thisanalysis of a microcosm of the experiences with transdisciplinary approaches of engineeringeducators in Canada, we conceptualize this process and these topics as “loose concepts” anddiscuss their power for future research and practice.IntroductionAcademic conferences provide an important venue to connect with the disciplinary community,to share research, and to build new knowledge. These sites of scholarly exchange are often wherewe explore concepts that are fuzzy or “loose” and through these conversations, generate newunderstandings or new directions.The Canadian Engineering Education Association / Association Canadienne de l’éducation engénie (CEEA-ACÉG) is a national organization that brings together engineering educators andresearchers at an
Equity & Inclusion in the Center ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering in Times of War, Upheaval and RevolutionBringing Geopolitics to Engineering EducationIt will surprise few of our readers within the LEES or ECSJ Divisions of ASEE that this paperstarts by recognizing the significant roles historically played by engineers in global politicaldevelopments, whether during episodes of industrialization or imperialism, capitalistretrenchment or revolutionary uprising, in ending famines or accelerating climate change. Theseroles have been clear to historians and policy makers for many generations, and to someengineers. Yet as matters for explicit address in engineering education
be either quantitative (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental), qualitative, or mixed methods in nature. • The article should target post-secondary students (i.e., undergraduate students and graduate students) in higher education contexts (e.g., college, university). • The article should be conducted in students’ primary or home language (L1). • The article can cover all disciplines (i.e., STEM, non-STEM, general education). • The article should be published in a peer-reviewed academic journal or conference proceedings. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals are believed to have high quality as well as demonstrate full study results, beyond pilot-test results or
Press.D’Souza, C. (2017). Topics in Inclusive Design for the Graduate Human Factors Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601583Figard, R. & Carberry, A. (2023). A Law of Diminishing Returns: Quantifying Online Accessibility for Engineering Students with Disabilities in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3326760Figard, R. & Mercado Rivera, A. (2023). STEM Education’s Misalignment to Proactive Accessible Design: Policy Recommendations for Realignment. United Nations Multi-stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and
. When we formulated the structure of the workshop, wetherefore built the topic of intersectionality into our plans, and attempted to live out thoseprinciples in our design.Workshop GoalsWith this in mind, we sought to bring together experts across a range of computing, engineering,and related technical and data-based disciplines as well as experts from other fields in the socialsciences, including education and the learning sciences, to build an agenda for inclusive policy,practices, and research for TNB computing students. Our specific goals were to: ● Define near- and long-term agenda items for intersectional research about the inclusion of TNB learners in computing for the Computing Education Research (CER) community ● Advance
Paper ID #39306Characterizing student argument justifications in small groupsociotechnical discussionsDr. Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts University Chelsea Andrews is a Research Assistant Professor at Tufts University, at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO).Ms. Fatima Rahman, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach STEM Education graduate student at Tufts University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Characterizing student arguments against a technology in small group sociotechnical discussionsIntroductionUniversities across the
and non-technical dimensions of engineering and transformingengineering education so that it more effectively prepares graduates for workplace success.Previous research suggested that interest in “Engineering and …” permeates ASEE and isconcentrated in but not limited to the division most closely associated with the topic. This paperdescribes a transferable method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods to identifyareas of convergence using papers published in the Leadership Development (LEAD) and theEngineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ENT) as evidence. These areas of convergenceare: (1) program design and effectiveness, (2) individual capabilities (including traits andthinking tools), (3) teams and groups, and (4
field of science andtechnology studies (STS), motivating both research and teaching. As a discipline, STS is fairlynew, tracing its roots to the 1980s, but as it has grown, it has taken up MacVicar’s challenge to © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Annual Conferencepartner with engineering programs to integrate the humanities and social sciences intoengineering education.The first publication within ASEE that specifically attends to integrating STS within engineeringeducation is a paper presented at the 1997 annual conference titled STS for Engineers:Integrating Engineering Humanities and Social Sciences. In it the author describes efforts todefine STS as a general
society. Leslie is a founding member of the Aula Fellowship for AI Science, Technology, and Policy.Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, ThatStatsGirl Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Research Scientist. She employs innovative and ethical mixed-methods research approaches to uncover insights about the 21st century workforce. Sreyoshi has a doctorate in Engineering Education, and Masters degrees in Applied Statistics (M.A.) and Mechanical Engineering (M.S.), from Virginia Tech. She earned her Bachelors degree in Mechatronics Engineering from Manipal University in India. Sreyoshi has been recognized as a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence (VTGrATE) Fellow, a Global Perspectives Program (GPP) Fellow, a
Technology.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University Maimuna Begum Kali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Engineering and Computing Education program at the School of Universal Computing
States.Communication in engineering continues to be an important element of engineering education,especially in terms of future employability. Universities are continually measured, ranked, andevaluated for performance-based funding based on their students’ employment numbersfollowing graduation. However, a divide exists between the level of communication competencyemployers expect from recent graduates versus their actual competency. Despite over twodecades of Communication (and English) faculty efforts, extensive research, and grantinvestment by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in engineering communication educationsince EC2000, the calls for universities to teach communication competence to engineeringundergraduates has only grown louder.At its core
include biomedical engineering, condition monitoring, and machine fault diagnosis.Prof. Patrick Linke Dr. Patrick Linke is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Chair of the Chemical Engineering Program at Texas A&M University at Qatar. Dr. Linke also serves as the Executive Director of the Office of Graduate Studies. He is the holder of the QatMary Queen, Texas A&M University, Qatar ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work In Progress: Towards a Transformative Collaboration – Technical Writing, Engineering, IndustryAbstractThis paper reports on a work in progress collaboration between Engineering and English facultyat an American university in the Middle
Paper ID #39294Someone Like You: Theorizing LGBTQ Participation in Engineering throughNetwork Homophily and State AuthenticityDr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University, Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration
; sustainable development, limits to growth and the role of technology.In general, this course is expected to fulfill the CEAB requirements in the Impact of Engineeringon Society, Ethics and Equity, and Professionalism graduate attributes.Four sections of ENG 3020 are offered per year. Though capped at 70 students, enrolmentfluctuates, with most sections having 40-60 students. In previous years, this course had noprerequisites, with a prerequisite of an Engineering Communication course only being added inthe 2023-2024 academic year. Due to this, and the fact that the course is not a prerequisite forany other courses, students in this course come from any year of their program, with a slightmajority coming from 3rd year and higher. This paper discusses
Paper ID #42446Implications of Engineering and Education Professor’s Problem-Solving Mindsetson Their Teaching and ResearchMs. Alexis Suzanne Capitano, Colorado School of Mines Alexis currently attends the Colorado School of Mines. She is a senior majoring in Electrical Engineering and simultaneously pursing a Masters of Science in STEM Education with a planned graduation date of December 2024.Ryan Miller, Colorado School of MinesDr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is a Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Electrical Engineering. In the Fall 2021, she visited the
Paper ID #40004Collaborating Alone: The Role of Technology Infrastructure in ScientificProblem-Solving PracticesNandini Sharma, The University of Texas at Austin Nandini is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication Studies at UT Austin. Her re- search interests are interdisciplinary and motivated by her formal engineering education in Computer Science (B.E., Punjab Engineering College, India), Information Science (MSIS, School of Information, UT Austin) and a decade of professional experience as a software and usability engineer in the software industry. Her research explores how technology design and
University where he combines his practical experiences of work in education, business, and industry with his research and teaching in professional education, professional practice, and the social foundations of work. He has published on topics ranging from organizational socialization (onboarding), workplace learning, organization studies, social science, and philosophy. He also works on a variety of topics sup- porting his students’ work on decision-making, the meaning of work, and social connectedness in school and the workplace. Korte received his Ph.D. in Work and Human Resource Education from the University of Minnesota.Dr. Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University Dr. Cory Brozina is an associate professor and the
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Learning the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion modules in an undergraduate electrical engineering classroomAbstract:In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a set of diversity, equity, andinclusion (DEI) based modules, created to be deployed in an introductory computing courseoffered to first year students in our program. Our objective is to ensure that engineeringundergraduate students, who are not historically exposed to DEI content within the engineeringcurriculum, are introduced to these important topics in the context of their technical courseworkand that they understand the relevance of DEI to their careers. We created 6 modules that cover awide range of topics
. Notwithstanding,the current general education curriculum in Taiwan still lacks engineering and humanitiesintegrated courses specifically designed for the College of Engineering, such as coursesrelated to engineering practice and corresponding cross-cultural socio-political systems. As aresult, students’ learning experiences are like a hodgepodge, lacking effectiveinterdisciplinary learning. Only a few engineering ethics courses are offered by professorsfrom the School of Engineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, but theyface human resource, professional, and teaching bottlenecks.Universities in Korea started offering engineering and humanities integrated courses as partof engineering curricula or liberal education around 2000. Like
clips on topics related to life after graduation andnavigating early career issues; the videos range from slightly over one minute to six and a halfminutes. The total time of the videos is under forty-two minutes.The videos present a variety of alumni speakers and deliver content on a range of areas ofstudent curiosity. The video topics include: 1) trying out different things; 2) making use ofresources; 3) what to look for in a job; 4) internships and growth opportunities; 5) networking; 6)does a dream job exist?; 7) tackling problems at work; 8) beyond the technical: soft skills; 9)work-life balance; 10) career pivots; 11) women in engineering; and 12) diversity in theworkplace (see Figure 1). Most videos feature more than one speaker. The
’ educational experience outside of ourdepartment.Design Engineering Program Development and Curricular StructureInstitutional ContextThe Department of Engineering, Design, and Society (EDS) was created at the Colorado Schoolof Mines (Mines) in 2017. EDS was created to provide campus-wide support for designeducation as well as to offer our own undergraduate design-based engineering major and toadminister Mines’ existing Humanitarian Engineering minors. Our bachelor’s of science (BS)degree program, originally a BS in Engineering (often referred to as “general engineering”), wasapproved by our university’s board of trustees in 2018. One of the goals for the program was toprovide an alternative pathway to graduation for undergraduate students seeking more
Paper ID #36960Social responsibility views in science and engineering: An exploratorystudy among engineering undergraduate researchersKassandra Fernandez, University of Florida Kassandra Fernandez is a Graduate Research Assistant at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida, where they are pursuing their PhD in Engineering Education (EED). They graduated from Miami Dade College with a B.S. in Biological Sciences and from the University of Florida with an M.S. in Microbi- ology and Cell Science. Before embarking on their PhD journey, they worked as a science teacher at a Title I school in Homestead, Florida and as
shifting (Clark-Stallkamp and Garmise, 2020). This includes theemergence of “transdisciplinary” academic plans that are being developed at universities andcolleges throughout the U.S. that partner with industry and aim to respond to public sectordemands for graduates who are trained to work on mixed-disciplinary research and developmentteams. Prominent examples include Arizona State University’s EdPlus (Arizona State university,2018), Bennington College’s “Field Work Term,” Georgia Tech’s “Creating the Next” (GeorgiaTech, 2021), and Purdue’s “Hands On Education - Real World Success” Initiatives (Purdue,2020).In this paper we draw on ethnographic research that was conducted as part of an externalevaluation involving a newly launched
Technology. She works extensively with students in thAnkita KumarBailey Bond-Trittipo, Florida International UniversityZoii Arrianna Henry, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)Dr. Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education, housed in the Department of Civil Engineering at California State University - Los Angeles. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering systems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She teaches structural mechanics and sociotechnical topics in engineering education and practice. Corey conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace engineering
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Countering Passive Engagement: STS Postures and Analyzing Student Agency in Everyday EngineeringAbstract “A culture of disengagement” is what Erin Cech [1, see also 4,9] has named the phenomenonthat, within engineering schools, students graduate with less interest in societal issues than whenthey arrive. Much of this disengagement is attributed to mindsets ([2]: centrality of military andcorporate organizations, uncritical acceptance of authority, technical narrowness, positivism andthe myth of objectivity) and ideologies ([1]: technical-social dualism, depoliticization,meritocracy) that create a socio-technical divide that encourages many students to marginalizesocial issues related
utilized an online survey, designed for this study and representing a particularconceptualization of STSE – the Currents Framework (Pedretti & Nazir, 2011). The survey wasdistributed to instructors from four engineering schools in Ontario Canada, which provided aninitial understanding and broad overview of STSE in the context of engineering education, andresulted in 180 surveys being completed. Following the survey, 12 engineering instructors wereinterviewed from three of the four sites, allowing for a deeper understanding of teaching goalsand practices, more generally, and associated with STSE, along with the challenges faced andenabling factors related to implementing an STSE approach. While some of the quantitativesurvey results are
Paper ID #38045STEM students leading cultural change: How agency and capacity forcollective action are cultivated within a distributed networkMr. Robert P. Dalka, University of Maryland, College Park Robert Dalka is a graduate student in the Physics department at the University of Maryland, College Park. He is a part of the Physics Education Research Group, along with his advisor, Dr. Chandra Turpen. His research interests are in student leadership and organizational change.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics at the
BackgroundResearch and education related to engineering ethics have grown in recent decades, in part due tointernational efforts such as the Washington Accord [1] and the globalization of the engineeringworkforce, which highlight the need for ethics to be embedded in engineering practice.Undergraduate education plays a key role in socializing students into the engineering professionand developing their requisite competencies, including those related to ethical and professionalresponsibilities. Research on engineering ethics education has focused on the integration ofethics in the curriculum such as the topics, pedagogies, and settings [2][3][4], and these reviewssynthesize the body of work on descriptions and outcomes of individual classroom
Paper ID #38037The Amazon Effect: A Case Study of Corporate Influence on StudentMacro-Ethical ReasoningDr. Fatima Naeem Abdurrahman, University of Maryland, College Park After completing undergraduate degrees in Physics, Astronomy, and Middle Eastern Studies at the Univer- sity of Maryland, Fatima earned a Masters and PhD in astrophysics from UC Berkeley. Her doctoral thesis included astrophysical work on black hole detection and adaptive optics instrumentation in addition to a qualitative study on relationship between the culture of academic astronomy in the US and the persistence of identity-based inequity in graduate
Tech.Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University Dr. Jan DeWaters is an Associate Professor in the Institute for STEM Education with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering at Clarkson University, and teaches classes in both areas. Her research focuses on developing and assessing effective, inclusive teaching and learning in a variety of settings. An environmental engineer by training, Dr. DeWaters’ work typically integrates environmental topics such as energy and climate into STEM settings.Lucas Adams, Clarkson University Current Senior at Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY majoring in Applied Mathematics and Statistics ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024