Paper ID #12160Enhancing TA Grading of Technical Writing: A Look Back to Better Under-stand the FutureDr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection
mentor-mentee relationship, but further exploration is necessary to portray mentoring as a means toachieve a balanced faculty career.Research Question 2: The usefulness of writing a PDP with experienced guidance in a formal classWriting the PDP within the context of the SEP class helped students in at least three distinctive ways.First, some of them had the chance to correct fundamental misconceptions about the faculty job and thefaculty functions themselves. Secondly, they gained a more detailed and comprehensive view of thefaculty job. Thirdly, they had the chance to reflect systematically on their professional career.In some cases, the class helped students correct misconceptions directly linked to the idea of balancebetween teaching and
, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Matthew Verleger is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronauti- cal University in Daytona Beach, Florida. His research interests are focused on using action research methodologies to develop immediate, measurable improvements in classroom instruction and the use of Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) in teaching students about engineering problem solving. Dr. Verleger is an active member of ASEE. He also serves as the developer and site manager for the Model-Eliciting Activities Learning System (MEALearning.com), a site designed for implementing, managing, and re- searching MEAs in large classes. c American
. Page 26.616.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Bait-and-Switch: K-12 Recruitment Strategies Meet University Curricula & CultureAbstractThis paper uses the metaphor of engineering bait-and-switch to characterize the misalignmentbetween educational approaches of major K-12 engineering initiatives and traditional higher-education engineering programs. We argue that this misalignment is the result of divergentunderlying educational logics. While K-12 engineering education is notably inclusive, “baiting”student interest with context-driven, open-ended problem solving, higher engineering education“switches” toward an exclusive, abstract fundamentals-first
graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Diana Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. Additionally, her scholarship includes topics such as curriculum development, contextualization of fundamental engi- neering sciences and integrating social justice into engineering education. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College
outcome in certain key areasthat cannot be easily embedded in ordinary undergraduate courses, and as a powerful trackingsystem for student advising.In regard to Objective 1, the IIT engineering portfolio is expected to help students track theirprogress, design their own academic path to graduation, develop their own enrichment activityplan that best fits their specific interests, and plan for career success. This is considered as the“fundamental” objective of the portfolio. On the “application” side, the objective is also to helpstudents with a better job interview and more successful placement. In regard to Objective 2, theportfolio is expected to become instrumental in helping employers to better focus their selectionprocess by matching the
whilepracticing their creative problem solving, hands-on lab work, and technical writing. Theseactivities fill the gap caused by lack of opportunities to work on engaging problems related to thehuman body, preparing students better to work in the medical field. Our recommendation is toperform a complete study with more students and the ability to conduct interviews.Implementation of these activities and labs could better prepare students to be creative andcritical thinkers, and therefore, better health professionals.References[1] Tobin, K. and Fraser, B. J. (1989), Barriers to higher-level cognitive learning in high schoolscience. Sci. Ed., 73: 659-682. doi:10.1002/sce.3730730606[2] NGSS Lead States, (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States
most of the time are young.” “Many times, TA's teach as if the students they are teaching know the material that is being taught and therefore, say little about the topic, rush through background formulas and concepts, and quickly arrive at answers. Usually students do not know as much as the TA assumes they know and it is actually very helpful when the TA slows down, explains things thoroughly, writes legibly using equations and pictures” “Being able to explain the concepts to students who aren't experts in the subject.” “They should, of course, know what they've teaching. But they should also be able to explain it in simple terms.”Content KnowledgeAlthough the stem “is an expert in the content
manuscripts and more than 50 conference papers.Dr. Rachel E McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Division at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research inter- ests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year. Page 26.1569.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience (REEFE
Paper ID #17868What’s So Funny About STEM: Examining the Implementation of Humor inthe ClassroomMs. Carrie E Sekeres, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Carrie Sekeres graduated with a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, with a concentration in Astronautics, from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, where she also works as a research assistant in the Engi- neering Fundamentals Department. Ms. Sekeres interned in the Integration Engineering branch of the Launch Services Program Directorate, working to develop and implement a working online collaboration space for several of the branches at Kennedy Space Center. Ms
context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Ms. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B.Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree from Memorial University. She coordinates leadership and community outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education, co-curricular and experiential learning, and the equity and accessibility of education.Dr. Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto Deborah Tihanyi is an
literature reviews, instrument development and validation, and person- ality theory. As a Graduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors program, he is heavily involved with developing and teaching laboratory content, leading the maintenance of the in-house robotics controller, and managing the development of the robotics project.Dr. Krista M. Kecskemety, The Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State Uni- versity in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace
, which is acomponent of job applications for faculty positions. The professional development facet of theprogram includes workshops for writing a CV or a Cover Letter and academic interviewing, attendingdiscipline specific conferences, presenting research, and interviewing faculty members to learn moreabout their career trajectory. The academic life facet includes workshops on the tenure and promotionprocess and student advising, as well as service involvement in the university. Participants alsocomplete a series of interviews of faculty, including administrators, to learn more about their careers.Overall, the program provides a large set of resources, support, and guidance through professionaldevelopment for graduate students who seek to be
Ph.D in Computer Science from the University of California, Davis. Dr. Haungs spe- cializes in game design, web development, and cloud computing. He is the developer of PolyXpress (http://mhaungs.github.io/PolyXpress) – a system that allows for the writing and sharing of location-based stories. Dr. Haungs has also been actively involved in curriculum development and undergraduate edu- cation. Through industry sponsorship, he has led several K-12 outreach programs to inform and inspire both students and teachers about opportunities in computer science. Recently, Dr. Haungs took on the position of Co-Director of the Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies (LAES) program. LAES is a new, multidiscisplinary degree offered
students.Through this workshop, we developed a community of LaTeX practitioners in our university.LaTeX is a typesetting tool that is widely used to write research papers, theses, anddissertations.In our home department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), we’ve often experienceda student climate that is less than helpful and borderline dismissive of new learners acquiringconcepts and tools that are indirectly related to classes. Specifically, our perception of the ECEenvironment is that it views LaTeX as a tool that should have been learned implicitly throughoutour education. Through the creation of our workshop, we sought to counter this dismissiveclimate and bring implicit concepts to the forefront, aiding in the creation of a more
teachingassistants in their courses, even when it directly conflicts with research demands. The simplest reason being that they need to distribute the responsibilities of the class so they have time to meet higher-order obligations of research. The grant and journal paper writing, meetings to garner support from domestic and international partners, as well as travelling to present at trade and academic conferences. The tasks that we graduate students can support, but ultimately our advisors carry out on a regular basis. Then there is the financial motivation for having us teach, that they need to keep us on payroll in times when we are conducting research but associated funds are unavailable. To clarify, the monies to support
Paper ID #15721Re-design of Engineering Mechanics I (Statics) Using CAP ModelMr. Khalilullah Mayar, Purdue University, West Lafayette Khalilullah Mayar is a current Fulbright scholar and a former junior faculty at Kabul Polytechnic Uni- versity where he taught introduction to engineering, and engineering mechanics courses for a couple of years to undergraduate students. Currently he is pursing a masters in construction management at Pur- due University. His research interests includes, engineering education, construction site productivity, and construction operations simulation and modeling
. These summer programs which vary from asingle week to several months provide students with an early opportunity to experience collegelife as a STEM student. Such an experience may include exposure to engineering research andstudent lab facilities, interactions with engineering faculty and students, an opportunity todevelop a passion for engineering and a stronger foundation in fundamental engineering skills.One such outreach program is the Texas Pre-Freshman Engineering Program3 (TexPREP). The Page 26.1505.2TexPREP program was founded in 1979 as a means to reach out to underrepresented minoritiesin engineering and other STEM fields. Students
course concepts. A list of example readings discussed throughoutthe course is provided in Table 1. In addition to the required reading, students were alsoencouraged to begin building a disciple-specific library that would support an individualengineering education curriculum development project. In my case, that project was thedevelopment of CE503, Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, an 11-week, 6-cr online course. The American Society of Civil Engineering Body of KnowledgeReport, commonly referred to as the BOK2 Report, and publications within the Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, and the Journal of Geotechnical andEnvironmental Engineering formed the foundation of my Civil Engineering
learning, and preparation of engineering graduate students for future careers. Her dissertation research focuses on studying the writing and argumentation patterns of engineering graduate students.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and is the Inaugural Director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She obtained a B.S. in mathemat- ics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering
research faculty with experience in clinical translation.3. Methods3.1 Course overview and study design At the University of Pittsburgh, a course entitled “Controlled Drug Delivery” is offered as a cross-discipline (bioengineering and chemical engineering), upper-division elective for undergraduate students, and an engineering elective for bioengineering graduate students. Upon completing the course, the student should be able to (1) state the constraints on material properties posed by the physiological environment; (2) use the fundamentals of polymers, diffusion, degradation, modeling and pharmacokinetics to solve problems specific to controlled drug delivery; and (3) demonstrate ability to search and summarize
, University of Tennessee Kayla Arnsdorff is an undergraduate student studying Industrial and Systems Engineering at the Univer- sity of Tennessee, Knoxville. She has experience as an undergraduate research assistant and as an engi- neering co-op in the field of lean manufacturing. Her research interests include epistemic and metacog- nition of engineering students during problem solving, and she is a member of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers both locally and nationally.Dr. Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in
the University of Minnesota where he served until 1987. Dr. Gustafson’s scholarship included work in grain quality as affected by drying and storage, finite element modeling, but he is most known for his work in electrical power applications in agriculture. He has authored the textbook Fundamentals of Electricity for Agriculture. He is a Fellow and Past President of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers; member American Society for Engineering Education, North American College and Teachers of Agriculture, and Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. For over fifteen years he has been involved in scholarship of teaching in learning. He annually offers a course entitled ”College
. Page 24.455.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Effective Educational Methods for Teaching Assistants in a First-Year Engineering MATLAB® CourseAbstractAt the University of Cincinnati, two courses were introduced during the 2012-2013 school yearto provide first-year students with hands-on experience in engineering and form a link betweenengineering and the required mathematics and science courses. These interdisciplinary coursesform a two-semester sequence in which students apply fundamental theory from algebra,trigonometry, calculus and physics to relevant engineering applications. MATLAB is introducedas a programming tool to enable students to explore
5 0 The Engineering Design Process is an important tool for 7. solving challenges.8 - 10 Write three brief descriptions on how robots are used below: 1. 2. 3. Male Female Decline to My gender is: State White African-American Hispanic
-Eggart, Michigan Technological University Dr. Jarvie-Eggart is a registered professional engineer with over a decade of experience as an environ- mental engineer. She lectures in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include technology adoption, online learning, service learning, sustain- ability and diversity in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 First Year Engineering Student Advice for Succeeding in Online CoursesAbstractThis complete research paper explores first year engineering (FYE) students’ advice for attainingsuccess in online learning. In the spring semester of
Paper ID #19362The Role of Empathy in Supporting Teaching Moves of Engineering DesignPeer EducatorsMs. Emilia Dewi Tanu, University of Maryland, College Park Emilia Tanu is a recent graduate of the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering program at the University of Maryland, College Park. She has collaborated with members of UMD’s Physics Education and Engi- neering Education Research Groups, and researchers at Olin College of Engineering. While at UMD, she was the co-chair of the Women in Engineering Student Advisory Board and a student ambassador for the Clark School of Engineering. She hopes to eventually pursue
. Through the stressful andexciting moments, you can learn a variety of lessons the first time you teach. You can even learna lot the second time you teach, the third, and so on. Because of this cyclical learning process,reflection can be an essential component to continual improvement. Through my experiences,I’ve found that preparation, expectation, motivation, and reflection are fundamental elements thatcontribute to whether someone is left with either a sweet or bitter taste after teaching as agraduate student.This paper will examine lessons learned on preparation, expectation, motivation, and reflectionin teaching and mentoring through the experiences and perspective of a graduate student. First, Itaught an engineering design course intended
for designingand maintaining custom circuit boards that are used to control course electronics such asswitches, LEDs, and motors. They are also responsible for wiring under the course. Finally, theTAs write the software to operate the course hardware.Collaboration between each team is integral to the project’s success. Actions and timelines ofone team directly effect and sometimes limit the possibilities for another. It has been assumedthat TAs involved with one or multiple of these groups learn skills that are directly applicable inthe engineering world and that they also learn important teamwork strategies that are usefultalking points in job interviews. TA involvement in the robot project is crucial for the project’ssuccess, yet it also
undergraduate survey open response 1) “Hands-on” “Maybe try to include some data collection, because that part of aspect of the labs the lab, which is very important, is now non-existent” “The people who are… fully online are at a disadvantage when writing the report because they have never physically interacted with the equipment” “The video lectures and video lab experiments get the point across, but they are not engaging… making the experiment more interactive in some way would be valuable… as opposed to just