. Studying these interactions and mediations is complicated by being within those samesystems [7]. We worked to operationalize intersectionality both within the workshop content andin our design and delivery of the workshop.An Intersectional Design IntentionAs our end goal is to enact a systems change, we are keenly aware that power dynamics andother issues of intersectionality must be addressed. As members of this community, we have hadthe opportunity to learn from leaders in the field about racial marginalization in computing andengineering spaces, the influence of disability on participation in computing and engineering,and the long history of gender-focused initiatives that have centered women in the past and arebeginning to include TNB people
Paper ID #38069Story-Driven Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Ariana Turner, Georgia Institute of TechnologyHye Yeon Lee, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Joseph M LeDoux, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Joe Le Doux is the Executive Director for Learning and Training in the Department of Biomedical En- gineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests include narrative and inclusive pedagogies and practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
with a peer or community member using a list ofsuggested questions about the module’s contents. Afterwards, we required students tocommunicate what they learned through completing and submitting a graded final deliverable.This deliverable could be a video, slide presentation, a written op-ed piece, or a piece of art aboutthe work they completed in the module. We evaluated the content of the modules through asurvey that assessed the students’ interest in the modules and determined the utility of themodules in the context of the study of computing. Based on the feedback of these surveys alongwith feedback from the instructors of the courses, we will further develop and improve thestructure and content of these modules and expand their reach to
, with a particular focus on the relationship between humanities andsocial sciences and core engineering subjects. The overarching goal of the engineeringeducation program was to foster creativity, innovation, collaboration, student-centeredlearning, problem-based learning, and hybrid approaches. This was reflected in the diversearray of faculty members, representing various fields including computer engineering,biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, humanities and social sciences,industrial engineering, and business administration. Since its inception, the new engineering department's identity has been a contentiousissue, particularly in relation to existing engineering disciplines and in relation to
Paper ID #41048Meta-Activity Theory as a Conceptual Tool for Supporting TransdisciplinaryCurricular Experimentation in Undergraduate Learning ContextsDr. Todd Nicewonger, Virginia Tech Todd E. Nicewonger has a Ph.D. in Applied Anthropology and his work focuses on the ethnographic study of engineers and designers in the US, Europe, and Kenya.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education and Deputy Executive Director of the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT) at Virginia Tech. ©American Society for
Director of First-Year Engineering at Youngstown State University. He completed his B.S. and M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his PhD is in Engineering Education, also from Virginia Tech.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Professor of Information Sciences & Technology and Director of Technocritical Research in AI, Learning & Society Lab (trailsLAB) at the College of Engineering and Computing at George Mason University, USA. He studies how technology shapes learning across formal and informal settings and the ethical implications of using technology. He publishes broadly in the fields of engineering and computing education, and educational technology. His
transformational change. We areengaging faculty, staff, and students in a substantial process of collaborative transformation thatinvolves rejecting binaries or dualisms commonly used to create hierarchies in engineeringthought and practice (rational-emotional, male-female, social-technical, mental-manual, hard-soft, concrete-abstract, etc.) and embracing a complex coexistence [11]; developing new skills inco-creation of holistic learning experiences and inclusive cultures; and evolving personal andprofessional identities that are constantly challenged and often in flux.Our transformation is guided by the following vision. Members of the Computer Engineeringdepartment at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo co-created this vision to guide our
the human experience. Sreyoshi has spoken at over 100+ global venues, addressing diverse audiences ranging from academics, NSF PIs, in- dustry leaders, entrepreneurs, and professionals to students or high-schoolers starting out with Computer Sciences, helping them strategize and broaden participation, as well as explore, understand, and apply emerging technologies. Sreyoshi is committed to broadening participation among underrepresented mi- norities in engineering and serves as a Senator at the Society of Women Engineers. She is also part of the Advisory Board at the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and serves as an Advisor to the leadership at Sisters in STEM. Sreyoshi frequently collaborates on several
INFRASTRUCTURE practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O’Malley, C. (Ed.), NATO ASI Series: Vol. 128. Computer supported collaborative learning. (pp. 66–97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5Star, S.L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research
experiences with the course, tounderstand the unique challenges for international students as they navigate sociotechnical classcontent in the U.S. context.Theoretical FrameworkWe draw on the Emergent Framework on Learning Race in the U.S. Context (LRUSC) [2] toorganize our analysis and findings. This framework was developed based on small focus groupsand individual interviews to understand how foreign-born students of color make sense of racialexperiences and racial minority status in the U.S. It presents an evolution through three maincategories: unexamined U.S. racial-ethnic identity, moving towards racial-ethnic identityexamination in the U.S. context, and integrative awareness in the U.S. context [2, p. 11]. At first,students with unexamined U.S
), Uppsala, Sweden: IEEE, Oct. 2020, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274244.[20] K. Trenshaw, E. Miskioğlu, D. Rushton, and P. Asare, “What’s in a Story? Comparative Analysis of Role Model and Mentor Narratives,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 35506. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35506.[21] I. S. Fitton, J. Dalton, M. J. Proulx, and C. Lutteroth, “Dancing with the Avatars: Feedforward Learning from Self-Avatars,” in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, New Orleans LA USA: ACM, Apr. 2022, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1145/3491101.3519732.[22] C. Clarke et al., “FakeForward: Using Deepfake Technology for Feedforward Learning
ideal field to embrace an interdisciplinary approach to AI education.Experiential learning approaches like project-based courses that are commonplace in engineering education arevaluable approaches to AI education. Eaton shared experiences teaching the courses “AI for Robotics” for second-year and up graduate students, as well as “Computational Sustainability and Assistive Computing” through sociallyimpactful projects to undergraduate students [33]. Both experiences allowed the instructor to highlight elements oforganizational challenges to consider. He underscores the necessity of a flexible curriculum, agile developmentmethodology, and openness in the project requirements, pointing out how “the multidisciplinary and project-drivennature of
students in engineering. The course section I discuss in this paper was the firsttime I was teaching ENG 3020, which took place during the first year of my position.I have an interdisciplinary educational background, beginning with a B.Sc in ElectricalEngineering. I then completed a M.Sc in Electrical Engineering with a focus on engineeringeducation, specifically studying how computer coding can be taught in K-6 classrooms. My PhDis in Educational Research with a specialization in Learning Sciences. My dissertation researchhighlighted critical approaches to computing education in informal education spaces such asmuseums, with a particular focus on pedagogy and facilitation for underrepresented learners inthese spaces. It was in my PhD that I was
place at a medium-sized private university in the northeast United States. Thecontext for this study is a first-year computation course for engineering students that is in theprocess of being redesigned to integrate sociotechnical content. There are five sections of thecourse, all taught by different instructors, with considerable autonomy, but all agreed to useproject-created materials for the sociotechnical pieces of the course. At the time this data wascollected, year 1 of the 3-year NSF-sponsored project, the first twenty minutes of one of twoweekly course meetings was allotted for stand-alone sociotechnical discussions. To prepare foreach discussion, students learned about a new sociotechnical case through an accessible readingor video and
-granting engineering programs in the US. These criteria, generally known asEngineering Criteria 2000, or EC2000, had been developed over the course of a decade, and atthe time of its debut in 1996, EC2000 was considered revolutionary in its shifting of focus awayfrom what is taught towards what is learned. In the intervening period, however, difficultiesparticularly associated with its eleven technical and professional outcomes—appearing asCriterion 3(a)-(k), Student Outcomes—bubbled to the surface.Along with the results of a study commissioned by ABET in 2002 and completed in 2006,ongoing ABET reviews and independent studies of engineering curricula across the countrybrought into stark relief the struggles many programs faced in interpreting and
Technology.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University Maimuna Begum Kali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Engineering and Computing Education program at the School of Universal Computing
African American females—and more broadly, WOC—toparticipate in engineering.Knowledge Filtered through the Hegemonic MajorityCarroll had a notably bad experience on her team, which highlighted multiple hiddenepistemologies within the engineering learning environment. Carroll was on a team of six for afirst-year computer-science focused team project. She was the only female and only AfricanAmerican on the team. With poor communication practices by everyone on the team andimproper division of labor as evidence, Carroll experienced negative aspects of teaming inengineering.Carroll expressed a need to assimilate into the dominant masculine culture to get along orcommunicate with her teammates. She states, Working with guys…it takes another type
constantly listening and capturing databecause that's how these things work and that's how [future] data sets get trained. I'm not sure ifall the customers are aware of it” (P56 Indian woman international student). Another studentclarified that, “AIs can simply learn your preferences by your daily habits, and they can come toknow who you are. It's a really big concern about privacy” (P37 Asian man internationalstudent).Similarly, because of their master’s level training in the subject, students were highly aware ofhow much power these models required for adequate training and computation phases andlamented how much energy was needed for merely slightly improved performance. “AIcompanies … are investing a lot in their computation ability and it's
Paper ID #38652Highlighting Gaps in Engineering Education through Emotional Safety inStudent StaffKylee Shiekh, Colorado School of Mines Kylee Shiekh is a student at the Colorado School of Mines. She has a degree in Computational Applied Mathematics and Data Science and is working towards a Masters in Quantum Engineering. She hopes to enter a PhD program for Engineering Education at the next step of her education. Her primary research in- terests are in engineering as enculturation, and the experiences of underrepresented students as compared to their peers.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Colorado School of Mines Dean Nieusma is
, the authors present the back story that led to the creation ofthe new major, the design of the curriculum, the articulation with the liberal arts, the difficultiesfaced in implementation, the student outcomes and benefits to Randolph-Macon, and the goalsand plans for the future.History of Engineering Physics at Randolph-Macon CollegeAt the encouragement of a local practicing civil engineer, Randolph-Macon first consideredadding a new department of engineering during the 1980s. During that time, the President of theCollege and the local engineer visited Swarthmore College [13] to learn more about theirprogram. The conclusion at the time was that beginning an engineering program would require afinancial investment far beyond the ability of RMC
structured discussionsrelated to current societal issues in a course were noted as strategies that enhanced studentmotivation around learning equitable design concepts (e.g., Gale, 2022). Other articlesmentioned a recognized challenge around managing students’ changing motivations. Initially,students may be motivated by societal impact, but they can shift their focus to technicalchallenges, assignment completion, deadlines, and grades in the course (Brinkley et al., 2021;D’Souza, 2017; Gale, 2022; Kang et al., 2021; Murdock et al., 2023; Oleson et al., 2023).Relatedly, there was a recognized need to acknowledge and accommodate the educationalbackgrounds of engineering students. Students from backgrounds such as computer science,human factors, human
Paper ID #38512Charting a Research Direction to Explore Development of SociotechnicalThinking in Engineering DesignDr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His current research interests include engineering design learning and communication, sociotechni- cal thinking in engineering, interest and motivation in engineering, conceptual change and understanding;; and school-to
outline and discuss specific attributes of interpersonal and interculturalcommunication, our experiences developing communication programs in engineering and otherSTEM disciplines, and how integrating a fuller and more complex model of communicationtraining in engineering programs can enhance STEM efforts toward diversity, equity, inclusion,sustainability, civic engagement, and justice. We conclude with a discussion about what the fieldof engineering can learn from our examples of how communication training is implemented inthree unique universities across two different STEM disciplines and suggestions for howengineering colleges can better integrate and accommodate broad communication training intheir programs.What is Communication?Communication
student experiences, computing education, fostering mastery-based learning mindsets, and assessments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 (Re)visions: Approaches to Teaching Technical Communications and Professional Development in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Course1. IntroductionIntegrating writing pedagogy-based practices and instruction into capstone curriculumdemonstrates the interconnectedness of the disciplines. While engineering programs and alumniof those programs report a need for technical and professional communication skills as part oftheir career success [1]. Success in their careers will depend on their ability to
, J., Plant, E. A., Hartwig, M. K., Vossen, J. J., Columb, C. J., & Brewer, L. E. (2018). Do gender differences in perceived prototypical computer scientists and engineers contribute to gender gaps in computer science and engineering?. Sex roles, 78, 40-51.Foutz, T., Singer, K. P., Navarro, M., & Thompson, S. (2015). Investigating the extent that an integrative learning module broadens the perception of first-year students about the engineering profession. American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 6(2), 99- 112.Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM journal, 1(2), 15.Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework
programs. Following her PhD, Fatima joined the Physics Education Research Group at the University of Maryland’s Department of Physics as a postdoctoral researcher, and now focuses on the study of ethics and institutional change in STEM higher education.Sona Chudamani, University of Maryland, College Park Sona Chudamani is a junior Computer Science major in the College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is the co-corporate contact for the UMD Association for Women in Computing (AWC), a club that strives to create an inclusive community to promote gender equality and empowerment in computing fields. She is also the Editor-in-Chief for QUESTPress, a newspaper in
part of the core curriculum.B.S. Engineering Program and Social Justice Case StudiesLUC’s B.S. Engineering program is a general engineering program with specializations ofbiomedical, computer, and environmental engineering. Each specialization emphasizes a socialjustice application. For example, in biomedical engineering, students learn to design and testrobust medical device software, in preparation for a medical device to be cleared or approved bythe FDA. All patients should receive high-quality medical devices, regardless of their ability topay. All Engineering courses are taught using a mandatory active learning style, which increasesthe retention of female students, students of color, and first-generation students [28-31].Engineering
theuniversity. Students who identify as underrepresented on the basis of race and/or gender are lesslikely to have access to technical learning opportunities and technologies [8]. In K-12 contexts,Vakil [9] explains that “research unequivocally shows that high quality STEM learningopportunities in and out of school are largely denied to racially minoritized students” (p.90).Numerous studies have shown that in university programs, students benefit from previoustechnical experience [10], but women are far less likely to have such experiences because ofgendered stereotypes of engineering processes e.g. computer coding [11].There are also challenges arising from students’ interests and the impact of gender stereotypes oncareer choice. For example, Potvin
Paper ID #38887Instructor Goals and Practices Related to Sociotechnical Thinking in theTeaching of Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching Stream with the Institute for Studies in Transdis- ciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP) at the University of Toronto. Her teaching and research focus on sociotechnical thinking, engineering teaching and learning and the development of life- long learning and other ”future-focused” skills. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Instructor Goals and
. Notwithstanding,the current general education curriculum in Taiwan still lacks engineering and humanitiesintegrated courses specifically designed for the College of Engineering, such as coursesrelated to engineering practice and corresponding cross-cultural socio-political systems. As aresult, students’ learning experiences are like a hodgepodge, lacking effectiveinterdisciplinary learning. Only a few engineering ethics courses are offered by professorsfrom the School of Engineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, but theyface human resource, professional, and teaching bottlenecks.Universities in Korea started offering engineering and humanities integrated courses as partof engineering curricula or liberal education around 2000. Like