understand the potential of online engineeringcurricula to support the teaching and learning of engineering mathematics, specifically,mathematical modeling, which is a mathematics technique and method used to solve societalengineering problems and complete engineering tasks in a predictive manner [17].Data Collection We used purposeful sampling [50] to identify specific entities with online engineeringcurricula that may have mathematical modeling. The initial list (see Table 2) of possible onlineengineering curricula came from the American Society for Engineering Education Pre-CollegeEngineering Education division, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Pre-University Education list, and the International Technology and
. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.55.[2] D. P. Crismond and R. S. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix.,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738–797, Oct. 2012.[3] M. Pinxten, B. De Fraine, W. Van Den Noortgate, J. Van Damme, and D. Anumendem, “Educational choice in secondary school in Flanders: the relative impact of occupational interests on option choice,” Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 541–569, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1080/13803611.2012.702991.[4] Ü. Kőycű and M. J. De Vries, “What preconceptions and attitudes about engineering are prevalent amongst upper secondary school pupils? An international study,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 243–258, May 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10798-015-9305-4
pedagogical goals for the K-12 classroom.Future DirectionsSince holding the focus groups, e4usa has started acting on some of these themes andsuggestions: ● Liaisons are sent emails every 3-4 weeks, copying the teacher. These emails tell the liaison where the teacher is in the curriculum and provide one or more specific suggestions about what the liaison could offer to the teacher in the upcoming weeks. By sending this information not only to the liaison, but also to the teacher, the teachers may feel more empowered to ask for something from their liaison. ● e4usa has begun hosting monthly optional 30 min sessions for liaisons only that allow e4usa staff to share information and more importantly, for liaisons to
Paper ID #37667Board 178: Teacher Perspectives of Outcomes and Challenges Resultingfrom Students’ Interactions with MATLAB in e4usa (Fundamental)Mr. Nicolas L´eger, Florida International University Nicolas L´eger is currently an engineering and computing education Ph.D. student in the School of Univer- sal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. He earned a B.S. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from the University of Maryland at College Park in May 2021 and began his Ph.D. studies the following fall semester. His research interests center on numerical and
Paper ID #38603Board 161: Elementary Students’ Mechanistic Reasoning about TheirCommunity-connected Engineering Design Solutions (Work in Progress)Dr. Mustafa Sami Topcu, Yildiz Technical UniversityDr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts with the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach and the Tufts Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction focus on supporting knowledge construction in engineering classrooms at the pre-college and undergraduate levels
. Rasoulifar, “Development of a taxonomy of keywords for education research,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 231- 251, 2016. dol: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1153045.[13]. J. Wing, “Computational Thinking,” Commun. ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33–35, 2006.[14]. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) & the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA), “Operational definition of computational thinking for K- 12”, 2011, [online], Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct- documents/computational-thinking-operational-definition-flyer.pdf[15]. National Research Council, “Committee for the workshops on computational thinking: Report of a workshop of pedagogical
, practices,facility characteristics, inspections, and engineering controls [3,4]. For example, national studiesin 2002 and 2022 found that only 81% and 83% of educators respectively had the appropriateeye protection for all students engaged in science and engineering activities in their courses [4].Furthermore, a national study published in 2022 by the International Technology andEngineering Educators Association (ITEEA) in collaboration with the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association(NSELA), discovered a number of alarming safety deficiencies among P-12 programs andeducators providing engineering instruction in the United States (U.S.) [3]. Further analysesfound that teachers who
-confidence, high school preparation, interest and career goals, and race andgender,” which they believed were interrelated [3]. Of these studies, twenty-eight indicated thathigh school preparation was a factor. The studies revealed a host of high school pedagogicalreason for attrition, including inadequate mathematics (calculus) preparation, low performance inscience classes, including physics, social sciences, and chemistry, overall high school GPA, andhigh school class rank. Some studies indicate that women and racial minorities may have lessaccess to high quality educational resources and opportunities during their high school years,which could impact their level of preparation for engineering programs in postsecondaryeducation. A significant
? Her resulting lifelong exploration and collaboration with over 50 organizations and hundreds of individuals has led her to develop the NEIR System Change Model for Education. Her work continues.Dr. Sandra Staklis, RTI International Sandra Staklis, Ph.D. is senior research education analyst at RTI International. She is a specialist in mixed-method research designs and has conducted evaluations of STEM education and career and technical education initiatives and programs for state, federal, and private clients, including the U.S. Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, and the Citi Bank, Ford, and JPMorgan Chase foundations. For these clients, she designs and implements research project in
High School Students (Resource Exchange) Context: Response: Tamecia Jones (trjones8@ncsu.edu), Erik Schettig (ejschett@ncsu.edu), Steven Miller (slmille6@ncsu.edu)Ninth grade student interns were STEM education faculty created a bootcamp ofchallenged to submit a project for the school day-sized sessions (15 hours total) to teachuniversity first-year engineering course, students modeling and prototyping. We selectedthe introductory course for all appropriate software
in the field. This hands-on experience helped thestudents develop their technical skills, as well as their problem-solving and critical thinkingabilities.3. Training the National TeamsWhen creating a curriculum for training students in robotics, there are several key considerationsthat educators should keep in mind. It is important to ensure that the curriculum is aligned with thegoals and objectives of the international competition the students will be participating in – namely,the FIRST Global Challenge. This will help to ensure that students receive the training they needto succeed in the competition and will give them a narrower scope of what they are expected toachieve. Moreover, the curriculum should be designed to be inclusive and
included an exercise in drafting interview questions that includes facilitatorfeedback. Groups then received a persona in a blind selection. During the development andprototyping phases, groups had the opportunity to give and receive peer feedback through aguided session that took place during Day 4. Additionally, groups received facilitator feedbackfollowing their final presentations, delivered on Day 5.Data collection and analysisWe used a pre/post survey (see Appendix) on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 = Strongly disagree,2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral; 4 = Agree, and 5 = Strongly Agree, to elicit participants’opinions/feelings about engineering, HCD, teamwork, and relationships among these. Thesurveys, which were provided as a paper document, were
-levelcurriculum weekly or bi-weekly after school,facilitated by a math/science instructor from theirrespective middle school campus. iRIDE programlead guides the facilitators and provides all resourcesand materials necessary to complete the activities attheir campuses. The activities range from building aMint-Mobile that explores gravity, friction, and unitrates to building a Straw-boat that explores carryingcapacity, budgets, and surface area. Some activitiescan be explored in one club session, while othersrequire 2-3 sessions. All activities encourage studentsto ask and explore questions to better understand the Figure 2: Students actively engaged in hands-on projectworld around them and connect
study was to introduce a conceptual framework forpedagogical content knowledge focusing on engineering integration. The components of EIPCKwere determined through a comprehensive review of prior literature on pedagogical contentknowledge. The resulting EIPCK framework has four domains (engineering content knowledge,general pedagogical knowledge, engineering integration pedagogical knowledge, and contextualknowledge) and five components (1- Knowledge of Orientation to Teaching Engineering, 2-Knowledge of Engineering Integration Curriculum, 3- Knowledge of Students' Understanding ofEngineering, 4- Knowledge of Engineering Teaching Strategy, and 5- Knowledge of Assessmentin Engineering). We hope that the EIPCK framework will contribute to future
contexts [3]. Thesecontinual changes make T&E education unique from many content areas in that it is rapidlyevolving to provide students with the latest design thinking skills, technical skills, and manyother competencies. The name changes reflect a shift in the focus of the field to keep up withemerging societal needs and educational initiatives. While early manual arts and industrial artsprograms primarily focused on developing technical skills in students (predominantly males), thefield shifted toward a focus on the application of skills related to various technologies andimplementing design-based thinking to help all students become more technologically andengineering literate citizens and consumers. These name changes reflect the
of inspiration when solving problems and designingsolutions [1], [2]. Engineering products created through natural inspiration are plentiful andinclude examples such as the bullet train, Velcro, and umbrellas [3]. Yet, the field of biologicallyinspired design (BID) is still relatively new within engineering [4]. Nonetheless, undergraduateand graduate engineering programs have emphasized integrating BID into their engineeringcurriculum to better prepare engineers for the global economy [5]. Studies have demonstratedthat BID integration has the potential to provide students with unique experiences that canencourage interdisciplinary interactions [6], [7]. Furthermore, due to its diverse nature, BID canincrease students’ interest and
alignedwith various energy themes, including: 1. Energy Storage: assessment of the performance on the PI’s (patented) heat-pipe augmented solar space heating system using internal storage media. 2. Energy Efficiency: energy performance analysis of the XXXX Phoenix House test bed (former solar decathlon participant). 3. Energy Transfer: experimentation in sky radiation for passive cooling. 4. Energy Conversion: studying the effect of working temperature on all-solid-state battery performance. 5. Renewable Energy: research pertaining to harvesting geothermal energy for building space conditioning.While each of the five research projects (2 teachers per project) are focused on potentialaugmentation and emerging
. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, E. Barendsen, and C. Chytas, Eds., Springer, 2021, vol. 13057, pp. 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90228-5_8[18] G. Anton and U. Wilensky, “One size fits all: Designing for socialization in physical computing,” Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2019, pp. 825-831. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287423[19] A. G. Chakarov, Q. Biddy, C. H. Elliott, and M. Recker, “The data sensor hub (DaSH): A physical computing system to support middle school inquiry science instruction,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6243, pp. 1-16, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186243[20] M. Przybylla, F. Henning, C. Schreiber, and R. Romeike, “Teachers’ expectations and
. Linsey, D. A. McAdams, “Methods for supporting bioinspired design,” In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 54884, pp. 737-744, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2011-63247.[2] J. K. Nagel, R. Pidaparti, C. Rose, and C. Beverly, “Enhancing the pedagogy of bio- inspired design in an engineering curriculum,” Association for Engineering Education – Engineering Library Division Papers, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26716.[3] K. Krippendorff, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2018.[4] M. Schreier, Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications, 2012.[5] J. K
dimension at the elementarylevel, at the middle school level the science standards of learning as well as the career andtechnical education competencies become an additional part of the integration of science,mathematics and technical knowledge used in the engineering-focused instruction. UNIT: Cold frame Sub-Concepts Dimension & Core Concepts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Engineering Habits of Minds Optimism x Persistence x Collaboration x Creativity x
schoollevel where over half of the schools in the United States offer a CS course [1]. There remain widegaps in who has access to and is participating in CS education at the high school level [2].Previous research highlights the fact that marginalized groups can feel that they don’t belong inCS as early as 2nd and 3rd grades [3]. One solution is to bring CS education to lower grades sothat belongingness (as well as knowledge) can be cultivated in the critical formative years.However, while middle school also has grown, the number of states that require CS in K-5 and thenumber of schools teaching CS in K-5 still remains low [1]. 1Mabie, McGill, Huerta
-united- states/[3] U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE). (2011a) 2010 Buildings Energy Data Book. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by D & R International, Ltd. Silver Spring, MD. March 2011. Obtained from http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/docs%5CDataBooks%5C2010_BEDB.pdf on 6/24/2013.[4] Jafari, A. and Valentin, V. (2016). “An Investment Allocation Approach for Building Energy Retrofits”, Construction Research Congress (CRC), May 31- June 2, 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.107[5] Fernandes, C., de Brito, J.M., and Cruz, C.O. (2016). “Thermal Retrofitting of
/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6[17] C.N. Baker, and B. Robnett, Race, social support and college student retention: A casestudy. Journal of College Student Development, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 325–335, 2012. [Online]Available: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0025[18] S. Hurtado and L. Ponjuan, Latino educational outcomes and the campus climate. Journalof Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 4 no. 3, pp. 235–251, 2005. [Online] Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192705276548[19] P. Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London, England: Continuum International, 1970.[20] Kirk, C.M., Lewis, K.L., Brown, K., Karlbo, B., and Park, E., The power of studentempowerment: measuring classroom predictors and individual indicators. The Journal ofEducational Research vol
hands-on engineering projects in the homehas the potential to develop children’s dispositions and ways of thinking common to engineers.IntroductionHabits of mind can be defined as learned or internalized dispositions that inform an individual'sactions and behaviors when confronted with challenges and problems [1]-[2]. Habits of mindhave been found to support the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills [3]-[4], which are key skills within the field of engineering, as well as other STEM fields such asmathematics [5]. As described by Alhamlan et al. [3], habits of mind are often discipline-specific. In this paper, we focus on habits of mind within the field of engineering, the values andattitudes engineers often use when making
develop lesson plansincorporating engineering PBL; more grade level specific activities, especially in the K-2 grades;more content specific instruction, and more cross curricular ideas. All teacher survey commentscan be viewed in Appendix B.What did we learn?Designing training by modifying challenges to fit two different grade bands is an overalleffective way to address the unique needs of each group. However, one 3-hour session onlytouches the surface and teachers indicated in the survey they desire more. We suggest thefollowing: 1. Require several sessions over the course of the academic year, so teachers can implement the workshop learnings into their curriculum and discuss the challenges and successes, while gaining
Policy at the University of Southern Cali- fornia (USC). Her research domains are organization behavior and diversity management with particular interests in diversity investment outcomes and the impact of executive level leadership diversity. Her re- search is multidisciplinary and applies methods and fields in public policy, management, political science, and sociology. Upon completion of her Bachelors of Arts degree in International Development Studies at UCLA, she began a successful career in banking and finance at Bank of America, Merrill Lynch. She has completed various post baccalaureate certifications through UCLA Anderson and the Harvard Business School; most recently, she completed her MPA at California
deliver the sessions and build arobust repository of support resources for educators across the state. This team began withcollege faculty and local, technical education administrators and teachers. It grew to includefaculty and staff across our university system and secondary educational partners across the state.Utilizing the strengths and inputs of all of the participants allowed us to achieve synergy andrealize greater outcomes, and influence future growth in our college and outreach efforts.In addition to internal grants, we have also received external funding from organizations such asthe National Science Foundation (NSF) to support outreach efforts by the Tickle College ofEngineering. In 2021, a member of the outreach committee received an
fundedResearch Experiences for Teachers (RET) programs since 2003 to support “authentic summerresearch experiences for K-14 educators to foster long-term collaborations between universities,community colleges, school districts, and industry partners [2].” Though long-standing andmeaningful in their impact, the RET program is limited in size because of the intense nature ofthe program from a facilities and personnel standpoint. The Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS), released in 2013, include some engineering practices across all grade levels. Thesestandards have been adopted in about half of the fifty states, with many other states creatingsimilar standards [3]. However, there is still a need to understand best practices in supportingstudent
Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020,.[16] L. Valli and D. Buese, "The Changing Roles of Teachers in an Era of High-StakesAccountability," American Educational Research Journal, vol. 44, (3), pp. 519-558, 2007.Available: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306859. DOI: 10.3102/0002831207306859.[17] J. C. Fairman and S. V. Mackenzie, "How teacher leaders influence others and understandtheir leadership," International Journal of Leadership in Education, vol. 18, (1), pp. 61-87, 2015.Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.904002. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2014.904002.[18] C. Cunningham, M. T. Knight, W. Carlsen, and G. J. Kelly, "Integrating engineering inmiddle and high school classrooms," International Journal of Engineering Education
adecline in interest in STEM starting at age 11 [2]. A look at gender differences found that middleschool girls are much less likely to report interest in a STEM career than boys [3]. To counteractthis decline in interest, researchers have found a link between consistent engagement in anafterschool STEM program with an improved interest in STEM [3] [4]. However, attendance inan out-of-school (OST) program is often sporadic [5], and the duration of programs varieswidely [6]. Further investigation is needed on the amount of exposure to OST STEM as apredictor of interest in STEM, with gender as a moderator. This study explores this relationshipby examining a middle school STEM afterschool program serving a traditionallyunderrepresented group, low