developing their skills and interest in the STEM fields to ensuretheir success at the post-secondary level and beyond. The fundamental principles of E-CADEMY are based on a combination of best practices from research including: a project-basedlearning (PBL) curriculum, high dosage model, cohort of like-minded peers, engagement withSTEM professionals, and family engagement [4]-[8]. This paper provides an overview of theprogram’s component, student feedback and program model future considerations.II. Program Overview Project SYNCERE has provided equitable hands-on engineering experiences for morethan 20,000 underrepresented students in grades three through twelve since 2011. The goal of theorganization’s work is to create pathways for
future work in assessing teacher confidence inteaching soft robotics and engineering design as well as the impacts of teacher-delivered softrobotics curricula on students. Future measures may include teacher self-efficacy, studenttinkering self-efficacy, and STEM identity as methods to probe the impact of the curriculum onteachers, students, and classrooms either in person or virtually.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (award # N000141912386), NationalScience Foundation (award #1830896) and the Tata Trusts through The Lakshmi Mittal andFamily South Asia Institute.References 1. G. Potvin et al., “Gendered interests in electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering: intersections with career outcome
Paper ID #29575The Formation and Dynamics of Teacher Roles in a Teacher-StudentGroupwork during a Robotic Project (Fundamental)Pooneh Sabouri, New York University Pooneh Sabouri received her Ph.D. in Teaching and Learning, focusing on science education at New York University. She has a master’s degree in mathematics education and statistics from The University of Texas at Austin and earned her bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Sharif University of Technology in Iran. Pooneh is interested in teacher learning and how to co-develop theoretical tools with teachers to inform and expand their teaching practices
with Project WET at the University of Arizona Maricopa County Cooperative Extension as a curriculum developer and professional development faciltator.Prof. Clark Miller, Arizona State University Clark A. Miller is Professor and Director of the Center for Energy & Society at Arizona State University. He holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University.Carlo Altamirano-Allende c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Building Youth’s Socio-Technical Engineering Knowledge through Engagement in a Community Solar Energy ProjectThe 21st century has seen increased public and research attention to engineering as a socio-technical field, requiring knowledge not only
monitor the students’ understanding of the design process in both short- and long-term projects[8-10]. According to Reddy et al., a rubric communicates the expectations through assignedgrading criteria which are described in terms of poor to excellent quality for a given assignment[8]. In the case of the EDP rubric, each stage of the EDP process becomes the criteria forevaluation.This study was a collaborative effort between a local high school and graduate fellows in theExperiential Practices in Education Research and Teaching in STEM (ExPERTS) program.ExPERTS is similar to the National Science Foundation’s Graduate STEM K-12 program in thatit pairs Ph.D. students with high school teachers to develop STEM curriculum. Graduate studentswith
Paper ID #33845Evaluation of virtual young scholar program with a focus on hands-onengineering design projects in a virtual setting (Evaluation)Dr. Elena Nicolescu Veety, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Elena Veety received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, in 2011. Her research focused on liquid crystal polarization gratings for tunable optical filters and telecommunications applications. Since 2011, she has been a Teaching Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. Currently, she is the Education
Level Williams-Diehm year-long curriculum and lessons "provide work readiness skills training "project-based technology curriculum USA high school K.L. et al., 2018 package to prepare students with disabilities for … can create space for students to [27] postsecondary education and bridge the divide between personal life employment" experiences and course content being
via the engineering design process, demonstrate how teachers can incorporate NGSS standards intotheir curriculum, and exhibit the educational value of engineering design and sustainability principles throughthe modules. Module DesignTo build the modules, a design process was created that engaged various STEM teaching practices: the four keyprinciples of learning, three principles of project-based learning, guided design approach and active learning. Scan here for
education in informal, traditional, distance, and professional environments. Dr. Goodridge currently teaches courses in ”Teaching, Learning, and Assessment in Engineering Education” and ”Engi- neering Mechanics: Statics.” Dr. Goodridge is an engineering councilor for the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) and serves on ASEE’s project board. Dr. Goodridge actively consults for projects includ- ing the development of an online curriculum style guide for Siemens software instruction, development of engineering activities for blind and visually impaired youth, and the implementation and investigation of a framework of engineering content to incorporate into P-12 engineering education. c American
as Project Lead the Way [3]. Project Lead theWay is a well-established program providing an engineering-specific curriculum and training tohigh school educators.This program can also be seen as a school-university partnership; however, most partnershipsfocus on teacher professional development. Brady describes that some of these partnershipsinclude supervision and mentoring, collaborative teaching initiatives, action research, jointprofessional development, shared planning, and school enrichment and support [4]. This programis a partnership focused on students.Ultimately, this program is innovative, as it is a university offering a high school class. The courseis unique to the university’s community. The course material is essentially the
(ASEE) published a special education researchproject dedicated to retention related issues of engineering students in 2012 [1, 2]. This ASEEretention project collectively invited around 60 universities to share their perceptions on thistopic and, specifically, asked for a focus on exploring the best practices and strategies forretaining students in Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing programs [1, 2]. Themain focus of this study is to find the reasons why 40 to 50% of engineering freshmen had eitherswitched or withdrawn from the engineering major. The study indicated that it is mainly due topoor teaching and advising, difficulty of the engineering curriculum, and lack of “belonging”within engineering [2, 3]. Furthermore, these
, M., (2011) Arduino Cookbook: Recipes to Begin, Expand, and Enhance Your Projects, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.33. Asimov, I., (2004) I, Robot, Bantam Books.34. Sudol, L.A. and C. Jaspan (2010) “Analyzing the strength of undergraduate misconceptions about software engineering,” Proc. The Sixth International Workshop on Computing Education Research. Aarhus, Denmark: Association for Computing Machinery.35. Cunningham, C., et al. (2005) “Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Portland, OR.
, biology, medicine, astronomy, etc. were presented to teachers.A sample template to help with developing a 3D printing project was provided as well.3) Engineering Simulation through the AutoDesk simulation platform, TinkerCAD. Teacherswere introduced to basics of circuits constructions and the simulation of Ohm’s simulationthrough tutorials and simple exercises. A classroom was created in Tinker and teachers weregiven an access code to join the class, complete the assigned exercises, and save their work.Teachers were able to simulate circuits with several components virtually without the need ofhaving the actual components or the fear of any hazard of electric shock. This allows teachers toimplement these simulations in introducing the concepts of
, elementary, and middle school curriculum and teacher professional development. Her recent book, Engineering in Elementary STEM Education, describes what she has learned. Cunningham has previously served as director of en- gineering education research at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Educational Outreach, where her work focused on integrating engineering with science, technology, and math in professional devel- opment for K-12 teachers. She also directed the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) project, the first national, longitudinal, large-scale study of the factors that support young women pursu- ing engineering degrees. At Cornell University, where she began her career, she created
research teams as needed to respond to these opportunities. She serves as chair of the College of Engi- neering curriculum committee and is a member of the university curriculum committee. Indira has been a faculty member at the University of Nevada, Reno since 1988. As Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering she has been actively involved in funded research. She has been primary mentor to several graduate students who are well placed in industry and academics. Her research areas include: Numerical and experimental bioelectromagnetics, RF/microwave/millimeter wave dosimetry, high intensity electro- nanopulse clinical applications, antenna design, and electrical properties of materials. Over the past 30 years
-focused engineering outreach programs generallyconsist of professional development opportunities to improve teachers’ engineering awarenessand ability to teach engineering related content [2, 3]. The ultimate goal is to increase studentinterest and engineering awareness by integrating content within math and science classes [3-5].However, most approaches focus more on incorporating engineering principles rather thanteaching math and science in the context of engineering [2, 6-9]. Carroll et al. [5] presented theirlessons learned from a long-term project focused on afterschool STEM activities in conjunctionwith a GEAR UP partnership grant. They also noted how those lessons learned influenced theirapproach for a project with a second grant bringing
National Science Foundation-funded project thatinvestigates the implementation of Engineering For Us All (e4usa), a yearlong high schoolcourse that introduces students across the United States to engineering design principles. Bysituating engineering design problems in local and global contexts relevant to students’ interests,this course aims to appeal to all students, not just those interested in pursuing a post-secondaryengineering pathway. Additionally, to eliminate barriers to entry, the only prerequisite that e4usarequires is Algebra I, and teachers are not required to have backgrounds in engineering. Toprepare the teachers to implement the e4usa curriculum, e4usa provides five weeks ofprofessional development during the summer. The e4usa
encourage them to pursue STEAM careers. One particularly effective approach isthrough hands-on learning and “making,” since children often have a natural affinity fortinkering and learn well through active involvement in meaningful activities [1]. Hands-on,project-based learning has been shown to get more students engaged with STEAM and help themlearn key skills for the future [2]. However, most STEAM education programs target students inupper-middle or high school [3]. Bustamante et. al write, “Since engineering education hastraditionally not been part of the general K–12 education experience (i.e., the beginning ofprimary school (age 5) through the end of secondary school (age 18)), early childhood educatorshave minimal background in engineering
challenges associated with managing these teams from both administrative andstudent learning perspectives are described succinctly by Schuster et al, 2006 [1] which includethemes that continue to resonate today at the predominantly undergraduate institution (PUI)described here: The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art. To address theparticular challenges of institutional memory, maintaining a continuous stream of core students(with a focus on compositional diversity) [4], and time/project management, faculty givestudents the agency to leverage their extracurricular competition activities into coursesthroughout the curriculum, as well as in STEM outreach events and programs that occurthroughout the year. One such example by Chambers et
York City schools to attend the full-time(five days a week for eight hours each day) PD program. This paper describes activities andoutcomes of this teacher PD program, which allowed participants to have authentic experiences inengineering, technology, entrepreneurship, and industry. Detailed overview of PD curriculum,activities, research projects, and teacher outcomes (e.g., technical quiz, self-perception, andexternal evaluation) are provided.2. Program Rationale Supported by Literature ReviewIn order to address the SEPs in NGSS, this teacher PD program incorporates the followingcomponents: learning about robotics and mechatronics; immersion in hands-on, collaborativeresearch; opportunities to foster entrepreneurial skills; and interactions
four-week summer session of a college preparatory program of future firstgeneration college students located in a northeastern urban center. The 22 students (14 female, 8male) were recruited into the college prep program in a school district where 86% of the studentswere minority and 75% low-income. The course was an engineering science course staged as anengineering firm reality television show where students had a weekly challenge that lead to finalprojects. The project of spotlight for this research was a medical device that would help improvelife in some manner involving a prototype and using electric circuits concepts learned over thecourse of the summer. The frame was applied to 26 video clips to evaluate the kinds ofengineering and
6 Post 18.17 4.03 26 98. Discussion and Future WorkAlthough the U.S. has new national science standards, limited studies have investigated theimplementation of the NGSS’ SEPs. Our study is vital to STEM educators and PD providers as itoutlines the challenges and success of implementing a robotics curriculum for science and mathteachers, along with the investigation of teachers’ self-efficacy. As evidenced below, the PDworkshop allowed participants to complete open-ended robot design projects by learning fromtheir engineering instructors while performing collaborative hands-on activities and overcominganxiety, all of which
activities.Quantitative data were collected using a questionnaire. The research team conductedobservations during the PD activities and interviewed the participants about their livedexperiences at the end of the project activities. The participating mathematics and sciencein-service teachers’ perceptions of the content and skills they gained from the PDactivities and the difficulties they faced during both the PD activities and theimplementation of their planned lessons were explored and documented. Walther, et al.[20] argued that research reports should follow a systematic process and provide actualknowledge claims. In our data collection and analyses, we used both qualitative andquantitative paradigms systematically and we attempted to provide knowledge claims
teachers were trained to fabricate DSSCs as partof an ongoing NSF RET program. The materials and equipment used for producing DSSCs arebasic, and a standard procedure was formulated for the work to be replicated in a regular classroom.DSSCs were constructed using fruit juices from blackberry, raspberry, mulberry, blueberry, andstrawberry. The absorption spectra of fruit dyes, along with food dyes, were examined in contrastto the solar spectrum. Teachers demonstrate the working principle of DSSCs and integrate hands-on activities into the K-12 curriculum. As the outcome, students should be able to (1) explain howa dye-sensitized solar cell converts sunlight into electricity; (2) design and build a dye-sensitizedsolar cell from basic components; (3
community of practice [22], [23]. School Teams attend a2-week summer institute where they spend time engaged in electrical engineering projects thatthey will later implement with their STEM clubs. The other half of the time equips educatorswith research-based, strategy-driven content about stereotypes, bias, and micro-messaging thatcan limit students’ pursuit and success in STEM pathways [24]. Content on growth mindset,affirming micro-messages, and self-efficacy introduces principles related to improving STEMinclusion, access, and equity. This content prepares participants for their action research projectswhich challenge participants to apply their new knowledge and usedata-informed-decision-making to improve STEM
rigor of this program4) Quality of professors, staff, and teaching assistantsBackground Conventional wisdom states that students choose to study engineering because they are“good at math and science.” However, there are mixed results when looking at the reverseimpact of engineering coursework on math and science performance. A publication of theNational Academies of Engineers indicates that K-12 engineering education improves students’ability to apply mathematics and science skills [1]. However, in a study of Project Lead theWay, a widely-used high school engineering curriculum that measures achievement throughstandardized testing between 8th and 10th grade, researchers found that enrolled students sawlower improvement in
Learning. In this position she provides professional development programming & support to faculty on their own teaching and student learning. Additionally, she consults on assessment, DBER, and other forms of teaching & learning research. Her disciplinary background is in experimental psychology as well as curriculum & instruction with a focus on higher education.Mrs. traci aucoin Traci Aucoin is currently the Lafayette Parish School System GEAR UP Project Director. She has worked in education for 30 years and has been a part of the GEAR UP initiative for seven years. She began her career as a high school biology and physics teacher before she moved into higher education where she served the University
teacher education has rarelyaddressed the foundational principles of engineering design, the skills for developing andimplementing engineering design curricula, and the pedagogical skills for supporting highquality engineering education in classrooms (Lehman & Capobianco, 2012; Reimers et al.,2015). Our project attempts to address this gap by studying the efficacy of a three-year effort todevelop and implement professional learning focused on engineering design for K12 teachers.The goal of our project was to increase K12 teachers’ knowledge of engineering design, theirskills for creating and adapting engineering curricula, and their confidence and skills forimplementing engineering curricula in their classrooms. Our study was guided by the
3 Active Living, University of Calgary 4 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of CalgaryAbstract:Minds in Motion is a University of Calgary initiative dedicated to encouraging youth to explorescience, engineering, and technology through hands-on, inquiry-based projects executed duringsummer camps and classroom workshops. The program has evolved over the past 20 years inresponse primarily to advances in teaching and learning pedagogy. This paper focusses on theevolution of one particular camp, the Energy Engineering Camp. Like many other science andengineering camps, the Energy Engineering camp historically focussed on covering topics bycompleting
evokes are proposed by P21 in theirFramework for 21st Century Learning [2], including collaboration, social/cross-cultural skills,productivity, accountability, leadership, and responsibility. Multiple pre-packaged curriculasuch as TeachEngineering, Engineering by Design and Project Lead the Way [3-5] addressteaming as a major professional skill. Such curricula are typically built upon frameworkssuch as NGSS [6] or the Common Core English Language Standards [7]. Attempts toeffectively integrate such content can be constrained for teachers lacking time and funding toconsider major revisions or additions to their curriculum implementations. Suchconsiderations inform this study’s premise to investigate teaching in pre-college classroomson a limited