information to potential participants and the public.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Pennsylvania State University. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis on educational testing and assessment. Page 14.1197.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Development of a National Workshop to Teach Norwegian Ph.D. Students in Engineering and Science How to Communicate ResearchKey Words: graduate
AC 2009-420: TWO PERSPECTIVES ON PEER REVIEWJulie Sharp, Vanderbilt University Julie E. Sharp is Associate Professor of the Practice of Technical Communication in the Vanderbilt University Engineering School. She designs and instructs combined engineering lab/technical communication courses and a technical communication course for engineering majors. A communication consultant, she has clients in industry and educational and professional organizations. She has published and presented numerous articles on communication and learning styles, including for ASEE and FIE conferences. In 2004, she earned ASEE Southeastern Section's Thomas C. Evans Award for "The Most Outstanding Paper
. He earned a BSEE and MSEE from the University of Wisconsin. He earned his MBA from Seattle University. His background in industry combines biomedical engineering with international marketing and sales. His dissertation research looks at entrepreneurial education. He has research interests in service-learning and experiential education. Page 14.671.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 How and to What Extent Does a Service-Learning Pedagogy Enhance Communication and Collaborative Skill Learning Among First Year Students?Introduction All engineering
participants to “bothrecount the emergence of your own perspective on global education for engineers and locate thatperspective in relation to those around you.” The first step in the writing process was a 500-wordabstract to which, after collecting responses from co-organizers, I drafted a detailed 500-1,000word response. The draft manuscripts were due two months prior to a workshop gathering. Eachauthor wrote reviews of eight to nine other manuscripts prior to the workshop, and the organizerssubmitted separate commentaries. The key feature of the workshop was that authors could not participate in the discussions oftheir manuscripts. The purpose was to transform the typical author-meets-critics exchange into aprocess of collaborative co-authorship
AC 2010-1688: TEACHING TO ABET'S CRITERION 3(I) LIFELONG LEARNINGOUTCOME: LESSONS ON INNOVATION FROM CREATIVE COMMUNITIESKatherine Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering KATHERINE WIKOFF is Associate Professor in the General Studies Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where she teaches courses in freshman communication, business and technical communication, literature, political science, film studies, and creative thinking. Email: wikoff@msoe.edu Page 15.1189.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching to ABET’s 3(i) Lifelong Learning Outcome
AC 2008-973: LIBERAL EDUCATION: A SURVEY OF GOALSMark Valenzuela, University of Evansville Mark Valenzuela is Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Evansville. He received both his PhD and MS degrees from Cornell University in the field of structural engineering. He received his BE degree from Vanderbilt University. He is a registered professional engineer in the state of Indiana.James Allen, University of Evansville James Allen is Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Evansville. He received his PhD from the University of Cincinnati, his MS degree from the University of Oklahoma and his BS degree from the University of Missouri Rolla. He is
AC 2007-787: PAUL REVERE IN THE SCIENCE LAB: INTEGRATINGHUMANITIES AND ENGINEERING PEDAGOGIES TO DEVELOP SKILLS INCONTEXTUAL UNDERSTANDING AND SELF-DIRECTED LEARNINGRobert Martello, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Robert Martello is an Associate Professor of the History of Science and Technology at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering.Jonathan Stolk, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Jonathan Stolk is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. Page 12.1147.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
AC 2009-325: A COURSE IN COMMUNICATION AND CREATIVITY FORUNDERGRADUATES IN ENGINEERING: SEEING ANDHEARING--COMMUNICATING WITH PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEO, AND SOUNDHelen Donis-Keller, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Page 14.20.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Course in Communication and Creativity for Undergraduates in Engineering: Seeing and Hearing: Communicating with Photographs,Video and Soundintroduction Given the global reach by employers for engineering professionals, creativity, innovationand the ability to communicate effectively have gained importance as assets of the Americanengineering workforce
prepared towork collaboratively in culturally diverse and global settings. In order to remain relevant in anevolving field, they must also be creative and innovative, imbued with an entrepreneurial spirit,and educated for leadership and life-long learning. Traditionally, the development of attributessuch as these have not been the primary goals of the undergraduate engineering curriculum,although recent changes in accreditation standards strongly encourage engineering programs tohelp students develop teamwork and lifelong learning skills.While support for what have been understood historically as liberal (or general) education goalsfuels many discussions in engineering education community, the level to which these goalscurrently permeate
with social scientists cannot be underestimated. Lucena37 notes thatprojects such as these create needs for non-engineers to participate in engineering projects. Fortheir part, engineers must have a modicum of knowledge related to the social, cultural, political,and economic contexts of globalization, so that terms such as neoliberalism are not met withblank stares, and so that due respect is given and a true collaboration can result. Interdisciplinarycollaboration is underway at Smith and three other institutions, two of which are in Nicaragua,for an initiative focused on product development education for economic empowerment inNicaragua. The initiative will involve students and faculty from economics, business,engineering, Latin American
AC 2007-2658: HELPING ENGINEERING STUDENTS WRITE EFFECTIVEEMAILJoanne Lax, Purdue University Ms. Lax is the communications specialist for the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN. She is a graduate of Northwestern University (B.S.J., 1977; M.S.J., 1978) and Purdue University (M.A. 1994). She teaches graduate courses in academic writing and speaking for international engineering students. Page 12.800.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Helping Engineering Students Write Effective EmailAbstractWith the widespread availability of text
AC 2010-914: ENGINEERING AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT: CRITICAL PEDAGOGY IN EDUCATION FOR“ENGINEERING TO HELP”Juan Lucena, Colorado School of MinesJen Schneider, Colorado School of MinesJon Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Page 15.475.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (ESCD): Critical Pedagogy in Education for “Engineering to Help”“Don’t come here [to my community] to help! Come here to listen, to find out if our[community’s] struggles are your struggles. Then and only then, we can sit anddiscuss how, if at all, we can work together.” --Gustavo Esteva, community activist in Chiapas
center.Initially this collaboration focused on how instructors could improve their grading andinstruction of writing within engineering courses. As the relationship matured, focus was shiftedto the importance of educating the writing center staff on the unique attributes of engineeringwriting as well as the engineering-specific writing skills expected of students by faculty. Unableto locate a writing guide that specifically met our undergraduate engineering needs, the writingcenter and Engineering faculty developed a handbook that outlines an effective engineeringwriting process and style for students, faculty, and writing center tutors.This paper provides an overview of the challenges the authors have experienced teaching writingwithin engineering
AC 2010-602: “MORE THAN JUST ENGINEERS”- HOW ENGINEERS DEFINEAND VALUE COMMUNICATION SKILLS ON THE JOB.Christine Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, MadisonKevin Anderson, University of Wisconsin, MadisonTraci Nathans-Kelly, University of Wisconsin, MadisonSandra Courter, University of Wisconsin-MadisonThomas McGlamery, University of Wisconsin-Madison Page 15.1391.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “More Than Just Engineers”: How Practicing Engineers Define and Value Communication Skills On the JobAbstractWhile most professional and academic sources have expressed a need for engineers who possessstrong communication skills, what these
Page 12.810.11Standards for Engineering Writing: A Data Driven Approach. Presented at the 2005 Annual Conference of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR, June 12–15, 2005.7. A. Powe and J. Moorehead. Grading Lab Reports Effectively: Using Rubrics Developed Collaboratively by ECEand Technical Writing Instructors. Presented at the 2005 Annual Conference of the American Society forEngineering Education, Chicago, IL, June 18–21, 2006.8. D. M. Beams and L. P. Niiler, Improving Technical Writing through Published Standards: The University ofTexas at Tyler Electrical Engineering Laboratory Style Guide: 12.9. Sorby, Sheryl A., and Bulleit, William M., An engineer’s guide to technical communication. Upper SaddleRiver, NJ: Pearson
communication curriculum in one department of civil engineering." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 51.3 (2008): 313-3278. Class surveys, conducted November 15-27, 2009 by anonymous response to 7 multiple choice/scaled answer/fill-in questions.9. Examples have been drawn with permission from Encana; Spar Aerospace; medical research labs at Mount Sini Hospital (Toronto), University of Calgary, University of Manitoba; Bell Labs, Hydro One (Ontario); Canadian Ministry of the Environment.10. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Curriculum Innovation Award, 200511. American Society of Engineering Education Best Paper Award, 200412. Alan Blizzard Award for Collaborative Education, 200413. Eggermont, M
AC 2010-1747: INTEGRATING THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGHCROSSDISCIPLINARY STUDIOSNadia Kellam, University of Georgia Nadia Kellam is an Assistant Professor and engineering educational researcher in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at the University of Georgia. She is co-director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER) research group. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity, creativity, identity formation, and the role of emotion in cognition.Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Joachim Walther is an Assistant Professor with the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Georgia
California San Diego. He received bachelor's degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from the University of Texas at Austin and practiced engineering for five years in the semiconductor industry. His research studies the social underpinnings of scientific controversies related to sexuality, as well as inequalities within scientific and technical fields. Page 14.1384.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 “Engineers Who Happen to be Gay:” Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students’ Experiences in EngineeringAbstractWhile much is known about the experiences of women and
AC 2008-2847: COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTION IN AN ENGINEERINGINTRODUCTORY STATISTICS COURSEJudith Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Judith Norback is the Director of Workplace and Academic Communication in Georgia Tech’s Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering. She received her B.A. magna cum laude from Cornell University and her Masters and Ph.D. from Princeton. Before joining Georgia Tech in 2000, she taught at Rutgers University, worked in job-related basic skills research at Educational Testing Service, and then founded and directed the Center for Skills Enhancement, Inc. Her research and curriculum development interests lie in workforce communication skills
AC 2009-1131: INTEGRATING MICROETHICS AND MACROETHICS INGRADUATE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION: DEVELOPINGINSTRUCTIONAL MODELSJoseph Herkert, Arizona State University Polytechnic Joseph Herkert, D. Sc., P.E., is Lincoln Associate Professor of Ethics and Technology at Arizona State University. He has taught engineering ethics and related courses for more than twenty years. His work on engineering ethics has appeared in engineering, law, social science, and applied ethics journals. Dr. Herkert is the past Editor of IEEE Technology & Society and a founding Associate Editor of Engineering Studies. He received his BSEE from Southern Methodist University and his doctorate in Engineering and
could not be overcome easily in the students’final quarter, as they were busy designing and building senior projects. Clearly more writinginstruction was needed during their mid-level courses. Even if students were required to takeTechnical Writing, which is not required by all majors, it seems that the students did not retainwhat was learned in order to apply those skills to their senior project report and oralpresentation.Simultaneous with the collaborative efforts between writing and engineering faculty at theCollege, the University as a whole was moving to adopt a new mid-level writing course. Theprevious general education requirements mandated that most students take a three-part Englishsequence. The new requirements would eliminate the
industrial tours. The French programs at Lyon involve the collaborative offerings from severalacademic institutions, including CPE (chemistry/chemical engineering). Thus we presentin Table 3 the evaluation thoughts from the 20 students in the overall programs (fourFrench institutions, including CPE) as well as the 7 students (among 20) who partook ofthe CPE laboratory component.Table 3Evaluation of Overall Program (20 respondents among 23 students)1. French language instructors (3) (4.0 max possible): 3.67, 3.63, 3.672. Seminar on French/European education 3.26/4.03. Intercultural presentation 3.16/4.04. Industry visits/tours Old Lyon
, California Polytechnic State University Stacey Breitenbach is currently Assistant Dean for Advising and Student Success Initiatives at the College of Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She received her B.S. and M.A. from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Prior to becoming Assistant Dean, she was the Executive Director of the College of Engineering Advising Center. Page 12.8.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A BA Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies Degree at a Polytechnic
AC 2010-633: INTEGRATION OF ENGINEERING AND THE LIBERAL ARTS: ATWO-WAY STREETCherrice Traver, Union College Cherrice Traver received her BS in Physics from the State University of New York at Albany in 1982 and her PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 1988. She has been a faculty member at Union College in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department since 1986, and has been the Dean of Engineering since 2005. Recently Dr. Traver has been involved in initiatives at the interface of engineering and the liberal arts. She has led two national symposia on Engineering and Liberal Education at Union College and she was General Chair for the 2008 Frontiers
Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Service-Learning Projects in 35 Core Undergraduate Engineering CoursesAbstractThe College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML) has integratedservice-learning (S-L) into many of its core required undergraduate courses over the last threeyears. Projects that meet real community needs and that help students achieve academicobjectives in the courses are difficult to create. Projects for 35 different undergraduate requiredcourses are summarized to help faculty, staff, and students develop S-L projects for their owncourses. Faculty at UML were encouraged to “start small rather than not at all.” Courses andprojects include, for example: first-year introduction to engineering with 340
. Page 14.1288.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Two Ways of Using Case Studies to Teach EthicsIntroductionProfessional ethics, like many other areas of academic study, is best taught through synthesis andapplication. Exposing students to the importance of ethics via, for example, a lecture on theNSPE Code of Ethics or a reading assignment on plagiarism may accomplish something on itsown, but such relatively low-stakes activities do little to put students in the position ofcontemplating and then making ethics-related decisions – they do little, in other words, to bringthe subject to life for students.One simple way to engage students more fully in the experience of professional ethics is the useof case studies
AC 2009-1719: PERSONAL VS. PROFESSIONAL E-MAIL: THE PALIN CASEEdward Gehringer, North Carolina State University Ed Gehringer is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. He has been a frequent presenter at education-based workshops in the areas of computer architecture and object-oriented systems. His research interests include architectural support for memory management, garbage collection, and computer-supported collaborative learning. He received a B.S. from the University of Detroit(-Mercy) in 1972, a B.A. from Wayne State University, also in 1972, and the Ph.D. from Purdue
integrating sustainability into engineering education at RensselaerPolytechnic Institute. The first model entails a single course on the social analysis of sustainabledesign, taught as a social sciences course but attempting to connect to and leverage (primarilyengineering) students’ disciplinary expertise and interests. The second model is a newlyinstituted undergraduate minor in “sustainability studies” that is offered in Science andTechnology Studies (STS). This minor is targeted to students across campus and, hence, isdesigned to complement a variety of majors, including engineering majors. The third model is apilot collaboration among three courses, each with a different lens on sustainable design. Thefourth and final model is an effort to
Opportunities of Service-learning (ETHOS)program at the University of Dayton (Dayton, Ohio) is founded on the belief that engineers aremore apt and capable to serve our world when they have experienced opportunities that increasetheir understanding of technology’s global linkage with values, culture, society, politics andeconomy. ETHOS seeks to provide these opportunities by means of curriculum integratedservice-learning programming. Such educational programming – classroom projects, studentorganization activities, collaborative research and international technical immersion – facilitatesholistic learning, ethical engineering practices, perspectives of technology integration andappropriate technology transfer. To appropriately measure the value
2006-513: INDUSTRIAL ETHICS TRAINING: A LOOK AT ETHICS GAMESMarilyn Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Page 11.753.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Industrial Ethics Training: A Look at Ethics GamesAbstractFederal legislation mandates that US businesses develop ethics training programs for theiremployees. Starting in 1991 with the US Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which were revised in1995, 1999, and 2004, and continuing through the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, passed in thewake of Enron, WorldCom, and other corporate scandals, businesses have had to implementethics training or risk substantial penalties. Industry has responded to the