of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19440 Dr. Geoffrey L. Herman is a teaching assistant professor with the Deprartment of Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He also has a courtesy appointment as a research assis- tant professor with the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering
methodsfor the production of carbon nanotubes were the subject of two active research projects at theuniversity15, 16. The nanotechnology experiment described in this work is based on the results andmethods from these projects.Carbon nanotubes are mostly produced by chemical vapor deposition17, laser ablation18, or arcdischarge. Using the arc-discharge, carbon nanotubes are synthesized by striking an electric arcbetween two graphite electrodes in an inert atmosphere. High temperatures developed betweenthe electrodes and high current densities allow formation of carbon nanotubes as deposits on thecathode as well as on the walls of a reaction chamber19. There are reported results on the arc-discharge method in various media like helium, argon, liquid
the innovation-decision process?,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 020104, 2012.[10] R. A. Mansbach, G. L. Herman, M. West, D. R. Trinkle, A. Ferguson, and A. Schleife, “Work in progress: Computational modules for the matse undergrad-uate curriculum,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[11] K. Thornton et al., “Summer school for integrated computational materials education.” https://icmed. engin.umich.edu/, 2017.[12] P. Giannozzi et al., “QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simu- lations of materials,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 21, no. 39, p. 395502 (19pp), 2009.[13] S. Plimpton, “Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics,” J
Conference & Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, June 2003.[4] Lee, J. S., Blackwell, S., Drake, J., and Moran, K. A. Taking a Leap of Faith: RedefiningTeaching and Learning in Higher Education Through Project- Based Learning. InterdisciplinaryJournal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2), 2014.[5] Hadim, H. A. and Esche, S. K. Enhancing The Engineering Curriculum Through Project-Based Learning. 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, November 6- 9, 2002.[6] Mills, J. E. and Treagust, D. F. Engineering Education – Is Problem based or Project-BasedLearning the Answer? Australasian Journal Of Engineering Education, Jan 2003http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf[7] Lidón, M.M. et al. Acquisition of transversal skills
2009 survey by Thornton et al. 1 , and the 2018 followup by Enrique etal. 2 , employers that hire Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) students value computationalmaterials science education and desire 50% of their hires to have a computational MSEbackground . Additionally, they believe MSE graduates should at least be aware of whatsimulations used in their field and what is computationally feasible 2 . They also highlighted a gapbetween industry and what is taught in class - while students are typically taught molecular andatomic-scale simulations in class, employers are more interested in macroscopic, continuummodels 1 .As a result of these surveys, faculty started an initiative project to address the shortcomings in ourMSE curriculum
Paper ID #14060Enhancing the STEM Curriculum Through a Multidisciplinary Approachthat Integrates Biology and Engineering: Biomaterials ModulesEthan Sclarsky, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Chemical Engineering undergraduate student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Tyler Marquis Cooper, Rowan UniversityDr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering & Education at Texas A&M, College Station. He received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His
course of the semester as well as tocompare results from the on-campus and distance groups. Previous studies by Cavalli et al.1 in arequired junior level materials science course (also taught to both on-campus and distancesections) indicated distance students, who are often working professionals, tended tounderestimate their mastery of the material as represented by posttest performance. In contrast,on-campus students tended to overestimate their understanding of the course topics. Distancestudents attributed a higher value to recorded lectures and homework assignments with regardsto aiding their understanding and on-campus students valued in-class discussions. Thecomposites course studied in the present work would fall later in the curriculum
- connections that require careful Page 24.770.6considerations for Product Lifecycle Assessment (PLA). combined with mechanical, thermal,and electrical properties that have the greatest role in design to minimize eco-impact.This project aims to develop a pilot course materials and modules that will help bridge the gapbetween the Industrial Engineering Technology (IET) and Mechanical Engineering Technology(MET) concentration curriculum, collaborative decision-making and sustainability: allnecessities in today’s engineering education. The main focus of the changes would be to embedand integrate sustainability concepts in both IET and MET curricula, in
of these changes beyond courses participating in the original SIIP project. Wecontinue to keep track of students’ perception of the computational curriculum withinparticipating courses. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of the computational exposure onstudents’ perspective in research and during job search. Finally, we collect and analyze feedbackfrom department faculty regarding their experience with teaching techniques involvingcomputation.2 IntroductionA computational approach has become an indispensable tool in materials science research andrelated industry. In addition to the research interest, the 2009 survey by Thornton et al. [1] andthe followup 2018 survey by Enrique et al. [2] showed that employers of MSE students, such
research experience as part ofan undergraduate engineering education. Every engineering curriculum includes a culminatingevent, usually a senior design project. Most curricula include some opportunity for independentor small group research, even if it is only limited to a literature review on a specific topic.Another research opportunity available to most undergraduate engineering students is anindependent study course. Research is also an important experience for undergraduate studentsconsidering going on to graduate school.There is a great deal of literature describing the value of undergraduate research, especially forscience and engineering students. The National Science Foundation (NSF), The NationalInstitutes of Health (NIH), and the
Paper ID #25924Quantifying Effectiveness of Three Unique Video Lecture Formats in a LargeFirst-Year Engineering Chemistry CourseMiss Marguerite Anne Tuer-Sipos, University of Toronto Marguerite Tuer-Sipos is a fourth year University of Toronto Materials Science and Engineering student currently pursuing her major thesis project in Engineering Education. Marguerite’s supervisor for the thesis project is Scott Ramsay, Associate Professor in the Materials Science & Engineering department at the University of Toronto.Mr. Stephen Manion, University of Toronto I am an undergraduate student in my final year of Materials
content anddismiss any negative precepts the students had about the steel industry in general.Students would understand as well that the iron and steel field, as the largest metals-based market in the world, still has a wealth of exciting discoveries to be made4. Throughintegration with an existing curriculum, the steel industry and engineering students wouldbe greatly aided by this new material. The specific structure of the lesson given at theUniversity of Kentucky in 2008 is described below in detail.Background and Structure of Plan In their first semester at the University of Kentucky, all engineering freshmentake introductory major-related courses. These introductory courses are designed mainly
State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The
, calculus, and statics). For Materials Science and Engineering students itserves as the first course taken within the major, and provides the foundation for later courses inthe curriculum. It is also taken by students in other engineering majors as an engineeringelective, and is their only exposure to materials science and engineering. The course covers abroad range of material; as taught by the author the topics can be broken down into thecategories of materials structure and defects, diffusion, phase diagrams, phase transformations,mechanical properties, composites, corrosion, and electrical properties.In this project, activities are being developed that cover the topics currently taught by the authorin his Introduction to Materials class
Railway Lightweighting Water Containers and Plastic Waste The Built Environment Material Properties and Structural Sections Electric Cars—Sustainability and Eco DesignFigure 6: The Five Step Method developed by Professor Ashby and coworkers [25]1. Unpacking the proposal—identifying timeline, objectives, and other key project objectives2. Stakeholder analysis—Identifying stakeholders and their influence on the project outcomes3. Fact finding—researching project and stakeholder needs4. Forming a judgement—analyzing impacts of facts on the three capitals of sustainability5. Reflection—looking at the outcome of fact analysis and determining if objectives
class: hands-on experienceAs a part of this course, each student was required to complete a project (Table 3). Depending onthe number of students enrolled in the course, the project work involved working individually orin groups on an experiment and then writing an individual or a group report. At the end of theproject, each individual/group was required to make an oral presentation on his/her/their workcontribution and findings. The individual/group report was 10-15 pages in length with adequatetechnical content and literature survey.Guest Lectures and Laboratory Tours: The special feature of this course was lectures by a limitednumber of guest speakers (maximum two). In Spring 2005, one of the guest speakers (from ourDepartment of Electrical
Faltens, Purdue University (Network for Computational Nanotechnology) Tanya Faltens is the Educational Content Creation Manager for the Network for Computational Nanotech- nology (NCN) which created the open access nanoHUB.org cyber-platform. Her technical background is in Materials Science and Engineering (Ph.D. UCLA 2002), and she has several years’ experience in hands-on informal science education, including working at the Lawrence Hall of Science at UC Berkeley. While at Cal Poly Pomona she introduced nanoHUB simulation tools into the undergraduate curriculum in materials science and engineering and electrical engineering courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Computing in the American Anthro- pological Association. She studies experts and their work in relation to environments, technologies, and human lives. Her current research projects deal with earthquake risk management technology in Mexico and the United States, environmental data justice in the US/Mexican borderlands, and the development and practice of engineering expertise.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year
-College- Students-Need-Now/248882[2] B. Bayne. “Adjusted Syllabus.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- 6d_W8rdzE9mW2DvPi-dPvRxo4sekKlz3VqEpnu4Dwg/edit (retrieved March 30, 2020).[3] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[4] L. L. Wu et al., “Rapidly Converting a Project-Based Engineering Experience for Remote Learning: Successes and Limitations of Using Experimental Kits and a Multiplayer Online Game,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 4, 2020.[5] S. L. Leung, B. A. Hargrove, E. R. Marsh, A. R. Gregg, and K. A. Thole, “Prompting by COVID-19 to Rethink the
Institute of Technology Simo Pajovic is a graduate student in the MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, where his research focuses on nanoscale transport phenomena. In 2019, he graduated from the University of Toronto with a B.ASc. in Mechanical Engineering. His capstone project was to design and prototype a benchtop universal testing machine for educational use. As an undergraduate research assistant, he worked on micromechanical characterization of lubricants used in aerospace applications and later designing and prototyping medical devices.Mr. Cheuk Yin Larry Kei, University of Toronto Larry Kei obtained his BASc in Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto in 2019. He is currently working in the
. Fear et al., Meaning Making and “The Learning Paradigm”: A Provocative Idea in Practice, Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 27, N0.3, 151- 167, Spring 2003.3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Washington D.C., National Academies Press, (2000). 4. Wright, R., and Boggs, J. Learning cell biology as a team: a project-based approach to upper-division cell biology, Cell Biol. Educ. 1, 145–153 (2002). 5. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, James W. Pellegrino, Naomi Chudowsky, and Robert Glaser, editors, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Knowing What Students
2006-2496: A CASE STUDY OF MULTI-AGENT-BASED SIMULATION INUNDERGRADUATE MATERIALS SCIENCE EDUCATIONPaulo Blikstein, Northwestern University Doctoral student at the Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling at the School of Education and Social Policy (Northwestern University).Uri Wilensky, Northwestern University Associate Professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and at the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwestern University. Director of the Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling (CCL). Page 11.11.1© American
electrical engineering at Virginia Tech, where he was named the Paul E. Torgersen Leadership Scholar. Page 23.364.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Deepening Conceptual Understanding in an Introductory Material Science Course through Active learning Strategies Page 23.364.2IntroductionIn this paper we report on a quasi-experimental study to explore the effect of instructionalmethodologies on student learning gains in a core materials science course at a large researchuniversity in the Northeast. The