategy that could be used tosuccessfully guide the efforts and activities to revise the curriculum with the department.1.2 Phase 1 Assess Current State of Industry and Industrial Engineering CurriculumThe objectives of Phase 1 were to assess the current state of the industry to identify emerging Page 12.35.4topic areas that would be beneficial to future IE graduates and to benchmark the existingindustrial engineering curriculum. The first major activity was to identify emerging topics andnon-traditional industry sectors through a literature
Page 23.93.5component tasks that are connected and help the solver step through the production of requestedresults. It may be chattiness, comfort-speech, weak academic humor, or attempts to makeconnections to a young person's sense of humor, curiosity, wonder, honesty, dignity, social life,future career, and/or passion for reform. It may call attention to the key concepts and tools neededto solve the problem. It may be embedded in the statement of the required tasks.A challenge is the statement of what the solver is required to produce. It may be formulated with orwithout scaffolding.A target is what the problem poser hopes will be accomplished when a learner engages with theproblem. This could be the exercise or development of any
. Forbes, J. F. Sullivan, B. A. Myers, and D. T. Reamon, "Exploring Student Impressions of and Navigation through a Flexible and Customizable Multidisciplinary Engineering Program," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, 2016, p. ID: #14937: American Society for Engineering Education.[10] W. J. Schell, D. K. Sobek II, and M. A. Velazquez, "Educating Tomorrow's Engineer: Adding Flexibility Through Student-Defined Electives," Quality Approaches in Higher Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12-22, March 2016.[11] N. W. Sochacka, K. W. Guyotte, and J. Walther, "Learning Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + The Arts) Education