in partnership with the library and the School ofEngineering to raise the level of awareness of technical standards and standards usage oncampus. The effort was a result of a campus-wide collaboration that provided a low-cost methodof introducing technical standards and providing a foundation to develop a series of online toolsaccessible to the campus community. The event featured guest speakers representative of sixmajor national and international standards bodies in addition to faculty, staff and students. Thepanels provided discussions on the background of the various types of standards and industriesimpacted, the development and implementation of these documents, the ways in which studentsand faculty can become more familiar with these
Paper ID #28744MESA Center Promoting Technical LiteracyDr. Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College Dan G. Dimitriu has been practicing engineering since 1970 and taught engineering courses concurrently for more than 20 years at various institutions. In 2001, he joined San Antonio College full-time as the Coordinator of its Engineering program. He has been involved with several engineering societies and became a member of the Two-year College Division of ASEE in 2002. His research interests are in engineering graphics, 3-D Visualization, fuel cells, plastics, and engineering education. He received the 2015 Presidential
Editor of American Journal of Undergraduate Research (AJUR). He has been serving as a re- viewer on the IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing since 2001. Dr. Pecen has served on ASEE Engineering Technology Division (ETD) in Annual ASEE Conferences as a reviewer, session moderator, and co-moderator since 2002. He served as a Chair-Elect on ASEE ECC Division in 2011. He also served as a program chair on ASEE ECCD in 2010. He is also serving on advisory boards of International Sustainable World Project Olympiad (isweep.org) and International Hydrogen Energy Congress. Dr. Pecen received a certificate of appreciation from IEEE Power Electronics Soci- ety in recognition of valuable contributions to the
from students inanalyzing the Chevy Volt system. Figure 3 shows a student diagram that obtained a low degreeof comparison with the expert diagram. The student diagram is showing the Chevy Volt as a typeof perpetual motion machine. The internal combustion engine is omitted. The transmission turnsthe generator and this in turn provides power to the transaxle in a closed loop with energy also 6delivered to the wheels. The electric motor is also missing so there is a miss-match in energytype between the electrical energy output of the power control unit and the input of the transaxlewhich should be mechanical energy. This was rated 44 percent similar to expert map by thealgorithm while the instructor
prefect researches.References[1] X. Liu, “An analysis of some concepts about general education,” Journal of Higher Education,vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 64-68, 2006.[2] L. Chen, “ Idea and Practice: Writing Seminar in Yale University,” International andComparative Education, no. 1, pp. 32-38, 2019.[3] Y. Han, “The General Education Curriculum Reform in Chinese Universities under theBackground of Internationalization,” Journal of National Academy of Education Administration,no. 11, pp. 32-37, 2017.[4] G. Xie, “Strengthening and Promoting General Education,” China University Teaching, no.3, pp. 71-73, 2008.[5] M. Li, “Reflection on the Philosophy and the Operational System of General Education inChinese Universities: 1995-2005,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 86-99
magna cum laude, a Masters of Business Administration in finance and international business from New York University with induction into Beta Gamma Sigma, and a charter as a Chartered Financial Analyst. He is co-founder of the Mississippi Coding Academies, member of the Board of Directors and Director of Jackson. He is a member of the Board of Directors, past chair, and the Entrepreneur in Residence of Innovate Mississippi, the corporate founder of Mississippi Coding Academies. He has served as an investor, adviser, senior executive or board member in over 30 startup and early stage high-potential companies. Previously, he was a banker and an emerging markets private equity investor. He has arranged, advised on
described above is mandatory as priorknowledge.The course has 4 overall course aims: 1. Subject specific (e.g. application of methods, analysisand evaluation of technical solutions in energy engineering), 2. Individual and professional (e.g.planning), 3. Group work and communication (e.g. professional oral and written communication),and finally 4. Engineering application (e.g. create technical solutions). Aims 1 and 4 complementeach other and are the main focus during the project. Aims 2 and 3 can be seen as supportive tothe process of solving the engineering problem (e.g. planning and report writing).The project work has been to design, build and test a portable solar heating system. All groupshave got a pump and about 1 square meter of high
data to teach discipline-specific writing patterns to STEM students” IEEE International Professional CommunicationConference (IPCC) Proceedings, Austin, TX, USA, October 2-5, 2016.[8] Wolfe, J., "How Technical Communication Textbooks Fail Engineering Students", TechnicalCommunication Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 351-375, 2009[9] Walker Kristen, “Integrating Writing Instruction into Engineering Courses: A Writing CenterModel,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89 no. 3, pp. 369-375, 2000[10] Poe, Mya, Lerner, Neal, and Craig, Jennifer Learning to Communicate in Science andEngineering: Case Studies from MIT, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2010.[11] Beaufort, Anne, College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University WritingInstruction, Logan, UT
is perhaps the ability to solveproblems of technical, financial, interpersonal, and other types [1]. Many of these real-worldengineering problems are ill-structured and complex, containing multiple conflicting goals, andrestricted by both engineering and non-engineering constraints. That is why the first skill forengineering graduates that ABET lists in its Criterion 3. Student Outcomes [2] is “an ability toidentify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles ofengineering, science, and mathematics.”Reaching optimum solutions for practical engineering problems requires a systematic approachbased on evaluation, interpretation, and creative decision making. Mature level of criticalthinking (CT) skills are crucial
President of the Rotary Club of Mayag¨uez, Puerto Rico, and is a Paul Harris Fellow of Rotary International. A few years ago he was honored as an ”Adopted Son” of the city of Mayag¨uez. American c Society for Engineering Education, 20212021 ASEE Annual Conference and ExpositionMastery Learning for the Undergraduates in EngineeringJayanta Banerjee, ASEE Life MemberMechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM)AbstractThe paper gives examples on the importance of mastery learning, that is learning a profession to itsperfection and even extending it to excellence, in engineering education and in engineering training,such as the CO-OPs, especially
, VT: Chelsea Green, 2010. 3. G.M. Weinberg, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. New York: Dorset House Publishing, 2011. 4. D.P. Stroh, Systems Thinking for Social Change: A Practical Guide to Solving Complex Problems, Avoiding Unintended Consequences, and Achieving Lasting Results. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2015. 5. W. Donaldson, Simple Complexity: A Management Book for The Rest of Us: A Guide to Systems Thinking. New York: Morgan James Publishing, 2017. 6. K. Stave and M. Hopper, “What Constitutes Systems Thinking: A Proposed Taxonomy.” 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Jul. 1, 2007. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu
: it isreferenced as OR in this text [15]. In the event criterion validity was established with theOfficial report. (2) To briefly consider the implications for the development of technologicalcompetence, and higher education more generally. (3) By inference, to demonstrate thepotential of case studies to contribute to curriculum design and development.The study begins with an illustration of the importance of the key questions that determinethe pathway an inquiry will take: throughout the discussion questions that the citizenship willwant answers to are considered. The idea of contextualization is illustrated by reference to thecockpit of the aircraft which also demonstrates the importance of the key concept of “socio-technical system”. The
reasonable performance.This is done knowing that it is not the best approach to learning. However, the students end upbelieving that grades are more important than deeper learning [3]. The pedagogical approachesneed to have the right approach to include the students’ views and voices to some degree. It isimportant to retain the students’ autonomy and perspectives. They need to own their role as activeparticipants of the class.While the new pedagogical approaches increase student participation, they are yet to tap into thestudents' actual thoughts and learnings within the classroom (unless the classroom does activelearning, and in particular includes reflective practice and various ways of engagement and sharingof perspectives). This is because
neverthelessimportant. Examples of equity and non-discrimination in design relate to transportation planning(civil engineering) [28], assistive technology [29], universal accessibility for people withphysical limitations [30], and artificial intelligence [31]. These design-related issues could bereadily integrated into a number of technical courses for a wide array of engineering disciplines.Right to Life and Security of Person – Article 3Article 3 of the UDHR states, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” [1].Technology is being used to document human rights abuses via tools including satellite imagery,remote sensing, and machine learning. Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents, and machinelearning can also be applied in numerous
and Inspire Non-STEM Majors” (Session T549) at the ASEE 2018 annual conference inSalt Lake City. The technological developments and innovations presented that might be used toovercome barriers to educating and inspiring non-STEM majors included: Massive open on-line courses (MOOCs) to dispense with the limitations of the traditional classroom. The proliferation of on-campus MakerSpaces that give access to 3-D printers, laser cutters, DIY electronics, and CAD / CAM and solid modeling design technology to all students and, in many cases, the public at-large. Flipped classrooms and Youtube that educate non majors and the interested public and promote technology and engineering in new ways.Prior to this
by factory workers, prescribed by line supervisors. Afterpassing the final quality check, the finished products are ready to be shipped. AlthoughTaylorism has largely vanished from contemporary workplace, many have argued that educationsystems of today are still rooted in Taylorism, or ‘factory model’ for education [1], [3].In the factory model, learners are treated as parts and materials, in which standard curricula,tests, and teaching pedagogies are applied to shape learners into finished products that areneeded by the society [4], [5]. The analogy between the factory model and its counterpart ineducation is shown in Figure 2. In this view, instructors teach subjects in a sequential manner asprescribed by department-level and college-level
has held a precarious place on school curricula internationally 7 . Similarto engineering in many ways, technology education shares a relationship with practical activity,with its roots in craft/liberal arts (technical) education policy of the early 20th century. In effortsto intellectualise the subject area, and to meet the needs of an evolving society 8 , policy changesshifted technology education’s emphasis beyond the acquisition of predetermined knowledge andskills, consequently then described in terms of a transferability of concepts, principles and skillsbetween different contexts 9 . This paradigm shift in international rhetoric is often considered tohave failed to materialise in practice as envisioned, as questions have been raised in
)Creation of new curriculum incorporating hybrid education 2) Use of new teaching tools offeringflexibility to students and 3) Proposing interdisciplinary within and across programs betweendifferent engineering disciplines.Keywords: Industry 4.0, Hybrid Engineering Education, Interdisciplinarity, PedagogicalApproaches 2 The Growth of Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education in the 21st CenturyIntroduction:As knowledge evolved from the fifteenth through the eighteenth centuries, no establishedboundaries between subjects existed, and scholars made simultaneous contributions in manyknowledge domains. For example
“technologist” and “technology” continuesin subsequent documents on technical education (exhibit 3, items 7 and 9), and is used by G.L. Payne in his report for the U.S. President’s Committee on Scientists and Engineers (exhibit3, item 8). Only one item in this list includes the term engineering in its title, and it was not an officialdocument (item 10). It was an international document and is included because in it theengineering associations from Western Europe and the United States defined the terms“technologist” and “technician”.Throughout the period 1950 to 1970 The Government appointed Councils to advise it onScientific Policy. Reports relating to manpower requirements and recruitment into highereducation were published at two yearly intervals
the phases, many students used apictorial representation to express their ideas. Additionally, many students went the extra mile todescribe the technical features that they understood. A summary of the indicator words thathelped us assess the inquiry stage of the student may be found in Table 2. From Fig. 3, we alsosee that as the semester progressed many students transitioned from intermediate inquiry stagesto higher cycles of learning and thinking.Table 2: Keywords or indicators highlighting the student’s verbalization in describing systems as they grew through the different inquiry stages Inquiry Stage Initial Indicators: Systems Level Final Indicators: Systems Level Identification General
understanding of engineering and technology –sometimes referred to as engineering and technological literacy [28]–[30]. Connecting to above,popular media, including videogames, may be one means to support greater engineering andtechnological literacy. There are many ways technological literacy has been defined [3], [29]–[31]. For example, the International Technology and Engineering Education Association (ITEEA)identified five aspects of technological literacy [29]: • Understanding the Nature of Technology, • Understanding of Technology and Society, • Understanding of Design, • Abilities for a Technological World, and • Understanding of the Designed World.Additionally, the National Academies of Engineering [30] released a report
in diversity among engineering students, in turnleading to engineers more capable of producing robust and creative solutions. References[1] A. Woodcock, D. McDonagh, J. Osmond, and W. Scott, “Empathy, Design and Human Factors,” in Advances in usability and user experience: proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Usability and User Experience, the Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA, July 17-21, 2017, T. Ahram and C. Falcão, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2017. pp. 569-579.[2] C. Rasoal, H. Danielsson, and T. Jungert, “Empathy among students in engineering programmes,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 427–435, 2012.[3] M
alike, these lessons should be carried forward as standardpractices that realize the benefits of orientations toward kindness in higher education.References[1] R.P. Auerbach, P. Mortier, R. Bruffaerts, et al. 2018. “The WHO world mental health surveys international college student project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders.” J. Abnorm Psychol. vol. 127 (7), pp. 623-638. DOI 10.1037/abn0000362.[2] National Alliance on Mental Illness. 2012. College students speak: A survey report on mental health. D. Gruttadaro and D. Crudo. NAMI, Arlington VA. 24 pp.[3] R. Beiter, R. Nash, M. McCrady, D. Rhoades, M. Linscomb, M. Clarahan, S. Sammut. 2015. “The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample
courses aren’t necessarily designed for learning withoptimized shortcuts, student’s experience a disconnect between what they learn and their “real-life” experiences and tend to use memorization/pattern matching as an easier approach/shortcuttowards learning [12,13].As a first evaluation, it appears that such practices would lead to students who are technically weakand unprepared to meet the demands of engineering environments [14,15]. However, over theyears, it has been observed that students who possess necessary soft skills [16,17] related tolearning, possess curiosity and are engaged in collaborative learning, can adjust and learn inchallenging technical environments despite some deficits in background. In fact, as suggested in[15,18], with
the problem. This focus is appropriate for the specific material ofthe course, but it misses how and why one gets to the point where the course material is needed.It also misses more general aspects of engineering and technology. Courses with project workmove beyond this to some degree, but are unlikely to succeed in covering some facets oftechnological and engineering literacy (TEL).Many approaches have been documented for teaching technological and engineering literacy [4,5]. A search for technological and engineering literacy in the ASEE PEER database in February,2019, resulted in a list of 60 papers from technical sessions of the Technological and EngineeringLiteracy/Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE) Division alone; 163 are listed for
guarantee buy-in from faculty and thesedisconnections can become apparent in the hidden curriculum. An engineering educator whoteaches an engineering service project course at a public, doctoral, highest research institutiondescribed the resistance she encountered in developing and teaching the course. I actually have run into a couple of times faculty will say what I'm teaching isn't real engineering because we talk about touchy feely things and because our students read papers on the sociological benefit of international development as well as the technical approach… I think in the four years I've been here it's improving and we've gained some traction and a little more respect… But I know that initially it was much more common to
CSM in the K-12 classroom, and 3) to impact K-12STEM curricula via the creation of standards-based active learning lessons infused with currentresearch which will be available through local, regional and national forums. During the summerof 2017, we systematically evaluated the effectiveness of the WE2NG RET program through pre-program, post-program and weekly surveys, employing both quantitative and qualitativequestions. By measuring teacher satisfaction/agreement (%) with respect to the followingcategories, post-program quantitative responses indicated high levels of program effectiveness;as a professional development program (94.4%), mentor relationships (88.9%), types of learningexperiences (88.9%), program accomplishments (83.4
framework that centers Black women’s voices and shiftshow the lack of racial and gender diversity in engineering is perceived. I found that the film had a tremendousimpact on women and girls of color by providing visible role models in STEM professions.KeywordsEngineering education, diversity, Hidden Figures, arts-based research methods, new materialism, culturallyresponsive methodologiesIntroductionDespite decades of efforts, racial and gender diversity remains elusive for engineering education and the professions[1]. Researchers in engineering education call for innovative methodologies [2], [3] to examine the complicatedhistorical and cultural entanglements related to increasing diversity in engineering education, which includesresearch method
design by using a preliminary data analysis.Keywords: logic of design, decision making, design philosophy1 IntroductionDesign and engineering of technological artifacts are the core functions of modern corporationsthat are situated in an increasingly international network of production, distribution, and exchange.It is well established in Science and Technology Studies (STS) 1 or history and philosophy of tech-nology 2,3 that social and political intentions as well as technical and instrumental necessities deter-mine the outcome of design and engineering decisions. Industrial and technological corporationsare establishments with financial, political, and moral roadmaps that among other entities such asresearch universities, national labs, or
. 2 (06 1997): 127-34. doi:10.1080/0729436970160202.[25]. Walsh, Laura N., Robert G. Howard, and Brian Bowe. "Phenomenographic Study ofStudents’ Problem Solving Approaches in Physics." Physical Review Special Topics - PhysicsEducation Research 3, no. 2 (12, 2007). doi:10.1103/physrevstper.3.020108.[26]. Dall'alba, Gloria, Eleanor Walsh, John Bowden, Elaine Martin, Ference Marton, GeoffereyMasters, Paul Ramsden, and Andrew Stephanou. "Assessing Understanding: APhenomenographic Approach." Research in Science Education 19, no. 1 (12 1989): 57-66.doi:10.1007/bf02356846.[27]. Duron, Robert, Barbara Limbach, and Wendy Waugh. "Critical thinking framework for anydiscipline." International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17